Hi All,
There was a recent discussion on whether the monitoring plugin should
use JMX or MEJB to fetch Geronimo's statistics. Since we want to be
able to monitor any type of Geronimo server, including little-G, it is
not preferred that we have to pull in OpenEJB in order to monitor that
server.
I was recently talking to a user that was really interested in the
modular framework of the server. They really liked the idea of
jettisoning the EJB container and were also really interested in
monitoring the server. For those folks I'd suspect that JMX is the
right answer. Personally,
On Jan 2, 2008, at 12:54 PM, Viet Nguyen wrote:
Hi All,
There was a recent discussion on whether the monitoring plugin should
use JMX or MEJB to fetch Geronimo's statistics. Since we want to be
able to monitor any type of Geronimo server, including little-G, it is
not preferred that we have
--- David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 2, 2008, at 12:54 PM, Viet Nguyen wrote:
Hi All,
There was a recent discussion on whether the monitoring plugin
should
use JMX or MEJB to fetch Geronimo's statistics. Since we want to be
able to monitor any type of Geronimo server,
I agree. I think Jeff mentioned this first, for the monitoring client
to support different connectors for getting the stats. So we would
have one connector that talks JMX, another one that uses MEJB, etc.
Jarek
On Jan 2, 2008 4:17 PM, Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was recently
On Jan 2, 2008, at 12:54 PM, Viet Nguyen wrote:
Hi All,
There was a recent discussion on whether the monitoring plugin should
use JMX or MEJB to fetch Geronimo's statistics. Since we want to be
able to monitor any type of Geronimo server, including little-G, it is
not preferred that we have
