[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3697?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12572456#action_12572456
]
Anita Kulshreshtha commented on GERONIMO-3697:
--
This completes the MEJB
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3697?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Anita Kulshreshtha closed GERONIMO-3697.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.1
Monitoring Console fix ups
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3530?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12572455#action_12572455
]
Anita Kulshreshtha commented on GERONIMO-3530:
--
IMO, we need to implement
Is there a plan on how to release the samples for 2.1 and forward? It
looks like the changes in the build structure have necessitated that we
do something to release samples independently (or perhaps it was other
changes). In past releases it looks like the samples were built, voted
on,
Hey Jason,
Both pages are gone!
quick comment on the Migrating with the J2G Migration Tool though. Maybe it's
my screen resolution but I can barely read the 2 screenshots.
Any chance you could update those !?
for example make them look like these
Yes, I think we should release the samples with or after each G release.
Thanks for starting this discussion! I meant to do that but got
distracted with other things.
I'm willing to help/work on the samples release.
Jarek
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 10:13 AM, Joe Bohn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Geronimo Revision: 631204 built with tests included
See the full build-0800.log file at
http://geronimo.apache.org/maven/server/binaries/2.1/20080226/build-0800.log
Download the binaries from
http://geronimo.apache.org/maven/server/binaries/2.1/20080226
[INFO] BUILD SUCCESSFUL
[INFO
Thanks, Hernan. I don't think it's just your resolution. It might take me
a bit, but I'll get larger, easier to read snapshots up as soon as I can.
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 10:25 AM, Hernan Cunico [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey Jason,
Both pages are gone!
quick comment on the Migrating with
On Feb 26, 2008, at 10:13 AM, Joe Bohn wrote:
Is there a plan on how to release the samples for 2.1 and forward?
It looks like the changes in the build structure have necessitated
that we do something to release samples independently (or perhaps it
was other changes). In past releases
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3861?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rick McGuire resolved GERONIMO-3861.
Resolution: Fixed
Committed revision 631262. 1.1.5 version only.
I've only committed
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3836?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jarek Gawor resolved GERONIMO-3836.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.2
2.1.1
Kevan Miller wrote:
On Feb 26, 2008, at 10:13 AM, Joe Bohn wrote:
Is there a plan on how to release the samples for 2.1 and forward? It
looks like the changes in the build structure have necessitated that
we do something to release samples independently (or perhaps it was
other changes).
What happened to this vote? I checked the tags and the code was never moved
over. Did this pass? Do we have an official binary I can link to on the
wiki docs?
On Mon, Nov 12, 2007 at 4:52 PM, Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Nov 6, 2007, at 9:03 PM, Lin Sun wrote:
The .project
Geronimo Revision: 631217 built with tests included
See the full build-0900.log file at
http://geronimo.apache.org/maven/server/binaries/trunk/20080226/build-0900.log
Download the binaries from
http://geronimo.apache.org/maven/server/binaries/trunk/20080226
[INFO] BUILD SUCCESSFUL
[INFO
Hi Dave,
thanks for bringing this up. For the 2-tier remote web server I'm figuring a web catalog scenario with tons of images and static text. I would rather serve all that static content from a different server. Same approach applies to the remote DB scenario. I guess if one has a centralized
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3861?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12572558#action_12572558
]
Sangjin Lee commented on GERONIMO-3861:
---
I'll submit a patch for 2.0 soon...
Hey B.J.,
I think this is a great beginning, and it will go a long way to creating
a robust and internationalized server. I can provide a couple of
answers/comments to your questions.
B.J. Reed wrote:
Questions/Answers
2) Is there a numbering standard for the key? The standard that I have
Currently the JMX connections supported by Geronimo are non-SSL
connections. Is it desirable to provide SSL JMX connections to Geronimo
(SSL or non-SSL is configurable by the users)?
++Vamsi
Done!
To add a News just click on *Add News* link while in Confluence (don't have
this option in the exported HTML). Add the news following the styling we've
been using, once saved it should appear on the home page after a few seconds. I
normally force an export to make sure all other
I wasn't sure if Add News will do the trick or if it would mess something
up. Thanks for taking care of it.
++Vamsi
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 11:34 PM, Hernan Cunico [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Done!
To add a News just click on *Add News* link while in Confluence (don't
have this option in the
On Feb 25, 2008, at 5:42 PM, David Jencks wrote:
This seems a wee bit excessive to me...
