[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-1749) Server Logs portlet - Web Access Log Viewer improvements

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1749?page=all ] Vamsavardhana Reddy updated GERONIMO-1749: -- Fix Version/s: 1.1.2 1.2 Server Logs portlet - Web Access Log Viewer improvements

[jira] Closed: (GERONIMO-1749) Server Logs portlet - Web Access Log Viewer improvements

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1749?page=all ] Vamsavardhana Reddy closed GERONIMO-1749. - Resolution: Fixed Fixed in rev 490685 in branches\1.1, branches\1.2 and trunk. Change log: o Improved upon the patch submitted by Rakesh

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-438) Deployer.deploy arguments inconsistent

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-438?page=comments#action_12461214 ] Vamsavardhana Reddy commented on GERONIMO-438: -- In trunk(rev 490751), org.apache.geronimo.deployment.Deploy has three deploy methods. 1. public

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-2577) Geronimo cluster (Tomcat Version)cannot continue the HttpSession when current node is down.

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2577?page=comments#action_12461217 ] Jeff Genender commented on GERONIMO-2577: - Ok...lets first make this Apples to Apples. Tomcat is being configured at the Host level and you are

[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-438) Deployer.deploy arguments inconsistent

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-438?page=all ] Vamsavardhana Reddy updated GERONIMO-438: - Attachment: g-438-option1.patch g-438-option1.patch: Patch as per option 1 described in the previous comment. Deployer.deploy arguments

[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-438) Deployer.deploy arguments inconsistent

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-438?page=all ] Vamsavardhana Reddy updated GERONIMO-438: - Attachment: g-438-option2.patch g-438-option2.patch: Patch as per option 2 described in the previous comment. Deployer.deploy arguments

Re: Geronimo build automation status (longish)

On Dec 28, 2006, at 12:11 AM, Jason Dillon wrote: A little holiday update on build automation muck... Turns out jolly ole st. nick brought me some coal for all of this anthill effort. I had thought that it would be easier/faster to get automated TCK builds up and running with direct effect

[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-2577) Geronimo cluster (Tomcat Version)cannot continue the HttpSession when current node is down.

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2577?page=all ] Jeff Genender updated GERONIMO-2577: Attachment: config.xml Geronimo cluster (Tomcat Version)cannot continue the HttpSession when current node is down.

[jira] Assigned: (AMQCPP-37) readUTF and writeUTF for BytesMessage

[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQCPP-37?page=all ] Timothy Bish reassigned AMQCPP-37: -- Assignee: Timothy Bish (was: Nathan Mittler) readUTF and writeUTF for BytesMessage - Key:

[jira] Resolved: (AMQCPP-37) readUTF and writeUTF for BytesMessage

[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQCPP-37?page=all ] Timothy Bish resolved AMQCPP-37. Resolution: Fixed Patch applied. I had to modify the Openwire Commands to reflect the new readUTF and writeUTF methods in BytesMessage. I also added

Re: purpose of branches\1.2

Yep. The branches\1.2 tree is being stabilized an Rick is finishing the Yoko integration. Bug fixes are fine but I ask you to be extra careful since I hope to ship this as soon as the Yoko integration passes the TCK. -dain On Dec 27, 2006, at 10:32 PM, Jason Dillon wrote: Are there

[vote] Release geronimo-ejb_3.0_spec

Fixed, verified to be compliant and ready for release. Release Branch: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/ branches/geronimo-ejb_3.0_spec/ Built Binaries: http://people.apache.org/~dblevins/stage-specs/org/ apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-ejb_3.0_spec/1.0/ I hereby propose we

Re: [vote] Release geronimo-ejb_3.0_spec

+1 Regards, Alan On Dec 28, 2006, at 1:29 PM, David Blevins wrote: Fixed, verified to be compliant and ready for release. Release Branch: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/ branches/geronimo-ejb_3.0_spec/ Built Binaries: http://people.apache.org/~dblevins/stage-specs/org/

Re: Adopt a spec?

On Dec 22, 2006, at 7:26 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote: On Dec 22, 2006, at 4:06 PM, Jason Dillon wrote: I don't get it... why do we need an adopt a spec program? I'm not really sure what it is... but it doesn't really sound good. :-\ --jason It was a suggestion on how to parcel them

Re: [vote] Release geronimo-ejb_3.0_spec

+1 Jacek On 12/28/06, David Blevins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Fixed, verified to be compliant and ready for release. Release Branch: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/ branches/geronimo-ejb_3.0_spec/ Built Binaries: http://people.apache.org/~dblevins/stage-specs/org/

[jira] Resolved: (AMQCPP-36) Cleanup whitespace and member function definitions in header files

[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQCPP-36?page=all ] Timothy Bish resolved AMQCPP-36. Resolution: Fixed Applied Stomp Frame patch Cleanup whitespace and member function definitions in header files

[jira] Resolved: (AMQCPP-34) Use covariant return type for clone()

[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQCPP-34?page=all ] Timothy Bish resolved AMQCPP-34. Resolution: Fixed Patches applied and tested Use covariant return type for clone() - Key:

Re: openwire protocol

Hi Motl, We have not yet put together a formal specification for it. But I guess it should be done, we are looking for a volunteer :) What we have are code generators that will generate the openwire marshallers for a few different languages. I did lots of working in putting those generators

Re: openwire protocol

Thank you for fast response. Really, I'm not looking for code generators, but more for some simple (might be incomplete) description of openwire network protocol. If I had one, I'd like to write an ethereal sniffer plugin for the protocol in future, that could ease significantly development

UDP transport over satellite

Hello, We are trying to move packets over a satellite connection. The broker is on the inside. The producer is on the outside connected via satellite. A simple client that talks using a DatagramSocket with a server works fine. I cannot, however, use the out-of-the-box sample from ActiveMQ to

[jira] Created: (AMQ-1111) Message.getJMSRedelivered() does not work if the server restarts

Message.getJMSRedelivered() does not work if the server restarts - Key: AMQ- URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ- Project: ActiveMQ Issue Type: Bug

[jira] Created: (AMQ-1112) remove expired messages from Store and update Message cursors

remove expired messages from Store and update Message cursors - Key: AMQ-1112 URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1112 Project: ActiveMQ Issue Type: Bug

Re: openwire protocol

Hi Motl, I've started documenting more OpenWire protocol details here: http://goopen.org/confluence/display/ACTIVEMQ/OpenWire I'll try to add more as I get time but please ping me if something needs clarification. On 12/28/06, Motl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thank you for fast response.

[jira] Resolved: (SM-742) JdbcAuditor fails on JBoss

[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-742?page=all ] Guillaume Nodet resolved SM-742. Fix Version/s: 3.1 Resolution: Fixed Assignee: Guillaume Nodet Author: gnodet Date: Thu Dec 28 13:22:26 2006 New Revision: 490828 URL:

[jira] Resolved: (SM-793) StandardProviderProcessor does not set exchange status to done for InOnly/RobustInOnly exchanges

[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-793?page=all ] Guillaume Nodet resolved SM-793. Fix Version/s: 3.1 Resolution: Fixed Assignee: Guillaume Nodet Author: gnodet Date: Thu Dec 28 14:00:45 2006 New Revision: 490845 URL: