Thanks Ken.
Thanks and Congrats Matt for agreeing to shoulder this huge responsibility.
Cheers
Prasad
On 11/16/06, Jeff Genender [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would like to offer some important news:
We have just had a changing of the guard for Geronimo.
[ANNOUNCE and THANK YOU]
Ken Coar has
On 11/16/06, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What is the branch going to be? I hope that we will branch trunk into
branches/1.2 and then update trunk to 2.0-SNAPSHOT.
If we use svk to facilitate merges on a timely basis then we should
not get much drift between them.
I heard some
Wow ! Seeing dates and milestones has me really motivated.
I'm ready !!!
Cheers
Prasad
On 11/15/06, Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been noodling over our Java EE 5.0 release of Geronimo and had
some ideas I wanted to share.
Given that the J2EE space is highly competitive I would
I saw this when building openejb, I think. I deleted openejb from my
local repo and rebuilt. Error gone.
Cheers
Prasad
On 11/14/06, Sachin Patel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is anyone else hitting the following?
[INFO]
Thanks for these comments, David.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENEJB-302#action_12448245
I'll create an ejbcontainer-testsuite now.
Thanx
Prasad
On 11/4/06, Prasad Kashyap [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David,
Can you please review and apply the patch here -
https://issues.apache.org
I like the idea of branching out 1.2 and making trunk 2.0. It will
bring isolated java EE5 code out of the different people's sandbox. We
can get a headstart on integrating them all together and also getting
our builds and tests to work on jdk 1.5.
(IMO, a sparse tree for Java EE5 won't generate
Good catch. OK. Will rename.
Cheers
Prasad
On 11/7/06, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If getGoalName() is going to return a class name, then I suggest that
getGoalName() be removed or renamed... as these are no longer what I
would expect a call to getGoalName() to return.
--jason
On
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2513?page=all ]
Prasad Kashyap resolved GERONIMO-2513.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Revision 471806
Can't deploy just a plan with geronimo-maven-plugin
David,
Can you please review and apply the patch here -
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENEJB-302
Thanx
Prasad
On 11/3/06, David Blevins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 2, 2006, at 6:30 PM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
OK. Sounds good. o.a.openejb it would be.
The reasons I want
+1
Used it to get openejb2 and specs code. I will miss that quick command now.
Cheers
Prasad
On 11/3/06, Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 2, 2006, at 2:21 PM, Paul McMahan wrote:
I agree that bootstrap has served its purpose and can be eliminated.
Thanks for the work you did
components.xml with a new lifecycle for site
http://people.apache.org/~prasad/components.xml
When I used to run the 'mvn -e -X site' command on the test-deployment
pom (packaging integration-test), it used to fail with the following
exception
[DEBUG] Error looking up lifecycle mapping to
I am going to remove the integration-test packaging that we
introduced for the testsuite framework. By having that custom
packaging, we are seeing the following problems
1) running the site goal on that pom
http://www.nabble.com/Are-these-errors-due-to-changes-in-genesis-logging---tf2562523.html
Nevermind :-)
See
http://www.nabble.com/Removing-the-custom-packaging-%22integration-test%22-tf2564140.html
Cheers
Prasad
On 11/2/06, Prasad Kashyap [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
components.xml with a new lifecycle for site
http://people.apache.org/~prasad/components.xml
When I used to run
it and still
generate the surefire-reports.
Cheers
Prasad
On 11/2/06, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 2, 2006, at 1:37 PM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
I am going to remove the integration-test packaging that we
introduced for the testsuite framework. By having that custom
packaging, we
framework integrated
with the G build.
Cheers
Prasad
On 11/1/06, David Blevins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 31, 2006, at 10:07 AM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
On 10/30/06, David Blevins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 30, 2006, at 7:51 AM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
Thanx. Please see comments
Jason,
I still don't have svn karma. Can you please commit this for us ?
Thanx
Prasad
-- Forwarded message --
From: Prasad Kashyap (JIRA) dev@geronimo.apache.org
Date: Oct 23, 2006 4:01 PM
Subject: [jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-2513) Can't deploy just a plan with
geronimo-maven
On Nov 2, 2006, at 6:14 PM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
Hmmm..
The surefire-report-plugin executes only in the test phase. Since we
are skipping it in our custom packaging, it never gets exeucted. So
any other packaging we do will have the same problem unless we
introduce the 'test' phase.
