+1
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 3:23 PM, Ivan xhh...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
One tradition usage for JNDI API is that, the users could configure a
factory class while creating the Context instance, and the jar file
contains the context factory is shipped in the user application.
Hashtable env =
CXF is not tested and supported in Geronimo 3.0, you can use axis2 as its
jaxws provider.
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 6:34 AM, AnthonyI etm...@att.net wrote:
I am trying to implement RESTful web services and started with the
converter-jaxws example. I am on Geronimo 3.0 with the
We can track it in jira https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6370
On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 12:24 PM, Shawn Jiang genspr...@gmail.com wrote:
We'd better to create a JIRA for code changes if possible. And then the
history viewer can know the background of this change in the JIRA.
+1
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 9:29 AM, Shawn Jiang genspr...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 11:05 PM, Yi Xiao xiaoyijhondeve...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi devs,
Please help to review and vote on the release of Geronimo Eclipse Plugin
(GEP) 3.0.0 RC3.
GEP 3.0.0 supports Geronimo
+1
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 10:42 PM, Shawn Jiang genspr...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
Thanks, Forrest !
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 9:55 AM, Forrest Xia forres...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Devs,
With updates to README and derby database creation scripts, again, here
is the daytrader 3.0.0 ready for
Will find a better way to make it automatically load version.
On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 4:49 PM, Shawn Jiang genspr...@gmail.com wrote:
we need to externalize these versions to pom.xml like what we did for
versions in karaf starting bundles. Or we have to maintain them manually
for good.
On
+1
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 3:39 PM, Forrest Xia forres...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 10:17 PM, Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.comwrote:
On Jul 5, 2012, at 9:27 PM, Forrest Xia wrote:
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 6:05 AM, Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Jul
+1
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 3:41 PM, Forrest Xia forres...@gmail.com wrote:
Don't forget this one, please!
On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 7:23 PM, Forrest Xia forres...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Devs,
Align with Geronimo 3.0.0 release, here is the daytrader 3.0.0 ready for
vote.
The source code up
Drop jetty release makes sense. +1 from my side.
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 10:23 AM, Forrest Xia forres...@gmail.com wrote:
Any more thoughts on droping jetty assembly from 3.0.0 release? or I will
go ahead to make the change and roll out 3.0.0 release...
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 12:41 PM,
I already updated that file, it will be synchronized to
http://geronimo.apache.org/plugins/http://geronimo.apache.org/plugins/plugin-repository-list-3.0-beta-1.txt
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 5:53 PM, pif frank.pien...@googlemail.com wrote:
I've the following problems or limitation with
+1
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 10:38 PM, Shawn Jiang genspr...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 9:37 PM, Forrest Xia forres...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Please vote for the Geronimo Tomcat 7.0.23.1 release, which is based on
Tomcat 7.0.23 tag, including an important security fix.
+1
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 12:13 AM, Ivan xhh...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
2012/1/19 Jarek Gawor jga...@gmail.com
+1
Thanks,
Jarek
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 8:14 AM, Forrest Xia forres...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
A release candidate for geronimo-jsp_2.2_spec 1.1 has been created and
+1
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 2:21 PM, Ivan xhh...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
2012/1/9 Forrest Xia forres...@gmail.com
Is there anyone else could review this release?
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 9:09 PM, Forrest Xia forres...@gmail.com wrote:
Myself +1
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 2:44 AM, Forrest Xia
+1
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 9:24 AM, Yi Xiao xiaoyijhondeve...@gmail.comwrote:
Rat check's result shows just some test resources miss license-head.
so my+1
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 11:30 PM, Forrest Xia forres...@gmail.com wrote:
Tag tck all passed!
