My preference for option #2 really had more to do with where the
optional modules (like directory, clustering, etc) should go than
where the samples should go. I think we're in agreement that the
samples should go into samples/trunk. I created GERONIMO-2784 to
outline what I think are the right
This is how I see it. The apps in geronimo/server/trunk/applications
should be the ones that are absolutely required by the server. Eg:
console, welcome app etc.
The optional apps like servlet-examples, jsp-examples should be moved
elsewhere to a samples directory or project. There is no need to
Any thoughts on what we do with the new Samples being added to
/geronimo/samples/trunk and the /geronimo/plugins/trunk files?
We currently have 5 places for samples and plugins (the above 2
locations plus server/applications, server/configs and
geronimo/daytrader) and I would like to spend
As part of the discussion on G2728 relating to the Directory server and
LDAP-Demo sample -
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2728
I'm wondering how others would like to see us handle optional server
components for 2.0, as we currently have some samples and plug-ins in
Thanks Donald for migrating this discussion onto [EMAIL PROTECTED] I posted
some
feedback about option #1 in the JIRA you referenced. To sum up, I was
concerned about moving optional modules to an area called plugins,
since IMO that's a misnomer since optional modules aren't always
plugins and
