I'll volunteer as the contact person.
Matt Hogstrom
Vice President, Apache Geronimo
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (or [EMAIL PROTECTED] if more appropriate)
919-656-0564
On Aug 22, 2007, at 8:32 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
o
On Aug 22, 2007, at 7:19 AM, Shiva Kumar H R wrote:
Does http://www.apache.org/dist/geronimo/ deserve a better mention,
may be directly under Available releases section?
no, this is a last resort for downloads. We rely on the mirror
system to spread the load. If we specifically
Yikes, that is not good. Hernan?
On Aug 22, 2007, at 5:29 AM, Peter Petersson wrote:
Hi
Poking around on the geronimo site I just noticed that downloading
of release v2.0.1 requires a Confluence account.
As I am able to get to the download links for all other versions i
suspect this may
I think its fixed .. if someone else can verify that would be great.
On Aug 22, 2007, at 10:10 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Yikes, that is not good. Hernan?
On Aug 22, 2007, at 5:29 AM, Peter Petersson wrote:
Hi
Poking around on the geronimo site I just noticed that downloading
of release
When you edit the page there is a set of restrictions at the bottom.
I simply set read to none.
On Aug 22, 2007, at 10:35 AM, Jacek Laskowski wrote:
On 8/22/07, Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think its fixed .. if someone else can verify that would be great.
Just log out
Please advise when this will go out. Thanks
Final
Apache Geronimo 2.0.1 released by Apache Software Foundation
date/time/location—The Apache Software Foundation (ASF) announced
today the release of Apache Geronimo 2.0.1 (http://
geronimo.apache.org http://geronimo.apache.org/).
On Aug 21, 2007, at 9:29 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Quick look:
On Aug 21, 2007, at 9:08 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
OpenJPA projects. Here is a list of some of these programming
enhancements:
Here is a list... sounds clunky... we will reword that.
Suggestions welcome
On Aug 21, 2007, at 9:25 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
We will review this and provide any feedback to you. Once approved
by both you guys and the PRC, we will submit it for the wire.
It is not an instantaneous process taking 24-48 hours, and
so doing that in conjunction with when you want the PR
On Aug 21, 2007, at 1:55 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Even if we submitted the PR for release today, the earliest it would
go out would be Thurs. There in an inherent latency in the release
process in the wire service.
Thursday would be fine. We have agreement on the Press Release based
on
add the release date too. Then an Archive
section for 1.0, 1.1 and 1.2. Thoughts?
Cheers!
Hernan
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
All,
Since 1.1.1 is the stable version of Geronimo I'd like to propose
that we remove the older versions from the download site. If
there are no objections I'll do
On Aug 21, 2007, at 3:00 PM, David Jencks wrote:
No plugins from plugins have ever been released. I'd like to see:
- use the maven release plugin + staging plugin
- use the maven-remote-resources-plugin
as minimum requirements for releasing. I've yet to get the maven-
release-plugin to
Hernan,
Oh mighty purveyor of Confluence shtuffes. Can you update our
website for downloads of 2.0.1...looks like its had time to bake and
we're good to go. (So long as Donald doesn't find a security
problem ;-P )
On Aug 21, 2007, at 3:31 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Matt, I must not be making myself clear... The PRC must
approve the PR. Once that's done, then we need, of course, you
guys to approve any and all changes (for example, who is
the contact person for this PR?). Finally, once all that
is done,
Da
On Aug 21, 2007, at 4:12 PM, Hernan Cunico wrote:
I'll update it later tonight. Are we ready for updating the News
section too?
Cheers!
Hernan
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Hernan,
Oh mighty purveyor of Confluence shtuffes. Can you update our
website for downloads of 2.0.1...looks like its
Thanks ... ugh ... totally missed the to ... Kevan, you da man
On Aug 21, 2007, at 5:33 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
Forwarding the result from user list to our dev list...
On Aug 20, 2007, at 9:56 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Subject says it all...I'll start pushing out the binaries this
morning
Jeff / Joe,
Can we get the Sun WebSite updated with Geronimo 2.0.1 being
certified rather than 2.0-M6-rc1?
All,
Since 1.1.1 is the stable version of Geronimo I'd like to propose
that we remove the older versions from the download site. If there
are no objections I'll do this tomorrow when we announce the 2.0.1
release.
Now that we've gotten through the issues that stalled 2.0 we have a
successful vote and I've updated the Press Release as well with
version information.
This should be pretty good as it was the mostly approved version
before the security problem.
Please review and perhaps the PRC can
Thanks to Vamsi and Jacek. for their comments. I've incorporated
all except the configuration by exception as my feeble mind couldn't
wordsmith it well enough. Give me your +1 on this and we'll let 'er
rip. Grat job everyone.