Here is my +1
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011
Hi, David:
There is a jira about activemq-broker-blueprint. The ${X + Y} stuff is
not getting evaluated at all., It's already fixed by Rex, may be helpful
to you.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5987?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#issue-tabs
I tried in my local windows without proxy, it works. I will try webproxy
setting
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 4:31 PM, pif frank.pien...@googlemail.com wrote:
behind a webproxy i get with geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6-3.0-beta-1
plugins listed at https://geronimo.apache.org/plugins/samples-3.0-beta-1/
+1
On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 8:29 PM, Forrest Xia forres...@gmail.com wrote:
Did rat:check, server build with this tomcat release, and all tck passed!
Myself +1
On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 8:17 PM, Forrest Xia forres...@gmail.com wrote:
Please vote for the Geronimo Tomcat 6.0.35.1 release,
+1
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 10:54 PM, Forrest Xia forres...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi folks,
A release candidate for Geronimo 2.1.8 has been created and staged.
The tag has been created here:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/tags/geronimo-2.1.8/
The staging repo is here:
For you reference:
Help is always on hand on the builds.at.apache.org bui...@apache.org mailing
list for any problems or build configuration issues/requests. Or try the
#asftest channel on irc.freenode.net for live support.
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 10:53 PM, Forrest Xia forres...@gmail.com
It seems like a good idea to me.
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 5:57 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré j...@nanthrax.netwrote:
Hi Charles,
as discussed on Karaf, I'm really eager to see the feedback from the
Geronimo community.
I would be more than happy to join and help the Geronimo community around
the
But a lot of work to do
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 9:27 PM, viola lu viola...@gmail.com wrote:
It seems like a good idea to me.
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 5:57 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré
j...@nanthrax.netwrote:
Hi Charles,
as discussed on Karaf, I'm really eager to see the feedback from
Hi All,
As the subject, this is a release accompany with Geronimo Server
3.0-beta-1, which includes these samples which now works on the server:
1. Java EE 5 samples
2. Java EE 6 samples
-
Hi devs,
The vote to release Geronimo SamplesDaytrader 3.0-beta-1 RC4 passes with 5
+1 votes and no 0 or -1 votes. Voting +1 were
Forrest Xia
Rex Wang
Kevan Miller
Shawn Jiang
Viola Lu
Janet Han
4 of above +1 were from PMC members.
Thanks all for your time of review and vote.
On Sat, Dec
Congrats
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 9:43 AM, Ivan xhh...@gmail.com wrote:
Congrats !
2011/12/9 Rex Wang rwo...@gmail.com
Congrats and welcome onboard!
2011/12/9 Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.com
Everyone,
In recognition of his contributions to the Geronimo project, the
Geronimo PMC
, Nov 25, 2011 at 7:02 PM, viola lu viola...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Devs,
A forth release candidate for Geronimo Sample Daytrader 3.0-beta-1 has
been created and staged coz of previous failure release candidate.
The tags have been created here:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo
+1
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 9:59 AM, Shawn Jiang genspr...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 2:09 PM, han hongfang hanhongf...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi devs,
Please help to review and vote on the release of Geronimo Eclipse Plugin
(GEP) 3.0-beta-1 RC2.
GEP 3.0-beta-1 supports
Hi Devs,
A forth release candidate for Geronimo Sample Daytrader 3.0-beta-1 has
been created and staged coz of previous failure release candidate.
The tags have been created here:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/samples/tags/samples-parent-3.0-beta-1
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 7:52 PM, viola lu viola...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Devs,
A release candidate for Geronimo Sample Daytrader 3.0-beta-1 has been
created and staged.
The tags have been created here:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/samples/tags/samples-parent-3.0-beta-1
+1
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 12:39 AM, Forrest Xia forres...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 6:49 AM, Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.comwrote:
As you have seen in recent Jira updates and dev list discussions
HypoBytes and Trygve Hardersen have offered to contribute Geronimo 2.2
. Or, you can complete
the daytrader vote and start a new samples vote… Your call…
--kevan
On Nov 18, 2011, at 6:28 AM, viola lu wrote:
Hi Devs,
A release candidate for Geronimo Sample Daytrader 3.0-beta-1 has been
created and staged.
