Re: [Results] Priorities for 1.2

2006-10-18 Thread Alan D. Cabrera
On Oct 10, 2006, at 8:28 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:Thanks Alan  ...  I figured that was the plan but thought I should ask than assume :)Jencks is encouraging me to fix some of the TranQL problems in TCK so I'm updating my copy to 1.2.  I simply can't wait to start running the TCK :-PGreat.  I'm

Re: [Results] Priorities for 1.2

2006-10-18 Thread David Jencks
On Oct 17, 2006, at 11:02 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:On Oct 10, 2006, at 8:28 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:Thanks Alan  ...  I figured that was the plan but thought I should ask than assume :)Jencks is encouraging me to fix some of the TranQL problems in TCK so I'm updating my copy to 1.2.  I simply

Re: [Results] Priorities for 1.2

2006-10-18 Thread Alan D. Cabrera
On Oct 18, 2006, at 12:24 AM, David Jencks wrote:On Oct 17, 2006, at 11:02 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:On Oct 10, 2006, at 8:28 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:Thanks Alan  ...  I figured that was the plan but thought I should ask than assume :)Jencks is encouraging me to fix some of the TranQL problems in

Re: [Results] Priorities for 1.2

2006-10-18 Thread Matt Hogstrom
On Oct 18, 2006, at 2:02 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:Great.  I'm thinking that we can try to cut a real release by the end of this month and run it through the TCK wringer.  What does everyone think?I think it would be excellent to get past TCK and branch trunk for the 1.2 release.  I am hearing

Re: [Results] Priorities for 1.2

2006-10-18 Thread David Jencks
On Oct 18, 2006, at 8:37 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:On Oct 18, 2006, at 12:24 AM, David Jencks wrote:On Oct 17, 2006, at 11:02 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:On Oct 10, 2006, at 8:28 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:Thanks Alan  ...  I figured that was the plan but thought I should ask than assume :)Jencks is

Re: [Results] Priorities for 1.2

2006-10-16 Thread Joe Bohn
Dain, Could you clarify the Full Java 5 support item some more? I was under the impression when I first read this (esp. the statement about certification) that this was the work necessary to get to JEE5. However, others have indicated that this is really certification (TCK at the 1.4 spec

Re: [Results] Priorities for 1.2

2006-10-16 Thread Dain Sundstrom
On Oct 16, 2006, at 11:28 AM, Joe Bohn wrote: Dain, Could you clarify the Full Java 5 support item some more? I was under the impression when I first read this (esp. the statement about certification) that this was the work necessary to get to JEE5. However, others have indicated that

Re: Priorities for 1.2

2006-10-12 Thread Sachin Patel
Sorry to be completely late on this thread but I'd like to add one more to the list... - Improved Tooling/Runtime integration.  Abstract out use of JarFile in deployers so J2EE deployment can occur in-place within IDE project structures.On Oct 2, 2006, at 3:40 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:We have

Re: [Results] Priorities for 1.2

2006-10-10 Thread Matt Hogstrom
Just as a point of reference on process. I'm just about done with the CMP improvements. These changes are really to tranQL and OpenEJB. I've had users asking for them and based on the note below I'm not sure what your expectations are. I plan on getting them tested and integrated this

Re: [Results] Priorities for 1.2

2006-10-10 Thread Alan D. Cabrera
On Oct 10, 2006, at 6:33 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote: Just as a point of reference on process. I'm just about done with the CMP improvements. These changes are really to tranQL and OpenEJB. I've had users asking for them and based on the note below I'm not sure what your expectations are.

[Results] Priorities for 1.2

2006-10-09 Thread Dain Sundstrom
The results are in! We had a good number of respondents, and the results are quite clear. Last night I spent a few hours tallying the results and analyzing them. There was a very clean ordering from the most popular to the least. Additionally, the features clearly fell into categories. Top

Re: [Results] Priorities for 1.2

2006-10-09 Thread Dain Sundstrom
For those that are interested, here is the raw data: http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDEV/priorities-12-results.html -dain On 10/9/06, Dain Sundstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The results are in! We had a good number of respondents, and the results are quite clear. Last night I spent a few hours

Re: Priorities for 1.2

2006-10-08 Thread John Sisson
Global JNDI Yoko ORB support Full Java 5 support More out of the box samples Console usability improvements OpenEJB 3.0 integration with @Stateless EJBs support OpenJPA integration More server modularization via plugins Console extensibility Jetspeed integration CMP improvements GShell

Re: Priorities for 1.2

2006-10-08 Thread Vamsavardhana Reddy
Security improvements. Most Security JIRAs should be addressed in 1.2 --vamsiOn 10/9/06, John Sisson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Global JNDIYoko ORB supportFull Java 5 supportMore out of the box samplesConsole usability improvementsOpenEJB 3.0 integration with @Stateless EJBs supportOpenJPA

Re: Priorities for 1.2

2006-10-06 Thread Jacek Laskowski
On 10/2/06, Dain Sundstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Please, sort the following list according to what *you* believe are the most important features to include in 1.2. It will help me tally the list if you simply reorder the list instead of putting numbers next to the features. Also, please

Re: Priorities for 1.2

2006-10-06 Thread Paul McMahan
On 10/2/06, Dain Sundstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Please, sort the following list according to what *you* believe are the most important features to include in 1.2. It will help me tally the list if you simply reorder the list instead of putting numbers next to the features. Also, please *do

