Re: Proposed new multiproject build

2004-10-07 Thread Dain Sundstrom
This is caused when you don't have all of the modules checked out yet. I believe that if you drop your current checkout and checkout again with m:co, m:update will start working for you. BTW I have been using m:update on my mac laptop and a windows desktop, which is checking out

Re: Proposed new multiproject build

2004-10-07 Thread sissonj
It worked for me... but.. A bit off topic, as my problems don't have anything to do with Dain's changes, but I have some questions on the build processing. I tried the following (without cleaning my repository but with an empty geronimo directory): maven m:co maven m:build I

Re: Proposed new multiproject build

2004-10-07 Thread Aaron Mulder
Yuo might be interested in GERONIMO-364 in JIRA -- which is to provide a build target to do all the downloads in one shot so the rest of the build can be run quickly in offline mode. Dain was going to look into it in his copious free time... :) Aaron On Fri, 8 Oct 2004 [EMAIL

Re: Proposed new multiproject build

2004-10-07 Thread Dain Sundstrom
After some thinking, I don't think this can be done directly with maven... let me explain. I thought we could simple do a standard reactor build (the thing that executes maven for each sub-module) with a do nothing target such as build:start. This would cause maven to download the

Re: Proposed new multiproject build

2004-10-07 Thread Aaron Mulder
I think I missed this earlier, but how do you set your CVS account to check out a subproject with write permissions if you use m:co? Does it use the same properties that maven getotherprojects does? Thanks, Aaron On Thu, 7 Oct 2004, Dain Sundstrom wrote: On Oct 7, 2004, at

Re: Proposed new multiproject build

2004-10-07 Thread David Jencks
On Oct 7, 2004, at 12:44 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote: On Oct 7, 2004, at 12:30 PM, David Jencks wrote: Right, I was trying to use a checkout from the previous version of maven.xml. I don't know why it didn't work, but after m:co m:update works. Cool Now I'm having what I consider a severe

Re: Proposed new multiproject build

2004-10-07 Thread Dain Sundstrom
On Oct 7, 2004, at 1:39 PM, David Jencks wrote: On Oct 7, 2004, at 12:44 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote: On Oct 7, 2004, at 12:30 PM, David Jencks wrote: Right, I was trying to use a checkout from the previous version of maven.xml. I don't know why it didn't work, but after m:co m:update works.

Re: Proposed new multiproject build

2004-10-07 Thread David Jencks
On Oct 7, 2004, at 3:06 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote: On Oct 7, 2004, at 1:39 PM, David Jencks wrote: On Oct 7, 2004, at 12:44 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote: On Oct 7, 2004, at 12:30 PM, David Jencks wrote: Right, I was trying to use a checkout from the previous version of maven.xml. I don't know why it

Proposed new multiproject build

2004-10-06 Thread Dain Sundstrom
I have rewritten our multiproject build to add support for windows. The new goals all start with m: so as to not disrupt our current stuff. Assuming everyone is happy, I would like to remove the current multiproject and reactor goals (and drop the m: prefix). This is only a proposal, so if

Re: Proposed new multiproject build

2004-10-06 Thread David Jencks
m:update doesn't work for me. Geronimo and activemq are updated, then it tries to update geronimo using cvs. BUILD FAILED File.. /Users/david/geronimo/geronimo/svn/geronimo/trunk/maven.xml Element... ant:cvs Line.. 205 Column 15 cvs exited with error code 1 Command line was