This fix seems to have exposed an issue where the connector builder
failed to deploy plans where no parent ID was specified (instead of
using the configured default). David J and I have checked in a fix
for that. I also fixed the problem where the j2ee-installer assembly
failed on missing
Hi there,
correction to my previous mail:
1) The strange split of all files between the two src archives was a
failure on my side. Actually there are exactly the same files in both zip
and tarball.
2) The problem with chopped off last characters in file names to some
extent still exists, but it
to start
geronimo.server:J2EEApplic
akshay
From: David Blevins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wed 12/14/2005 11:05 AM
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Vote] Geronimo V1.0 Release binaries
Uploading again... The connection was reset.
On Dec 13
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
+1 assuming the binaries pass the TCK
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote, On 12/13/2005 9:18 PM:
+1 assuming the binaries pass the TCK
On Dec 13, 2005, at 8:30 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
We are currently going through the final testing phases and have
+1 from me.
On 12/13/05, Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We are currently going through the final testing phases and have the binary
images available for review. These images represent what we will be making
available to users after we confirm the final set of tests.
Please take some
Yanking my +1. The binaries are flawed.
-David
On Dec 13, 2005, at 9:53 PM, David Blevins wrote:
Files uploaded! Here is my +1 baring any tck failures.
-David
On Dec 13, 2005, at 8:30 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
We are currently going through the final testing phases and have
the binary
+1 assuming the binaries pass the TCK
On Dec 13, 2005, at 8:30 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
We are currently going through the final testing phases and have
the binary images available for review. These images represent
what we will be making available to users after we confirm the
final set
[X] +1 Release these binaries
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
We are currently going through the final testing phases and have the
binary images available for review. These images represent what we will
be making available to users after we confirm the final set of tests.
Please take some time to
I assume david is still uploading? they aren't all there...
On Dec 13, 2005, at 8:30 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
We are currently going through the final testing phases and have
the binary images available for review. These images represent
what we will be making available to users after we
Uploading again... The connection was reset.
On Dec 13, 2005, at 9:29 PM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
I assume david is still uploading? they aren't all there...
On Dec 13, 2005, at 8:30 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
We are currently going through the final testing phases and have
the binary
Files uploaded! Here is my +1 baring any tck failures.
-David
On Dec 13, 2005, at 8:30 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
We are currently going through the final testing phases and have
the binary images available for review. These images represent
what we will be making available to users after
] Geronimo V1.0 Release binaries
Uploading again... The connection was reset.
On Dec 13, 2005, at 9:29 PM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
I assume david is still uploading? they aren't all there...
On Dec 13, 2005, at 8:30 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
We are currently going through the final testing
Not gonna do a RCn series first?
--jason
On Dec 13, 2005, at 8:30 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
We are currently going through the final testing phases and have
the binary images available for review. These images represent
what we will be making available to users after we confirm the
I'm sorry to say, but -1: the console has a dangling SNAPSHOT that
means that no database pools can be deployed from the database pool
portlet. I put all the blame on the guy who did the SNAPSHOT cleanup
in the branch, who was, umm, me. :)
I checked the fix in to the 1.0 branch.
Aaron
On
Hi guys,
unfortunately:
-1 (non binding)
Reason:
The tarballs for source and bin are corrupt. They includes files with a
missing last character in their name. I checked md5 of the downloads (OK).
The zip seems OK. Some differences between the archives might be
intentionally, but obviously not
15 matches
Mail list logo
