[BUILD] trunk: Failed for Revision: 955863

Geronimo Revision: 955863 built with tests included See the full build-0300.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20100618/build-0300.log See the unit test reports at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20100618/unit-test

AUTO: Rob High is out of the office. (returning 07/06/2010)

I am out of the office until 07/06/2010. I'm on vacation, returning 06-Jul-2010. In an emergency please contact Bob Johnson at 1-914-766-1315 or John Falkl at 1-914-766-1244. Note: This is an automated response to your message Re: [DISCUSSION] change 2.2 branch build JDK from 6 to 5 sent on

Re: [DISCUSSION] change 2.2 branch build JDK from 6 to 5

On Jun 17, 2010, at 11:18 PM, chi runhua wrote: On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 10:36 AM, Shawn Jiang genspr...@gmail.com wrote: Right, stay with SE 5. But document that there might be some potential issue(e.g. webservice problems caused by SE 6 bundled saaj and jaxb) when working with SE 6.

Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo 2.1.5 (1st try) - RESULT

On Jun 17, 2010, at 10:56 PM, Rex Wang wrote: fixed the geronimo-plugins.xml accordingly. Thanks Kevan for catching this. I also update my 2.1.5 release tips(at the page bottom): https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Geronimo+2.1.5+Release+Tips Will get the process merge

Re: [DISCUSSION] change 2.2 branch build JDK from 6 to 5

On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 7:15 PM, Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.comwrote: On Jun 17, 2010, at 11:18 PM, chi runhua wrote: On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 10:36 AM, Shawn Jiang genspr...@gmail.com wrote: Right, stay with SE 5. But document that there might be some potential issue(e.g.

[RESULT][VOTE] Geronimo 3.0-M1 release - 3rd attempt

The Vote passes with 4.5 +1 votes and no 0 or -1 votes. Voting for the release were Rick McGuire Jarek Gawor Kevan Woods Donald Wood Joe Bohn Thank you for the time spent reviewing this. The release artifacts will be promoted and made available for download ASAP. Rick On 6/9/2010 4:13

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Geronimo 3.0-M1 release - 3rd attempt

Believe you meant Kevan Miller and Donald Woods... :-) -Donald On 6/18/10 7:57 AM, Rick McGuire wrote: The Vote passes with 4.5 +1 votes and no 0 or -1 votes. Voting for the release were Rick McGuire Jarek Gawor Kevan Woods Donald Wood Joe Bohn Thank you for the time spent

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Geronimo 3.0-M1 release - 3rd attempt

On 6/18/2010 8:24 AM, Donald Woods wrote: Believe you meant Kevan Miller and Donald Woods... :-) Yeah...it's been a rough morning! Rick -Donald On 6/18/10 7:57 AM, Rick McGuire wrote: The Vote passes with 4.5 +1 votes and no 0 or -1 votes. Voting for the release were Rick

[BUILD] trunk: Failed for Revision: 955992

Geronimo Revision: 955992 built with tests included See the full build-0900.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20100618/build-0900.log See the unit test reports at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20100618/unit-test

[RESULT][VOTE] Release new javamail components -- second attempt

The vote to release the new javamail components has passed with 4 +1 votes and no 0 or -1 votes. Voting +1 were Rick McGuire Donald Woods Kevan Miller Hai Hong Xu (Ivan) The artifacts will be promoted to maven central today. Rick On 6/11/2010 6:57 AM, Rick McGuire wrote: This is a bug fix

Re: How my PHP application will work in Geronimo

Hi everyone, Please let me know how to resolve Curl error for PHP Java Bridge in Apache Geronimo server. I am not getting any solution for it. Its very urgent. If you have any ideas, then please share with me. -- View this message in context:

Re: How my PHP application will work in Geronimo

On Jun 18, 2010, at 8:01 AM, c_das007 wrote: Hi everyone, Please let me know how to resolve Curl error for PHP Java Bridge in Apache Geronimo server. I am not getting any solution for it. Its very urgent. If you have any ideas, then please share with me. Hi, Can you describe the

[VOTE] Release Geronimo 2.1.6

A release candidate for Geronimo 2.1.6 has been created and staged. The tag has been created here: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/tags/geronimo-2.1.6/ https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/tags/geronimo-2.1.5/ The staging repo is here:

[BUILD] trunk: Failed for Revision: 956098

Geronimo Revision: 956098 built with tests included See the full build-1500.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20100618/build-1500.log See the unit test reports at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20100618/unit-test

Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo 2.1.6

+1 Was able to build the tag and start the JEE5 Tomcat assembly. A few minor issues, but nothing requiring another release: - Copyright dates in Welcome app and Console not updated to 2010 - Welcome App shows an Embedded Tomcat @VERSION@ - RELEASE_NOTES.txt was the only RAT failure -Donald

Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo 2.1.6

+1 Source, license/notice, signatures/checksums, build -- all look good. Thanks Rick! --kevan On Jun 18, 2010, at 12:31 PM, Rick McGuire wrote: A release candidate for Geronimo 2.1.6 has been created and staged. The tag has been created here:

[BUILD] trunk: Failed for Revision: 956168

Geronimo Revision: 956168 built with tests included See the full build-2100.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20100618/build-2100.log See the unit test reports at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20100618/unit-test