[jira] [Resolved] (GERONIMODEVTOOLS-744) More flexible no-redeployment option

2011-06-22 Thread Jarek Gawor (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-744?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jarek Gawor resolved GERONIMODEVTOOLS-744. -- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 3.0 More flexible

[jira] [Commented] (GERONIMODEVTOOLS-744) More flexible no-redeployment option

2011-06-22 Thread Jarek Gawor (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-744?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13053063#comment-13053063 ] Jarek Gawor commented on GERONIMODEVTOOLS-744: -- Added support for

Re: How to resolve artifact conflict when deploying applications

2011-06-22 Thread Gary Shin
What if it is Geronimo 3, does this feature still exist. Please let me know, so i would like to give it a try. Thanks, SG On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 8:44 PM, chi runhua chirun...@gmail.com wrote: If you are using Geronimo 2.2 or 2.1, you can define the classloading order by using hidden-classes

[Discussion] [GERONIMO-5904] Reference bound in JNDI is not dereferenced properly when lookup

2011-06-22 Thread Shenghao Fang
Hi, According to the previous discussion http://apache-geronimo.328035.n3.nabble.com/jira-Created-GERONIMO-5904-Reference-bound-in-JNDI-is-not-dereferenced-properly-when-lookup-td2819720.html this issue seems not be able to be resolved in Geronimo side, but have to be done in Tranql.

Fwd: Activemq does not support customized message listener ?

2011-06-22 Thread Shawn Jiang
Forwarding this to geronimo list. -- Forwarded message -- From: Shawn Jiang genspr...@gmail.com Date: Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 4:50 PM Subject: Activemq does not support customized message listener ? To: d...@activemq.apache.org In EJB31 spec: 5.4.2 The Required Message Listener

Re: How to resolve artifact conflict when deploying applications

2011-06-22 Thread chi runhua
For G3.0, the deployment codes will covert the old hidden-classes configuration to the new import-package style. hidden-classesjavax.faces/hidden-classes would be import-package!javax.faces/import-package. inverse-classloading is not supported anymore. Jeff C On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 3:03 PM,

[BUILD] branches/2.2: Failed for Revision: 1138403

2011-06-22 Thread Jarek Gawor
Geronimo Revision: 1138403 built with tests included See the full build-0800.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20110622/build-0800.log See the unit test reports at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20110622/unit-test-reports

Add Java EE schema files to Geronimo Server?

2011-06-22 Thread Rex Wang
Hi Geronimo and OpenEJB devs, I am fixing the servlet tck problems. And it requires to validate the standard Deployment Descriptors xml files before deployment. Now we use the org.apache.openejb.jee.JaxbJavaee to do the unmarshal, for example, a web.xml to a WebApp object. So we need add the

[jira] [Resolved] (GERONIMO-5996) Development mode for Aries applications

2011-06-22 Thread Jarek Gawor (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5996?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jarek Gawor resolved GERONIMO-5996. --- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 3.0 Development mode for Aries applications

[jira] [Resolved] (GERONIMO-5994) Hot deployer has a couple of issues

2011-06-22 Thread Jarek Gawor (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5994?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jarek Gawor resolved GERONIMO-5994. --- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 3.0 Hot deployer has a couple of issues

[jira] [Resolved] (GERONIMO-5861) Update a bundle within an EBA

2011-06-22 Thread Jarek Gawor (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5861?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jarek Gawor resolved GERONIMO-5861. --- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 3.0 Update a bundle within an EBA

Re: [QUESTION]Is it OK to apply customized DOJO to geornimo from legal perspective ?

2011-06-22 Thread Kevan Miller
On Jun 22, 2011, at 1:30 AM, Shawn Jiang wrote: We rebuild dojo locally to only include the dojo components geronimo console needs. It's a popular method to use dojo. It will reduce server size, startup time,and page loading time. I don't know if we have any problem to apply the

Speeding up G3.0 build time

2011-06-22 Thread Russell E Glaue
I am wanting to update the G3 dev wiki to help first-time builders get started. How would you suggest a build of G3 could become faster? The only tip I am aware of for speeding up trunk (G3) builds is to install a maven repository proxy like nexus. This is eluded to in the wiki already. Are there

Re: Activemq does not support customized message listener ?

2011-06-22 Thread David Jencks
AMQ is a jms product, so it only supports javax.jms.MessageListener. If you want to use another message listener interface you need a resource adapter that sends messages to it. thanks david jencks On Jun 22, 2011, at 1:51 AM, Shawn Jiang wrote: Forwarding this to geronimo list.

