[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-631?page=all ]
Hiram Chirino updated AMQ-631:
--
Fix Version: 4.0
(was: 4.0 RC3)
> verify that HttpsTransportBrokerTest won't hang on other env
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-629?page=all ]
Hiram Chirino updated AMQ-629:
--
Fix Version: 4.0 RC4
(was: 4.0 RC3)
> test case SslTransportBrokerTest not work
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-639?page=all ]
Hiram Chirino resolved AMQ-639:
---
Fix Version: 4.0 RC4
(was: 4.0 RC3)
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed.
> Broker is not re-connecting to a network of brokers after go
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-693?page=all ]
Hiram Chirino updated AMQ-693:
--
Fix Version: 4.1
(was: 4.0 RC2)
> STOMP C client ready for Sun Workshop 6 and above on Sola
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-630?page=all ]
Hiram Chirino updated AMQ-630:
--
Fix Version: 4.1
(was: 4.0 RC2)
Look into fixing this post 4.x
> After broker has shutdown, cannot shutdown a client applicat
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-501?page=all ]
Hiram Chirino updated AMQ-501:
--
Fix Version: 4.0
(was: 4.0 RC3)
> ActiveMQ is not JCA1.5 compliant
> -
>
>
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-691?page=all ]
Hiram Chirino updated AMQ-691:
--
Fix Version: 4.0 RC4
(was: 4.0)
> ResponseCorrelator does not release blocked sync requests when transport has
> an async f
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-560?page=all ]
Hiram Chirino updated AMQ-560:
--
Fix Version: 4.0 RC4
(was: 4.0)
> TEST org.apache.activemq.transport.fanout.FanoutTransportBrokerTest Hangs
> every once in a
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-487?page=all ]
Hiram Chirino updated AMQ-487:
--
Fix Version: 4.0 RC4
(was: 4.0)
> Temp Destination definition not sent across network bridge to support
> request/reply
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-492?page=all ]
Hiram Chirino updated AMQ-492:
--
Fix Version: 4.0 RC4
(was: 4.0)
> Design error in MulticastDiscoveryAgent use of FailoverTransportConnec
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-645?page=all ]
Hiram Chirino updated AMQ-645:
--
Fix Version: 4.0 RC4
(was: 4.0)
> migrate geronimo to incubator-activemq
> --
>
>
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-454?page=all ]
Hiram Chirino updated AMQ-454:
--
Fix Version: 4.0 RC4
(was: 4.0)
> ActiveMQMessageConsumer stop method has no effect if a listener is registe
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-604?page=all ]
Hiram Chirino updated AMQ-604:
--
Fix Version: 4.0 RC4
(was: 4.0)
> get http transport working again
>
>
>
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-683?page=all ]
Hiram Chirino updated AMQ-683:
--
Fix Version: 4.0 RC4
(was: 4.0)
> Memory leak in ManagedRegionBroker
> --
>
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-695?page=comments#action_36102 ]
Hiram Chirino commented on AMQ-695:
---
Looks like a bug in the way that temporary destinations are being cleaned up.
This should not affect you normal processing of messages
: 4.0
Reporter: Hiram Chirino
Assigned to: Hiram Chirino
Fix For: 4.0 RC3
WARN Service - Failed to remove tmp destination
temp-topic://ID:rfs8.lab.reconnex.net-34639-1146084114685-4:10:3
javax.jms.JMSException: Destination still has an active subscription:
topic
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-694?page=comments#action_36081 ]
Hiram Chirino commented on AMQ-694:
---
Could you describe the strange behaviour? Perhaps even submit a small unit
test for it?
> Probblem with "messageSelector&qu
wow. nice post.
+1 on all counts.
On 4/23/06, Aaron Mulder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> All,
>
> Here's a little something I've been assembling to help as we move past
> certification and look for what's next. I'd like to post this (or
> something like it) to the web site, ideally for the 1.1 re
autoconf scripts is going
to be a hassle and not a lot of folks are trained in that art.
