I forgot to vote. Doh.
+1 Accept
+1 create app subproject and move apps, samples to it
geir
On Sep 20, 2005, at 12:13 PM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
There has been little comment or complaint about the DayTrader
contribution GERONIMO-1016.
I have done a cursory review and committed the
Accept DayTrader :
+1 from geir, dain, joe, alan, david, sachin, dims, john, gianny, david
So let it be noted that the DayTrader contribution was accepted.
For the App subproject :
+1 from geir, joe, dims
-1 from everyone else
So noted that this isn't happening now.
geir
On Sep 20, 2005,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-MMS-Smtp-Program: Macallan-Mail-Solution; Version 4.6.0.1
X-MMS-Smtp-Auth: Authenticated As [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-MMS-Smtp-Mailer-Program:
Yup, that is part of the cleanup effort :)
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
There has been little comment or complaint about the DayTrader
contribution GERONIMO-1016.
I have done a cursory review and committed the code minus the binary
code (.class and .ear) into trunk/sandbox. I did this as a
+1 Accept the DayTrader donation into the project
-1 Do not create Applications subproject.
I think I'm a bit confused here. You seem to be implying that if the
code is at scm/geronimo/daytrader it is a subproject. I think it
makes since to move the applications out of trunk to keep it
+1 Accept the DayTrader donation into the project
- The more good samples we have will quicken and assist the
adoption of Geronimo
+1 Create an Applications subproject (to which Apache Geronimo
subproject rules apply) and move DayTrader (if accepted)
with other relevant
On Sep 20, 2005, at 12:28 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
+1 Accept the DayTrader donation into the project
-1 Do not create Applications subproject.
I think I'm a bit confused here. You seem to be implying that if
the code is at scm/geronimo/daytrader it is a subproject.
I was going to
On Sep 20, 2005, at 12:32 PM, Joe Bohn wrote:
+1 Accept the DayTrader donation into the project
- The more good samples we have will quicken and assist the
adoption of Geronimo
+1 Create an Applications subproject (to which Apache Geronimo
subproject rules apply) and move
+1 Accept the DayTrader donation into the project
-1 Create an Applications subproject (to which Apache Geronimo
There is no compelling need at the moment for this.
Regards,
Alan
On 9/20/2005 9:32 AM, Joe Bohn wrote:
+1 Accept the DayTrader donation into the project
- The more
+1 Accept the DayTrader donation into the project
-1 Do not create Applications subproject. Leave in trunk.
There are too many issues with regard to maintaining compatibility with
multiple geronimo versions to consider decoupling the
sample/application release cycle from geronimo's release
On Sep 20, 2005, at 1:04 PM, David Jencks wrote:
+1 Accept the DayTrader donation into the project
-1 Do not create Applications subproject. Leave in trunk.
There are too many issues with regard to maintaining compatibility
with multiple geronimo versions to consider decoupling the
+1 Accept the DayTrader donation into the project
-1 Create an Applications subproject (for now)
Sachin.
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
There has been little comment or complaint about the DayTrader
contribution GERONIMO-1016.
I have done a cursory review and committed the code minus the binary
+1 Accept the DayTrader donation into the project
- The more good samples we have will quicken and assist the
adoption of Geronimo
+1 Create an Applications subproject (or) DevTools. Doesn't matter to me.
-- dims
On 9/20/05, Sachin Patel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 Accept the DayTrader
+1 Accept the DayTrader donation into the project
-1 Do not create Applications subproject. Leave in trunk.
(Keep it simple for now. Review this later when Geronimo is more
stable. I think it is too early to try to have applications with their
own release cycle).
John
Geir Magnusson Jr.
+1 Accept the DayTrader donation into the project
-1 Do not create Applications subproject. Leave in trunk.
On Sep 20, 2005, at 4:28 PM, John Sisson wrote:
(Keep it simple for now. Review this later when Geronimo is more
stable. I think
it is too early to try to have applications with
I'm just curious what people expect to happen here.I'm happy to
go with the flow, but at least want to understand the flow.
DayTrader is an application that is used as a performance tool for
any J2EE server, so it's not Geronimo only. (Contrast that with the
console, as an example.)
My concern is primarily with the geronimo plan. While presumably the
app itself isn't going to need to change to be deployed to other app
servers, I expect each server to need a separate plan. I was thinking
we'd keep the app and geronimo plan together in synch with the geronimo
version.
On Sep 21, 2005, at 12:13 AM, David Jencks wrote:
My concern is primarily with the geronimo plan. While presumably
the app itself isn't going to need to change to be deployed to
other app servers, I expect each server to need a separate plan.
Wouldn't that be part of the DayTrader
18 matches
Mail list logo