On Aug 20, 2007, at 11:16 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Now
Sent my vote to the user list by accident.
Here is my official +1
On Aug 15, 2007, at 4:39 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
The updated binaries are available for review. I have incorporated
the security changes provided by David Jencks, Kevan and Vamsi.
Thanks gents !
I also incorporated
Congrats on the new job and the especially the wedding. At some
point there will the pitter pat of new developers running around at
the Patel household :)
Here is wishing you the best on your new projects at work and personal.
On Aug 17, 2007, at 11:35 AM, Sachin Patel wrote:
Hello
I don't think there is anything wrong with including them. We
compile them against the jdbc drivers provided by the vendors but
don't include the jars themselves.
+1 to the idea.
I'll package up the DB2 one.
On Aug 17, 2007, at 8:57 PM, David Jencks wrote:
I'd like to distribute the
Viewer is broken when date fields are empty) in case a new RC
needs to be spun for some reason. Never thought the fix would be
one line :o) or else would have got it merged before RC1 was spun :o(.
Vamsi
PS: I sincerely do not want to delay the release of 2.0.1 :o)
On 8/16/07, Matt Hogstrom
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3389?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12520317
]
Matt Hogstrom commented on GERONIMO-3389:
-
Perhaps this should be relabeled enhancement and we can catch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3389?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Matt Hogstrom updated GERONIMO-3389:
Issue Type: Improvement (was: Bug)
We should catch this since we know what
We should probably update the release notes on the Wiki.
On Aug 16, 2007, at 11:07 AM, Hernan Cunico wrote:
sorry for the confusion, I meant the binaries, not the bin
directory. When you download the source you get the README.TXT on
the root directory but when you build it or download the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3401?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Matt Hogstrom updated GERONIMO-3401:
Issue Type: Improvement (was: Bug)
Summary: Stop of module from System Modules
Looks like the security issues were addressed and are checked into
branches/2.0.1.
I am following up on any small changes I feel we can safely put in
and am wearing my release manager hat trying to balance risk / reward.
I also changed to 2.0.1-SNAPSHOT as I'm trying out the Maven release
Initial discuss thread
Oops...hang on ... upload problem.
On Aug 15, 2007, at 4:34 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Initial discuss thread
The updated binaries are available for review. I have incorporated
the security changes provided by David Jencks, Kevan and Vamsi.
Thanks gents !
I also incorporated a few additional fixes. Please note the change
log for the changes to the release notes for more information.
The
Upload complete ... vote away.
On Aug 15, 2007, at 4:34 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Initial discuss thread
I pushed Geronimo 2.0 out over the weekend so it has had better than
24 hours to percolate through the net. Hernan, would you mind
updating the download page? I'll pop together a news blurb and
followup on the press release activity.
The systems are available...anyone want to volunteer to run those
through? Looks like 2.0.1 is coming pretty quickly too .
On Aug 13, 2007, at 1:14 PM, Jeff Genender wrote:
How about releasing the other 2 configurations? i.e. Tomcat/CXF and
Jetty/Axis2. Any objections to running the TCK
All,
Earlier today one of the Geronimo committers discovered a bug in the
command line deployer where a null user / password on the deployer
command line will allow a user to deploy modules to a 2.0 server.
This is an unacceptable security exposure and as such we have
abandoned the
r563662 and
r563782 would be good also.
thanks
david jencks
On Aug 13, 2007, at 1:59 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
All,
Earlier today one of the Geronimo committers discovered a bug in
the command line deployer where a null user / password on the
deployer command line will allow a user
I have updated branches/2.0 from 2.0.1-SNAPSHOT to 2.0.2-SNAPSHOT and
deployed the relevant bits.
tags/2.0.0 has been copied to branches/2.0.1 and the poms have been
updated and build cleanly (don't forget mvn -Dstage=bootstrap).
I'll review the commits in the branches/2.0 tree and make a
Incorporating Jarek's changes. I'll take this forward as of 1500
Eastern on Monday).
Thanks everyone for their feedback. Ack this thread if this looks
good so we can get an idea of who likes it.
= DRAFT =
Apache Geronimo Version 2.0 released by Apache Software Foundation
: public (Regular issues)
Affects Versions: 2.0, 2.0.x
Environment: Geronimo 2.0.1-SNAPSHOT using Tomcat JEE assembly. Most
likely affects others as well
Reporter: Matt Hogstrom
Fix For: 2.0.x
When using the Geronimo Console to stop of a module a 404 is received
I incorporated the good ideas I've seen so far. Not sure if cross-posting to prc is appropriate but seems to be working so far :)Ted, I like the change in ordering you suggested...seems to give us a bit more punch.= DRAFT =Apache Geronimo Version 2.0 released by Apache Software
The 2.0 release has passed with 17 +1's. w00t !!
