+1
-dain
On Dec 18, 2006, at 12:57 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
All,
I have prepared 2.0-M1 for release. Of course all the hard work
was done by the lot of y'all :)
I have tested DayTrader 2.0-SNAPSHOT on this build and I'm
satisfied with the results. All modes of operation functioned
+1
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
All,
I have prepared 2.0-M1 for release. Of course all the hard work was
done by the lot of y'all :)
I have tested DayTrader 2.0-SNAPSHOT on this build and I'm satisfied
with the results. All modes of operation functioned well (SLSB,
Direct, EJB and JPA). I
+1
--vamsi
On 12/18/06, Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All,
I have prepared 2.0-M1 for release. Of course all the hard work was
done by the lot of y'all :)
I have tested DayTrader 2.0-SNAPSHOT on this build and I'm satisfied
with the results. All modes of operation functioned
+1
chris
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
All,
I have prepared 2.0-M1 for release. Of course all the hard work was
done by the lot of y'all :)
I have tested DayTrader 2.0-SNAPSHOT on this build and I'm satisfied
with the results. All modes of operation functioned well (SLSB,
Direct, EJB and JPA).
Looks good. +1.
On Dec 18, 2006, at 3:57 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
All,
I have prepared 2.0-M1 for release. Of course all the hard work
was done by the lot of y'all :)
I have tested DayTrader 2.0-SNAPSHOT on this build and I'm
satisfied with the results. All modes of operation
On Dec 18, 2006, at 3:57 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Please review and cast your vote early. The faster we determine
this build is good or if there is an issue the better.
Thanks in advance for all your help in this effort.
This vote will conclude at 0400 ET on Dec 21 (unless all you PMC
+1
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
All,
I have prepared 2.0-M1 for release. Of course all the hard work was
done by the lot of y'all :)
I have tested DayTrader 2.0-SNAPSHOT on this build and I'm satisfied
with the results. All modes of operation functioned well (SLSB, Direct,
EJB and JPA). I
I tried tomcat6-jee5:
-- The log file is empty.
-- Is it necessary to change all the log levels from WARN to ERROR (rev
488143)?
Thanks
Anita
--- Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All,
I have prepared 2.0-M1 for release. Of course all the hard work was
done by the lot of
Which log is empty?
anita kulshreshtha wrote:
I tried tomcat6-jee5:
-- The log file is empty.
-- Is it necessary to change all the log levels from WARN to ERROR (rev
488143)?
Thanks
Anita
--- Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All,
I have prepared 2.0-M1 for release. Of
Hi All,
I have two basic comments/questions.
1- I see a bunch of INFO messages in both Tomcat and Jetty at startup, not a
show stopper for this release.
2- Deployment on Jetty is not behaving exactly as I expected. Not sure if I
messed up the dep plans given the new specs, however this same
+1
I tried all 4 assemblies and deployed a simple web application to each.
All went as expected. As already mentioned, there are some info
messages (more with tomcat than jetty).
Joe
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
All,
I have prepared 2.0-M1 for release. Of course all the hard work was
done
geronimo.log is empty on both Jetty and Tomcat
Cheers!
Hernan
Jeff Genender wrote:
Which log is empty?
anita kulshreshtha wrote:
I tried tomcat6-jee5:
-- The log file is empty.
-- Is it necessary to change all the log levels from WARN to ERROR (rev
488143)?
Thanks
Anita
--- Matt
If you want more extensive debugging you can crank the log level up.
for M2 I want to look at the log in a bit more detail as a user I
would expect some server started messages and the like and I think we
need to tweak the server to get that level of usability.
The log does work which is
+1
Best wishes,
Paul
On 12/18/06, Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All,
I have prepared 2.0-M1 for release. Of course all the hard work was
done by the lot of y'all :)
I have tested DayTrader 2.0-SNAPSHOT on this build and I'm satisfied
with the results. All modes of operation
The geronimo.log is empty. It does not contain system information.
Thanks
Anita
--- Jeff Genender [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Which log is empty?
anita kulshreshtha wrote:
I tried tomcat6-jee5:
-- The log file is empty.
-- Is it necessary to change all the log levels from WARN to
Found no show-stopping issues for a milestone.
+1
Cheers
Prasad
On 12/18/06, Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All,
I have prepared 2.0-M1 for release. Of course all the hard work was
done by the lot of y'all :)
I have tested DayTrader 2.0-SNAPSHOT on this build and I'm satisfied
with
With the addition of a license header to geronimo/server/tags/2.0-M1/
testsuite/deployment-testsuite/manifestcp/manifestcp-ejb/src/main/
resources/META-INF/ejb-jar.xml, I'm +1.
--kevan
+1
I don't think we should spend too much time on this release. Lets
just note the issues we run into and try to fix them for M2, possibly
implementing more build support to help us avoid more legal-related
issues, which seem to be the bulk of problems we run into.
--jason
On Dec 18,
+1
-David
On Dec 18, 2006, at 12:57 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
All,
I have prepared 2.0-M1 for release. Of course all the hard work
was done by the lot of y'all :)
I have tested DayTrader 2.0-SNAPSHOT on this build and I'm
satisfied with the results. All modes of operation functioned
+1
Jacek
On 12/18/06, Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All,
I have prepared 2.0-M1 for release. Of course all the hard work was
done by the lot of y'all :)
I have tested DayTrader 2.0-SNAPSHOT on this build and I'm satisfied
with the results. All modes of operation functioned well
20 matches
Mail list logo
