Thanks to all that have provided input. For those that haven't had a
chance please take a few minutes to review the board report and
update with your input.
http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxPMGT/apache-geronimo-board-report-2007-07-
july.html
I'll wrap this up and send to the board sometime
I have something that came up that I need to attend to. In order to
ensure that we have our report in on time I'm going to send the
following to the Board @ rather than later this evening. If someone
has something that they really want in there I'll be happy to amend
the report.
+1
On Jul 16, 2007, at 7:27 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
Axis2 encountered a javamail bug in the the spec code almost
immediately after the 1.0 version was released, so we needed to
spin a new release of the javamail artifacts. This will also
require a new released of the provider and mail
On Jul 16, 2007, at 3:17 AM, Jason Dillon wrote:
Why in bin/* ?
Only cause they are related to scripts.
Apache Geronimo Board Report for July 2007
The Apache Geronimo Project has completed a certified Java EE 5.0
compliant stack in release 2.0-M6-rc1. This is not the official 2.0
release but demonstrates that we have an implementation that passes
the grueling demands of the Java EE 5.0
Yup.
In my testing CMP mode as well as JDBC mode was working fine. The
new runtime Mode Chris had added to DayTrader was failing. The
problem manifested itself in two different ways. One manifestation I
saw was an exhaustion of the connection pool and a flurry of
connection timeouts.
On Jul 13, 2007, at 8:13 PM, Jeff Genender wrote:
Does that make me Marc of geronimo? ;-)
You mean because we automatically discount what you say? :)
I like the idea a lot. How would this work mechanically? Are you
thinking of $G/bin/rc.d/ ?
If so, the convention of prepending script names with a numbered
prefix to help with ordering would useful to start with as well.
Great idea.
On Jul 13, 2007, at 7:04 PM, Jeff Genender wrote:
I saw a note from Gianny this morning about WADI and making a
versioned release. His comment was that he could make ait available
a few days ahead of time. So I guess that beg's the question when
will we release. I thought I'd summarize my thoughts and solicit
input from folks.
Since
Please take a few minutes to visit the Wiki and fill in board report
which is due next week. I'll take the contents and finalize it on
Monday around 1700 ET and send it to the board. Thanks for your help
http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxPMGT/apache-geronimo-board-report-2007-07-
july.html
On Jul 11, 2007, at 12:24 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
If some people could review, that would be great.
on the Active-IO question there is some coding work to be done.
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2944
All of the OpenEJB mods should be AL 2.0 but it sounds like there is
Security Level: public (Regular issues)
Affects Versions: 2.0-M7
Environment: All
Reporter: Matt Hogstrom
Assignee: Kevan Miller
I deployed DayTrader 2.0 on the latest SVN rev 554753 of trunk.
I deploy daytrader-ear-2.0-SNAPSHOT.ear (using the
daytrader-g
Security Level: public (Regular issues)
Affects Versions: 2.0-M7
Environment: All
Reporter: Matt Hogstrom
Assignee: Tim McConnell
DayTrader 2.0 uses a Session Bean that acts as a focal point for many
application operations. This bean does a lookup
+1
On Jul 10, 2007, at 9:30 AM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
The activation and stax specs had almost passed the vote the first
time around. It got dinged on missing scm section in the poms. I have
fixed it now and am resubmitting them for a vote.
Please review the specifications located at
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3304?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12511497
]
Matt Hogstrom commented on GERONIMO-3304:
-
You might look at DayTrader as it has jboss DDs in it. Look
Hi everyone,
For those that are not subscribed to [EMAIL PROTECTED] there is a
discussion in progress about the current state of the Open Letter to
Sun that Apache put out in the public a few months ago.
The discussion is centered around Apache's participation in the Java
Community
Seems like the dev list has been a bit quiet lately as I know many
folks have been working on getting 2.0 done and through some
additional testing for Axis, fit and finish stuff, etc. Although
important, its not exactly the next generation so I thought I'd start
this thread to get some
org/apache/axis2 (3M)
org/apache/cxf (2M) is new.
Isn't Axis 1 piece parts required regardless its just CXF / Axis 2?
Wasn't sure if the Axis2 above included the 1 parts.
I know this is ugly but should we consider splitting the assembly
further based on the webservices ? Just
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3265?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12509329
]
Matt Hogstrom commented on GERONIMO-3265:
-
I agree with the approach Paul. Suggestions on solving
?key=pZVJhnHN3LjuF5FjgmXnrRQ
This can be tuned further.
Cheers
Prasad
On 6/27/07, Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jun 26, 2007, at 10:57 PM, Jay D. McHugh wrote:
In order to (hopefully) simplify finding where the increase in
footprint size comes from, I made a new page on the wiki
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: public (Regular issues)
Environment: All
Reporter: Matt Hogstrom
Assignee: Dain Sundstrom
Fix For: 2.0-M7
DayTrader 1.2 deploy's correctly on 2.0 but when an attempt to execute a
SessionBean is tried a JNDI lookup
On Jun 26, 2007, at 10:57 PM, Jay D. McHugh wrote:
In order to (hopefully) simplify finding where the increase in
footprint size comes from, I made a new page on the wiki:
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/TOw
Jay
Jay, this is excellent. Clearly the pesky repository is a major
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3240?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12508708
]
Matt Hogstrom commented on GERONIMO-3240:
-
What do you mean the driver works properly? sounds like a bad
On Jun 21, 2007, at 8:49 PM, Jay D. McHugh wrote:
Has anyone checked to see if the ConcurrentModificationException
that blocked 1.2 is affecting 2.0?
On the list...
I've recreated the environment but I'm getting a connection error
where we run out of connections. I owe this to Dain and
I think everyone knows Jay and I have the honor of announcing that he
recently accepted an invitation to join the Apache Geronimo project.
Jay has been working with Geronimo for several months now and is one
of those folks that brings a great perspective of someone who not
only works on
Most excellent...on the big board. Good job everyone !
On Jun 20, 2007, at 10:39 AM, Jeff Genender wrote:
Hi,
I wanted to extend a hearty congrats out to our community for
helping to
get Geronimo fully JavaEE5 certified.
We are now on Sun's compatibility page:
We've gone through the CTS grind and came out victorious http://
java.sun.com/javaee/overview/compatibility.jsp
OpenEJB has moved to TopLevel and CXF has certified and Axis 2 is
working that way too.
All in all its been an excellent six months.
So, what are we going to do for 2.0 and
13 +1's (including an implicit one by me)
I copied the files to the dist dir last night. We should updated the
web site and download pages. Hernan, can you give that a go ?
Thanks!
On Jun 11, 2007, at 10:59 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
I think I've narrowed the problem on the rebuild. When
FYI
Begin forwarded message:
From: J Aaron Farr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: June 15, 2007 5:36:33 AM EDT
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Call for Papers Opens for OS Summit Asia 2007
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Call for Papers Opens for OS Summit Asia 2007
The call for papers
Lately I've been working with users in debugging various application
problems. Some of the problems are merely configuration but others
are deeper application / infrastructure problems. Regardless of the
type of problem I've never personally been satisfied with the
diagnostic information
+1 ...
On Jun 13, 2007, at 5:13 PM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
Please review the specifications located at
http://people.apache.org/~prasad/specs_rc2
The only changes that were made to the binaries that passed a vote
over the past weekend was to add the scm section to the pom.xml.
I have dropped
+1
On Jun 12, 2007, at 11:03 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
Please review the javamail specifications located at http://
people.apache.org/~prasad/specs_rc1/
The files in question are geronimo-javamail_1.4_spec-1.0.tar.gz
http://people.apache.org/%7Eprasad/specs_rc1/geronimo-
.
Rick
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Lately I've been working with users in debugging various
application problems. Some of the problems are merely
configuration but others are deeper application / infrastructure
problems. Regardless of the type of problem I've never personally
been satisfied
On Jun 14, 2007, at 10:51 AM, Paul McMahan wrote:
I like your ideas! Thanks for bringing up this important topic.
One of my pet peeves in debugging geronimo apps is when I'm trying
to step through a gbean call but the debugger doesn't have the
source available since cglib has
CXF is looking to cut their release starting on Friday and they need
the WS-MetaData spec. Originally this was approved except it was
missing the SCM tag. Prasad added that but this puts this particular
spec being released after their date. It would be really helpful if
we could approve
On Jun 14, 2007, at 2:22 PM, David Jencks wrote:
I don't understand the release process for specs to tell what is
going on, however there is no https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/
geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-ws-metadata_2.0_spec-1.1.1 (what i'd
expect a 1.1.1 to be under) nor a
I'd prefer to let M6 fly as it will be obsolete in about a month.
Its a lot of work to respin for this IMHO.
On Jun 14, 2007, at 5:19 PM, Jacek Laskowski wrote:
Hi,
In the course of just spot it I found that DISCLAIMER.txt listed
OpenEJB and OpenJPA as incubating projects. As I understand
I am going to release Deployment as it passed with all +1's The
other specs either had issues or were dependent on specs that had
issues so I'll spin up a new vote for them.
Thanks for your critical eyes.
On Jun 8, 2007, at 5:43 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Please review the specifications
I have made changes to the Servlet specification by replacing the web-
app_2_5.xsd as well as the web-app_2_2.dtd files with clean room
implementations. This is a heads up. Let's allow these to bake for
a few days and then we'll release these and be done with any IP issues.
Hi Filip,
Like Ragu, its in there. Looks like Prasad provided the tar ball of
the artifacts as they'd reside in the Maven Repo:
geronimo-j2ee-management_1.1_spec-1.0/
geronimo-j2ee-management_1.1_spec-1.0/org/
geronimo-j2ee-management_1.1_spec-1.0/org/apache/
Looks like we have all the input we're going to get for 2.0-M6. I'm
cutting the release binaries today to start a vote. I'll be calling
it -rc2 so as not to be confused with 2.0-M6-rc1 which was the first
release to pass CTS.
Look for the binaries and thanks for the input / help.
I'll get to it later this week after sorting through the
other issues raised by folks on the current specs.
Rick
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Please review the specifications located at http://
people.apache.org/~hogstrom/specs-rc1/
We are voting these in a block. Failures will be removed from
The title says it all...
You can peruse these at http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/2.0-M6-rc2
[ ] +1 for to release
[ ] 0 to abstain
[ ] -1 don't release (please provide reason)
This vote will conclude on Thursday June 14th at 1500.
Scrap these...rc3 is coming...the double copying of versions is back.
On Jun 11, 2007, at 3:06 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
The title says it all...
You can peruse these at http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/2.0-M6-rc2
[ ] +1 for to release
[ ] 0 to abstain
[ ] -1 don't release (please
I think I've narrowed the problem on the rebuild. When building from
the top-level it seems we pick up more cars than we want. If I build
local in the assemblies dir then things seem to be scoped correctly.
Something odd with Maven and / or how were using it.
The binaries are uploading
Oh yeah...here is my +1
On Jun 8, 2007, at 5:43 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Please review the specifications located at http://
people.apache.org/~hogstrom/specs-rc1/
We are voting these in a block. Failures will be removed from the
block and others will proceed forward.
Voting concludes
+1
On Jun 8, 2007, at 11:06 PM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
Please review the specifications located at
http://people.apache.org/~prasad/specs_rc1/
We are voting these in a block. Failures will be removed from the
block and others will proceed forward.
Voting concludes on Monday, June 11th at
Please review the specifications located at http://people.apache.org/
~hogstrom/specs-rc1/
We are voting these in a block. Failures will be removed from the
block and others will proceed forward.
Voting concludes on Monday, June 11th at 1800 ET.
Thanks
I am putting together a list of specs that need to be released. I am
planning on taking the current SNAPSHOTs in Geronimo and putting them
up for individual votes. Not to worry, if they change we can release
another one but this will reduce the clutter and help out some o f
our brethern
Point taken :)
On Jun 7, 2007, at 12:48 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
Please double check that all dependencies of the specs are marked
as provided before spinning the release.
-dain
On Jun 7, 2007, at 8:36 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
I am putting together a list of specs that need
Cool shtuffes ... your a busy beaver.
