EJB Relationship Mapping Names

2005-07-27 Thread Aaron Mulder
What's the purpose of the ejb-relation-name and ejb-relationship-role-name elements at: openejb-jar/relationships/ejb-relation/ejb-relation-name openejb-jar/relationships/ejb-relation/ejb-relationship-role/ ejb-relationship-role-name It

Re: EJB Relationship Mapping Names

2005-07-27 Thread Gianny Damour
Hi, They are indeed not used except for documentation purposes. I am not sure that we should rename them documentation as this will not mirror the standard DD. Thanks, Gianny On 28/07/2005 12:43 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote: What's the purpose of the ejb-relation-name and

Re: EJB Relationship Mapping Names

2005-07-27 Thread Jeremy Boynes
Aaron Mulder wrote: What's the purpose of the ejb-relation-name and ejb-relationship-role-name elements at: openejb-jar/relationships/ejb-relation/ejb-relation-name openejb-jar/relationships/ejb-relation/ejb-relationship-role/

Re: EJB Relationship Mapping Names

2005-07-27 Thread Gianny Damour
On 28/07/2005 1:01 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote: On Wed, 27 Jul 2005, Jeremy Boynes wrote: I believe there are certain scenarios where multiple relationships can exist between a pair of entities and there is no other way to tell them apart. Well if this was true, then our code is broken,

Re: EJB Relationship Mapping Names

2005-07-27 Thread Aaron Mulder
I don't like including fields for documentation purposes that have a name that doesn't make it clear that they're only for documentation. As Jeremy just demonstrated, it's easy to convince yourself that those fields should be used in some cases (and I was moderately convinced of that

Re: EJB Relationship Mapping Names

2005-07-27 Thread Gianny Damour
You convinced me. Let's rename these elements description. Thanks, Gianny On 28/07/2005 1:07 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote: I don't like including fields for documentation purposes that have a name that doesn't make it clear that they're only for documentation. As Jeremy just demonstrated, it's