Now
On 10/30/06, David Blevins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 30, 2006, at 7:51 AM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
Thanx. Please see comments inline -
Couple thoughts on the poms:
- the parent would lineage would be org.apache.openejb:itests -
org.apache.openejb:openejb
- the groupId would
Thanx. Please see comments inline -
Cheers
Prasad
On 10/27/06, David Blevins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, I took look through where you're going and here's a slightly
altered proposal.
We group the tests with the beans as such:
openejb-footests/src/main/# this is where the beans will
, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
Thanx David. I shall try to put it in a sandbox if I can, or else send
you a a patch.
Cheers
Prasad
On 10/23/06, David Blevins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 23, 2006, at 2:34 PM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
I have migrated the openejb-itests module to m2
Committer since Oct 9.
Cheers
Prasad
On 10/27/06, Christopher M. Cardona [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was invited to become a committer last week and I accepted it.
Thanks,
chris
Jeff Genender wrote:
I figured this will get some people's attention.
If you have recently become a committer or
Blevins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 27, 2006, at 7:34 AM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
http://people.apache.org/~prasad/ejb-modules.zip
You may remove the parent from the top level pom and adjust the
groupId appropriately to build this.
Looks like you have the beans in there. Where is the test
Please try now. Sorry 'bout that.
Cheers
Prasad
On 10/27/06, David Blevins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 27, 2006, at 10:20 AM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
I haven't changed the test code at all. It is essentially the same as
it is in the openejb-itests module. Neverthless, here it is.
http
Good write-up Matt. And since we are speaking about guiding principles
and goals, I wish we'd also mention someplace that our server will be
built by parts and can be customizable per the users' needs.
If our geronimo-framework and plugin architecture is what sets us
apart from the others, then
Joe,
I still think the specs from javax are being picked up as a transitive
dependency. Our specs should be from o.a.g.specs groupId. Did you try
the exclusion mechanism at all ?
Cheers
Prasad
On 10/20/06, Joe Bohn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
anita kulshreshtha wrote:
The
I have migrated the openejb-itests module to m2 with the intention of
using it for G's testsuite. The junit test code will have to go under
the ejbcontainer-testsuite under the testsuite framework
(geronimo/testsuite).
The beans and the ejub jars can go just about anywhere. So I'd like
to
Thanx David. I shall try to put it in a sandbox if I can, or else send
you a a patch.
Cheers
Prasad
On 10/23/06, David Blevins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 23, 2006, at 2:34 PM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
I have migrated the openejb-itests module to m2 with the intention of
using it for G's
Thanx Jacek. I might take you up on that offer :-)
Cheers
Prasad
On 10/23/06, Jacek Laskowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/23/06, Prasad Kashyap [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have migrated the openejb-itests module to m2 with the intention of
using it for G's testsuite. The junit test code
I don't think the search order will solve your problem because the
different spec jars are being picked up as transitive dependencies. So
no matter what the search order, those aritfacts will be picked up
since they are listed explicitly as dependencies of your dependencies.
I believe you should
Here's another option. Depending on how much the spec has changed
between 1.1 and 1.2, we could fork jakarta and provide our own
implementation. Just a thought.
Then again, what are the pros and cons of picking up Glassfish ?
Cheers
Prasad
On 10/19/06, Paul McMahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rick,
Here's the Yoko bug I was talking about. I deployed a simple TSSBean
whose POAName attribute is set. It deployed fine. I then undeployed
the plan. That was successfull as well. Now when I go back to redeploy
the same plan, I get an adapter already exists exception. I have
attached both the
Congratulations Chris !
Cheers
Prasad
On 10/18/06, Paul McMahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Congrats Chris!!
Paul
On 10/18/06, Gianny Damour [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
The Geronimo PMC is pleased to announce that Christopher M. Cardona
has recently accepted our invitation to become an
Hey Vamsi,
Congrats !
Cheers
Prasad
On 10/18/06, Paul McMahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Congrats Vamsi!
Paul
On 10/18/06, Alan Cabrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Geronimo PMC is pleased to announce that Vamsavardhana Reddy has
recently accepted our invitation to become an Apache
Just FYI -
This issue has now been resolved. I did a build with a fully clean
repo and source again. That fixed it. The NPE bug around like 693 of
the current TranqlCmpSchemaBuilder.java still exists. Where do I
open the JIRA and submit the patch ?