> Regards,
> Nate
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hiram
> Chirino
> Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2006 11:48 AM
> To: activemq-dev@g
Hi Nathan,
I assume you've committed that patch to SVN by now.
I was just testing the latest cms against the latest activemq on OS X
and ran into an issue where the client was hanging in the
StompTransport::addMessageListener call.
Root cause: the mutex being used did not seem to support recursi
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hiram Chirino
> Sent: Wednesday, April 19, 2006 2:02 PM
> To: activemq-dev@geronimo.apache.org
> Subject: Re: openwire-cpp question
>
> Just do a
>
> svn co svn://svn.stomp.codehaus.org/stomp/scm stomp
>
>
How about we make that an optional extensible header that defaults to
"binary" if not set. All stomp implementations should at least
support text and binary. Something like:
message-type:text
And activemq would also support some other types such as:
activemq-map, activemq-stream, and activemq-
We officially don't support using maven 2 to build yet (we are still
working on it). Please use maven 1.
On 4/20/06, Li, Fan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi:
>
> When I tried to complie the latest source code from
> incubator-activemq-4.0-SNAPSHOT, I get the following error
>
> Missing:
> --
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-645?page=all ]
Hiram Chirino resolved AMQ-645:
---
Resolution: Fixed
Geronimo 1.2 branch has been migrated to 4.x
> migrate geronimo to incubator-activ
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-691?page=all ]
Hiram Chirino resolved AMQ-691:
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed.
> ResponseCorrelator does not release blocked sync requests when transport has
> an async f
client?
>
> David: are you planning to incorporate these changes in your code soon?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Vik
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hiram Chirino
> Sent: Wednesday, April 19, 2006 1:51 PM
> To: acti
On 4/19/06, Dhawan, Vikram (LNG-DAY) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey David,
>
> I was able to build this code on Sun Workshop 8, I had to put some OS
> dependant condition checks, like you have for MACOS and have to modify code a
> little bit here and there nothing major.
>
> I am able to run it
yes I think so.
On 4/18/06, Dhawan, Vikram (LNG-DAY) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Hiram,
>
> Is 04/18 SNAPSHOT is good enough to test this?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Vik
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behal
Hi,
I recently fix a synchronization bug in the STOMP connector. Please
wait for the next SNAPSHOT and test it again.
On 4/10/06, vik Dhawan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I am noticing a weird behavior in AMQ today, things works fine if i produce
> one message and consume that message b
+1
On 4/18/06, Bruce Snyder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 4/12/06, James Strachan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Lets try redo RC3 quick before anyone notices :)
>
> +1
>
> Bruce
> --
> perl -e 'print unpack("u30","D0G)[EMAIL
> PROTECTED]&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E );'
>
> Apache Geronimo - http://ger
Hi,
We will release ActiveMQ 3.2.4 as soon as the G folks say that the
current 3.2.4-SNAPSHOT looks good to them.
--
Regards,
Hiram
; Nate
>
> On 4/15/06, Hiram Chirino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Well, wile working with the Ruby stomp client I found some issues with
> > the java stuff. I committed some changes that may please try them
> > out!
> >
> >
>
>
--
Regards,
Hiram
Outstanding! Thanks Nathan!
On 4/16/06, Nathan Mittler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Done!
>
> http://docs.codehaus.org/display/ACTIVEMQ/Proposed+C+Client+Architecture
>
> On 4/16/06, Hiram Chirino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Nathan,
> >
>
er.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Vik
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hiram
> Chirino
> Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2006 1:09 PM
> To: activemq-dev@geronimo.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Openwire C client issue
>
> loo
Howdy.. now eclipse project files were included in the tar :(
On 4/14/06, Hiram Chirino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> yep got.. just got a little swamped. Will look into it asap.
>
> On 4/14/06, Nathan Mittler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hey Hiram,
> > Just
looks like some new command types were added but we forgot to add them
to the header file that defines the id of command types.
