Re: [VOTE] 2.0-M2 Milestone ready for review and JACC Specs

2007-01-30 Thread Gianny Damour
+1 Gianny On 29/01/2007, at 12:56 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote: Oh yeah...here is my+1 On Jan 27, 2007, at 1:01 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote: All, I have made the binaries from Geronimo 2.0-M2 available for review at: http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/2.0-M2-rc1 In this directory you will

Re: [VOTE] 2.0-M2 Milestone ready for review and JACC Specs

2007-01-29 Thread Sachin Patel
My +1 On Jan 27, 2007, at 1:01 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote: All, I have made the binaries from Geronimo 2.0-M2 available for review at: http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/2.0-M2-rc1 In this directory you will find the various assemblies for your review as well as one massive tar ball that has

Re: [VOTE] 2.0-M2 Milestone ready for review and JACC Specs

2007-01-29 Thread anita kulshreshtha
+1 Please note the following issues for future releases: 1. Clicking on LDAP Viewer produces stack trace: 08:49:59,484 WARN [ExecuteQuery] Method execution failed: java.lang.Exception: Problem connecting to directory server: localhost:1389 at

Re: [VOTE] 2.0-M2 Milestone ready for review and JACC Specs

2007-01-29 Thread Christopher M. Cardona
anita kulshreshtha wrote: +1 Please note the following issues for future releases: 1. Clicking on LDAP Viewer produces stack trace: 08:49:59,484 WARN [ExecuteQuery] Method execution failed: java.lang.Exception: Problem connecting to directory server: localhost:1389 at

Re: [VOTE] 2.0-M2 Milestone ready for review and JACC Specs

2007-01-29 Thread Paul McMahan
+1 I compiled the source.zip from your directory, which also required building openejb-r500340 and geronimo-jacc_1.1_spec--1.0-M2 locally. I tested the admin console and plugins, updating the plugin catalog to support this new release. Nice job everyone! Best wishes, Paul On 1/27/07, Matt

Re: [VOTE] 2.0-M2 Milestone ready for review and JACC Specs

2007-01-29 Thread Paul McMahan
On 1/29/07, anita kulshreshtha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +1 Please note the following issues for future releases: 1. Clicking on LDAP Viewer produces stack trace: 08:49:59,484 WARN [ExecuteQuery] Method execution failed: java.lang.Exception: Problem connecting to directory server:

Re: [VOTE] 2.0-M2 Milestone ready for review and JACC Specs

2007-01-28 Thread Matt Hogstrom
Oh yeah...here is my+1 On Jan 27, 2007, at 1:01 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote: All, I have made the binaries from Geronimo 2.0-M2 available for review at: http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/2.0-M2-rc1 In this directory you will find the various assemblies for your review as well as one massive

Re: [VOTE] 2.0-M2 Milestone ready for review and JACC Specs

2007-01-28 Thread Alan D. Cabrera
On Jan 26, 2007, at 10:01 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote: All, I have made the binaries from Geronimo 2.0-M2 available for review at: http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/2.0-M2-rc1 In this directory you will find the various assemblies for your review as well as one massive tar ball that has the

Re: [VOTE] 2.0-M2 Milestone ready for review and JACC Specs

2007-01-28 Thread David Blevins
On Jan 27, 2007, at 7:39 PM, Kevan Miller wrote: On Jan 27, 2007, at 1:01 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote: All, I have made the binaries from Geronimo 2.0-M2 available for review at: http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/2.0-M2-rc1 In this directory you will find the various assemblies for your

Re: [VOTE] 2.0-M2 Milestone ready for review and JACC Specs

2007-01-28 Thread Joe Bohn
Here's my +1. I did a quick test of each of the 4 assemblies (tomcat/jetty; jee5/minimal). I noticed just one strange thing. When deploying a simple web application without a deployment plan and then viewing it from the console it; listed configuration parents that included both the axis2

Re: [VOTE] 2.0-M2 Milestone ready for review and JACC Specs

2007-01-28 Thread Jarek Gawor
Joe, I just noticed that yesterday. There is a small bug in CXFBuilder (and Axis2Builder) that causes the cxf/axis2 dependencies to be always added to any application. I don't think that's a major issue. I will be submitting a patch today or tomorrow that will resolve that issue (among other

Re: [VOTE] 2.0-M2 Milestone ready for review and JACC Specs

2007-01-28 Thread Prasad Kashyap
On 1/27/07, Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Jan 27, 2007, at 1:01 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote: All, I have made the binaries from Geronimo 2.0-M2 available for review at: http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/2.0-M2-rc1 In this directory you will find the various assemblies for your

Re: [VOTE] 2.0-M2 Milestone ready for review and JACC Specs

2007-01-27 Thread Kevan Miller
On Jan 27, 2007, at 1:01 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote: All, I have made the binaries from Geronimo 2.0-M2 available for review at: http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/2.0-M2-rc1 In this directory you will find the various assemblies for your review as well as one massive tar ball that has the

[VOTE] 2.0-M2 Milestone ready for review and JACC Specs

2007-01-26 Thread Matt Hogstrom
All, I have made the binaries from Geronimo 2.0-M2 available for review at: http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/2.0-M2-rc1 In this directory you will find the various assemblies for your review as well as one massive tar ball that has the various artifacts that will ultimately be