Hi Geir,
They are part of the schema in the spec pdf, no claimed copyright in
the schema definition.
TTFN,
Bill Dudney
MyFaces - myfaces.apache.org
On Mar 8, 2006, at 4:48 AM, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
if the comments are part of someone else's copyrighted material,
and it's not under a
if the comments are part of someone else's copyrighted material, and
it's not under a permissive open source license, please don't copy them.
geir
Bill Dudney wrote:
So I will go ahead and type the comments (I'm more than half way through
it anyway) and then we can delete them if we need to.
So I will go ahead and type the comments (I'm more than half way
through it anyway) and then we can delete them if we need to.
OK?
Jeff or anyone else, who should I go to for official statement? [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
TTFN,
Bill Dudney
MyFaces - myfaces.apache.org
Wadi - incubator.apache.org/wa
John Sisson wrote:
> We shouldn't retype the comments in the XSD just like the javadoc in the
> spec. You are welcome to type your own original comments.
This is debatable for XSDs. We currently seem to be using a lot of XSDs
verbatim for the SPECs, so we need an official statement on this.
>
We shouldn't retype the comments in the XSD just like the javadoc in the
spec. You are welcome to type your own original comments.
Thanks,
John
Bill Dudney wrote:
Hi All,
I think this must have gotten lost in the traffic over the weekend.
Anyone know if I should/have to retype all the docu
Hi All,
I think this must have gotten lost in the traffic over the weekend.
Anyone know if I should/have to retype all the documentation comments
in the XSD?
Thanks,
Bill Dudney
MyFaces - myfaces.apache.org
On Mar 5, 2006, at 6:50 AM, Bill Dudney wrote:
One other question - the document
One other question - the documentation comments in the XML schema for
the spec? Should I type in these comments or leave them out?
Thanks,
-bd-
On Mar 3, 2006, at 1:00 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
BTW add a jira for this, so everyone knows you are working on it.
-dain
On Mar 3, 2006, at 10:0
BTW add a jira for this, so everyone knows you are working on it.
-dain
On Mar 3, 2006, at 10:02 AM, Bill Dudney wrote:
Hi All,
Thanks for the comments.
Dain: Yeah its not copying out of the pdf but simply typing, hardly
feels like original work though so even though I'm not copying, it
Hi All,
Thanks for the comments.
Dain: Yeah its not copying out of the pdf but simply typing, hardly
feels like original work though so even though I'm not copying, it
sure feels like it. :-)
I'll leave the comments out and post a patch after I get one more
pass over it (~early next week
On Mar 3, 2006, at 9:37 AM, David Jencks wrote:
On Mar 3, 2006, at 9:10 AM, Bill Dudney wrote:
Hi All,
I've started getting ready for JSF 1.2 and figured that a good
place for the api jar to land is the uber spec project @ G for
JavaEE 5.
I'm most of the way there for Servlet 2.5 and JS
On Mar 3, 2006, at 9:10 AM, Bill Dudney wrote:
Hi All,
I've started getting ready for JSF 1.2 and figured that a good
place for the api jar to land is the uber spec project @ G for
JavaEE 5.
I'm most of the way there for Servlet 2.5 and JSP 2.1 but I was
wondering about javadoc. Does a
Hi All,
I've started getting ready for JSF 1.2 and figured that a good place
for the api jar to land is the uber spec project @ G for JavaEE 5.
I'm most of the way there for Servlet 2.5 and JSP 2.1 but I was
wondering about javadoc. Does anyone know what the rules are
regarding javadoc in
12 matches
Mail list logo
