Re: [Discussion] Geronimo 2.1.7 Release

Thanks Forrest and Janet for the commit and testing. On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 7:10 PM, han hongfang hanhongf...@gmail.com wrote: For GERONIMO-4296, Forrest has done some testing and committed it into both branch 2.1 and 2.2. Janet

[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-5679) Enable derby.connection.requireAuthentication system property so that derby can be set without authentication.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5679?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] viola.lu updated GERONIMO-5679: --- Attachment: G5679.patch Now after set

[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-5679) Enable derby.connection.requireAuthentication system property so that derby can be set without authentication.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5679?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] viola.lu updated GERONIMO-5679: --- Attachment: G5679_21.patch G5679_22.patch attach patch for 21 and 22. Enable

[jira] Created: (GERONIMO-5683) Thread safety for needScanJar(), scanJar(), and scannedJars.add() in GeronimoTldLocationsCache

Thread safety for needScanJar(), scanJar(), and scannedJars.add() in GeronimoTldLocationsCache --- Key: GERONIMO-5683 URL:

[BUILD] trunk: Failed for Revision: 1033391

Geronimo Revision: 1033391 built with tests included See the full build-0300.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20101110/build-0300.log Download the binaries from http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20101110 [INFO] BUILD

Re: Please test tranql connectors on java 1.5

I have prepared a patch on http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/TQL-27 which removes all Java 6 specific methods and compiles nicely with Java 1.5. Unfortunately I currently can not test the resulting jars (the junit tests run nicely). Johannes Am 09.11.10 10:44, schrieb Forrest Xia: On Tue,

Re: Please test tranql connectors on java 1.5

Hi Johannes, Thanks for this patch, and I just did a quick test, seems to me it works well with G 2.1.7 snapshot under java 5. To David, I attached two patches in TQL-22 and TQL-27, pls help review and commit them along with Johannes' patch into trunk, then we can roll out a tranql release for

Re: How to add a new version number into Affects Version/s and Fix Version/s field in jira?

Hi Kevan, When these version numbers could be ready? or suggest me how to make that change by myself? thanks! Forrest

[BUILD] trunk: Failed for Revision: 1033480

Geronimo Revision: 1033480 built with tests included See the full build-0900.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20101110/build-0900.log See the unit test reports at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20101110/unit-test

Re: How to add a new version number into Affects Version/s and Fix Version/s field in jira?

On Nov 10, 2010, at 9:42 AM, Forrest Xia wrote: Hi Kevan, When these version numbers could be ready? or suggest me how to make that change by myself? Sorry, missed your reply. Should be all set. --kevan

Re: How to add a new version number into Affects Version/s and Fix Version/s field in jira?

On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 10:53 PM, Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.comwrote: On Nov 10, 2010, at 9:42 AM, Forrest Xia wrote: Hi Kevan, When these version numbers could be ready? or suggest me how to make that change by myself? Sorry, missed your reply. Should be all set. I see them,

[jira] Created: (GERONIMO-5684) Some txmanager Timers are not being created as daemon threads

Some txmanager Timers are not being created as daemon threads - Key: GERONIMO-5684 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5684 Project: Geronimo Issue Type: Bug

[jira] Assigned: (GERONIMO-5683) Thread safety for needScanJar(), scanJar(), and scannedJars.add() in GeronimoTldLocationsCache

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5683?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ashish Jain reassigned GERONIMO-5683: - Assignee: Ashish Jain Thread safety for needScanJar(), scanJar(), and

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-5680) Find a way to slove the wired bundle cache

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5680?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12930702#action_12930702 ] David Jencks commented on GERONIMO-5680: As a long term goal I would like to

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-5680) Find a way to slove the wired bundle cache

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5680?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12930705#action_12930705 ] Jarek Gawor commented on GERONIMO-5680: --- Two ideas: 1) As a short term solution,

[BUILD] trunk: Failed for Revision: 1033687

Geronimo Revision: 1033687 built with tests included See the full build-1500.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20101110/build-1500.log See the unit test reports at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20101110/unit-test

Strange build problem

Hi, Does anyone see this problem? When build trunk from root these days, it always stops at plugins/j2ee/geronimo-j2ee-builder module with exceptions like these: [ERROR] Failed to execute goal org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-compiler-plugin:2.0.2:compile (default-compile) on project

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-5655) switch to tomcat standard taglibs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5655?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12930902#action_12930902 ] Rex Wang commented on GERONIMO-5655: found a split package issue after tomcat

[jira] Created: (DAYTRADER-78) Reorg daytrader code tree for different G releases

Reorg daytrader code tree for different G releases -- Key: DAYTRADER-78 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAYTRADER-78 Project: DayTrader Issue Type: Task Security Level: public

[BUILD] trunk: Failed for Revision: 1033799

Geronimo Revision: 1033799 built with tests included See the full build-2100.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20101110/build-2100.log Download the binaries from http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20101110 [INFO] BUILD

[jira] Created: (GERONIMO-5685) No initialized web beans context is attached while creating servlet instance

No initialized web beans context is attached while creating servlet instance Key: GERONIMO-5685 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5685 Project: Geronimo

[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-5685) No initialized web beans context is attached while creating servlet instance

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5685?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ivan updated GERONIMO-5685: --- Attachment: GERONIMO-5685.patch I am not sure whether it is the fault of Tomcat, guess that they are just

OWB is always enabled even no web beans in the web application

Hi, I found some jsf and ejb cases failed with the exception below, and apparently, no web beans is used in those application, suppose that all the OWB related codes should not be executed. After checking the integration codes, I found something like in the OpenWebBeansWebInitializer :