Microprofile site pushed

Hi guys, I pushed the microprofile subsite on http://geronimo.apache.org/microprofile/ Don't advertise it yet since it still requires works but it allows to have a quick look without much effort. To deploy it, just go in the site module of geronimo-microprofile and launch; $ mvn clean package

Re: Microprofile site pushed

Hi Rudy, fixed, thanks for the catch up For info this page is generated (manually run) from Downloads.java, i just didnt sync up the table :( Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog

Re: Microprofile site pushed

Hi Romain, I just did a quick overview, and I saw that the download sizes are wrong. should be Kb instead of Mb. Maybe we should also group the versions when an artifact has multiple (like config) now it is confusing. Thx Regards Rudy On Fri, 27 Jul 2018 at 09:51, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:

[jira] [Resolved] (GERONIMO-6611) Jackson is mandatory

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6611?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Romain Manni-Bucau resolved GERONIMO-6611. -- Resolution: Fixed > Jackson is mandatory > > >

[jira] [Created] (GERONIMO-6611) Jackson is mandatory

Romain Manni-Bucau created GERONIMO-6611: Summary: Jackson is mandatory Key: GERONIMO-6611 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6611 Project: Geronimo Issue Type: Bug

OpenAPI jackson dependency

Hi guys, A user reported the requirement of jackson in current code (thanks lambdas :() whereas it is not needed in most of the cases. I fixed it on master (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6611) and wonder if we want to release an opanapi 1.0.1 shortly with this fix. wdyt? Romain

[GitHub] diuis opened a new pull request #1: jdk9+ compilation

diuis opened a new pull request #1: jdk9+ compilation URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-openapi/pull/1 Enabled java 9+ compilation (with the introduction of activation api at runtime scope). Removed already defined maven plugin versions (some was outdated). Updated

Re: OpenAPI jackson dependency

If it's not required and causing problems, I'd say yes. Especially because you already fixed it Le ven. 27 juil. 2018 à 17:31, Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit : > Hi guys, > > A user reported the requirement of jackson in current code (thanks lambdas > :() whereas it is not needed in most of the