On Jun 7, 2007, at 6:52 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
So, I hacked up something in the latest 1.0-beta-2-SNAPSHOT of the
selenium-maven-plugin. Its deployed, and some site docs updated.
http://mojo.codehaus.org/selenium-maven-plugin/examples/
That would be excellent...wanna divide and conquer ?
On Jun 7, 2007, at 4:44 PM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
Matt,
If you need any help in releasing them, please let me know. Anything
you need - building them, cross checking,etc.
Cheers
Prasad
On 6/7/07, Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
Thanks Hernan!
Looks like were about there. Let's get a good thrashing on these
notes so everyone take a look :-)
Thanks!
On Jun 1, 2007, at 5:57 PM, Hernan Cunico wrote:
Alright, here is the template for the release notes.
Need your input on the significant changes for this milestone
Environment: All
Reporter: Matt Hogstrom
Assignee: Matt Hogstrom
Fix For: 2.0-M6
Created new 2.0-M6 branch.
svn cp https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/trunk
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/branches/2.0-M6
Committed revision 543874
In getting 2.0-M6 ready I realizaed that I left a bunch of 2.0-M5
stuff out there. Just a heads up that I'll be cleaning that up today
and tomorrow. If your ambitious and would like to clean up your
JIRA's that would be excellent. Otherwise, I'll be putting out some
e-mails.
Thanks
Created the 2.0-M6 branch this morning from trunk. Got sidetracked
on Saturday with a few personal errands. I'll be updating rev
numbers and publishing SNAPS this morning.
svn cp https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/trunk https://
David, thanks for fixing this...I'm updating now :)
On Jun 1, 2007, at 5:14 AM, David Jencks wrote:
I got daytrader to deploy to the tomcat server w/rev 543434. I
didn't check that very much worked though.
thanks
david jencks
On May 31, 2007, at 6:41 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Shiva, we're
Crawling is good before running. Sounds excellent.
On Jun 1, 2007, at 4:42 PM, sharrissf wrote:
First cut will almost certainly be for session clustering. We have
a whole
list of other stuff
that we want to do but we want to get our feet wet first.
jgenender wrote:
I think there
I like Kevan's suggestion. We ship the assemblies we normally build.
On Jun 1, 2007, at 8:28 PM, Gianny Damour wrote:
On 01/06/2007, at 3:56 AM, David Jencks wrote:
On May 31, 2007, at 9:53 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
There has been lots of work going on to get Geronimo 2.0
certified
There has been lots of work going on to get Geronimo 2.0 certified
and it seems like the light at the end of the tunnel is not an
oncoming train but the other side :) With that we're also at the
point of cutting a milestone since we're at the end of May. Given
that all possible
Shiva, we're still working through some deployment issues with
Geronimo and DT 2.0. It doesn't work yet but help is welcome :)
On May 28, 2007, at 11:27 AM, Shiva Kumar H R wrote:
After building Daytrader from http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/
geronimo/daytrader/trunk I tried deploying it
Probably worth a re-packaging on an official release in the future.
On May 29, 2007, at 1:48 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
It is a bug that Maven inherited from Ant 1.6
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28776
I'm not sure there is much we can do other then re-tar/checksum/
I see your commit on the 29th...do you not see it?
On May 29, 2007, at 12:25 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
I just noticed that the following directories under our svn repo do
not generate notifications to the [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing
list -
SuSE 10.2 has problems with the IBM JDK. Don helped me out with a
fix to glibc. You'll get a message indicating Failed to start VM.
Just a heads up.
On May 29, 2007, at 12:39 PM, Anita Kulshreshtha wrote:
Don,
I wiped out 9.2 and installed 10.2. I do not have any details other
than
For those that are in the Bay area attending JavaOne or just live in
the area that are interested some of the Geronimo developers are
hanging out at the W located at
181 3rd Street · San Francisco, California 94103 · United States
No guarantees who will be there when but thought picking a
I changed the format of the Server startup completed in nn seconds.
To not be an integer but show 3 digits of precision. It was useful
for me in some timing tests. If no one objects I'd like to leave it in.
Committed revision 535697
I concur...if there are no objections by the end of the week I'll
delete it.