The tags have been created here:
https
Hi Devs,
A release candidate for Geronimo Sample Daytrader 3.0-beta-1 has been
created and staged.
The tags have been created here:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/samples/tags/samples-parent-3.0-beta-1
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/daytrader/tags/daytrader-3.0-beta-1/
+1
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 6:49 PM, Shawn Jiang genspr...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 11:39 AM, han hongfang hanhongf...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi devs,
Please help to review and vote on the release of Geronimo Eclipse Plugin
(GEP) 3.0-beta-1 RC1.
GEP 3.0-beta-1 supports
Hi Devs,
A release candidate for Geronimo Sample Daytrader 3.0-beta-1 has been
created and staged.
The tags have been created here:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/samples/tags/samples-parent-3.0-beta-1
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/daytrader/tags/daytrader-3.0-beta-1/
Hi Devs,
Hi all,
A release candidate for Geronimo Sample Daytrader 3.0-beta-1 has been
created and staged.
The tags have been created here:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/samples/tags/samples-parent-3.0-beta-1
Congrats.
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 11:52 PM, Sangjin Lee sjl...@gmail.com wrote:
Congratulations! Great work!
Regards,
Sangjin
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 7:45 AM, Forrest Xia forres...@gmail.com wrote:
Fantastic!
Thank you all for bringing this out.
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 11:23 PM,
+1
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 9:35 PM, Shawn Jiang genspr...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 10:07 PM, Rex Wang rwo...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Devs,
Let's review and vote for 3.0-beta-1 RC2.
Geronimo 3.0-beta-1 supports Java Enterprise Edition 6.0 Full Profile
specification, and also
I will release samples.
On Sat, Nov 5, 2011 at 3:48 AM, Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.com wrote:
Along with the 3.0 server beta, we'll be wanting to release the
eclipse plugin and samples... Any volunteers for release manager?
--kevan
--
viola
Apache Geronimo
Hi,Kevan:
Updated @ rev=1197963
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1197963view=rev already.
Where i can subscribe the sample/server build results in builbot? Thanks.
On Sat, Nov 5, 2011 at 6:30 AM, Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.com wrote:
On Nov 4, 2011, at 6:25 AM, viol...@apache.org wrote:
It's done already. I will update tranql version in geronimo 2.1.8 . Close
this thread.
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 1:18 PM, viola lu viola...@gmail.com wrote:
I also created a thread in tranql also. This is for geronimo 2.1.8 release,
pls help do it. Thanks in advance!
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 6
I also created a thread in tranql also. This is for geronimo 2.1.8 release,
pls help do it. Thanks in advance!
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 6:03 AM, Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.comwrote:
On Oct 20, 2011, at 5:10 AM, viola lu wrote:
Hi, Dev:
Pls help release tranql components listed here
Hi, Dev:
Pls help release tranql components listed here, thanks in advance!
https://nexus.codehaus.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/tranql/tranql-connector-sqlserver2008-xa/1.0-SNAPSHOT/
Hi, Dev:
Currently in geronimo 2.1.*, if i run keytool in jdk to generate csr or
other non-keystore files under var/security/keystores, geronimo server will
persist them in j2ee-security module when i access keystore porlet in admin
console, which scans all files under this folder and instance
Xia forres...@gmail.com
Make a doc, and tell user not putting non-keystore files in that folder,
might be an option :)
Forrest
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 6:16 PM, viola lu viola...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, Dev:
Currently in geronimo 2.1.*, if i run keytool in jdk to generate csr or
other non
time to verify
this. If your patch results in something we can verify will still work with
jdk 1.5 (including drivers that work with jdk 1.5 that don't include the new
methods) I'll apply it and release all the connectors to use it.