...Documentation Administration Administrative Tasks
Administering applications Installing and removing applications
Can we get expandable trees in the Documentation page? If so I
think the
Dave,
we need to figure out a way to organize th content. For 2.1 we'll hopefully end
up around 200 pages, we can't have them all listed on one page.
More specifically on Installing and removing applications it will only take 2
clicks to get there once in the 2.1 doc space
From
Yes, it seems like an option security conscious users would want
(especially if they want to remotely monitor a hosted server)
-Donald
Vamsavardhana Reddy wrote:
Currently the JMX connections supported by Geronimo are non-SSL
connections. Is it desirable to provide SSL JMX connections
I liked David's idea of collapsible trees. Is that possible with the wiki?
It doesn't seem like something a wiki would be able to inherently handle but
one can hope.
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 1:41 PM, Hernan Cunico [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dave,
we need to figure out a way to organize th
Wasn't clear, but are you proposing a properties files per module? If
not, then placing all of the possible strings in one common file will
become a nightmare to maintain and breaks from our plugin architecture.
As far as the message prefix, how about using an abbreviated maven
artifact
Hi All,
To reduce the number of layers... any thoughts on implementing a page that
encompasses the main subject with well defined heading hierarchy then
referencing using page + anchors? I recognize that for some documentation
(administrative tasks...) this would yield an excessively long page -
I agree - it would be really nice to have a sample bundle (along with
plugin samples) released with each major geronimo release. This can
be very good from a user perspective so that they have something to
get them started.
Lin
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 11:03 AM, Joe Bohn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I added a new portlet to the admin console via the new
pluggable mechanism. However when I click on the link to that portlet
I am always asked to authenticate even though I have authenticated on
the login page of the admin console. How can I configure my portlet to
also be part of the
Released!
http://geronimo.apache.org/2008/02/18/apache-geronimo-v21-released.html
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 3:00 PM, Jacek Laskowski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi,
Has Geronimo 2.1 been released? Can't find any reference of it
anywhere. Didn't we vote for it already and the vote was for putting
I will implement both suggestions for the message key naming convention:
Dan's idea to move the I/E/W to the end to make it stand out more and
Donald's use the groupid + abbreviated class name for the prefix. I'll
also use Dan's suggestion to remove the key from the message in the
.properties
Hi All,
I think we discussed long time ago what goes into /lib. What I think the answer
was does not seem to apply anymore.
Can someone refresh my memory
Cheers!
Hernan
Hi,
Has Geronimo 2.1 been released? Can't find any reference of it
anywhere. Didn't we vote for it already and the vote was for putting
it on the shelves?
Jacek
--
Jacek Laskowski
http://www.JacekLaskowski.pl
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 12:03 PM, Jason Warner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Released!
http://geronimo.apache.org/2008/02/18/apache-geronimo-v21-released.html
Noticed it at last. Thanks Jason. Did we send an announcement to dev
and user mailing lists too?
Jacek
--
Jacek Laskowski
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3867?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12572642#action_12572642
]
Joseph Leong commented on GERONIMO-3867:
Hi Joe,
Any ideas as to which files
Some thoughts:
1) Each module or plugin should have its own resource file.
2) Messages should be formatted using java.text.MessageFormat. The
substitution arguments should be arbitrary objects (not just strings)
and should be passed using varargs.
3) As soon as we encode the module or group id
just so I understand better what the issue seem to be.
A) is it because of how/where the content is displayed?
or
B) is it because the content is organized in a multi level structure?
As for collapsible sections, that could address A). There are a few issues to
workout with the autoexport
I was looking at the migration sample applications (From JBoss to Geronimo)
and realized it might take me a while to verify them. Is anyone opposed to
me moving all the sample apps over as-is and noting that they're unverified
on 2.1 until I, or some other enterprising individual, is able to go
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3813?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jarek Gawor resolved GERONIMO-3813.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.1
Assignee: Jarek Gawor
This problem
Hi,
I am interested in collecting ideas on how we can improve user
experience with the geronimo 2.x server, particularly, what type of
testing we can do for each geronimo major release to identify probs
and resolve them.