Cheers
Prasad
On 10/12/06, Prasad Kashyap
the previously
mentioned error with the plan (wrong ns and xsd).
Cheers
Prasad
On 10/12/06, David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 12, 2006, at 1:27 PM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
My efforts in deploying the openejb-itests.jar with the attached plan
is failing b'coz of some errors in the plan
, clustering etc.
Cheers
Prasad
On 10/11/06, Jacek Laskowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/11/06, Prasad Kashyap [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David,
Thanks for that write-up on the openejb itests. It helped me
understand the structure better.
All the client code (in src/itests) have a dependency
comments and/or concerns.
I still have to fix a few plans to work with our version 1.2.
Thanx
Prasad
On 10/6/06, David Blevins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Don't know if I have the best answers, but I'll i'll try my best...
On Oct 5, 2006, at 8:21 PM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
Can someone please shed some
Hi Anita,
The clover plugin is used to get test coverage on our modules. Eg:
http://geronimo.apache.org/maven/server/modules/geronimo-activation/clover/index.html
But I don't see the maven-clover-plugin being executed along with the
other reports in the genesis' project-config. I don't know
Here is an excerpt from the log file of a maven build. Hope this helps.
The dir-list.txt gives the contents of the itests/target dir after the
ejb archives are created but before the geronimo binary is unpacked.
Cheers
Prasad
On 10/5/06, Prasad Kashyap [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am looking
I am looking at migrating the openejb-itests to the new testsuite framework.
I already have the plan migrated to the 1.1 format. However I have
some questions regarding the way the classes for the ejb jars are set
up and the classes for tests. Can someone please shed some light on it
and help me
Whoooh Jason
Congrats !
Cheers
Prasad
On 10/2/06, Joe Bohn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Congratulations Jason!
Kevan Miller wrote:
All,
The Geronimo PMC is pleased to welcome Jason Dillon as the newest
member of the Geronimo PMC. We're very happy to have Jason joining us
to help
Congrats Hiram !
Cheers
Prasad
On 10/2/06, Joe Bohn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Congratulations Hiram!
Kevan Miller wrote:
All,
The Geronimo PMC is pleased to welcome Hiram Chirino as the newest
member of the Geronimo PMC. We're very happy to have Hiram joining us
to help with the oversight
some real tests now. I'll start working on one so that it
could serve as an example for others to write their own.
Cheers
Prasad
On 9/28/06, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sep 27, 2006, at 8:40 PM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
Build flow (for a given *-testsuite), probably ends up something like
+1
We should change the schema such that the conditions are neatly
presented, more like in a xml format than like in java code style. The
condition string value has the potential to become a very long string
and thus difficult to read.
module
A good compromise. Also, good for a start. Let's do this.
Cheers
Prasad
On 10/2/06, Dain Sundstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How about we split them into j2ee 1.4, j2ee 1.5 and independent
modules for the non j2ee specs? This will prevent the flux from the
1.5 development from causing lots of
I was thinking about migrating the old openejb itests
(openejb2/modules/openejb-itest) to the new testsuite framework. Since
they were already used by us for quite some time, I thought they might
make a real good example testsuite for the ejb container
(ejbcontainer-testsuite).
In the maven1
Level: public (Regular issues)
Components: buildsystem
Affects Versions: 1.2
Reporter: Prasad Kashyap
Assigned To: Jason Dillon
Fix For: 1.2
Creating a new packaging for the geronimo-packaging-plugin.
The new package name will be called integration
I had to use the following line in configs/client pom.xml to get it to build
For the openejb-core dependency -
version2.2-incubating-SNAPSHOT/version
Do I have something screwed up ?
Cheers
Prasad.
On 9/28/06, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can publish the G bits once I get it to
In fact, I had to use that version to all configs that depended on openejb-*.
version2.2-incubating-SNAPSHOT/version
Cheers
Prasad
On 9/28/06, Prasad Kashyap [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I had to use the following line in configs/client pom.xml to get it to build
For the openejb-core dependency
and
stop-server be also executed ?
