Prasad,
Any chance I can convince you to add an easy to filter on tag to the
beginning of the subject line for these notices? Typically, build
successful is not an interesting event, and can be shuffled into a
different folder.
Rick
Prasad Kashyap wrote:
-- Forwarded message
Hi All,
I'm working on Configuring JMS document for v1.2 of Geronimo. I noticed an
error when I try to deploy the JMS Resources or when I try to view its
deployment plan.
I tried on both Linux and Windows environments. Please find the error below:
-
16:01:24,343 ERROR [AbstractHandler] Unable
Wow !!! Nice to hear that. We might get something out of this to JAXWS
stuff. ;-)
Lasantha
David Blevins wrote:
I think I have the axis1 based webservices support pretty much ported
over (sans a few details to be filled in later). I was just about to
check in and go to bed, but ... then I
Its only really interesting after a series of failed builds... but I
agree normally not very interesting.
--jason
On Feb 9, 2007, at 1:41 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
Prasad,
Any chance I can convince you to add an easy to filter on tag to
the beginning of the subject line for these notices?
Build failed notifications will definitely be useful and save a lot of
time for a lot of us :o)
Vamsi
On 2/9/07, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Its only really interesting after a series of failed builds... but I
agree normally not very interesting.
--jason
On Feb 9, 2007, at 1:41
What's the symptom?
-- dims
On 2/9/07, Dain Sundstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please fix ASAP.
-dain
--
Davanum Srinivas :: http://wso2.org/ :: Oxygen for Web Services Developers
- Forwarded message --
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 9 Feb 2007 12:59:16 -
Subject: Build failure for Revision: 505235
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
See the full build log file at
http://people.apache.org/~prasad/binaries/20070209/build.log
[INFO]task-segment
On 2/9/07, David Blevins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The bigger question is do our tcks match because the javaee5 tck
definitely has that field as non-final. Made a comment on that
issue, hopefully Marc can shed some light on it.
Javadoc is also with no final. I think Marc found it troublesome
Just a heads up on this issue. I looked at the problem and talked to
the Derby guys. The method getProperties has been deprecated (well,
actually made private) on the client DataSources. As a result our
code to parse and set the createDatabase property has been
regressed. According to
What is a 2.0.5 release? Do you mean M2? If so there were notes
about it and its released. If you meant something else I'm not
getting it from the context.
On Feb 8, 2007, at 6:36 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
Has this gotten stalled? Its been a few weeks now and still
nothing...
--jason
Maybe he was talking about maven 2.0.5 ...
On 2/9/07, Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What is a 2.0.5 release? Do you mean M2? If so there were notes
about it and its released. If you meant something else I'm not
getting it from the context.
On Feb 8, 2007, at 6:36 PM, Jason Dillon
I'm a dumb-ass... sent to the wrong list... sorry.
--jason
On Feb 9, 2007, at 5:40 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
What is a 2.0.5 release? Do you mean M2? If so there were notes
about it and its released. If you meant something else I'm not
getting it from the context.
On Feb 8, 2007, at
I opened JIRA http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2296
So far no comments. I'll follow up with the derby folks today. If
there isn't something on the horizon I'll add code to fix this in our
adapter.
On Feb 8, 2007, at 7:28 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
Okay, thanks for the update.
Since we're not in RTC anymore (and hope to not return) Anyone opposed?
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2812?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Davanum Srinivas closed GERONIMO-2812.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Lasantha,
Since i already applied GERONIMO-2811, am not checking
+1 to get rid of it.
-- dims
On 2/9/07, Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since we're not in RTC anymore (and hope to not return) Anyone opposed?
--
Davanum Srinivas :: http://wso2.org/ :: Oxygen for Web Services Developers
+1 remove.
Vamsi
On 2/9/07, Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since we're not in RTC anymore (and hope to not return) Anyone opposed?
See the full build log file at
http://people.apache.org/~prasad/binaries/20070209/build.log
[INFO]task-segment: [install]
[INFO]
[INFO] [tools:require-java-version {execution: validate-java-version}]
[INFO
See the full build log file at
http://people.apache.org/~prasad/binaries/20070209/build.log
Download the binaries from http://people.apache.org/~prasad/binaries/20070209
On 2/9/07, Vamsavardhana Reddy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Build failed notifications will definitely be useful and save a lot of
time for a lot of us :o)
Here you go Vamsi. Your wishes have been granted ;-) Or did you break
this yourself to see how useful this notification is ? Hmmm ;-)
On 2/9/07, Rick McGuire [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Prasad,
Any chance I can convince you to add an easy to filter on tag to the
beginning of the subject line for these notices?
