[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-3416) make some -test artifacts that for instance start up a mock server suitable for testing deployment parts

2007-10-15 Thread Vamsavardhana Reddy (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3416?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12534756 ] Vamsavardhana Reddy commented on GERONIMO-3416: --- Related rev 566893. make some -test artifacts

Re: svn commit: r584163 - /geronimo/server/branches/2.0.2/RELEASE_NOTES-2.0.2.txt

2007-10-15 Thread Vamsavardhana Reddy
On 10/12/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: kevan Date: Fri Oct 12 06:45:18 2007 New Revision: 584163 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=584163view=rev Log: Update MEJB group information Modified: geronimo/server/branches/2.0.2/RELEASE_NOTES-2.0.2.txt

Re: getting invalid option: -javaagent:

2007-10-15 Thread Mardak
annaiah wrote: invalid option: -javaagent:C:\Profiler\lib\xyz.jar Do you see the -javaagent option when you do java -help? The latest version of Harmony on the site doesn't seem to have a -javaagent option. Apache Harmony Launcher : (c) Copyright 1991, 2006 The Apache Software Foundation or

Re: getting invalid option: -javaagent:

2007-10-15 Thread annaiah
We would like to know how to set this -javaagent parameter in JAVA_OPTS. We are facing some problem while running the geronima batch file with geronima debug command . I have copied the console message below after running the command geronima debug, I have made the font bold at the place of

Re: svn commit: r584163 - /geronimo/server/branches/2.0.2/RELEASE_NOTES-2.0.2.txt

2007-10-15 Thread Kevan Miller
On Oct 15, 2007, at 3:06 AM, Vamsavardhana Reddy wrote: snip I should have reported this early. This should read Updated CA (Certification Authority) Helper application. CA Helper application is not part of the Admin Console. Not a big thing though, but, do consider this change if

Re: [VOTE] Geronimo 2.0.2 (rc1)

2007-10-15 Thread Paul McMahan
+1 On Oct 12, 2007, at 9:57 PM, Kevan Miller wrote: All, I've prepared a 2.0.2 release candidate for review and vote. http://people.apache.org/~kevan/release-votes/geronimo-2.0.2-dist/ contains the 8 Java EE and Minimal server (tar/zip and tomcat/ jetty) binaries. Here are pointers to the

Re: [VOTE] Geronimo 2.0.2 (rc1)

2007-10-15 Thread Rick McGuire
+1 Kevan Miller wrote: All, I've prepared a 2.0.2 release candidate for review and vote. http://people.apache.org/~kevan/release-votes/geronimo-2.0.2-dist/ contains the 8 Java EE and Minimal server (tar/zip and tomcat/jetty) binaries. Here are pointers to the zip files:

Re: [VOTE] Geronimo 2.0.2 (rc1)

2007-10-15 Thread Prasad Kashyap
+1 Cheers Prasad On 10/12/07, Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: All, I've prepared a 2.0.2 release candidate for review and vote. http://people.apache.org/~kevan/release-votes/geronimo-2.0.2-dist/ contains the 8 Java EE and Minimal server (tar/zip and tomcat/jetty) binaries. Here are

Re: [VOTE] Geronimo 2.0.2 (rc1)

2007-10-15 Thread Jeff Genender
+1 Prasad Kashyap wrote: +1 Cheers Prasad On 10/12/07, Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: All, I've prepared a 2.0.2 release candidate for review and vote. http://people.apache.org/~kevan/release-votes/geronimo-2.0.2-dist/ contains the 8 Java EE and Minimal server (tar/zip and

[jira] Assigned: (GERONIMO-3309) Add missing LICENSE.txt and NOTICE.txt files to the J2G conversion tool

2007-10-15 Thread Lin Sun (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3309?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Lin Sun reassigned GERONIMO-3309: - Assignee: Lin Sun (was: Kevan Miller) Add missing LICENSE.txt and NOTICE.txt files to the

Re: [Discuss] Remaining work items before we create a J2G 1.0.0 branch?

2007-10-15 Thread Lin Sun
Kevan, I'll look at it. I agree the license issues should be fixed before we release j2g 1.0. Lin Kevan Miller wrote: On Oct 12, 2007, at 1:55 PM, Jason Warner wrote: Donald, I'm still unsure of the status of the license files for J2G. If we can get a confirmation that those are ok,

Re: [VOTE] Geronimo 2.0.2 (rc1)

2007-10-15 Thread Lin Sun
+1. briefly tested the tomcat jee5 assembly, able to start and using the database pool portlet. lin Kevan Miller wrote: All, I've prepared a 2.0.2 release candidate for review and vote. http://people.apache.org/~kevan/release-votes/geronimo-2.0.2-dist/ contains the 8 Java EE and Minimal

Re: [VOTE] Geronimo 2.0.2 (rc1)

2007-10-15 Thread Jarek Gawor
+1 Jarek On 10/12/07, Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: All, I've prepared a 2.0.2 release candidate for review and vote. http://people.apache.org/~kevan/release-votes/geronimo-2.0.2-dist/ contains the 8 Java EE and Minimal server (tar/zip and tomcat/jetty) binaries. Here are pointers

Re: [VOTE] Geronimo 2.0.2 (rc1)

2007-10-15 Thread Shiva Kumar H R
+1 Tested geronimo-tomcat6-jee5-2.0.2-bin.zip with the sample web-apps at GERONIMO-3254 and everything ran fine. - Shiva On 10/13/07, Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: All, I've prepared a 2.0.2 release candidate for review and vote.

Re: [VOTE] Geronimo 2.0.2 (rc1)

2007-10-15 Thread Tim McConnell
+1 Kevan Miller wrote: All, I've prepared a 2.0.2 release candidate for review and vote. http://people.apache.org/~kevan/release-votes/geronimo-2.0.2-dist/ contains the 8 Java EE and Minimal server (tar/zip and tomcat/jetty) binaries. Here are pointers to the zip files:

Re: [VOTE] Geronimo 2.0.2 (rc1)

2007-10-15 Thread Hernan Cunico
+1 Cheers! Hernan Kevan Miller wrote: All, I've prepared a 2.0.2 release candidate for review and vote. http://people.apache.org/~kevan/release-votes/geronimo-2.0.2-dist/ contains the 8 Java EE and Minimal server (tar/zip and tomcat/jetty) binaries. Here are pointers to the zip files:

Alternative packaging for monitoring collecting agent

2007-10-15 Thread vhnguy2
Hi All, The monitoring plugin has been going smoothly, up until the recent MEJB security fix. The previous architecture was for the monitoring collecting agent (a GBean which resided on the server to be monitored) to interface with the MEJB. However, I was told that GBeans are not security

Re: [VOTE] Geronimo 2.0.2 (rc1)

2007-10-15 Thread Kevan Miller
Thanks for the votes so far. The 72 hours expires at 10 PM (EDT), this evening. I'll give it a bit more time for others to inspect. I'll plan on calling the vote tomorrow morning -- around 9 AM my time... --kevan

Re: gshell broken in trunk?

2007-10-15 Thread Jason Dillon
This should be fixed now. Sorry for the delay. --jason On Oct 11, 2007, at 4:05 PM, David Jencks wrote: I see this also. I have no idea what caused it. I was wondering if we could all agree on some manual integration tests before committing to gshell so that the projects that depend

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-3309) Add missing LICENSE.txt and NOTICE.txt files to the J2G conversion tool

2007-10-15 Thread Lin Sun (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3309?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12534966 ] Lin Sun commented on GERONIMO-3309: --- I think there are a few remaining work items need to be done for this jira

[jira] Commented: (SM-630) org.apache.servicemix.jbi.messaging.JcaFlowTransactionTest

2007-10-15 Thread Oleg Zhurakousky (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-630?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_40383 ] Oleg Zhurakousky commented on SM-630: - Quick comment The scenarios within this test seem to be following what's

Re: Build issue with trunk - build hangs

2007-10-15 Thread Joe Bohn
Is nobody else hitting this problem? Is anybody else building on OpenSUSE? I have two machines and get hang in the same place on each machine while trying to install the car-maven-plugin. Even bumping my MAVEN_OPTS to -XX:MaxPermSize=512m -Xms512m -Xmx1024m didn't seem to have any effect.

Re: Build issue with trunk - build hangs

2007-10-15 Thread Erik B. Craig
Joe, I was running into the same issue on CentOS, my MAVEN_OPTS were -Xmx512m -XX:MaxPermSize=128m. After I changed them to -Xmx2048m -XX:MaxPermSize=512m , the problem went away immediately. This is on Maven 2.0.7 and Sun JDK 1.5.0_12 Dunno if that will help you at all, but there you go =)

Re: [VOTE] Geronimo 2.0.2 (rc1)

2007-10-15 Thread David Jencks
+1 david jencks On Oct 12, 2007, at 6:57 PM, Kevan Miller wrote: All, I've prepared a 2.0.2 release candidate for review and vote. http://people.apache.org/~kevan/release-votes/geronimo-2.0.2-dist/ contains the 8 Java EE and Minimal server (tar/zip and tomcat/ jetty) binaries. Here are

Re: gshell broken in trunk?

2007-10-15 Thread Jeff Genender
Thanks! Sent from my iPhone On Oct 15, 2007, at 2:22 PM, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This should be fixed now. Sorry for the delay. --jason On Oct 11, 2007, at 4:05 PM, David Jencks wrote: I see this also. I have no idea what caused it. I was wondering if we could all agree

Re: [VOTE] Geronimo 2.0.2 (rc1)

2007-10-15 Thread Anita Kulshreshtha
+1 Anita --- Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: All, I've prepared a 2.0.2 release candidate for review and vote. http://people.apache.org/~kevan/release-votes/geronimo-2.0.2-dist/ contains the 8 Java EE and Minimal server (tar/zip and tomcat/jetty) binaries. Here are pointers to

[jira] Commented: (SM-625) Failed unit test (servicemix-core) : org.apache.servicemix.jbi.nmr.flow.MultipleFlowsTest

2007-10-15 Thread Oleg Zhurakousky (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-625?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_40378 ] Oleg Zhurakousky commented on SM-625: - You're right; there is no way of knowing if an Endpoint exists anywhere in

[jira] Issue Comment Edited: (SM-625) Failed unit test (servicemix-core) : org.apache.servicemix.jbi.nmr.flow.MultipleFlowsTest

2007-10-15 Thread Oleg Zhurakousky (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-625?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_40378 ] ozhurakousky edited comment on SM-625 at 10/15/07 5:38 AM: --- You're right; there is no way

ServiceMix Bean issues with send()

2007-10-15 Thread Andreas Schaefer (2)
Hi I try to figure out what is going wrong with the ServiceMix Bean component when used with an asynchronous message exchange (send()). There is a good chance to I do not understand how the message exchange should work. This is what I tried: - Bean SU 1 sends an In-Out ME to another Bean

[jira] Created: (SM-1107) Deploy endpoints and listeners through the lwcontainer

2007-10-15 Thread Guillaume Nodet (JIRA)
Deploy endpoints and listeners through the lwcontainer -- Key: SM-1107 URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-1107 Project: ServiceMix Issue Type: New Feature

Re: ServiceMix Bean issues with send()

2007-10-15 Thread Guillaume Nodet
On 10/16/07, Andreas Schaefer (2) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi I try to figure out what is going wrong with the ServiceMix Bean component when used with an asynchronous message exchange (send()). There is a good chance to I do not understand how the message exchange should work. This is what

[jira] Commented: (SM-1097) Remote shell console based on GShell

2007-10-15 Thread Guillaume Nodet (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-1097?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_40388 ] Guillaume Nodet commented on SM-1097: - GShell integration has been moved to ServiceMix 4.0 branch.