thanks
david jencks
On Sep 22, 2011, at 4:09 AM, viola lu
+1
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 9:46 AM, Forrest Xia forres...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
Forrest
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 9:28 PM, Ivan xhh...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, let's vote for MyFaces 2.0.9_1,
The reason for this vote is to include the patch in this JIRA :
+1
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 9:47 AM, Forrest Xia forres...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
Forrest
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 6:09 PM, Rex Wang rwo...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi devs,
Please vote for Geronimo Forked Aries Blueprint 0.3.0.1
This release bases on Apache Aries Blueprint 0.3 tag, and includes
there other connectors you want me to release?
thanks
david jencks
On Sep 20, 2011, at 12:25 AM, viola lu wrote:
Hi, david:
Thanks. One more request:
Can you help apply http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/TQL-29, and after
that, can you do a tranql release, so we can introduce these patches
+1
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 9:19 PM, Shawn Jiang genspr...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 11:09 AM, Shenghao Fang
michael1224.f...@gmail.com wrote:
Please vote for Geronimo Customized Tomcat 6.0.33.1.
The codes are based on Apache Tomcat 6.0.33 tag, and include the
this (after tweaking a couple dates etc) and the tql-22 patch
having trouble logging into tranql jira so I haven't closed these.
thanks
david jencks
On Sep 17, 2011, at 5:54 PM, viola lu wrote:
--
viola
Apache Geronimo
called version 1.4 by
mistake)
https://nexus.codehaus.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/tranql/tranql-connector-db2-xa/1.7-SNAPSHOT/
Were there other connectors you want me to release?
thanks
david jencks
On Sep 20, 2011, at 12:25 AM, viola lu wrote:
Hi, david:
Thanks. One more
We have to upgrade tranql also, which has new patches.
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 5:41 PM, Shenghao Fang
michael1224.f...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi Devs,
It has been long time since the latest Geronimo 2.1 release (2.1.7). I
thought it's time for us to do the plan for a new Geronimo 2.1 release
--
viola
Apache Geronimo
+1
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 10:51 AM, Rex Wang rwo...@gmail.com wrote:
rat:check and build pass, license/notice looks good to me.
+1
-Rex
2011/9/13 Ivan xhh...@gmail.com
The components up for vote are:
Okay, i will change String to StringBuilder in String s.
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 3:06 PM, Shawn Jiang genspr...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Viola,
a quick comment.
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 2:48 PM, viol...@apache.org wrote:
Author: violalu
Date: Tue Sep 6 06:48:50 2011
New Revision: 1165512
think this replacement is a pretty big project that will result in
reduced functionality why is this a useful project?
thanks
david jencks
On Aug 30, 2011, at 12:24 AM, viola lu wrote:
The error i got is as below:
2011-08-30 10:40:42,484 INFO [KernelContextGBean] bound gbean
+1
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 9:39 AM, Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.com wrote:
+1.
Signature, checksum, rat, build, license/notice files -- all look good.
Thanks Rex!
--kevan
On Sep 1, 2011, at 5:43 AM, Rex Wang wrote:
Please vote for geronimo rebundled bval-jsr303 0.3_1-incubating
+1
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 9:54 AM, Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.com wrote:
Looks good. signature, checksum, rat, license/notice, build, jars -- all
look good.
Thanks Ivan!
--kevan
On Sep 1, 2011, at 9:50 AM, Ivan wrote:
Please vote for the woodstox-core-asl 4.1.2_1 release, which
+1
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 9:44 AM, Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.com wrote:
Looks good. Thanks Ivan! Here's my +1
signatures, checksums, rat, build, license, notice files -- all look good.
--kevan
On Sep 1, 2011, at 10:21 AM, Ivan wrote:
Please vote for the Geronimo Tomcat 7.0.19.2
+1
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 9:22 AM, Shawn Jiang genspr...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 5:40 PM, Rex Wang rwo...@gmail.com wrote:
This is a bug-fix release that will be used for the Geronimo Server
3.0-beta release.
