RE: Unit/Stress Tests

2004-08-04 Thread Alan D. Cabrera
*ConfiguableTest.java and just exclude those. Alan -Original Message- From: David Blevins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2004 10:26 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Unit/Stress Tests On Tue, Aug 03, 2004 at 08:41:44AM -0400, Alan D. Cabrera wrote: IMHO

Re: Unit/Stress Tests (Bite Sized Task)

2004-08-04 Thread David Blevins
On Wed, Aug 04, 2004 at 05:01:57PM -0500, Dain Sundstrom wrote: On Aug 3, 2004, at 2:09 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote: That's basically a 20 minute difference with only 4.5 minutes reportedly spend on our tests. What is taking up the other 15 minutes? Is setUp/tearDown not counted in the test

Re: Unit/Stress Tests

2004-08-03 Thread David Jencks
Before we jump off the cliff here, just how long do the stress tests currently take? I don't think it is a significant fraction of the build time. I recall trying this idea of isolating stress tests in jboss builds and it turned into a real mess. Noone likes maintaining the test system,

Re: Unit/Stress Tests

2004-08-03 Thread David Blevins
On Tue, Aug 03, 2004 at 09:19:54AM -0700, David Jencks wrote: Before we jump off the cliff here, just how long do the stress tests currently take? Ok, never mind, I retract the idea. I just ran some comparisons and came out with some interesting numbers. On my 3Ghz WinXP/Cygwin box, these

Re: Unit/Stress Tests

2004-08-03 Thread Dain Sundstrom
I think the reason our stress tests don't take very long, is we are limiting them because we don't want the build to take a long time. I think once we remove this limitation the test time will grow and we will get actual stress testing. -dain On Aug 3, 2004, at 11:19 AM, David Jencks wrote: