Dear Forrest Xia,
This message acknowledges receipt of your NDA, which has been filed in the
Apache Software Foundation records.
Warm Regards,
Craig L Russell
Secretary, Apache Software Foundation
-2.1.0-SNAPSHOT.jar no longer need to include a
dependency exclusion for commons-logging.
Enjoy!
Donald
Craig L Russell
Architect, Oracle
http://db.apache.org/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:craig.russ...@oracle.com
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
onimo-validation_1.0_spec-1.0/
Vote will be open for 72 hours.
[ ] +1 approve
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
Thanks,
Donald
Craig L Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:craig.russ...@sun.com
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
Hi Kevan,
On Dec 2, 2009, at 2:32 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
On Dec 2, 2009, at 4:13 PM, Craig L Russell wrote:
Hi,
It's been brought to my attention that the terminology used to
describe Java EE is incorrect in this web page: http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDEV/road-map-for-jee
should be used properly. Please see [1] and
[2] for Sun's point of view.
Thanks,
Craig
Please copy me if you choose to reply. Thanks.
[1] http://www.theserverside.com/news/thread.tss?thread_id=35561
[2] http://www.java.com/en/about/brand/naming.jsp
Craig L Russell
Assistant Secretary,
the ianal plugin. The jar
and source artifacts include the License and Notice files.
The branches will be moved to tags and the staging artifacts
promoted to the release repo if the vote passes.
Vote open for 72 hours.
[ ] +1
[ ] +0
[ ] -1 (and reason why)
Thanks,
Donald
Craig
that contains the spec jar. With suitable tests to
make sure that we don't break the Geronimo build, this should be
straightforward.
Craig
Thoughts/ideas/opinions?
-Jeremy (OpenJPA committer)
Craig L Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo
408 276
On Aug 9, 2007, at 6:50 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
On 8/4/07, David Jencks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm a bit confused though about the inclusion of cddl xsds in apache
svn since IIUC you have indicated xsds are definitely "source
code" (I completely agree) and the draft 3rd party licensing page
sa
On Aug 4, 2007, at 12:15 PM, David Jencks wrote:
2. Hypothetically, starting from the cddl licensed schemas, what
can we generate from them, what can we include in apache svn and
releases, and what license is any of this under? The geronimo pmc
has previously thought that generated source
portlet/portlet-app_1_0.xsd) doesn't have any restrictive language,
it also doesn't have any indication at all of its license in the
xsd itself. A license header would be a welcome improvement IMO.
many thanks,
david jencks
On Jun 20, 2007, at 9:31 PM, Craig L Russell wrote:
Apologies in advance if this is noisy. I've been using maven for only
a year, so I don't understand all the issues.
Maven will cache artifacts locally and if you have a dependency on a
non-snapshot version of the artifact, it only ever gets downloaded
once. From then on, it assumes that the
Hi Ken,
I reviewed the proposal and yeah, it looks good to me. (non-binding)
CORBA is a huge piece of work and I'm not surprised that it takes 22.
I'd be surprised if the number of initial committers were less than
13. (random number generator 6..18)
Craig
On Feb 8, 2006, at 5:41 PM, Rode
12 matches
Mail list logo