On May 3, 2007, at 2:41 AM, Jason Dillon wrote:
m4 never got cooked fully, which is why the branch is still there.
it was decided to just move on to m5 due to problems with the m4
branch. The branch should
On May 4, 2007, at 9:44 AM, Donald Woods wrote:
I like instances/template and instances/default, as it maps to
how some other app servers use domains for their instances
directory
Also, has the geronimo-maven-plugin been updated to handle this
change?
This sounds reasnaonable
Sounds like a great idea. One item to remember is that not all folks
can be there so make sure that you post back to the dev list about
what y'all discuss. And the invitation should be open to anyone that
is interested so all community members (commiters, users, etc.) that
can make it
I did some profiling of DayTrader deploy (which takes almost 60
seconds) to understand what is taking so long. It appears that we
spend a significant amount of time MultiParentClassLoader.loadClass
(). We've been in here before and added some code to direct requests
for specific class
The vote has concluded.
15 +1 Votes (counting mine which I forgot to put in the thread)
1 +0Vote
I'll pop the binaries out later today. Hernan, would you do the
honors on the site page tomorrow after they've had time to percolate?
Thanks all.
On Apr 26, 2007, at 8:38 AM, Matt Hogstrom
These will be released tonight / tomorrow but you can get M5 from
here now
http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/2.0-M5-rc1/
On Apr 29, 2007, at 7:25 PM, kalyan (JIRA) wrote:
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3122?
Welcome Gert !
On Apr 27, 2007, at 8:50 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
Gert has accepted the PPMC invitation to become a committer on
ServiceMix.
Congratulations and welcome aboard Gert !
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
Principal Engineer, IONA
Blog:
I'd for for a name like servers for instance. Or, since space is
not a concern how about
thisIsWhereTheServerInstanceDataIsLocatedIfYourLookingForIt
On Apr 27, 2007, at 8:07 AM, Anita Kulshreshtha wrote:
--- Anita Kulshreshtha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From a discussion in another
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Here is a question to ponder. Would anyone object if I simply
made these binaries available from people as a monthly unstable
release? Given the amount of time it takes to spin this up and
vote I'd rather just pick an svn version and make it available.
I think it burns
The 2.0-M5 binaries are available at http://people.apache.org/
~hogstrom/2.0-M5-rc1
The binaries addressed a problem seen in 2.0-M4 which was
subsequently scrubbed where 2.0-Mn and 2.0-Mn-SNAPSHOT binaries were
included. Building with a clean repo has resolved that issue.
It is possible
Starting DISCUSS thread if necessary for this release.
I have to go back and see the directory layout your proposing. I
didn't see a specific proposal in the JIRA so if I'm covering
existing ground my apologies.
How about for purposes of this discussion:
$G == GERONIMO_HOME
We organize servers by default as:
$G/var/servers/geronimo01/config
On Apr 26, 2007, at 8:43 AM, Anita Kulshreshtha wrote:
--- Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have to go back and see the directory layout your proposing. I
iki.apache.org/GMOxDOC20/running-multiple-instances-of-geronimo.html
didn't see a specific proposal in the JIRA
Some
On Apr 26, 2007, at 9:17 AM, Donald Woods wrote:
Can't we just reorganize the existing layout to be a simpler -
GHOME/instances/template/var/...
GHOME/instances/template/deploy/
GHOME/instances/default/var/...
GHOME/instances/default/deploy/
where instances could be a word we all vote
On Apr 26, 2007, at 12:37 PM, Paul McMahan wrote:
This may be related to the changes made in https://
issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3051. It seems that there
are some classloader related problems with the sql tags in jstl.
After trying out the M5 release candidate just now I
of people's time to follow the release process. Simply pop out
the binary, let people play with it and if things are broken there is
always trunk. Perhaps we could move to a weekly unstable.
Anyway, I'd like some thoughts on this.
On Apr 26, 2007, at 2:39 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Starting
Thanks Rick ... I figured it must be some remnant. Cheers.
On Apr 25, 2007, at 7:03 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
I was doing a build of 2.0-M5 last night with the IBM VM. I got
the following compile errors on CORBA. Rick, does this make
sense? Its late so I haven't
I'll look later today.