On 4/13/06, Dhawan, Vikram (LNG-DAY) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Hiram,
>
> I saw that it was your initiative to write the openwire C client. For the
> following issu
+1
On 4/9/06, Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> I have compiled a M1 release yesterday. Please take some time to
> download and test it under your environment before voting it.
> The maven artifacts are available at
>
> http://people.apache.org/~gnodet/incubator-servi
5).
>
> Regards,
> Mats
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hiram Chirino
> Sent: den 5 april 2006 18:31
> To: activemq-dev@geronimo.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Update: AMQ C++ Client: First working draft
>
> Hi M
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-660?page=comments#action_35982 ]
Hiram Chirino commented on AMQ-660:
---
Hi Johan,
With a new server, you could always run the DDL manually against the DB.
As for the < issue and the "Column index 1
Hi Mats,
Feature. Consider it to be like content-length
Regards,
Hiram
On 4/5/06, Mats Forslöf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> A new update has been uploaded to
> http://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-656, see issue for more details.
>
> When debugging the OpenWire protocol we've f
+1
On 4/3/06, Hiram Chirino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Guys,
>
> This RC1 failed to pass incubator approval. There was a small issue
> with some of the logging message produced on start up. So I've done a
> new RC2 release from trunk and has all the latest bug
Hi Guys,
This RC1 failed to pass incubator approval. There was a small issue
with some of the logging message produced on start up. So I've done a
new RC2 release from trunk and has all the latest bug fixes.
I've posted it here:
http://people.apache.org/~chirino/incubator-activemq-4.0-RC2/
I've
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-660?page=comments#action_35952 ]
Hiram Chirino commented on AMQ-660:
---
Outstanding.
Thank you for looking into this. The ACTIVEMQ_MSGS_EIDX only helps durring
periodic batch job that does message cleanup
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-660?page=comments#action_35946 ]
Hiram Chirino commented on AMQ-660:
---
Hi Johan,
The tables look like:
CREATE TABLE ACTIVEMQ_MSGS(ID INTEGER NOT NULL, CONTAINER VARCHAR(250) ASCII,
MSGID_PROD VARCHAR(250
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-660?page=comments#action_35931 ]
Hiram Chirino commented on AMQ-660:
---
The statement that is being executed is:
DELETE FROM ACTIVEMQ_MSGS WHERE ( EXPIRATION<>0 AND EXPIRATION Add support for
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-660?page=comments#action_35921 ]
Hiram Chirino commented on AMQ-660:
---
Just added initial support for MaxDB. Requested original poster to submit logs
to try to resolve the "Old message cleanup failed d
On 3/28/06, Matt Hogstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
>
> * Upgrade ActiveMQ to Version 4. I don't know all the changes so we need
> Hiram's input here but I think some of the improvements included improved
> configurability.
>
Hey I just sent out a related note, but the short of it is sinc
with 4.x yet?
Please let me know if this broke anything.
Regards,
Hiram
On 3/26/06, Hiram Chirino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Wow.. I'm a bit confused with all the version stuff then... I've been
> working off trunk which I assumed was 1.1. I'll attach a patch of
&g
gt;
> James
>
> On 3/27/06, Hiram Chirino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I've been thinking that it may be best to move the ActiveMQ bean
> > modules into the Geronimo source tree. ActiveMQ actually does not
> > ship the gbean modules in it's binary d
thx! James, start moderating ;-)
On 3/27/06, Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think James is.
> I am a moderator on ServiceMix and received a moderating mail the first
> time a notification has been sent.
>
> Guillaume
>
> Hiram Chirino wrote:
>
>
I've been thinking that it may be best to move the ActiveMQ bean
modules into the Geronimo source tree. ActiveMQ actually does not
ship the gbean modules in it's binary distro, so I think it would make
sense to have them actually be maintained inside Geronimo. The upside
to this is if Geronimo wa
I have not seen any JIRA emails on the dev list since the JIRA
instance moved to Apache hardware. Perhaps it's emails are being
moderated? Who's a list moderator here?
--
Regards,
Hiram
Hi,
I just added a doap file for the ActiveMQ project:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/activemq/trunk/doap.rdf
Could you get it included at projects.apache.org?