Cheers
Prasad
On 9/28/06, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sep 27, 2006, at 8:40 PM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
Custom packaging or lifecycle phase bindings
-
The geronimo-maven-plugin (g-m-p
, 2006, at 3:01 PM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
The selenium tests on windows blocks. Firefox does not open.
I now have 5 java processes running.
[INFO] ---
[INFO] T E S T S
[INFO] ---
[INFO
Security Level: public (Regular issues)
Components: deployment
Affects Versions: 1.1.x, 1.2
Reporter: Prasad Kashyap
Assigned To: Aaron Mulder
Fix For: 1.2
After an undeploy, it's entry is left behind in the config.xml with a
load=false
Let me try to articulate my vision of the multi-module setup under
testsuite. If my understanding is off base, please feel free to show
me the bigger picture.
- testsuite/
|
| - - - console-testsuite/
| |
| | - - - pom.xml
| |
| | - - - src/test/java/...
|
| - - -
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2419?page=all ]
Prasad Kashyap updated GERONIMO-2419:
-
Attachment: reporters.patch
Patch: reporters.patch
introduces #logOutput and #reporters config option.
introduces an interface IReporter.java
There have been a lot of threads lately about how the bootstrap is
failing. A single bootstrap execution no longer does the trick. We
have to do a step by step execution, switching jdk in the process.
This has become more painful.
We should publish the specs and remove it from the bootstrap
Thanx Jacek.
We should then manually publish the specs and still remove it from
bootstrap. It is stil a hassle free for a large number of users.
Cheers
Prasad
On 9/26/06, Jacek Laskowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/26/06, Prasad Kashyap [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can this please be done
was going to try an example build using version ranges.
I'm still leaning towards one version for them all... but this needs
to be resolved before we can release them.
--jason
On Sep 26, 2006, at 11:41 AM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
Thanx Jacek.
We should then manually publish the specs and still
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2419?page=comments#action_12437938
]
Prasad Kashyap commented on GERONIMO-2419:
--
Naah, m2 doesn't require it. I just picked a name. Don't care if you want to
change it.
Log the output
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2426?page=all ]
Prasad Kashyap updated GERONIMO-2426:
-
Attachment: site-docs.patch
site-docs.patch
Introduces usage-for-modules.apt
Site docs, javadocs for the geronimo-maven-plugin
: public (Regular issues)
Components: buildsystem
Reporter: Prasad Kashyap
Fix For: 1.2
Attachments: site-docs.patch
Use this JIRA to update the site docs and javadocs for the
geronimo-maven-plugin.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA
:
I think I've fixed this, please verify.
I included a properties file in the correct location with some basic
instructions and no entries. Does this seem reasonable?
thanks
david jencks
On Sep 20, 2006, at 1:29 PM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
While trying to run a server that I built from trunk
Yayy... Congrats Paul !!
Cheers
Prasad
On 9/21/06, Gianny Damour [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Congratulations Paul!
Gianny
On 22/09/2006, at 7:23 AM, David Jencks wrote:
All,
The Geronimo PMC is pleased to welcome Paul McMahan as the newest
member of the Geronimo PMC. We're very happy to
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2419?page=all ]
Prasad Kashyap updated GERONIMO-2419:
-
Attachment: xmlReporter.patch
log-startServer.patch
Patches:
xmlReporter.patch -- apply from root of genesis project
not fully
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2419?page=all ]
Prasad Kashyap updated GERONIMO-2419:
-
Patch Info: [Patch Available]
Log the output of the executions from the geronimo-maven-plugin goals
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2419?page=all ]
Prasad Kashyap updated GERONIMO-2419:
-
Attachment: log-allGoals.patch
Patch: log-allGoals.patch
This patch replaces the previous log-StartServer.patch.
I have had to trap
While trying to run a server that I built from trunk, I get the
following exception
Booting Geronimo Kernel (in Java 1.4.2_10)...
16:33:58,566 ERROR [GBeanInstanceState] Error while starting; GBean is now in
the FAILED state:
Kevan, Jason, Blevins, et al,
Thanks for your constructive feedback and comments. You are right. The
issue is not about the type of changes Jason mentioned. Those don't
warrant a JIRA. Jason recently strenghtened the protection and privacy
on some methods. It would be ridiculous to expect him to
The week has begun with quite a few build errors.
specs:
--
Four specs have moved up to Java 1.5. They are
interceptor, EJB 3.0, JPA1.0, and Annotation.