Sure Rick. Thy wish is my command. What kinda tag do you need ?
Typically, build
successful is not an interesting
On 2/9/07, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Curious, what is the max heap size you are using?
-Xmx512m -XX:MaxPermSize=128m
I have had this setting for quite sometime now. What changed recently
? Paul McMahan saw the same thing too.
--jason
Cheers
Prasad
On Feb 8, 2007, at 7:30
Dain,
I blew up my local .m2 repo (just to be on the safe side) and ran the
build using JDK1.5 on WinXP from svn revision 505174. Works fine.
thanks,
dims
On 2/9/07, Davanum Srinivas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What's the symptom?
-- dims
On 2/9/07, Dain Sundstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/9/07, Prasad Kashyap [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/9/07, Vamsavardhana Reddy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Build failed notifications will definitely be useful and save a lot of
time for a lot of us :o)
Here you go Vamsi. Your wishes have been granted ;-) Or did you break
this yourself to
+1 to remove
On 2/9/07, Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since we're not in RTC anymore (and hope to not return) Anyone opposed?
On 2/9/07, Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since we're not in RTC anymore (and hope to not return) Anyone opposed?
I'm not either. Remove it.
Jacek
--
Jacek Laskowski
http://www.JacekLaskowski.pl
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2742?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12471722
]
Aman Nanner commented on GERONIMO-2742:
---
Ok, server deployment worked for me too...I'm not sure why it
@EJB/@EJBs annotation support
-
Key: GERONIMO-2816
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2816
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Sub-task
Security Level: public (Regular issues)
I've seen the same thing with the jax-ws test! It took over 15 secs to
deploy and I know it wasn't taken that long a few weeks ago.
Lin
Also, the deployment itself now seems to take atleast 2x-4x longer than
before.
Cheers
Prasad
Parent/child classloader problem in EARConfigBuilder and
AbstractWebModuleBuilder
-
Key: GERONIMO-2817
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2817
Project:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2817?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tim McConnell reassigned GERONIMO-2817:
---
Assignee: Tim McConnell
Parent/child classloader problem in EARConfigBuilder and
+1 , nuke it.
Cheers!
Hernan
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Since we're not in RTC anymore (and hope to not return) Anyone opposed?
Testing gmail filter and forward
See the full build log file at
http://people.apache.org/~prasad/binaries/20070209/build.log
Download the binaries from http://people.apache.org/~prasad/binaries/20070209
Testing gmail filter and forward
+1 to removing it
david jencks
On Feb 9, 2007, at 6:12 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Since we're not in RTC anymore (and hope to not return) Anyone
opposed?
+1
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Since we're not in RTC anymore (and hope to not return) Anyone opposed?
See the full build log file at
http://people.apache.org/~prasad/binaries/20070209/build.log
Download the binaries from http://people.apache.org/~prasad/binaries/20070209
[INFO] Reactor Summary:
[INFO]
[INFO] Geronimo
There are compile errors so I thought it would be obvious, but I
guess we have different stuff in our repos.
-dain
[INFO]
[INFO] Building Geronimo :: AXIS2
[INFO]task-segment: [install]
[INFO]
- CXF: initial service-ref support
what is rev 505235?
Thanks,
Ted Kirby
On 9 Feb 2007 10:04:24 -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
See the full build log file at
http://people.apache.org/~prasad/binaries/20070209/build.log
Download the binaries from http://people.apache.org/~prasad
is rev 505235?
Thanks,
Ted Kirby
On 9 Feb 2007 10:04:24 -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
See the full build log file at
http://people.apache.org/~prasad/binaries/20070209/build.log
Download the binaries from http://people.apache.org/~prasad/binaries/20070209
Looks like a corrupt jar dain...
-- dims
On 2/9/07, Dain Sundstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There are compile errors so I thought it would be obvious, but I
guess we have different stuff in our repos.
-dain
[INFO]
Are these really necessary? Can we send these to SCM? They are getting
really annoying...
Jeff
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
See the full build log file at
http://people.apache.org/~prasad/binaries/20070209/build.log
Download the binaries from http://people.apache.org/~prasad/binaries/20070209
On Feb 9, 2007, at 11:52 AM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
I deleted the axis repo, rebuilt and it worked. Does this jar
corruption happen for other people, because this is the second time
in 2 days? Is there something wrong with the axis build, or
geronimo, or am I just lucky?
