Hello Rakesh,
It is definitively useful. Dain has already created a JIRA for this
issue: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1133. To contribute
your custom PrimaryKeyGenerator, you need to attach to this JIRA your
implementation and select the Grant license to ASF... radio button.
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1412?page=comments#action_12361588
]
Jakob Færch commented on GERONIMO-1412:
---
I am NOT able to reproduce this issue.
It was originally observed on a build from source sometime around december 10th.
Jacek Laskowski wrote:
Is there anything else before AB is finally run without any errors?
How did you find the above one? I can't seem to reproduce it and
everything seems to be working fine from my (end-user) perspective.
The status for the Adventure Builder is that the application is
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1164?page=all ]
Jakob Færch updated GERONIMO-1164:
--
Attachment: dont-list-my-smtphost.patch
Attaching dont-list-my-smtphost.patch to replace the name of my corporate smtp
host with the value
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1412?page=all ]
Gianny Damour closed GERONIMO-1412:
---
Resolution: Cannot Reproduce
As requested by Jakob, this issue can be closed.
Create followed by findByPrimaryKey in same transaction ctx,
2006/1/3, Jakob Roesgaard Færch [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I am unable to reproduce the error. I have just added a comment to the
Jira requesting that the issue be canceled. Perhaps you could do that?
Hi Jakob,
I could have done it, but Gianny was faster. Thanks Gianny!
Jakob
Jacek
2006/1/3, Jakob Roesgaard Færch [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Jacek Laskowski wrote:
Is there anything else before AB is finally run without any errors?
How did you find the above one? I can't seem to reproduce it and
everything seems to be working fine from my (end-user) perspective.
The status for
Hi
Iam trying to distribute the Java Adventure Builder into Geronimo1.0,
Ihave some problemin the distribution of Order Processing Center (opc)
It shows this error
Unable to set attribute port to ${smtpPort}org.apache.geronimo.common.DeploymentException: Unable to set attribute port to
ram me wrote:
I am trying to distribute the Java Adventure Builder into Geronimo1.0,
Interesting - it's exciting to see if the deployment can be reproduced.
I have some problem in the distribution of Order Processing Center (opc)
It shows this error
Unable to set attribute port to
Typically it's for all releases, until someone else volunteers for a
specific version(s). for example we have two different people for
Axis1 and Axis2. So either way is ok.
-- dims
On 1/1/06, Aaron Mulder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 1/1/06, Alan D. Cabrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
trunk will
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-264?page=all ]
toby cabot closed GERONIMO-264:
---
exceptions being swallowed at startup
-
Key: GERONIMO-264
URL:
forwarding this on behalf of Matt... - sachin Begin forwarded message:From: Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED]Date: January 3, 2006 9:47:28 AM ESTTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: [Fwd: [Vote] 1.0 Release - Do we ship it?] Can you forward thsi for me? I'm still getting SPAM errors. I've sent a note to
Hi fellow Geronimoers,
ActiveMQ is planing to do it's first milestone release while it's in
the incubator. Since you guys have done this before, I'm hoping you
guys can recall what the gotchas were and/or have a tips on doing a
good release.
I also have some questions:
- Can I use the
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-29?page=all ]
Sachin Patel reassigned GERONIMODEVTOOLS-29:
Assign To: Sachin Patel
The installableruntime feature requires a possibly broken plugin
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-29?page=all ]
Sachin Patel resolved GERONIMODEVTOOLS-29:
--
Resolution: Fixed
This is now fixed. This zip distribution no longer contains the
installableruntime feature and its plugin.
Hiram,
Here are some reading material for background reading:
- http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Releases
- http://www.google.com/search?hl=enq=%22Release+Manager%22+site%3Aapache.org
Also see below
On 1/3/06, Hiram Chirino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi fellow
[-1] I'd like to see 1404 fixed. This invalidates the help displayed. This also has a slight impact on tooling since the default output does not display correctly in the Eclipse console view. Thus the default output in tooling needs to be INFO and currently this cannot be set. On Jan 3, 2006,
Sachin,
Does the server crash completely, does it not start up at all? if not,
it can wait till 1.0.1. If everyone starts -1-ing stuff, we will never
ship!. Please consider withdrawing your -1.
[X] +1 Release 1.0
thanks,
dims
On 1/3/06, Sachin Patel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[-1] I'd like to
[X] +1 Release 1.0
Davanum Srinivas wrote:
Sachin,
Does the server crash completely, does it not start up at all? if not,
it can wait till 1.0.1. If everyone starts -1-ing stuff, we will never
ship!. Please consider withdrawing your -1.