So invoking a single bootstrap command with jdk 1.4 as default fails.
openejb2:
-
Missing:
1)
As we move back towards CTR, can we please adopt the practice of using
a JIRA for every code change we make, however small the code change
may be.
Since we have assumed the responsibility of providing good
documentation/discussion with all code changes, a JIRA provides that
crucial link between
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2359?page=all ]
Prasad Kashyap updated GERONIMO-2359:
-
Attachment: RemoveHackinDeploy.patch
Patch: RemoveHackinDeploy.patch
This patch removes the moduleArchive hack that was in the ModuleConfig.java
In the 1.0/1.1 timeframe, I believe there was a bug in the deploy tool
caused during undeploy. After an undeploy, it left the configId in
the config.xml marked as load=false and it also left behind the
empty dirs in the repository under groupId/artifactId/version.
If I remember correctly,
After an undeploy, the repo contains the groupId/artifactId/version
but nothing under that. So yes, completely empty.
Cheers
Prasad
On 9/15/06, Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sep 15, 2006, at 11:56 AM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
In the 1.0/1.1 timeframe, I believe there was a bug
Found a related JIRA. Not sure if things changed here -
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1974
Cheers
Prasad
On 9/15/06, Prasad Kashyap [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After an undeploy, the repo contains the groupId/artifactId/version
but nothing under that. So yes, completely empty
I tried your suggestion about using just the artifactId in a mojo
execution. That wouldn't work. However, it works as you said from the
CLI.
Cheers
Prasad
On 9/14/06, Aaron Mulder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/13/06, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can I use the artifactId with
Cool ! Unknowingly I had been building on JDK 1.5 for a while now. The
java installation on my windows decided to upgrade itself. The builds
had passed successfully but I hadn't tested the server runtime.
Recently, I downgraded my jdk back to 1.4.2 after I encountered some
build problems. The
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2359?page=all ]
Prasad Kashyap updated GERONIMO-2359:
-
Attachment: StartStopUndeploy.patch
Patch: StartStopUndeploy.patch
allows start/stop/undeploy goals to take in multple modules by using #modules
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2359?page=all ]
Prasad Kashyap updated GERONIMO-2359:
-
Attachment: multipleModuleIds.patch
Patch: multipleModuleIds.patch
This patch will allow multiple #moduleId to be specified for the start, stop
My non-binding vote -
[X] +1 CTR with documentation guidelines
Cheers
Prasad
On 9/10/06, Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is a vote to determine the development process the Geronimo
community wishes to use for trunk development. If any modifications
are needed for a branch
Please help me try to understand this -
Will our jars will be taken/seen/used outside the Geronimo context ?
If they are, then I agree that geronimo-activation-1.2.jar is more
meaningful than a simple activation-1.2.jar. The latter also gives
scope for name conflicts.
But if our jars are always
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2359?page=all ]
Prasad Kashyap updated GERONIMO-2359:
-
Attachment: DeployToolSuport-v3.patch
Patch: DeployToolSupport-v3.patch
Added forceStop option for undeploy mojo.
Added convenience mojos
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2359?page=all ]
Prasad Kashyap updated GERONIMO-2359:
-
Attachment: DeployToolMojo.patch
Patch: DeployToolMojo.patch
This patch has just 1 file in it. DeployToolMojo.java. It combines and replaces
3
Congrats Hernan !
Cheers
Prasad
On 9/11/06, Gianny Damour [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Congratulations Hernan!
Gianny
On 12/09/2006, at 12:08 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
All,
The Geronimo PMC is pleased to welcome Hernan Cunico as the newest
member of the Geronimo PMC. We're very happy to have
Congrats Rick !
Cheers
Prasad
On 9/11/06, Gianny Damour [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Congratulations Rick!
Thanks,
Gianny
On 12/09/2006, at 12:17 AM, Jeff Genender wrote:
All,
The Geronimo PMC is pleased to welcome Rick McGuire as the newest
member
of the Geronimo PMC. We're very happy to
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2359?page=all ]
Prasad Kashyap updated GERONIMO-2359:
-
Attachment: genesis-ArtifactItem.patch
DeployToolSuport-v2.patch
Patches:
genesis-ArtifactItem.patch to be applied to genesis tree
-SNAPSHOT/car
at
org.apache.geronimo.kernel.config.MultiParentClassLoader.loadClass(MultiParentClassLoader.java:249)
Cheers
Prasad
On 9/6/06, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sep 6, 2006, at 8:03 PM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
Here are the use case scenarios I thought of -
UC #1 : use
Matt,
I liked this relaxed RTC proposal. However, would you be willing to
consider one slight change to it.