The components up for vote are:
+1
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 9:22 AM, Shawn Jiang genspr...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 11:26 PM, Rex Wang rwo...@gmail.com wrote:
Please vote for the geronimo xbean 3.8 release, which will be used in
Geronimo 3.0-beta release
The components up for vote are:
, 2011, at 8:00 PM, viola lu wrote:
If we would like use third-party TransactionManager such as Bitronix
TransactionManger instead of geronimo default transaction manger
implementation, and Hibernate as their persistence layer. It's better if
third-party TransactionManger can be initialized
If we would like use third-party TransactionManager such as Bitronix
TransactionManger instead of geronimo default transaction manger
implementation, and Hibernate as their persistence layer. It's better if
third-party TransactionManger can be initialized in Application context,
But can we
+1
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 10:42 PM, Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.comwrote:
Here's my +1. Thanks Forrest!!!
Signatures, checksums, RAT, build, binaries, license/notice files all look
good to me.
--kevan
On Aug 25, 2011, at 10:12 AM, Forrest Xia wrote:
[VOTE] release YOKO 1.3 - 1st
Congrats.
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 9:12 AM, Yi Xiao xiaoyijhondeve...@gmail.comwrote:
Congratulations, Michael!
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 5:08 AM, Jay D. McHugh jaydmch...@gmail.comwrote:
Congratulations Michael and welcome!
Jay
On 08/18/2011 09:18 AM, Shawn Jiang wrote:
I'd like to
Thanks for your input, i will setup an environment to try first.
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 12:05 AM, David Jencks david_jen...@yahoo.comwrote:
Hi Viola,
I haven't looked at the details in some time check anything I might say
:-).
On Aug 10, 2011, at 1:47 AM, viola lu wrote:
Hi, David
implemented the inbound security stuff so we should consider updating the
docs for 3.0. Perhaps the excerpt below can be made clearer so people other
than me can understand it :-\
thanks
david jencks
On Aug 9, 2011, at 9:47 PM, viola lu wrote:
Hi, Dev:
From geronimo 2.1 doc:
https
Hi, Dev:
From geronimo 2.1 doc:
https://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDOC21/connectors-and-transaction-management-jdbc-jms-j2ca-datasource-connection-pool-eis.html
Security (Credentials)
In the J2CA 1.5 spec security considerations are confined to providing the
credentials for outbound connections.
and RMI provider for Geronimo,
we don't support RMI object load balance(maybe I am wrong)
Forrest
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 11:49 AM, viola lu viola...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,Dev:
In current geronimo 2.1.* and 2.2.*, as i know, high scalability and
load balance are implemented in web-tier
Hi, Dev
When running javaee6-testsuite\el2.2-test , if jsf java classes is packaged
in WEB-INF/lib, annotationClassSetMap(MyFacesModuleBuilderExtension.java)
managebean set is empty as below, and no managed bean is loaded
annotationClassSetMap.put(javax.faces.bean.ManagedBean.class, new
I will check it.
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 10:11 PM, Ivan xhh...@gmail.com wrote:
Hmm, could you double check whether it is a similar issue with
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5817. ? If not, I will take
a look at it later.
2011/8/2 viola lu viola...@gmail.com
Hi, Dev
When
Thanks Ivan, I already checked spec, and tried your suggestion, It worked
well.
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 10:25 PM, viola lu viola...@gmail.com wrote:
I will check it.
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 10:11 PM, Ivan xhh...@gmail.com wrote:
Hmm, could you double check whether it is a similar issue
Hi,Dev:
In current geronimo 2.1.* and 2.2.*, as i know, high scalability and load
balance are implemented in web-tier and ejb-tier.
I am not sure whether we support failover and load balance RMI Object
and if an end-user deploy its RMI service on geronimo clustered environment
so they can
+1
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 9:54 PM, Rex Wang rwo...@gmail.com wrote:
rat:check, build pass, thanks Shawn!