--
Regards,
Hiram
ntil it can be properly
ported.
On 3/26/06, David Jencks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Mar 26, 2006, at 11:29 AM, Hiram Chirino wrote:
>
> > Hi David,
> >
> > I've started to update my geronimo 1.1 working copy to use amq 4.
>
> Are you sure you mean g
Hi David,
I've started to update my geronimo 1.1 working copy to use amq 4. If
your interested in helping port it over, then yeah I think a branch
would be a good idea.
What should the branch name be?
Regards,
Hiram
On 3/26/06, David Jencks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Geronimo 1.1 needs some
am
On 3/23/06, Matt Hogstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'll note that. Hiram...any reason you can think of that would stop us from
> testing the newer ActiveIO on the 1.0.0 build to shake out any issues?
>
>
> Hiram Chirino wrote:
> > Hi John,
> >
> >
nk I'll work on
upgrading activemq to use activeio 3.x which CAN be concurrently used
with the version Geronimo uses. I would just upgrade Geronimo's
security module to use the 2.x or 3.x but activeio's interfaces are
still not pinned down and I want to avoid other folks from break
On 3/22/06, Hiram Chirino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Guys,
>
[snip[
> [ ] +1 Release the binary as our milestone 4
> [ ] -1 Veto the milestone release (provide specific comments)
>
Doh! that's what you get for using a previous email as a template! I
hope every bod
[ http://jira.activemq.org/jira//browse/AMQ-643?page=all ]
Hiram Chirino resolved AMQ-643:
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version: (was: 4.0 RC 2)
4.0 RC1
> maxInactivityDuration does not seem to work prope
On 3/22/06, David Jencks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Mar 22, 2006, at 11:12 AM, Hiram Chirino wrote:
>
> > Awesome! This could give me a kewl approach to exposing the ActiveMQ
> > objects in Geronimo.. Now if I could just have complex data (like
> > say
}
> } else {
> log.warn("The ConfigurationManager in the kernel does not
> allow changes at runtime");
> }
> return null;
>
> I haven't looked at removing recently, but I know it's possible.
>
> Thanks,
>
Hi Li,
As of svn revision 387562, we no longer use the preLoadSize. see:
http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=387562&view=rev
Please get an update and let me know if this has fixed your issue.
On 3/22/06, Li, Fan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi:
>
> I am running test on the JmsConnectors, the test
[ http://jira.activemq.org/jira//browse/AMQ-653?page=all ]
Hiram Chirino resolved AMQ-653:
---
Resolution: Fixed
applied
> The README.txt file contains references to activemq.
Hi Dain,
Is possible to dynamicaly register/unregister a GBean in the kernel?
Last time I checked, that was not really possible, but I'm hoping
things have changed since then?
--
Regards,
Hiram
+1 from me too. Way back when I was working on the ActiveMQ -
Geronimo integration, the poxies gave me a few headaches.
Regards,
Hiram
On 3/19/06, Matt Hogstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1...the debugging thing has been a problem. If for no other reason this is
> the
> right thing to do.
Hi John,
oh that's awesome! I had not realized that it would that simple.
We definitely need to get our lists on Nabble ASAP. Who knows how to do that?
