NullPointerException if MDB does not have resource-adapter element specified
Key: GERONIMO-549
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-549
Project: Apache Geronimo
Type: Bug
Thanks for the review. I will go through your comments one-by-one over
the next few days.
A few things to keep in mind:
1. The rmi/iiop code is fairly solid (with my fingers crossed). I hope
to get in a bunch of test cases that following the Geronimo design.
2. The stub/skeleton generation is
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-549?page=history ]
David Jencks reassigned GERONIMO-549:
-
Assign To: David Jencks
NullPointerException if MDB does not have resource-adapter element specified
Mark wrote:
The GIOP, IOP, IIOP were taken from the CORBA 3.x spec. I should
probably add a readme.txt to the interop/src/idl directory with the
locations of where the files came from.
I would suggest the NOTICE file, both in the iiop module and in the
project root, as that is the traditional
Hi All;
To plan for how to continue I will look in to writing a GBean based
EngineRgsitry as I explained and get geronimo webservices to work to
calls coming to SimpleAxisServer (based on sockets). Once that is
working let us talk finer details how the SimpleAxisServer can be
replaced by
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: jboynes
Date: Mon Jan 24 22:35:47 2005
New Revision: 126350
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=revrev=126350
Log:
second part of JavaMail; use different protocols for store and transport in test
I could not find in the spec what the behaviour should be if the
Functioning of Transaction Time out was not properly handled
Key: GERONIMO-550
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-550
Project: Apache Geronimo
Type: Bug
Components: transaction manager
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-550?page=history ]
Sandip Ghayal updated GERONIMO-550:
---
Attachment: TransactionTimer.java
patches.out
1 Removal of timer event for Transaction Timeout,
Instead use current time before
jetty welcome files don't work
--
Key: GERONIMO-551
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-551
Project: Apache Geronimo
Type: Bug
Components: web
Versions: 1.0-M3
Reporter: David Jencks
Assigned to: David
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-551?page=history ]
David Jencks reopened GERONIMO-551:
---
jetty welcome files don't work
--
Key: GERONIMO-551
URL:
I'd like to check that this doesn't violate any philosophical
principles behind deployment. I think that all classes used at runtime
should be available at deployment time: this patch checks that all
dependencies are in fact present at deployment time. Any arguments?
thanks
david jencks
Hi David,
It seems that this is related to this JIRA issue:
[ http://nagoya.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-504?page=comments#action_55900
]
that Jeremy has commented.
Thanks,
Gianny
On 26/01/2005 8:33 AM, David Jencks wrote:
I'd like to check that this doesn't violate any philosophical
On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 14:14:44 -0700, Bruce Snyder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 11:48:53 -0800, Dain Sundstrom
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 20, 2005, at 11:46 AM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
Does anyone know anything about this and whether we should use it in
Geronimo?
I am of the opinion that this feature should be optional.
Regards,
Alan
-Original Message-
From: Gianny Damour [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tue 1/25/2005 5:01 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
Subject: Re: svn commit: r126427 -
What if those classes are only availble in the target server?
-Original Message-
From: Dain Sundstrom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tue 1/25/2005 5:21 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
Subject: Re: svn commit: r126427 -
I guess there are two scenarios here 1) were deploying to the target
server live in which case the dependencies will be there, and 2) were
building a .car file offline for a different target server. In the
*rare* second case, I would hope the the offline vm had access to the
same repo
16 matches
Mail list logo
