+1 To add the JAXB specs to geronimo
I also like the plan.
-dain
On Dec 14, 2005, at 11:56 AM, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
Brett Porter wrote:
Since JaxMe is at Apache, you can move it over with svn mv.
Exactly. However, initially, I'd prefer a copy operation. (No idea,
whether that's as easy
Hi,
the JaxMe project contains a clean room implementation of the JAXB API
1.1. As future versions of J2EE will contain the JAXB API, I propose
that these be moved to the other Geronimo J2EE spec implementations.
Jochen
--
Often it does seem a pity that Noah and his party did not miss the
boat.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jochen Wiedmann wrote, On 12/14/2005 1:46 AM:
Hi,
the JaxMe project contains a clean room implementation of the JAXB API
1.1. As future versions of J2EE will contain the JAXB API, I propose
that these be moved to the other Geronimo J2EE spec
Since JaxMe is at Apache, you can move it over with svn mv.
Has the JaxMe community as a whole voted to do this? I think it makes
sense, it would just be good to ensure everyone agrees. It will also
impact the committer list for Geronimo.
Cheers,
Brett
On 12/14/05, Alan D. Cabrera [EMAIL
Brett Porter wrote:
Since JaxMe is at Apache, you can move it over with svn mv.
Exactly. However, initially, I'd prefer a copy operation. (No idea,
whether that's as easy in SVN.) That would give a smoother step. We
could wait until the generated jar files do meet the Maven repositories
and