I think it would be nice to have a set of test (either automated or
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3813?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jarek Gawor updated GERONIMO-3813:
--
Affects Version/s: 2.0.x
Geronimo start with JPDA-option throw Exception
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3861?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sangjin Lee updated GERONIMO-3861:
--
Attachment: GERONIMO-3861-v2.patch
Here's a patch for AHC for mina 2.0. The hiccup was
Not opposed, but I just had a flashback of what we did for 1.2 -
http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDOC12/sample-applications.html. Titles are self
explanatory ;-)
Another thing to keep in mind would be, and strictly about J2G migration, what
are the new features we didn't cover then that we should
On Feb 26, 2008, at 3:30 PM, Jacek Laskowski wrote:
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 12:03 PM, Jason Warner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Released!
http://geronimo.apache.org/2008/02/18/apache-geronimo-v21-released.html
Noticed it at last. Thanks Jason. Did we send an announcement to dev
and user
Created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3876
I have quickly put together an implementation to enable SSL for JMX
connectors. See JIRA for a patch. Here are some problems that I have run
into.
The JMXConnector GBean is in j2ee-security config. If I add a
KeystoreManager as
Allow configuring JMX over SSL
--
Key: GERONIMO-3876
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3876
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: New Feature
Security Level: public (Regular issues)
Oops. This was announced in the vote and discussion threads, last
week, but I forgot to send the ANNOUNCE. So, here it is for
posterity's sake
The Geronimo 2.1 binaries are available for download --
http://geronimo.apache.org/downloads.html
2.1 introduces a number of cool features. Most
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3876?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Vamsavardhana Reddy updated GERONIMO-3876:
--
Attachment: GERONIMO-3876.patch
GERONIMO-3876.patch: Patch created against
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3876?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12572675#action_12572675
]
Vamsavardhana Reddy commented on GERONIMO-3876:
---
To test, start jconsole
Geronimo Revision: 631365 built with tests included
See the full build-1500.log file at
http://geronimo.apache.org/maven/server/binaries/trunk/20080226/build-1500.log
Download the binaries from
http://geronimo.apache.org/maven/server/binaries/trunk/20080226
[INFO] BUILD SUCCESSFUL
[INFO
AsyncHttpClient should provide a method that returns monitoring listeners
-
Key: GERONIMO-3877
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3877
Project: Geronimo
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 12:21 PM, Hernan Cunico [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think we discussed long time ago what goes into /lib. What I think the
answer was does not seem to apply anymore.
Can someone refresh my memory
I think /lib is only for the framework-only libraries so the kernel
can
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 9:52 AM, Dan Becker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You are correct. gshell with debug worked for me.
Just to make sure I follow - did you run gshell with
-agentlib:jdwp=blahblah set?
Jacek
--
Jacek Laskowski
http://www.JacekLaskowski.pl
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 11:59 AM, Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What happens if you run 'stop-server' prior to ctrl-c? Can you
generate a stack trace for the gsh java process after ctrl-c? I forget
how to do this on windows 'fn - prt sc' ?
Ctrl+BREAK?
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 12:44 PM, Lin Sun [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One thought is to add more test samples. Seems to me people are
trying different things with geronimo server and most of the stuff
they tried are not covered by our samples.Any ideas what other
samples may be good to
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 11:48 AM, Manu George [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I added a new portlet to the admin console via the new
pluggable mechanism.
You guys seem to speak some cryptic language I don't understand lately ;-)
What's the new pluggable mechanism. Is there anything on the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3877?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sangjin Lee updated GERONIMO-3877:
--
Attachment: GERONIMO-3877.patch
a suggested fix
AsyncHttpClient should provide a method
On Feb 26, 2008, at 6:59 PM, Jacek Laskowski wrote:
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 11:48 AM, Manu George
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I added a new portlet to the admin console via the new
pluggable mechanism.
You guys seem to speak some cryptic language I don't understand
lately ;-)
Just a quick note... I'm back online in Bangkok and you'll be hearing
a lot more from me very soon :-) Sorry about the blackout last few
weeks, was quite hectic trying to sort everything out.
--jason
Full thread dump Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (1.5.0_13-b05 mixed mode):
Timer-0 daemon prio=6 tid=0x0aec2808 nid=0x1400 in Object.wait()
[0x0b51f000..
0x0b51fbe8]
at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method)
- waiting on 0x034146d8 (a java.util.TaskQueue)
at
59 matches
Mail list logo