Could you please propose a timelimit before which the patch gets the
required +1 or atleast one -1 vote ? After the set time, if there
isn't any single nay vote, the patch becomes ready
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2359?page=all ]
Prasad Kashyap updated GERONIMO-2359:
-
Attachment: DeployToolSuport.patch
Patch: DeployToolSupport.patch
This patch adds DistributeModuleMojo and UndeployModuleMojo to the
geronimo
I have uploaded the DeployToolSupport.patch to
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12340282/DeployToolSuport.patch
This patch adds DistributeModuleMojo and UndeployModuleMojo to the
geronimo-maven-plugin. The deploy is done by conecting to the default
uri deployer:geronimo:jmx
The
if we go with this.
* * *
I hope you find all of my comments as constructive... I appreciate
your work :-)
Absolutely. I appreciate the feedback, sincerely.
--jason
Cheers
Prasad.
On Sep 6, 2006, at 11:22 AM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
I have uploaded the DeployToolSupport.patch
there is not maven plugin
to invoke it but should be straight forward to do with maven.
Its license appears to (this non-lawyer at least) be compatible.
Also the Struts folks are using Selenium from M2 AFAIK.
TTFN,
-bd
On Aug 8, 2006, at 12:14 PM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
Does anybody know of any good
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2359?page=comments#action_12432037
]
Prasad Kashyap commented on GERONIMO-2359:
--
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/geronimo-dev/200608.mbox/[EMAIL
PROTECTED]
Itests for Geronimo
The jspc problem is not limited to windows. It just failed with the
same error on a linux machine.
Cheers
Prasad
On 8/30/06, anita kulshreshtha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- Jeff Genender [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
anita kulshreshtha wrote:
2) JSP compilation errors
Problem:
Congrats Anita !
Cheers
Prasad
On 8/28/06, Joe Bohn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Congrats Anita!!!
Joe
Jeff Genender wrote:
All,
We're pleased to let you know that we have a new committer in our midst.
Anita Kulshreshtha has recently accepted an invitation to join the
Geronimo project.
[+1] Publish Genesis 1.0 to m2 central
Cheers
Prasad
On 8/28/06, David Blevins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Aug 27, 2006, at 10:42 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
[+1] Publish Genesis 1.0 to m2 central
-David
If the mojo extends directly from the AbstractMojo.. it works.
It fails when it extends from MojoSupport in genesis:plugin-support :-(
Cheers
Prasad
On 8/28/06, Prasad Kashyap [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am suspecting an error with our geronimo-deployment-plugin.
Invoking any of the goals
? is this with -X
--jason
On Aug 28, 2006, at 12:44 PM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
If the mojo extends directly from the AbstractMojo.. it works.
It fails when it extends from MojoSupport in genesis:plugin-
support :-(
Cheers
Prasad
On 8/28/06, Prasad Kashyap [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am suspecting
Another bootstrap just did the trick. It fixed itself. Like a windows
reboot ? ;-)
Cheers
Prasad
On 8/28/06, Prasad Kashyap [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK.. here are the logs with -X
describe.log is generated for the help:describe plugin on the startServer goal.
startServer.log is generated
For people's future reference :
The description of a goal in a mojo cannot span across multiple
comment lines. If it does, then your goal is not registered in the
plugin and the error messages you get will be nowhere close this
reason.
Cheers
Prasad
On 8/28/06, Prasad Kashyap [EMAIL PROTECTED
Affects Versions: 1.2
Reporter: Prasad Kashyap
Fix For: 1.2
The openejb itests which we had for a few releases now have been dead for a
while. Here's an effort to revive them and expand it's scope for all of
Geronimo.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2359?page=all ]
Prasad Kashyap updated GERONIMO-2359:
-
Attachment: itests-1.0.patch
Itests for Geronimo
---
Key: GERONIMO-2359
URL: http
601 - 700 of 1196 matches
Mail list logo