Re: Speeding up G3.0 build time

2011-06-22 Thread Kevan Miller
On Jun 22, 2011, at 12:09 PM, Russell E Glaue wrote: I am wanting to update the G3 dev wiki to help first-time builders get started. How would you suggest a build of G3 could become faster? The only tip I am aware of for speeding up trunk (G3) builds is to install a maven repository

[jira] [Resolved] (GERONIMODEVTOOLS-740) Generate p2 metadata for GEP

2011-06-22 Thread Jarek Gawor (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-740?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jarek Gawor resolved GERONIMODEVTOOLS-740. -- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 3.0 Generate p2 metadata

Re: Speeding up G3.0 build time

2011-06-22 Thread Russell E Glaue
On 06/22/2011 12:02 PM, Kevan Miller wrote: On Jun 22, 2011, at 12:09 PM, Russell E Glaue wrote: I am wanting to update the G3 dev wiki to help first-time builders get started. How would you suggest a build of G3 could become faster? The only tip I am aware of for speeding up trunk (G3)

[BUILD] branches/2.1: Failed for Revision: 1138303

2011-06-22 Thread Jarek Gawor
Geronimo Revision: 1138303 built with tests included See the full build-0200.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.1/20110622/build-0200.log Download the binaries from http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.1/20110622 [INFO] BUILD

Re: Speeding up G3.0 build time

2011-06-22 Thread Kevan Miller
On Jun 22, 2011, at 1:27 PM, Russell E Glaue wrote: On 06/22/2011 12:02 PM, Kevan Miller wrote: On Jun 22, 2011, at 12:09 PM, Russell E Glaue wrote: snip I am using a very basic build procedure. 1. checkout G3 trunk 2. JAVA_HOME=/path/to/jdk/1.6.0_22 3. download and install a fresh

[BUILD] branches/2.2: Failed for Revision: 1138556

2011-06-22 Thread Jarek Gawor
Geronimo Revision: 1138556 built with tests included See the full build-1400.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20110622/build-1400.log See the unit test reports at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20110622/unit-test-reports

Re: Add Java EE schema files to Geronimo Server?

2011-06-22 Thread Kevan Miller
On Jun 22, 2011, at 10:05 AM, Rex Wang wrote: Hi Geronimo and OpenEJB devs, I am fixing the servlet tck problems. And it requires to validate the standard Deployment Descriptors xml files before deployment. Now we use the org.apache.openejb.jee.JaxbJavaee to do the unmarshal, for

Re: Add Java EE schema files to Geronimo Server?

2011-06-22 Thread David Jencks
On Jun 22, 2011, at 12:24 PM, Kevan Miller wrote: On Jun 22, 2011, at 10:05 AM, Rex Wang wrote: Hi Geronimo and OpenEJB devs, I am fixing the servlet tck problems. And it requires to validate the standard Deployment Descriptors xml files before deployment. Now we use the

Re: Speeding up G3.0 build time

2011-06-22 Thread Russell E Glaue
On 06/22/2011 01:54 PM, Kevan Miller wrote: On Jun 22, 2011, at 1:27 PM, Russell E Glaue wrote: On 06/22/2011 12:02 PM, Kevan Miller wrote: On Jun 22, 2011, at 12:09 PM, Russell E Glaue wrote: snip I am using a very basic build procedure. 1. checkout G3 trunk 2.

Re: Snapshots

2011-06-22 Thread David Blevins
On Mar 10, 2011, at 1:43 AM, Mark Struberg wrote: Not sure if we like to do that. Of course it would be easier to handle, but this might break geronimo snapshot releases which assume that a current SPI doesn't got changed. I think we can leave it as is with our manual deploys. This way,

[jira] [Created] (GERONIMO-6020) built-in ee beans

2011-06-22 Thread David Jencks (JIRA)
built-in ee beans - Key: GERONIMO-6020 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6020 Project: Geronimo Issue Type: Sub-task Security Level: public (Regular issues) Components: OpenWebBeans

Re: Snapshots

2011-06-22 Thread Joseph Bergmark
I set up the Hudson builds for both OpenWebBeans-trunk and OpenWebBeans_1.0.x. I suspect I could configure it to also configure it to publish them. I see there is a Deploy artifacts to Maven repository option that takes a repository URL. Sincerely, Joe On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 6:02 PM, David

[BUILD] branches/2.2: Failed for Revision: 1138677

2011-06-22 Thread Jarek Gawor
Geronimo Revision: 1138677 built with tests included See the full build-2000.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20110622/build-2000.log See the unit test reports at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20110622/unit-test-reports

[jira] [Commented] (GERONIMO-5674) Dojo related improvement.

2011-06-22 Thread Shawn Jiang (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5674?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13053608#comment-13053608 ] Shawn Jiang commented on GERONIMO-5674: --- Committed the big patch. It reduce

Re: [QUESTION]Is it OK to apply customized DOJO to geornimo from legal perspective ?

2011-06-22 Thread Shawn Jiang
Thanks, Kevan, Just committed the patch to turnk@1138711 On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 11:03 PM, Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.comwrote: On Jun 22, 2011, at 1:30 AM, Shawn Jiang wrote: We rebuild dojo locally to only include the dojo components geronimo console needs. It's a popular method to

[jira] [Commented] (GERONIMO-5744) bundle urls and 3rd party libraries

2011-06-22 Thread Jarek Gawor (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5744?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13053634#comment-13053634 ] Jarek Gawor commented on GERONIMO-5744: --- I committed the patch with some

[jira] [Resolved] (GERONIMO-5942) JspModuleBuilderExtension and TomcatModuleBuilder warning message displayed when start eba application

2011-06-22 Thread Ivan (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5942?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ivan resolved GERONIMO-5942. Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 3.0 Commit the changes to trunk at.r1138733

Re: JspModuleBuilderExtension logging in console

2011-06-22 Thread Ivan
Thanks for reporting this, and also find that there is a JIRA GERONIMO-5942https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5942 opened by other users. It is caused by incorrect bundle is used to load the tag classes from other bundles, just commited some changes, and it should be OK now. Actually,