+1
2011/7/21 Shawn Jiang genspr...@gmail.com
build, unit test, rat:check are all good.
my own +1.
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 10:07 AM, Shawn Jiang genspr...@gmail.comwrote:
These
+1
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 10:46 AM, Ivan xhh...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
2011/7/25 Shawn Jiang genspr...@gmail.com
+1
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 12:45 PM, Rex Wang rwo...@gmail.com wrote:
This is a bug fix release.
The sources up for vote are:
+1
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 1:54 PM, Rex Wang rwo...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 rat:check, build pass
2011/7/20 Ivan xhh...@gmail.com
Please vote for Geronimo Customized Tomcat 7.0.19.1
The codes are based on Apache Tomcat 7.0.19 tag, and include the following
extra changes :
a. Recover the
+1
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 9:35 PM, Forrest Xia forres...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
Forrest
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 11:44 AM, Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.comwrote:
On Jul 20, 2011, at 11:24 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
Looks great Shawn. Thanks!
I checked signature/checksum,
+1
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 9:34 PM, Forrest Xia forres...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
Forrest
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 2:59 PM, Jacek Laskowski ja...@japila.pl wrote:
+1
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 4:02 AM, Shawn Jiang genspr...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks, Kevan !
I've deleted scout/jaxb/saaj
+1
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 2:58 PM, Jacek Laskowski ja...@japila.pl wrote:
+1
Jacek
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 3:09 PM, Jacek Laskowski ja...@japila.pl wrote:
Hi,
Note: This is my first release ever so provide guidance where needed.
The release of Geronimo Transaction Manager version
+1
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 12:28 PM, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.comwrote:
+1
On Jul 18, 2011, at 6:54 AM, Shawn Jiang wrote:
This is a single vote for releasing 6 new Geronimo bundles that are OSGi
versions of other jar files. The wrappered jars are
woodstox-core-asl
+1
On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 10:52 AM, Rex Wang rwo...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
2011/7/16 Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.com
Here's my +1. Thanks Forrest!
Signature/checksums looked good. Source, license/notice, and build all
looked good.
--kevan
On Jul 15, 2011, at 9:16 AM, Forrest Xia
Problem is fixed. thanks, ivan.
On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 11:48 PM, Ivan xhh...@gmail.com wrote:
Open a jira https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6079 and went
ahead commit some changes to trunk.
2011/7/15 viola lu viola...@gmail.com
Hi, Dev:
I packaged a web app with jsf
Hi, Dev:
I packaged a web app with jsf features into an EAR, and deployed it, but
got an NPE when starting MyFacesWebAppContext gbean. This is related with
code line in MyFacesModuleBuilderExtension
*AbstractName myFacesWebAppContextName =
moduleContext.getNaming().createChildName(moduleName,
+1
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 12:38 PM, Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.comwrote:
Same about the year in the NOTICE file. So, would like to see that updated.
The source, signatures/checksums, LICENSE/NOTICE file looks good. I'm
running a build, now. Will let you know if I see any problems. I
.
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 10:59 PM, Ivan xhh...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, it is by design. App client modules should not have access to web
modules, ejb modules and other app client modules in the same ear package.
2011/7/12 viola lu viola...@gmail.com
Hi, Dev:
I met a problem when deploy
Hi, Dev:
I met a problem when deploy an ear which packages an ejb, application
client, web app. And the EJB is in the class-path of app client module
manifest, but Appclientmodulebuilder class doesn't add this class-path of
manifest to module's LinkedHashSetString classpath, So it's not in the
OK, i already update it to accurate package names.
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 8:28 PM, Ivan xhh...@gmail.com wrote:
It looks to me that org.apache is a very common package name, once it is
added in the bootdelegation list, each class belongs to this package (even
class from Geronimo) will be
on this with the
exact information why this is needed in the first place? What
exceptions or problems did you see? Maybe that option needs to be JVM
specific?
