There are parts of the Axis code that rely on OpenEJB. This
seems to introduce a circular dependence as OpenEJB relies on Geronimo. IIUC,
this code may be better placed in OpenEJB.
Thoughts?
Regards,
Alan
I will be out of the office starting 18.07.2004 and will not return until
14.08.2004.
Thomas Ermesjo has left on vacation, and will be back 16. august.
I will be out of the office starting 18.07.2004 and will not return until
14.08.2004.
Thomas Ermesjo has left on vacation, and will be back 16. august.
I will be out of the office starting 18.07.2004 and will not return until
14.08.2004.
Thomas Ermesjo has left on vacation, and will be back 16. august.
I will be out of the office starting 18.07.2004 and will not return until
14.08.2004.
Thomas Ermesjo has left on vacation, and will be back 16. august.
I will be out of the office starting 18.07.2004 and will not return until
14.08.2004.
Thomas Ermesjo has left on vacation, and will be back 16. august.
I will be out of the office starting 18.07.2004 and will not return until
14.08.2004.
Thomas Ermesjo has left on vacation, and will be back 16. august.
I will be out of the office starting 18.07.2004 and will not return until
14.08.2004.
Thomas Ermesjo has left on vacation, and will be back 16. august.
I will be out of the office starting 18.07.2004 and will not return until
14.08.2004.
Thomas Ermesjo has left on vacation, and will be back 16. august.
I will be out of the office starting 18.07.2004 and will not return until
14.08.2004.
Thomas Ermesjo has left on vacation, and will be back 16. august.
I will be out of the office starting 18.07.2004 and will not return until
14.08.2004.
Thomas Ermesjo has left on vacation, and will be back 16. august.
I will be out of the office starting 18.07.2004 and will not return until
14.08.2004.
Thomas Ermesjo has left on vacation, and will be back 16. august.
I will be out of the office starting 18.07.2004 and will not return until
14.08.2004.
Thomas Ermesjo has left on vacation, and will be back 16. august.
I will be out of the office starting 18.07.2004 and will not return until
14.08.2004.
Thomas Ermesjo has left on vacation, and will be back 16. august.
I will be out of the office starting 18.07.2004 and will not return until
14.08.2004.
Thomas Ermesjo has left on vacation, and will be back 16. august.
I will be out of the office starting 18.07.2004 and will not return until
14.08.2004.
Thomas Ermesjo has left on vacation, and will be back 16. august.
I will be out of the office starting 18.07.2004 and will not return until
14.08.2004.
Thomas Ermesjo has left on vacation, and will be back 16. august.
I will be out of the office starting 18.07.2004 and will not return until
14.08.2004.
Thomas Ermesjo has left on vacation, and will be back 16. august.
Should we add this to maven.repo.remote?
Regards,
Alan
> -Original Message-
> From: David Blevins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, August 08, 2004 10:18 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Axis module fails
>
> On Sun, Aug 08, 2004 at 08:29:44AM -0400, Alan D. Cabrera wro
Yes, by a work around hack. This would ideally be fixed.
Regards,
Alan
> -Original Message-
> From: Davanum Srinivas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, August 08, 2004 12:12 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Axis module fails
>
> Alan replied back that
Alan replied back that he got the build working
On Sun, 8 Aug 2004 11:46:27 -0400 (EDT), Srinath Perera
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> that code generation done (where the error occurs) inside name="test:test"> isn't the the Compiled class avalible by that time. The
> AxisGeronimoUtils moved fr
that code generation done (where the error occurs) inside isn't the the Compiled class avalible by that time. The
AxisGeronimoUtils moved from EWS to here becouse it is more natural to
have it here. Should we move that code .. can we fix the build while it is
here.
Thanks
Srinath
> On Sun, Aug
On Sun, Aug 08, 2004 at 08:29:44AM -0400, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
> I figured out the problem, geronimo-axis-1.0-SNAPSHOT.jar was not in my
> repository, a chicken and the egg thing. I just hand copied the jar
> into my local maven repository. This makes me wonder, should we be
> updating a maven
Message:
A new issue has been created in JIRA.
-
View the issue:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-285
Here is an overview of the issue:
-
I figured out the problem, geronimo-axis-1.0-SNAPSHOT.jar was not in my
repository, a chicken and the egg thing. I just hand copied the jar
into my local maven repository. This makes me wonder, should we be
updating a maven repository w/ snapshots?
Regards,
Alan
> -Original Message-
>
NIGHTLY BUILD/TEST
Date: Sun Aug 8 05:32:42 EDT 2004
Kernel: Linux 2.4.26
Host: beaver.codehaus.org
Java: 1.4.2_04-b05, mixed mode
Maven: 1.0
CHECKOUT: incubator-geronimo
BUILDING: incubator-geronimo
BUILD SUCCESSFUL
Total time: 15 minutes 16 seconds
Finished at: Sun Aug 08 05:48:54 E
Message:
The following issue has been re-assigned.
Assignee: Gianny DAMOUR (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED])
-
View the issue:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-284
Here is an overview of the issue:
Message:
A new issue has been created in JIRA.
-
View the issue:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-284
Here is an overview of the issue:
-
On Aug 7, 2004, at 5:13 PM, Gianny Damour wrote:
On 7/08/2004 4:22 AM, David Jencks wrote:
The assembly module doesn't conform to the maven standard action of
producing an artifact, and its results are not in the module itself.
Furthermore it doesn't produce an easily installable geronimo
insta
On 7/08/2004 4:22 AM, David Jencks wrote:
The assembly module doesn't conform to the maven standard action of
producing an artifact, and its results are not in the module itself.
Furthermore it doesn't produce an easily installable geronimo instance.
I'd like to suggest that the assembly module
30 matches
Mail list logo
