Re: Reorganizing javamai (revisited)

2006-06-08 Thread Rick McGuire
Alan D. Cabrera wrote: Rick McGuire wrote: Alan D. Cabrera wrote: Rick McGuire wrote: I brought this up a couple of months ago, and I believe we reached a consensus on what should be done but the work was put off until after 1.1 shipped. Since then, I have a new factor to introduce into thi

Re: Reorganizing javamai (revisited)

2006-06-08 Thread Alan D. Cabrera
Rick McGuire wrote: Alan D. Cabrera wrote: Rick McGuire wrote: I brought this up a couple of months ago, and I believe we reached a consensus on what should be done but the work was put off until after 1.1 shipped. Since then, I have a new factor to introduce into this discussion, so I want

Re: Reorganizing javamai (revisited)

2006-06-08 Thread Rick McGuire
Alan D. Cabrera wrote: Rick McGuire wrote: I brought this up a couple of months ago, and I believe we reached a consensus on what should be done but the work was put off until after 1.1 shipped. Since then, I have a new factor to introduce into this discussion, so I want to make sure we've go

Re: Reorganizing javamai (revisited)

2006-06-08 Thread Alan D. Cabrera
Rick McGuire wrote: I brought this up a couple of months ago, and I believe we reached a consensus on what should be done but the work was put off until after 1.1 shipped. Since then, I have a new factor to introduce into this discussion, so I want to make sure we've got good agreement on what

Re: Reorganizing javamai (revisited)

2006-06-08 Thread Dain Sundstrom
+1 Great idea. -dain On Jun 7, 2006, at 5:46 AM, Rick McGuire wrote: I brought this up a couple of months ago, and I believe we reached a consensus on what should be done but the work was put off until after 1.1 shipped. Since then, I have a new factor to introduce into this discussion,

Re: Reorganizing javamai (revisited)

2006-06-08 Thread David Jencks
Looks good. +1 thanks david jencks On Jun 7, 2006, at 5:46 AM, Rick McGuire wrote: I brought this up a couple of months ago, and I believe we reached a consensus on what should be done but the work was put off until after 1.1 shipped. Since then, I have a new factor to introduce into th

Re: Reorganizing javamai (revisited)

2006-06-08 Thread Davanum Srinivas
+1 from me. On 6/7/06, Rick McGuire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I brought this up a couple of months ago, and I believe we reached a consensus on what should be done but the work was put off until after 1.1 shipped. Since then, I have a new factor to introduce into this discussion, so I want to

Reorganizing javamai (revisited)

2006-06-07 Thread Rick McGuire
I brought this up a couple of months ago, and I believe we reached a consensus on what should be done but the work was put off until after 1.1 shipped. Since then, I have a new factor to introduce into this discussion, so I want to make sure we've got good agreement on what needs to be done.