I've had
- CXF: initial service-ref support
what is rev 505235?
Thanks,
Ted Kirby
On 9 Feb 2007 10:04:24 -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
See the full build log file at
http://people.apache.org/~prasad/binaries/20070209/build.log
Download the binaries from
http
for everybody who want it to run one
of their own.
Cheers
Prasad
Jeff
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
See the full build log file at
http://people.apache.org/~prasad/binaries/20070209/build.log
Download the binaries from http://people.apache.org/~prasad/binaries/20070209
[INFO] Reactor Summary
Now, I get this failure:
[INFO] Executing tasks
[unzip] Expanding: C:\g\modules\geronimo-j2ee-builder\target\test-ear-javaee
_5.ear into C:\g\modules\geronimo-j2ee-builder\target\test-ear-javaee_5-unpacked
.ear
[INFO]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
See the full build log file at
http://people.apache.org/~prasad/binaries/20070209/build.log
Download the binaries from
http://people.apache.org/~prasad/binaries/20070209
[INFO] Reactor Summary:
[INFO
I agree we need the notifications but the dev list is not the place.
-sachin
On Feb 9, 2007, at 12:35 PM, Jeff Genender wrote:
There is a reason we have a SCM list...and I believe it is
more-or-less for this exact reason.
PROTECTED] wrote:
See the full build log file at
http://people.apache.org/~prasad/binaries/20070209/build.log
Download the binaries from
http://people.apache.org/~prasad/binaries/20070209
[INFO] Reactor Summary:
[INFO
this up for further discussion and get some consensus on this please.
Jeff
Cheers
Prasad
Jeff
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
See the full build log file at
http://people.apache.org/~prasad/binaries/20070209/build.log
Download the binaries from
http://people.apache.org/~prasad/binaries
on this
please.
Jeff
Cheers
Prasad
Jeff
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
See the full build log file at
http://people.apache.org/~prasad/binaries/20070209/build.log
Download the binaries from
http://people.apache.org/~prasad/binaries/20070209
[INFO] Reactor Summary:
[INFO
Running Servicemix 3.1 on Jonas 4.8.4
-
Key: SM-837
URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-837
Project: ServiceMix
Issue Type: Bug
Affects Versions: 3.1
Environment: Windows XP,
think that this is a completely unreasonable request, then lets
open this up for further discussion and get some consensus on this
please.
Jeff
Cheers
Prasad
Jeff
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
See the full build log file at
http://people.apache.org/~prasad/binaries/20070209
When I disabled processWebAnnotations() in EjbRefBuilder the time it
took to deploy a simple web application went from 27 seconds to 9
seconds. I was also able to run web-testsuite without hitting the
OOM error and without increasing max heap size.
Tim, IIUC you had a patch ready for
Of late, there's been a lot more samples contributions. To make this
task easier, I have a geronimo-samples-archetype which will create the
samples template for you. You will just have to drop your java code in
there without having to worry too much about maven build structure.
some consensus on this
please.
Jeff
Cheers
Prasad
Jeff
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
See the full build log file at
http://people.apache.org/~prasad/binaries/20070209/build.log
Download the binaries from
http://people.apache.org/~prasad/binaries/20070209
Wow ! Thanx Paul.
David Blevins had once told me that if the deployer does not find
geronimo-openejb.xml, it does not know it has to handle the app to
OpenEJB deployer. The recent changes during OpenEJB integration
enables a DD and plan free deployment. However, this I suspect, causes
a nasty
Both these errors that you mention below are related with server
startup. You should be able to recreate them without the testsuite, on
a standalone server. Seems like your run of the testsuite caught both
these errors.
Can you please open JIRAs for them ?
I have ported the OpenEJB 2 CORBA code and updated it to the OpenEJB
3 APIs. The code is contained in three new modules geronimo-corba,
geronimo-corba-builder and geronimo-yoko.
The CORBA code is highly coupled to Geronimo so I put it in
Geronimo. In the future, I would like to split
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2454?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
David Jencks reassigned GERONIMO-2454:
--
Assignee: David Jencks (was: Rick McGuire)
Upgrade xerces to version 2.8.1
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2454?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12471795
]
David Jencks commented on GERONIMO-2454:
Similar changes applied to 1.2 branch in rev 505440. I had to
Hi All,
I put together two documents explaining how Geronimo's wiki is organized,
confluence spaces, HTML auto export plugins, etc. as well as some basic
guidelines for formatting the content for the articles that make the actual
Geronimo documentation.
