Within the ASF, the use of the development mailing list is *the* method
of development discussion. That's the reason for it.
Wikis are good for after the fact documentation.
IRC is good when a small subset of developers need to
get together quickly to talk about some aspects of
development, but it
Jim Jagielski wrote:
Within the ASF, the use of the development mailing list is *the* method
of development discussion. That's the reason for it.
Wikis are good for after the fact documentation.
IRC is good when a small subset of developers need to
get together quickly to talk about some aspects
For the record, when the words hidden agenda came up, my exact response
was, Can we turn this back into a technical discussion?
Talking offline is fine. Throw in beer and it's even better. Can't
wait to see everyone at ApacheCon next week.
My beef was in the very first sentence of Aaron's
I think that this is an important issue, but not the important one for
this thread, and we're getting caught in a rathole.
The conversation in question started on the dev list, had a phone call
between two individuals that really respect each other and wanted to
figure out where the crossed
On Nov 8, 2004, at 12:24 PM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
Within the ASF, the use of the development mailing list is *the*
method
of development discussion. That's the reason for it.
Wikis are good for after the fact documentation.
IRC is good when a small subset of developers need
On Nov 8, 2004, at 1:44 PM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
David Blevins wrote:
My apologies to Jeremy as I had assumed the decision to commit a new
deployer was part of a their discussion.
Appreciated, thank you. To be clear, it _was_ part of the discussion;
we were discussing the best way to proceed
I never considered this issue as anything serious at all.
Quite the opposite; as I mentioned just about every ASF project
has had this pop up. I was simply stating the general rule, without
any sort of interpretation of the events that lead to
it. :)
pace vobiscum!
Speaking only for myself, I think that geronimo and the people involved
are top-notch. The project and the people are too good to allow this
sort of devolution. I really think that where one feels heat seeking
light would be preferrable. And, I want to say that often I am the
On Sun, 7 Nov 2004, Bruce Snyder wrote:
Per these disagreements, I think that we should address them before we
move on simply because I don't want to be bitten by these same issues
again. I suggest that we learn from this issue and set forth some
guidelines for the future.
As for the
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
On Nov 7, 2004, at 1:21 PM, Bruce Snyder wrote:
Per these disagreements, I think that we should address them before we
move on simply because I don't want to be bitten by these same issues
again. I suggest that we learn from this issue and set forth some
guidelines for
On Nov 7, 2004, at 2:39 PM, Bruce Snyder wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
On Nov 7, 2004, at 1:21 PM, Bruce Snyder wrote:
Per these disagreements, I think that we should address them before
we move on simply because I don't want to be bitten by these same
issues again. I suggest that we learn
11 matches
Mail list logo