[X] +1 Release 1.0
thanks,
dims
On 1/3/06,
Hi Folks,
I guess it's possible that I'm the only person that used offline
deployment, at least I don't see a lot of people clamoring to bring it
back. It's very useful for me, though, so I'd like to find out if
there's a possibility of bringing it back onto HEAD (and hopefully the
1.0 branch,
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-30?page=comments#action_12361642
]
Sachin Patel commented on GERONIMODEVTOOLS-30:
--
But when you try to use the features of the plugin, what happens? (i.e define a
geronimo runtime). Not
[+1] I'll withdraw my -1. 1.0.1 is fine for 1404.
- sachin
On Jan 3, 2006, at 10:25 AM, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
Sachin,
Does the server crash completely, does it not start up at all? if not,
it can wait till 1.0.1. If everyone starts -1-ing stuff, we will never
ship!. Please consider
Jules Gosnell wrote:
Jeff Genender wrote:
Hi Jules, and welcome back...
I think Geronimo integration needs some open discussion. I think there
is general consensus of a wadi configuration and a common
geronimo-web.xml integration. I think there is significant discussion
on gbean-izing
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1399?page=all ]
Sachin Patel resolved GERONIMO-1399:
Resolution: Fixed
Assign To: Sachin Patel
Fixed by pointing to jsr88 jar.
DeploymentFactory-Implementation-Class property missing from
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1404?page=all ]
Alan Cabrera updated GERONIMO-1404:
---
Fix Version: (was: 1.0)
Not a show stopper
Can't set server startup verbosity to INFO
--
How does this affect debugging?
Regards,
Alan
On 1/3/2006 8:39 AM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
That sounds pretty interesting -- does it really fully handle
annotations? I thought some of those could be inspected at runtime
and I'm not sure how that could be supported in 1.4, but I really
don't
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1413?page=all ]
Donald Woods updated GERONIMO-1413:
---
Attachment: Geronimo-1413.patch
Console patch against latest AG 1.0 from 20051221 attached
Console needs to set JSP and Servlet contentType to UTF-8
If this is the same one we worked on week before last, it did pass the TCK.
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2006 09:21:30 -0500
From: Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
All,
We have had the last candidate out and available since 12/22. I
personally have
+1 to releasedavid jencksOn Jan 3, 2006, at 6:48 AM, Sachin Patel wrote:forwarding this on behalf of Matt... - sachin Begin forwarded message:From: Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED]Date: January 3, 2006 9:47:28 AM ESTTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: [Fwd: [Vote] 1.0 Release - Do we ship it?] Can you
On 1/3/06, Sachin Patel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We have had the last candidate out and available since 12/22. I personally
have
had a chance to put the 12/22 build under performance stress and I'm
satisfied
that the build is stable and runs in a variety of modes using DayTrader.
Despite
[X] +1 Release 1.0--kevanOn Jan 3, 2006, at 9:48 AM, Sachin Patel wrote:forwarding this on behalf of Matt... - sachin Begin forwarded message:From: Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED]Date: January 3, 2006 9:47:28 AM ESTTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: [Fwd: [Vote] 1.0 Release - Do we ship it?] Can you
2006/1/3, Sachin Patel [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[X] +1 Release 1.0
[ ] -1 Do not release 1.0 (Reasons included)
Jacek
+1 Release 1.0
Regards,
Alan
On 1/3/2006 10:11 AM, Jeff Genender wrote:
If this is the same one we worked on week before last, it did pass the TCK.
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2006 09:21:30 -0500
From: Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
All,
+1 Release 1.0
Regards,
Alan
On 1/3/2006 10:11 AM, Jeff Genender wrote:
If this is the same one we worked on week before last, it did pass the TCK.
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2006 09:21:30 -0500
From: Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
All,
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1399?page=all ]
Lin Sun closed GERONIMO-1399:
-
Verified it is fixed and I can deploy the hello program now.
DeploymentFactory-Implementation-Class property missing from deployer.jar
manifest
Console About page does not set the shortcut icon
-
Key: GERONIMO-1414
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1414
Project: Geronimo
Type: Bug
Components: console
Versions: 1.0
Environment:
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1164?page=comments#action_12361671
]
Jacek Laskowski commented on GERONIMO-1164:
---
Applied.
Sendingproject.properties
Transmitting file data .
Committed revision 365738.
