Right, so deleting doesn't remove anything.
I think that hiding our history like this is a bad idea, and will
lead to even more confusion - if you don't want to make a mistake and
work on a branch accidentally, don't check it out.
Anyway, I can't see how removing the branch will prevent
I agree with Geir in that I think that we should have kept the branch;
even though it is widely accepted that we will not extend it with a
patch, it's just good form to do things in a consistent standard way.
What confused me when I responded to Dain's original request was the QA
suffix.
Geir, if your statement were factually correct I would agree with
you, but we have not lost or hid any history. Go see for yourself.
$ cd tags/v1_0_M4
$ svn log project.properties
or
http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/geronimo/tags/v1_0_M4/
project.properties?rev=227113view=log
You will
On Sep 19, 2005, at 6:36 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
I agree with Geir in that I think that we should have kept the
branch; even though it is widely accepted that we will not extend
it with a patch, it's just good form to do things in a consistent
standard way.
Well given that Geir was
On Sep 19, 2005, at 11:17 AM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
Geir, if your statement were factually correct I would agree with
you, but we have not lost or hid any history. Go see for yourself.
I never said we lost anything. We are hiding it because you can't go
look at our structure of branches
On Sep 17, 2005, at 5:34 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
Geir, I sent and email about this and the feedback I got was do it.
Yes, at 1 a.m. yesterday, and two responses. I didn't get to dev
list mail yesterday due to bringing home wife and new baby from
hospital.
Regardless, we don't want
I don't care what we do with M4, but for any release we plan to
maintain, I think we need to keep branches around indefinitely. If
people are going to confuse branches and tags, then I think we need to
solve that with documentation on our source page or releases page or
something.
Aaron
On
Just to remind everyone, svn doesn't have branches or tags and
nothing is ever gone or deleted, everything is still around, and at
any point in time we can patch an old release if we feel it's really
necessary.
-David
Didn't we decide not to do this?
We leave the branch as well, so if someone wants to evolve it and
tag, they can...
geir
On Sep 17, 2005, at 1:39 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: dain
Date: Sat Sep 17 10:39:10 2005
New Revision: 289835
URL:
Geir, I sent and email about this and the feedback I got was do it.
Regardless, we don't want this branch, the tag contains the real M4
code so the QA branch we created for testing M4 is confusing to users
(like me).
-dain
On Sep 17, 2005, at 1:04 PM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Didn't we
10 matches
Mail list logo
