I have to agree with John that browser and platform support is the
most important factor. Furthermore, I think the ajax library in
library in Geronimo should continue to be shared across its webapps.
On both of these accounts I would lean heavily towards upgrading the
monitoring client
Erik B. Craig wrote:
All,
Currently the monitoring client is using Dojo 0.4.3 charting, which
does not necessarily behave as expected on Firefox/Safari on a mac, or
on IE6 on Windows.
I consider this to be a shortcoming, and given the new version of Dojo
available (1.0.1), began
I had an off-line discussion with Erik about IE support of the various
charting solutions. I *thought* Erik was saying that Dojo 0.4.3
charting works with IE, but just not always as expected. Actually, it
turns out that Dojo 0.4.3 charting does not work with IE at all (similar
to timeplot).
On Dec 7, 2007, at 6:46 AM, John Sisson wrote:
IMHO, as much as I dislike saying this.. IE support should be
mandatory considering the number of users who use it. The
disadvantages of Dojo 1.0.1 sound pretty minor compared the other
options not supporting browsers.
I think browser
--- Joe Bohn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The mouse-over feature is cool ... but considering all things listed
as
advantages/disadvantages it seems to me that the dojo 0.4.3 comes out
ahead for now. After timeplot has addressed the IE issue and x/y
axis
labels (with min/max) then it would
All,
Currently the monitoring client is using Dojo 0.4.3 charting, which does
not necessarily behave as expected on Firefox/Safari on a mac, or on IE6
on Windows.
I consider this to be a shortcoming, and given the new version of Dojo
available (1.0.1), began investigating migrating the
On Dec 6, 2007, at 9:29 PM, Erik B. Craig wrote:
All,
Currently the monitoring client is using Dojo 0.4.3 charting, which
does not necessarily behave as expected on Firefox/Safari on a mac,
or on IE6 on Windows.
I consider this to be a shortcoming, and given the new version of
Dojo
On Dec 6, 2007, at 10:35 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
On Dec 6, 2007, at 9:29 PM, Erik B. Craig wrote:
All,
Currently the monitoring client is using Dojo 0.4.3 charting, which
does not necessarily behave as expected on Firefox/Safari on a mac,
or on IE6 on Windows.
I consider this to be a
On Dec 6, 2007, at 9:29 PM, Erik B. Craig wrote:
Personally, I think it would be really cool if we could use the
Timeplot graphing libraries, as it is all BSD licensed and therefore
friendly I believe (right, Kevan?)...
K. License-wise, there's no problem with Timeplot. It's a straight
On Dec 6, 2007, at 9:29 PM, Erik B. Craig wrote:
All,
Currently the monitoring client is using Dojo 0.4.3 charting, which
does not necessarily behave as expected on Firefox/Safari on a mac,
or on IE6 on Windows.
Errmmm, I stand corrected by myself, it looks like in 0.4.3 things are
Erik B. Craig wrote:
All,
Currently the monitoring client is using Dojo 0.4.3 charting, which does
not necessarily behave as expected on Firefox/Safari on a mac, or on IE6
on Windows.
I consider this to be a shortcoming, and given the new version of Dojo
available (1.0.1), began
I agree with Joe. I think having the x/y axis labels are very
important, especially if we wish to allow the admin to customize these
graphs. It will be rather confusing without them (unless we can write
an extension for Simile to add this feature). Also, I like the curved
lines.
--Viet
+100 for simile.
IMO the curved lines in dojo 0.4.3 are really bogus and basically lie
about how much data you have. I'd recommend you not use them if
possible.
The mouse-over feature is very useful, you can easily read actual
numbers off the graph
multi-series display is pretty much
13 matches
Mail list logo