Java Adventure
On 1/3/06, Rajith Attapattu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was wondering what the current status is for IMAP??
I have begun working on the IMAP transport, but there's still much
work to be done.
I will work on the remaining issues of the POP3 implementation.
Dain when are u going to apply
I have implemented most of store, folder and message. Currently working on
the multipart messages. Didn't get much done during the holidays but
hopefully I'll get a chance to work on it this week.
bilal
I was wondering what the current status is for IMAP??
I will work on the remaining
+1 for Releasing 1.0
Regards,
John
[Adventure Builder] Configure Mutual Authentication for Web Services
Key: GERONIMO-1415
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1415
Project: Geronimo
Type: Improvement
Components:
2006/1/3, Jakob Roesgaard Færch [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
===
Secure Webservices
===
The web service enabled session beans BrokerServiceBean,
LodgingPOEndpointBean, ActivityPOEndpointBean, AirlinePOEndpointBean
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1164?page=all ]
Jacek Laskowski resolved GERONIMO-1164:
---
Resolution: Fixed
As Jakob wrote: The status for the Adventure Builder is that the application
is running without errors. I couldn't
Hi,
This is to announce that Java Adventure Builder Reference 1.0.3
deploys and runs fine in Apache Geronimo. The task Java Adventure
Builder Reference application deployment
(http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1164) is resolved then
and will be closed in a few days unless some
Will the hot deployment directory satisfy you needs?
-dain
On Jan 3, 2006, at 7:34 AM, toby cabot wrote:
Hi Folks,
I guess it's possible that I'm the only person that used offline
deployment, at least I don't see a lot of people clamoring to bring it
back. It's very useful for me, though,
I would love to start using Java 5 as soon as possible. I have been
using the backport-util-concurrent package for a while in xbean and
the Java 5 interfaces are really nice to use. Above all other
features, I would love to have generics support in geronimo.
Generics give me much more
On Jan 3, 2006, at 1:07 PM, Rajith Attapattu wrote:
Dain when are u going to apply the patch (with the POP3 impl) ??
I assume it's after 1.0 release.
I actually forgot about it. I'm kind of in the middle of something,
so I won't be able to get to it this week.
Bruce, can you apply the
+1 to release
-dain
I had a quick look at retrotranslator today. Generics and some other
language 5.0 features were, as some of you may know, originally
developed on a 1.4 JVM. So in principal this is a cool idea and at one
point the javac engineer suggested we provide the target 1.4 option. I
would probably draw
On 1/3/06, Dain Sundstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 3, 2006, at 1:07 PM, Rajith Attapattu wrote:
Dain when are u going to apply the patch (with the POP3 impl) ??
I assume it's after 1.0 release.
I actually forgot about it. I'm kind of in the middle of something,
so I won't be
[daytrader] Broken links on benchmarking page
-
Key: GERONIMO-1416
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1416
Project: Geronimo
Type: Bug
Components: sample apps
Versions: 1.0
Reporter: John
[daytrader] daytrader/docs/tradeFAQ.html out of date
Key: GERONIMO-1417
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1417
Project: Geronimo
Type: Bug
Components: sample apps
Versions: 1.0
[X] +1 Release 1.0
Sachin Patel wrote:
forwarding this on behalf of Matt...
- sachin
Begin forwarded message:
From: Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: January 3, 2006 9:47:28 AM EST
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Fwd: [Vote] 1.0 Release - Do we ship it?]
Can you forward thsi for me?
Hi Dims,
I didn’t got your reply in my mailbox. Today I checked this
thread.Then i come to know that u want me to upload
the contribution files.But I don’t know how to upload
and what should be the format. Can you please help me?
Regards
Rakesh Ranjan
Hi friends,
I am trying to get a reference to Geronimo
TransactionManager. For this, I have done the following things : -
a) Getting a
reference to the kernel using the KernelRegistry class.
b) Then searching
the TransactionManager GBean using a pattern.
c) Finally
getting the
Hi Matt,
I installed the 1.0 release candidate (tomcat build) on Solaris x86. I
accessed the daytrader page, clicked on the Go Trade! link and then
clicked on the Log in button. I then got a
javax.ejb.ObjectNotFoundException stack trace.
I found that if I went to the Configuration screen
Grr, more confidential information footers. Please don't do that to
public mailing lists! If your information is confidential, don't send
it to the world, and if it's not confidential, please don't assault us
with the legalese!
Anyway, now that that's off my chest, Geronimo cannot (well,
57 matches
Mail list logo