Re: Priorities for 1.2

2006-10-06 Thread Kevan Miller
Hmm. I could understand a poll to understand what items we should be *working* on. But you're posing this as a release wish list... I don't think it works like that... Planning a release isn't just what functions we would you like to see... It's a mix of what and when... For a 1.2 release,

Re: Priorities for 1.2

2006-10-06 Thread David Blevins
OpenJPA integration Yoko ORB support Full Java 5 support Global JNDI -David

Re: Priorities for 1.2

2006-10-06 Thread Andrus Adamchik
Not that I have a say here, but this is my list... :-) Cayenne integration Full Java 5 support Console usability improvements Console extensibility More server modularization via plugins OpenEJB 3.0 integration with @Stateless EJBs support Global JNDI Andrus On Oct 2, 2006, at 3:40 PM, Dain

Re: Priorities for 1.2

2006-10-06 Thread David Jencks
Is Cayenne integration an example of JPA integration? If so if you have a little time would you like to try adapting the sandbox/javaee/ itests/jpa example to cayenne? If not, what do you have in mind? Also I suspect Cayenne integration will require GlobalJNDI -- openjpa does. thanks

Re: Priorities for 1.2

2006-10-06 Thread Andrus Adamchik
On Oct 6, 2006, at 2:37 PM, David Jencks wrote: Is Cayenne integration an example of JPA integration? Yes. If so if you have a little time would you like to try adapting the sandbox/javaee/itests/jpa example to cayenne? I'll take a look. Also I suspect Cayenne integration will require

Re: Priorities for 1.2

2006-10-06 Thread Jacek Laskowski
On 10/6/06, Andrus Adamchik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Not that I have a say here, but this is my list... :-) Do you mean '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' is your list or something else? ;-P Jacek -- Jacek Laskowski http://www.laskowski.net.pl

Re: Priorities for 1.2

2006-10-06 Thread Andrus Adamchik
I guess you are joking, but of course I was referring to the list of prioritized issues not the mailing list :-) Andrus On Oct 6, 2006, at 3:48 PM, Jacek Laskowski wrote: On 10/6/06, Andrus Adamchik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Not that I have a say here, but this is my list... :-) Do you

Re: Priorities for 1.2

2006-10-04 Thread Gianny Damour
OpenJPA integration GShell integration Global JNDI Full Java 5 support More out of the box samples Thanks, Gianny On 03/10/2006, at 5:40 AM, Dain Sundstrom wrote: We have collected 14 features for 1.2 and now we need to prioritize them. The sorted list of features will help guide us in

Re: Priorities for 1.2

2006-10-03 Thread Heinz Drews
If there is interest in a non-committer opinion then my list would be: Yoko ORB support (Assuming that this is necessary to get Java 5 fully supported) Full Java 5 support Console usability improvements Global JNDI Geronimo OSGi bundle More server modularization via plugins Console

Re: Priorities for 1.2

2006-10-03 Thread anita kulshreshtha
Global JNDIYoko ORB support Full Java 5 supportOpenEJB 3.0 integration with @Stateless EJBs supportOpenJPA integrationMore server modularization via pluginsConsole usability improvementsConsole extensibilityCMP improvementsGeronimo OSGi bundleJAF 1.1Jetspeed integrationGShell integrationMore out

Re: Priorities for 1.2

2006-10-03 Thread Jay D. McHugh
Another non-committer's list: OpenEJB 3.0 integration with @Stateless EJBs support CMP improvements OpenJPA integration Full Java 5 support Yoko ORB support (This is required for full java 5 support isn't it?) Global JNDI More out of the box samples Geronimo OSGi bundle Jetspeed integration

Priorities for 1.2

2006-10-02 Thread Dain Sundstrom
We have collected 14 features for 1.2 and now we need to prioritize them. The sorted list of features will help guide us in determining when to release based on how many high priority features we have completed. Please, sort the following list according to what *you* believe are the

Re: Priorities for 1.2

2006-10-02 Thread Jason Dillon
Full Java 5 support Console extensibility More server modularization via plugins GShell integration No opinion: OpenJPA integration Global JNDI Yoko ORB support JAF 1.1 CMP improvements Console usability improvements Jetspeed integration More out of the box samples OpenEJB 3.0 integration with

Re: Priorities for 1.2

2006-10-02 Thread toby cabot
In this user's opinion (for what it's worth): Full Java 5 support Geronimo OSGi bundle Console usability improvements Global JNDI Console extensibility More out of the box samples OpenJPA integration Yoko ORB support JAF 1.1 GShell integration CMP improvements Jetspeed integration More server

Re: Priorities for 1.2

2006-10-02 Thread Guillaume Nodet
Global JNDI Console extensibility More server modularization via plugins OpenJPA integration Geronimo OSGi bundle Full Java 5 support Console usability improvements OpenEJB 3.0 integration with @Stateless EJBs support Yoko ORB support GShell integration JAF 1.1 CMP improvements Jetspeed

Re: Priorities for 1.2

2006-10-02 Thread David Jencks
Global JNDI OpenJPA integration Yoko ORB support OpenEJB 3.0 integration with @Stateless EJBs support More server modularization via plugins Console usability improvements Console extensibility Full Java 5 support what does this mean??? GShell integration CMP improvements Jetspeed integration