hem to
> >>>> the 1.6 branch. The goal is to make Geronimo work with 1.6.1-SNAPSHOT.
> >>>> Once that is done, we can create the 1.6.1 release anytime you want.
> >>>>
> >>>> Andreas
> >>>>
> >>>> On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 04:31, Ivan wrote:
erience is that every ORB is different. The only ORB we
> guarantee this code works with is Yoko.
Ah got it. Muchos gracias!
Sanjiva.
--
Sanjiva Weerawarana, Ph.D.
Founder & Director; Lanka Software Foundation; http://www.opensource.lk/
Founder, Chairman & CEO; WSO2, Inc.; http://ww
may be a really dumb
question .. but I'll ask anyway :). Is the OpenEJB CORBA code an
alternative to Yoko? I thought Yoko also implemented IIOP etc..
Thanks,
Sanjiva.
--
Sanjiva Weerawarana, Ph.D.
Founder & Director; Lanka Software Foundation; http://www.opensource.lk/
Founder, Chairma
On Fri, 2006-03-24 at 16:46 +0100, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> Hossam Karim has kindly contributed some logos for ServiceMix. Thanks !
> You can found them at http://docs.codehaus.org/display/SM/Logo
>
> The original idea was to have some "Powered by ServiceMix" logo and
> these are somewhat differen
I have a dumb question .. why are these messages coming from
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Shouldn't they come from something @apache.org?
Sanjiva.
On Thu, 2006-03-09 at 10:40 -0800, Guillaume Nodet (JIRA) wrote:
> [ http://jira.activemq.org/jira//browse/SM-149?page=all ]
>
> Guillaume Nodet resol
Sorry for the late response.
On Sat, 2006-02-18 at 11:13 +0100, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> Why such a restriction ?
Because ServiceMix is a project under incubation at ASF. That means its
not an official product of the ASF and as such has to be made clear that
its not. If you put it in as part of a
On Fri, 2006-02-17 at 11:42 -0800, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
>
> One thing that should be resolved as soon as possible is how we will
> bring in new members. At the moment there are 17 proposed new
> committers for a total of 37 committers. I think that this list might
> rival that of Geronimo i
On Wed, 2006-02-15 at 15:56 +, James Strachan wrote:
> Dims & Sanjiva
>
> Given your arguments that the Sybase BPEL donation should be in a new
> podling rather than part of ServiceMix - I wonder if you'd like to
> join us in the ODE proposal then we can have a united Apache
> community
On Mon, 2006-02-13 at 11:16 -0800, David Blevins wrote:
> I could use jaxb support now. I'd like to use it instead of castor
> or xmlbeans for marshalling deployment descriptors -- or rather with
> castor or xmlbeans if either of them implement jaxb.
We've done our own partial schema to Java
Hi Guys,
Can you give an indication of when you expect to go for J2EE 1.5
certification and hence require JAX-WS and JAX-B support from Axis2?
Getting some indication of the timing will help us prioritize and target
it to a specific version of Axis2. (We're not putting it into 1.0; hence
the quest
I'm going to remove my original -1 from this thread and vote +1 for it.
My apologies for helping to create this major ruckus. This type of
heated discussion does not help build communities and cross community
interactions that would benefit all of us in many ways. That is
especially so because thi
Hi James,
> We're not sucking in another project. Its a contribution of code
> only. How is this any different than has already happened on
> Geronimo, Agila (twister), Harmony etc?
Geronimo is not an incubating project and hence can bring more stuff in.
The Agila/Twister merger was done thru
Absolutely -1: The first time I ever saw any of this topic was
Wed, 1 Feb 2006 12:20:32 -0700 (Thu, 01:20 LKT)
and now at
Thu, 2 Feb 2006 16:22:28 + (22:22 LKT)
you want to have a vote on it? You've GOT to be kidding.
Also, how is it that a project under incubation can start sucking in
more
Wow what a love fest ;-).
Sorry to be a PITA but can someone explain to me the connection between
a JBI impl and a BPEL engine?? Why does it make sense for this to become
a part of ServiceMix? In fact, what's the relationship to Geronimo at
all? Can someone indicate the coupling points?
Also, Gei
On Wed, 2005-12-21 at 00:05 +0100, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> They are redirected to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OK .. is there any reason why they can't/shouldn't be sent to -dev?
Sanjiva.
On Tue, 2005-12-20 at 23:10 +0100, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> In svn head is a fully fonctional implentation WS-Notification 1.3
> Public Review Draft 1 from 07 July 2005
> which support:
> * pull style notifications
> * demand based publishing
> * xpath filtering
>
> This component also cont
On Mon, 2005-12-12 at 03:41 -0500, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> Folks,
>
> Can we please vote David as committer to take care of Axis 1.x.
>
> Here's my +1
+1 .. welcome aboard David.
Sanjiva.
Has this proposal been sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] yet? I'd like to be one
of the incubation mentors .. given my involvement in Synapse I think
it'll be good to try to get cross-polination.
Sanjiva.
On Fri, 2005-11-18 at 12:50 -0500, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> [ ] +0 = I don't mind either way
>
> S
On Fri, 2005-10-21 at 15:38 -0700, Eishay Smith wrote:
> Dain,
>
> Did you think about the communication with client side?
> How do you think an OSGi bundle that lives inside an Eclipse environment
> will communicate with another bundle that resides in Geronimo?
> Will it have a "standard way", u
What's the reason for originally deciding to go with object
serialization to store configuration *data* instead of some text format,
say an XML format?
Sanjiva.
On Mon, 2005-05-16 at 08:44 -0700, David Blevins wrote:
> Nice spin. Though you're joking around, I'll answer seriously.
>
> PROJECTS:
On Tue, 2005-05-10 at 11:36 -0700, Craig Johannsen wrote:
> Hey! This is a surprise. Is this ultimately good for Geronimo? Will
> IBM's business objectives for Websphere distort or limit the vision of
> the Geronimo project?
The key for Geronimo's success as an Apache project lies with the
Ge
Hi Guys,
This is a bit off from the usual discussions on this list .. ;-).
I'm involved with some discussions on how open source projects
manage to aggregate other components into larger components/products.
Clearly Geronimo is a good example of a system that puts together
a whole lotta other stu
Um, Srinath wrong list? ;-)
Sanjiva.
- Original Message -
From: "Srinath Perera" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, March 07, 2005 3:49 PM
Subject: [Axis2][Revisit]How about making Message context executable?
> Hi All;
>
> I put this Q about making the MessageCon
ARGH! Can we not send such large attachments??
Sanjiva.
- Original Message -
From: "i386-redhat-linux-gnu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2005 8:09 AM
Subject: build failed Mon Feb 7 18:09:37 PST 2005
>
> ==[SUMMARY]
"Dain Sundstrom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> I know that running two web servers seems cool, but would any (sane)
> user actually need (not want) to do this? I feel that a reasonable
> solution is to have separate distributions for tomcat and jetty.
+1.
Sanjiva.
I sent this earlier today but it hasn't made it to the list for
some reason. Apologies if its a dup.
Sanjiva.
- Original Message -
From: "Sanjiva Weerawarana" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, November 22, 2004 5:27 AM
Subject: po
Hi Guys,
After meeting Jeremy and others at ApacheCon, I'm very interested
in exploring the possibility of using the kernel in Axis2.
Could I get some pointers please? The function we're looking for
right now is:
- class loading management for service isolation
- deployment and deployed code ma
Dims and Srinath .. Dims is currently in India on vacation with
limited connectivity. Srinath is sleeping .. its nite here :-(.
It'll be checked first thing in the morning GMT+6 time.
Sanjiva.
- Original Message -
From: "Aaron Mulder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Mo
28 matches
Mail list logo