Jarek
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 10:41 AM, viola lu viola...@gmail.com wrote:
OK, i already update it to accurate package names.
On Wed, Jun 29
bootdelegation here. Or it
will not work with Oracle JRE, which does not ship the required classes.
2011/6/30 viola lu viola...@gmail.com
It's very specific test case. If we use Apache JSTL
implementation(jstl.jstl.1.2) not ri , and run jstl test cases on IBM JDK,
it will report
Congrats
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 11:32 PM, Ivan xhh...@gmail.com wrote:
I would like to welcome chi run hua on aboard, as he recently accepted
the Geronimo PMC invitation to become a committer. His account was
just created , so you should start seeing some commits from him soon.
--
Ivan
Hi, forrest:
You can revert karaf to 2.1.2 back if this results in compatibility and
blocks build. After i get a resolution from JDK forum , then continue this
upgrade. Thanks.
On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 11:55 AM, Forrest Xia forres...@gmail.com wrote:
after I change the jdk to oracle 64bit, the
to the specified context. e.g. If
users configured the jndiName with value jca:/a/b. With current changes, it
might not work.
2011/3/22 viola lu viola...@gmail.com
But i think it's unnecessary to create an extra namesapce that no other
components will use in geronimo. And currently all namesapces
But i think it's unnecessary to create an extra namesapce that no other
components will use in geronimo. And currently all namesapces are exposed as
blueprint service, even i created one here, should i expose it too?
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 4:58 PM, Ivan xhh...@gmail.com wrote:
I think that
The Apache Geronimo project is pleased to announce the 2.2.1 release of
Geronimo Samples and Daytrader. These releases are aligned with Geronimo
Server 2.2.1 release. For more details, please read the news post on Geronimo
web
, Ivan xhh...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
2011/1/17 Rex Wang rwo...@gmail.com
+1
2011/1/12 Forrest Xia forres...@gmail.com
+1
Build, Signature, Running Plugins seems OK.
Thank you Viola for bring this out.
Forrest
On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 7:50 PM, viola lu viola...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all
Thanks, i can edit wiki spaces now.
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 11:50 AM, Ivan xhh...@gmail.com wrote:
I have added you in the geronimo-committer group, think you should have
required permissions.
2011/1/7 viola lu viola...@gmail.com
Here is my confluence id : *viola.lu*, email: *viol
Thanks Kevan, I can access tck now.
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 12:35 PM, Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.comwrote:
On Jan 10, 2011, at 10:37 PM, viola lu wrote:
Can somebody assign me TCK access? Thanks in advance!
You should be all set. Send a subscription request to
geronimo
Can somebody assign me TCK access? Thanks in advance!
-- Forwarded message --
From: Craig L Russell craig.russ...@sun.com
Date: Sat, Jan 8, 2011 at 2:38 AM
Subject: re: Fwd: [TCK] Request for TCK access for Apache Geronimo TCK
materials. Please verify NDA is on file
To: viola lu
Hi, Devs:
Can somebody grant me geronimo documentation wiki spaces access permission
like GMOxDOC21, GMOxDOC22, GMOxSAMPLES, GMOxPMGT and GMOxSITE? Thanks in
advance!
--
viola
Here is my confluence id : *viola.lu*, email: *viol...@apache.org*.
On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 4:00 PM, viola lu viola...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, Devs:
Can somebody grant me geronimo documentation wiki spaces access permission
like GMOxDOC21, GMOxDOC22, GMOxSAMPLES, GMOxPMGT and GMOxSITE? Thanks
Hi all,
A release candidate for Geronimo Sample Daytrader 2.2.1 has been created
and staged.
The tags have been created here:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/samples/tags/samples-parent-2.2.1/
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/samples/tags/samples-parent-2.2.1/
1 - 100 of 142 matches
Mail list logo