On 3/21/06, John Sisson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hiram Chirino wrote:
> > Hi John,
> >
> > Nabble looks
Hi John,
Yep it will be needed. We need to update it so that it works with
the new 4.x way of updating stuff. Should not be to hard to get it
working again now that 4.x has stabilized. What would be nice is to
have a better set of gbeans than what we had with ActiveMQ 3.x. The
3.x gbe
Hi John,
I've created a couple ActiveMQ issues to track those:
http://jira.activemq.org/jira/browse/AMQ-651
http://jira.activemq.org/jira/browse/AMQ-652
Putting them on the ActiveMQ Road map seems to encourage folks to
resolve them. Since 4.x is substantially different from 3.x, I've got
a feeli
Environment: Geronimo
Reporter: Hiram Chirino
Fix For: 4.0 RC 2
Need to check to see if this is still valid against 4.x
see:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1494
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1494?page=comments#action_12371370
]
Hiram Chirino commented on GERONIMO-1494:
-
see http://jira.activemq.org/jira/browse/AMQ-652
> Potential infinite loop in ActiveMQ shutdown process
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-815?page=comments#action_12371369
]
Hiram Chirino commented on GERONIMO-815:
I've got a feeling that this will not show up anymore with AMQ 4.x but will
need to get the integration work for AM
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1493?page=comments#action_12371368
]
Hiram Chirino commented on GERONIMO-1493:
-
See
http://jira.activemq.org/jira/browse/AMQ-651
> Deadlock in ActiveMQ close process
[ http://jira.activemq.org/jira//browse/AMQ-531?page=all ]
Hiram Chirino updated AMQ-531:
--
Fix Version: (was: 4.0 RC1)
4.0 RC 2
> XBean has a runtime issue with Spring 2.
[ http://jira.activemq.org/jira//browse/AMQ-639?page=all ]
Hiram Chirino updated AMQ-639:
--
Fix Version: (was: 4.0 RC1)
4.0 RC 2
> Broker is not re-connecting to a network of brokers after going down and then
> being brought b
[ http://jira.activemq.org/jira//browse/AMQ-501?page=all ]
Hiram Chirino updated AMQ-501:
--
Fix Version: (was: 4.0 RC1)
(was: 4.0)
4.0 RC 2
> ActiveMQ is not JCA1.5 compli
[ http://jira.activemq.org/jira//browse/AMQ-632?page=all ]
Hiram Chirino resolved AMQ-632:
---
Resolution: Fixed
patch committed.
> TaskRunnerFactory from broker is not carried along to Broker-to-Broker
> conne
[ http://jira.activemq.org/jira//browse/AMQ-643?page=comments#action_35864
]
Hiram Chirino commented on AMQ-643:
---
The change has been commited.
You now configure the maxInactivityDuration on the wireFormat. So on tcp
connection, it would look like
[ http://jira.activemq.org/jira//browse/AMQ-531?page=comments#action_35860
]
Hiram Chirino commented on AMQ-531:
---
While the jarjar would resolve the binary compatability issues, it would break
folks who make use of spring objects in the spring.xml
[ http://jira.activemq.org/jira//browse/AMQ-531?page=all ]
Hiram Chirino reassigned AMQ-531:
-
Assign To: james strachan
Looks like we can close this one out.
> XBean has a runtime issue with Spring 2.
[ http://jira.activemq.org/jira//browse/AMQ-643?page=comments#action_35852
]
Hiram Chirino commented on AMQ-643:
---
Hi Kevin,
Yeah, I agree, making sure everybody is using the same setting is a bit of a
problem. I working on a change right now that will
[ http://jira.activemq.org/jira//browse/AMQ-643?page=comments#action_35845
]
Hiram Chirino commented on AMQ-643:
---
Hi Kevin,
The maxInactivityDuration setting has to match on both sides of the connection.
If they do then there is no need to make
[ http://jira.activemq.org/jira//browse/AMQ-507?page=all ]
Hiram Chirino reassigned AMQ-507:
-
Assign To: Jonas Lim (was: Hiram Chirino)
Have you been able to consistently reproduce this?
> java.sql.SQLException: Failed to remove a message during l
Leo,
Many of the folks in the ActiveMQ project already have been through
the incubation process once before when we put Geronimo though. It's
not like this is our first rodeo. So in our eyes we really do think
we are very close to having satisfied the incubation requirements. I
think Alan was o
[ http://jira.activemq.org/jira//browse/AMQ-573?page=all ]
Hiram Chirino resolved AMQ-573:
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version: (was: 4.1)
4.0 M5
The JMX QueueView now has a copy and delete methods that can be used to do the
[ http://jira.activemq.org/jira//browse/AMQ-533?page=all ]
Hiram Chirino resolved AMQ-533:
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version: 4.0 M5
> Unable to create ACTIVEMQ_ACK table
> ---
>
>
[ http://jira.activemq.org/jira//browse/AMQ-465?page=all ]
Hiram Chirino resolved AMQ-465:
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version: (was: 4.1)
4.0 M5
> deadlock when using VM transport and Jen
[ http://jira.activemq.org/jira//browse/AMQ-465?page=all ]
Hiram Chirino reopened AMQ-465:
---
forgot to update fix for version.