On Apr 24, 2007, at 2:05 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
Just noticed when I transferred a Feature from the Geronimo JIRA
over to the DayTrader JIRA, that it is still using the RTC Workflow.
Status (Workflow) Open (jira)Open (RTC Workflow)
Can someone fix
I'll be cutting a branch from trunk tonight to do an M5 spin up.
Just a followup from the note a few days ago . Hernan, any chance
you can spin up some release notes?
Also, if folks can look at their JIRAS and close the ones on M5 or
move them to M6 that would be great.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3060?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Matt Hogstrom reassigned GERONIMO-3060:
---
Assignee: Matt Hogstrom (was: Jay D. McHugh)
Add a separate tree branch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3060?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Matt Hogstrom updated GERONIMO-3060:
Affects Version/s: (was: 2.0-M6)
2.0-M5
Will apply
I created the branch and built 2.0-M5-SNAPSHOT
Geronimo was at svn: 532162
OpenEJB was at svn: 532177
I'll do some testing in the morning.
If we can add some release notes, and any candy we need I'll build a
release for vote tomorrow sometime.
I was doing a build of 2.0-M5 last night with the IBM VM. I got the
following compile errors on CORBA. Rick, does this make sense? Its
late so I haven't thought about it but thought you might be up
earlier than me :) This was with IBM 5.0 JDK for Linux.
[INFO] Building Geronimo ::
10 +1 votes and no 0, or -1's
On Apr 18, 2007, at 12:22 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Please review and vote on the binaries for geronimo-ws-
metadata_2.0_spec-1.2. the binaries can be seen in:
http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/spec-rc1
[ ] +1 Release these binaries
[ ] 0
[ ] -1 Do
I would like to take a cut of our branch on Tuesday evening and spin
up an M5. I know were cranking on certification but given the crash
and burn on M4 I think this is really important to iron out any
issues waiting for us as we move towards a 2.0 release. I'd like to
solicit your
+1 vote - 10
0 vote - 1
On Apr 18, 2007, at 12:23 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Please review and vote on the binaries for geronimo-
jta_1.1_spec-1.1. the binaries can be seen in:
http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/spec-rc1
[ ] +1 Release these binaries
[ ] 0
[ ] -1 Do not release
+1 vote:12
No other votes cast.
On Apr 18, 2007, at 12:23 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Please review and vote on the binaries for geronimo-
annotation_1.0_spec-1.1. the binaries can be seen in:
http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/spec-rc1
[ ] +1 Release these binaries
[ ] 0
[ ] -1 Do
+1 vote:9
0 vote: 1
On Apr 18, 2007, at 12:22 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Please review and vote on the binaries for geronimo-
jpa_3.0_spec-1.1. the binaries can be seen in:
http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/spec-rc1
[ ] +1 Release these binaries
[ ] 0
[ ] -1 Do not release
Ignore this vote...simply ammended the subject for those who might be
crawling through e-mail looking for [RESULT]
On Apr 23, 2007, at 10:41 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
+1 vote:12
No other votes cast.
On Apr 18, 2007, at 12:23 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Please review and vote
, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Please review and vote on the binaries for geronimo-stax-
api_1.0_spec-1.0. the binaries can be seen in:
http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/spec-rc1
[ ] +1 Release these binaries
[ ] 0
[ ] -1 Do not release these binaries
This vote will conclude Saturday April 21 at 1300
Yesterday I updated OpenEJB and Geronimo to use new SNAPSHOTs of
specifications for JPA, Annotation, JTA and ws-metadata. I published
the openejb artifacts to the M2 repo. You should svn up on G and do
a rebuild.
Some good points. See inline
On Apr 18, 2007, at 4:36 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
Is this not a disaster waiting to happen?
Isn't everything we do a disaster waiting to happen :)
Do we really need to include this package just for usage by the
following?
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3107?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Matt Hogstrom updated GERONIMO-3107:
Assignee: Matt Hogstrom (was: David Jencks)
PersistenceUnits getting processed more
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3107?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Matt Hogstrom closed GERONIMO-3107.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Applied the patch. Swizzled the patch a little to only add a PU
201 - 300 of 2122 matches
Mail list logo