I'll push the binaries out this weekend and we can declare victory
next week !!
Great job all !
On Aug 8, 2007, at 3:56 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
I have put together the release and its been a long journey to get
here.
If you have
forgot to update the Subject line. Once again.
The 2.0 release has passed with 17 +1's. w00t !!
I'll push the binaries out this weekend and we can declare victory
next week !!
Great job all !
On Aug 8, 2007, at 3:56 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
I have put together the release and its been
This works for me. Anyone else ?
On Aug 11, 2007, at 7:37 PM, Jarek Gawor wrote:
Matt,
A few comments:
1) I We should say Apache Axis2 instead of just Apache Axis.
2) I liked the original first paragraph because it announced Geronimo
as Java EE 5 server which is really the most important
On Aug 9, 2007, at 7:22 AM, Anita Kulshreshtha wrote:
Is anyone else seeing this in geronimo-welcome.. I am building from
http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/geronimo-2.0-rc1/geronimo-2.0-
src.zip
I haven't as I haven't built on a Windows system. Perhaps someone
else can chime in?
Forgot my +1 (perhaps implied)
On Aug 8, 2007, at 3:56 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
I have put together the release and its been a long journey to get
here.
If you have comments please put them on the corresponding [DISCUSS]
thread.
[ ] +1 Release Geronimo 2.0
[ ] 0 No opinion
[ ] -1 Do
I think I addressed many of the concerns. Special thanks to Amy Hocraffer for some great ideas to better organize and spiff up the announcement.Please take a few minutes and comments and review. Also, please make sure our claims are accurate :)= DRAFT =Apache Geronimo Version 2.0 released
I have put together the release and its been a long journey to get here.
If you have comments please put them on the corresponding [DISCUSS]
thread.
[ ] +1 Release Geronimo 2.0
[ ] 0 No opinion
[ ] -1 Do not release Geronimo 2.0
Vote will conclude on 0700 ET on Saturday August 11th.
For your discussing pleasure.
I have unpacked the tar ball in my account so that it is accessible.
Unfortunately, the bandwidth at my hotel was fairly limited and it
had about 2 hours to upload and it was late. I should have noted my
intention to unpack it when I woke up.
Thanks Kevan for your suggestion.
On Aug 8,
Yes,
It is at https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/components/
txmanager/branches/2.0
It will be copied to the corresponding tags directory.
On Aug 8, 2007, at 6:58 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
Is there any branch / tag for the txmanager component 2.0.1 release ?
On 8/8/07, Matt
This is great; I expect that we're going to find bugs for the next
several weeks. I suggest that we fix this in 2.0.1 and make it a
priority to get these bugs integrated in that and spin up a release
in the next 4 - 5 weeks. By that time a number of the dependent
projects will have
-rc1 using
http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/geronimo-2.0-rc1/geronimo-2.0-
src.zip
It is not a biggie but if txmanager was independently released and
available on central, it would have been nice.
Thanks
Anita
--- Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For your discussing pleasure
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3368?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Matt Hogstrom closed GERONIMO-3368.
---
Closing as it has been resolved and committed.
Axis2ClientConfigurationFactory not always
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3365?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Matt Hogstrom closed GERONIMO-3365.
---
Assignee: Jarek Gawor
Closing as it has been resolved and committed.
config.xml
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3352?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Matt Hogstrom closed GERONIMO-3352.
---
Closing as it has been resolved and committed.
Upgrade to Jetty 6.1.5 (just released
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3332?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Matt Hogstrom closed GERONIMO-3332.
---
Closing as the problem could not be recreated.
POJO Web-services under Geronimo fail
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3196?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Matt Hogstrom closed GERONIMO-3196.
---
Closing per Jarek's comments.
ConcurrentModificationException in ?wsdl processing
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3305?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Matt Hogstrom closed GERONIMO-3305.
---
Close pending Jarek's comments and changes.
Out Of Memory Error when Running DayTrader
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3353?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Matt Hogstrom closed GERONIMO-3353.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Changed default to:
Committed revision 563399.
Adjust server log4j
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2581?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Matt Hogstrom closed GERONIMO-2581.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Version changes complete for 2.0.
Update Version Numbers of Dependent
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1567?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Matt Hogstrom updated GERONIMO-1567:
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.0)
2.0.x
Moving to 2.0.x
Plan XML files
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-807?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Matt Hogstrom closed GERONIMO-807.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Applied patch and tested and it works. The text for criteria is still
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2025?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Matt Hogstrom updated GERONIMO-2025:
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.0)
2.0.x
Moving to 2.0.x
Undeploy
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1907?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Matt Hogstrom updated GERONIMO-1907:
Fix Version/s: (was: 1.x)
(was: 2.0)
2.0.x
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2884?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Matt Hogstrom updated GERONIMO-2884:
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.0)
2.0.x
JNDI Name Not Correct
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3059?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Matt Hogstrom closed GERONIMO-3059.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Looks like this has been fixed.
CLIs refactoring - options
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3089?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Matt Hogstrom updated GERONIMO-3089:
Fix Version/s: (was: 1.2)
(was: 2.0)
2.0.x
I'm in San Francisco at Linux World this week. If anyone is
interested in dinner or something on Wednesday night have a hollar.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Matt Hogstrom updated GERONIMO-3324:
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.0)
2.0.x
Moving to 2.0.x
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3337?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Matt Hogstrom closed GERONIMO-3337.
---
Resolution: Invalid
cars need to be installed as plugins as such deploy is invalid
I did some work incorporating release notes, cleaning up JIRAs and
other stuff tonight and I believe 2.0 is ready for its RC1.
Kevan started some TCK runs but we can spin the vote in parallel.
The only two items remaining I can see are the JSPC and Selenium
plugins that are still in
I tried building the RC tonight and ran into this:
[INFO] [tools:verify-legal-files {execution: verify-legal-files}]
[INFO] Checking legal files in: geronimo-kernel-2.0.jar
[INFO] Checking legal files in: geronimo-kernel-2.0-sources.jar
[INFO]
Please include your updates and comments on this press release.
After Thursday I'll forward to the PRC for their review with our
comments. I'm cross-posting here to give the PRC a heads up.
DRAFT
Apache Software Foundation Announces Release Of Apache Geronimo
Version 2.0
My +1 ...
On Aug 3, 2007, at 8:01 AM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
Thanks. The branches and trunk have now been updated to pick up the
released version of the x-m-p 2.3.1
Cheers
Prasad
On 8/3/07, David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BTW the vote on xmlbeans-maven-plugin 2.3.1 passed and I
discussion or something... but what is the
difference between these 2 branches:
server/branches/2.0
server/branches/2.0.0
?
--jason
On Aug 5, 2007, at 7:48 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
I updated the version number to 2.0 from 2.0-SNAPSHOT. These
artifacts should not be deployed
We probably don't need these built right now.
On Aug 5, 2007, at 6:53 PM, Anita Kulshreshtha wrote:
Isn't this build supposed to be building trunk? If yes, it should
build 2.1-SNAPSHOTs and not 2.0.1-SNAPSHOT? I do not see any point in
building 2.0.1-SNAPSHOTs.
Thanks
Anita
--- [EMAIL
I updated the version number to 2.0 from 2.0-SNAPSHOT. These
artifacts should not be deployed as they have the official 2.0
version number.
Also, updated the versions of many released artifacts to they're
appropriate released version numbers.
We should be about ready to build and start
+1
I'll cut the branch tonight. If there are objections we can always
whack it.
On Aug 3, 2007, at 2:30 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
All,
I think it's time to create a 2.0.0 branch and start to rev-up the
release build process. How do others feel?
From that point on, only must-fix
All,
Please take a peek at the jar files for the txManagr components that
David Jencks had busted out earlier. A tar ball can be found at
http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/txmanager-2.0-rc1/
[ ] +1 Release these binaries
[ ] 0 No opinion
[ ] -1 Do not release these binaries (please
Oops ... here is my +1
Vote will complete at 2330 ET, August 3 2007.
It would be nice to be able to embed comments in the config.xml.
On Jul 31, 2007, at 10:46 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
We used to include a config.xml.original in the var/config
directory. This made it possible to back up to the default
configuration, if config.xml became corrupted. It would
Good point. I think we have the KEYs file in a couple of places.
on people there is: /www/people.apache.org/
./repo/m1-ibiblio-rsync-repository/geronimo/KEYS
./repo/m2-ibiblio-rsync-repository/org/apache/geronimo/KEYS
./repo/m1-ibiblio-rsync-repository/org.apache.xbean/KEYS
+1 ... good job
On Jul 30, 2007, at 10:04 PM, Tim McConnell wrote:
Hi, Please review and vote on the release of the following Geronimo
specs:
-- geronimo-jacc_1.1_spec-1.0
-- geronimo-jsp_2.1_spec-1.0
-- geronimo-servlet_2.5_spec-1.1
The corresponding tar files are here:
Please review and vote on the Genesis release of 1.2. At this
location you will find a tar ball with the repository and related
artifacts that will be released.
http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/genesis-rc1
Branch with source is at https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/
All,
It looks like we're winding down and readying for the 2.0 release
that is long awaited. I've been working on something at work for the
last week that has kept me a little distracted from G so apologies if
I missed something in a thread.
There are lots of supporting elements that
I agree...the current profiles work. Lots of things to do but let's
push this one out. Jason, are you up settin it on fire or prefer
someone else do the honors.?
If you want I can prolly spin a release up tomorrow sometime.
On Jul 28, 2007, at 8:43 AM, Jason Dillon wrote:
Just a quick
The staging profile ... yes.
On Jul 28, 2007, at 9:52 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I will spin it. Still wondering if anyone is using the release
profile... Can't tell from your response. Are you using it?
--jason
-Original Message-
From: Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat
/GERONIMO-3353
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Task
Security Level: public (Regular issues)
Reporter: Matt Hogstrom
Assignee: Matt Hogstrom
Fix For: 2.0
The title says it all.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You
I'm looking at it Chris.
On Jul 25, 2007, at 10:57 PM, Christopher Blythe wrote:
I was working on DayTrader 2.0 when I found that the resetTrade
method for all of the runtime modes (with the exception of Direct
mode) would fail. I went back and deploy DayTrader 1.2 on GMO 2.0
and noticed
Most excellent. We should probably talk about deprecating the EJB
2.1 stuff in DT 2.1 and leave it behind. For 2.0 using it to allow a
baseline for transition makes sense. Work for you ?
On Jul 25, 2007, at 11:59 AM, Christopher Blythe wrote:
All,
As it currently stands, DayTrader 2.0
On Jul 25, 2007, at 12:58 PM, Christopher Blythe wrote:
Matt...
Just sent out an email about that... I think I may be leaning
towards removing it ASAP. Let me know what you think...
I'd like to leave it in. Geronimo had such poor CMP performance on
1.1.1 I think that the comparison
On Jul 25, 2007, at 12:56 PM, Christopher Blythe wrote:
I think I'm swaying more towards option 1.
Ok, I like that option. I wouldn't worry about daytrader release
relative to Geronimo if that was your concern about time. If we
rlelease DT 2.0 a month later it won't kill us. We
Security Level: public (Regular issues)
Reporter: Matt Hogstrom
Fix For: 2.0
Using DayTrader 2.0 if you deploy the app.
Create the tables and populate them
Log in and do a few trans
Undeploy the app
Deploy the app
We get an out of memory error in permgen space.
Here
I am deploying the 2.1-SNAPSHOT from trunk this morning and while
verifying the file permissions I noticed the old -Mn SNAPSHOTs. If
no one has any objections I'll clean up all SNAPSHOTs up to (and not
including) M6 to be a little more efficient on space.
Let me know if you object or have
I completed the branch for 2.0 this morning and you can find it in
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/branches/2.0.0
Trunk poms have been updated to 2.1-SNAPSHOT and the bootstrap,
applications and configs have been published to the Maven SNAPSHOT repo.
go for it
On Jul 22, 2007, at 1:48 PM, David Jencks wrote:
I noticed all the keys (except portOffset) in config-
substitions.properties start with Plan which seems redundant
obvious and confusing.
Anyone object if I remove this prefix?
e.g. instead of
PlanServerHostname=0.0.0.0
No objections from me.
On Jul 19, 2007, at 6:30 AM, Jason Dillon wrote:
I've mentioned this a few times before...
I think we should move the STATUS file up to the top-level geronimo
dir. As in:
svn mv http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/trunk/STATUS
I think I would like to branch on Monday. I'll put out a notice.
On Jul 19, 2007, at 10:42 AM, Donald Woods wrote:
Are we still thinking July 30th to create the branch, or does it
need to be done sooner for a August 3rd release target?
-Donald
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
I saw a note from Gianny
Its about that time to liberate trunk from the lethargy of waiting
for 2.0 to ship and I propose that we branch on Monday morning around
0900 Eastern time. This will make trunk 2.1-SNAPSHOT and I'll copy
trunk to branches/2.0.0
I spect we'll start CTS at that time.
I'll put out a
Just to make sure that we were not having the same issues on 2.0
retested on trunk with Session Direct mode on DayTrader 2.0-SNAPSHOT
and we are not having the concurrent modification exception. Just a
datapoint.
101 - 200 of 2122 matches
Mail list logo