> deadlock when using VM transport and Jencks...
> --
>
>
[ http://jira.activemq.org/jira//browse/AMQ-465?page=all ]
Hiram Chirino resolved AMQ-465:
---
Resolution: Fixed
The asyncDispatch setting configured on the connection was not being honored by
the connectionConsumers. Fixed so now the default should be
[ http://jira.activemq.org/jira//browse/AMQ-533?page=comments#action_35809
]
Hiram Chirino commented on AMQ-533:
---
ActiveMQ has not been enhanced so that the SQL statements used can be tuned.
In you case, you would want to used something similar to
[ http://jira.activemq.org/jira//browse/AMQ-492?page=all ]
Hiram Chirino resolved AMQ-492:
---
Resolution: Fixed
> Design error in MulticastDiscoveryAgent use of FailoverTransportConnec
Hi Mats!
On 3/16/06, Mats Forslöf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We need some additional information on the OpenWire protocol to wrap up our
> work on the C++ AMQ client.
>
> 1. To use loose encoding what do we have to do, is it simply to set the tight
> encoding attribute to false on the
>
> The Invocation type, that I am describing, is not bound to a specific
> protocol (note that I mention both web and tiers above) - but an
> abstraction over calls/rpcs/etc.. carried via a number of possible
> transports : Http, OpenEJB, IIOP, various WS transports...
>
Sounds interesting but a
I'll start at thread on infrastructure to discuss how best to get the
JIRA migration done.
Regards,
Hiram
On 3/13/06, Justin Erenkrantz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 3/13/06, Hiram Chirino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I agree that we should work on getting our JIRA
Hi Noel,
We've got a JIRA out there to create the PPMC lists:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-757
But perhaps it has fallen through the cracks. Should I ping the
infrastructure mailing lists about this issue? Any help with this
would be most appreciated!
Regards,
Hiram
On 3/13/06
Hi John,On 3/13/06, John Sisson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:> This is not a vote, but simply a discussion about the graduation of> ActiveMQ from the Incubator. The status file is located here:>>
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/activemq/trunk/STATUS>> We are proactiv
Many of the cool new features in ActiveMQ 4.x consumers are enabled
using destination options, but that had not been documented before.
But that doco is now here:
http://docs.codehaus.org/display/ACTIVEMQ/Destination+Options
Regards,
Hiram
+1
On Mar 2, 2006, at 2:55 AM, Greg Wilkins wrote:
All,
I'm tuning back into G after zoning out for a while
I'd like to started work on the jetty6 integration to
provide servlet 2.5
The goals of the jetty 6 integration will be:
+ 2.5 servlet API.
+ annotation support
+ Simplify integr
Hi Everybody,
I just recently added the IFR smart pointer cpp headers to svn that
the openwire cpp library was dependent on. I was previously not sure
if we could include external sources but cliff's doc clear this issue
up for me:
http://people.apache.org/~cliffs/3party.html
Regards,
Mats,
That's correct.
Regards,
Hiram
On Mar 2, 2006, at 7:39 AM, Mats Forslöf wrote:
Most informative, thanks Hiram. Is it correct that the C# client
only supports tight marshalling at the moment?
Regards,
Mats
-Original Message-
From: Hiram Chirino [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Everybody,
Just a quick heads up, openwire by default tries to encode commands
as tight as possible on the wire to decrease bandwidth requirements.
To do this, it currently uses a 2 pass algorithm where the first pass
collects all boolean writes into a bit array and pre calculates the
501 - 600 of 696 matches
Mail list logo