Documentation architecture:
documentation and build scripts points to not existing directories in
repository
-
Key: SM-838
URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-838
Project: ServiceMix
On 2/8/07, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm definitely *NOT* in-favor of 8 assemblies.
Ditto. Even if there was time and manpower to test every possible
assembly then I still don't think the end user would be prepared to
make an informed choice about which one to download.
On Feb
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2600?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Matt Hogstrom closed GERONIMO-2600.
---
Assignee: Matt Hogstrom (was: Kevan Miller)
Updated to 10.2.2.0 as well as corresponding
The TCK needs to be updated too... in pom.xml 3 places I think, and
in modules/cts-database
--jason
On Feb 9, 2007, at 12:50 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: hogstrom
Date: Fri Feb 9 12:50:01 2007
New Revision: 505489
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=505489
Log:
Updated
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2454?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12471830
]
David Jencks commented on GERONIMO-2454:
xalan 2.6.0 works in 1.2, rev 505513.
Upgrade xerces to
On 2/9/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: prasad
Date: Fri Feb 9 13:52:23 2007
New Revision: 505518
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=505518
Log:
* removed persistence-context-type. transaction is implied
Did it cause any troubles? I wonder whether it could or
On 2/9/07, Jacek Laskowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/9/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: prasad
Date: Fri Feb 9 13:52:23 2007
New Revision: 505518
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=505518
Log:
* removed persistence-context-type. transaction is implied
FYI, I've update the TCK.
--jason
On Feb 9, 2007, at 12:54 PM, Matt Hogstrom (JIRA) wrote:
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2600?
page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Matt Hogstrom closed GERONIMO-2600.
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
I have ported the OpenEJB 2 CORBA code and updated it to the OpenEJB 3
APIs. The code is contained in three new modules geronimo-corba,
geronimo-corba-builder and geronimo-yoko.
The CORBA code is highly coupled to Geronimo so I put it in Geronimo.
In the future, I
Thanks...forgot.
On Feb 9, 2007, at 5:11 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
FYI, I've update the TCK.
--jason
On Feb 9, 2007, at 12:54 PM, Matt Hogstrom (JIRA) wrote:
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2600?
page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
For those that don't know about it...
If you have more than one computer on your desk, and would like to
use one keyboard/mouse for them all w/o a KVM switch, you can use
Synergy:
http://synergy2.sourceforge.net/
And there is a nice control panel thingy for mac osx:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2814?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ted Kirby updated GERONIMO-2814:
Attachment: repo2-ag20-plan2.xml
JIRA-2814-2.0.patch
This patch adds a
I just crafted a wiki page with this title at
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxDOC20/Multiple+Repositories+and+Server+Instances
to describe how to set up and use multiple repositories and server
instances. They can be used together or separately, that is, they are
independent of
FYI... I didn't realize they made a maven plugin for this guy.
Dunno if it works well or not... having never used RAT before.
Kevan, should we try to hook this up? Maybe as an optional profile
to be run for release prep fluff?
--jason
Begin forwarded message:
From: Jochen Wiedmann
Nice find!
Jason Dillon wrote:
For those that don't know about it...
If you have more than one computer on your desk, and would like to use
one keyboard/mouse for them all w/o a KVM switch, you can use Synergy:
http://synergy2.sourceforge.net/
And there is a nice control panel
David,
Did you just disable support for Servlet-based WS? If so, why?
Jarek
On 2/9/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: dblevins
Date: Fri Feb 9 19:52:38 2007
New Revision: 505624
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=505624
Log:
Ported Axis1 integration
Added:
On Feb 9, 2007, at 2:32 PM, Rick McGuire wrote:
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
I have ported the OpenEJB 2 CORBA code and updated it to the
OpenEJB 3 APIs. The code is contained in three new modules
geronimo-corba, geronimo-corba-builder and geronimo-yoko.
The CORBA code is highly coupled to
How big would one assembly be if we include *everything* like jetty,
tomcat, axis2, cxf, everything. Not turned on though... then just
provide people with a way to switch between personalities from the
command line, and make one of them as default, so that if the server
starts to boot up
81 matches
Mail list logo
