I ' m wondering if your problem comes from the activemq.xml configuration file.
Do you have a reference to a bean named broker in this file ?
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
On 4/7/06, Charlesh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have following servicemix.xml:
?xml version='1.0' encoding='ISO-8859-1' ?
Hi Everybody,
Some of the CGI headers are missing in the HttpConnector component. The
HttpMarshaler.java file could include the following piece of code: This
would help in the identification of clients.
Best regards
Soumadeep
Class: HttpMarshaler.java
Method 1:
protected void
Exchange with attachments can not be serialized (therefore unusable on
clustered flows)
---
Key: SM-391
URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-391
Project: ServiceMix
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-391?page=all ]
Guillaume Nodet resolved SM-391:
Fix Version: 3.0-M2
Resolution: Fixed
Assign To: Guillaume Nodet
Author: gnodet
Date: Sun Apr 9 12:19:48 2006
New Revision: 392808
URL:
Could you please raise a JIRA and attach your patch ?
This is not a big deal, but this allows keeping track of issues /
patches / contributors, aso...
Thanks,
Guillaume Nodet
On 4/9/06, Soumadeep [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Everybody,
Some of the CGI headers are missing in the HttpConnector
Additional CGI Header in HttpConnector Component
Key: SM-392
URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-392
Project: ServiceMix
Type: Improvement
Components: servicemix-components
Environment: All OS
Done
Thanks
Soumadeep
-Original Message-
From: Guillaume Nodet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 10, 2006 12:52 AM
To: servicemix-dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: CGI headers missing
Could you please raise a JIRA and attach your patch ?
This is not a big deal, but this
Hi,
Need some help with auto-deploying service assemblies. Is there a proper doc
somewhere, which I can refer to?
This is what I tried.
Structure of the xxx-sa.zip
xxx-sa.zip
|--- META-IN
|- jbi.xml
|--- xxx-su.zip
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-392?page=comments#action_36019 ]
Guillaume Nodet commented on SM-392:
Why do you want to put these properties on both the exchange and the message ?
I think one location should be sufficient, but I have not
ServiceMix 3.0-M1 RC doesn't like spaces in the path on Windows
---
Key: SM-393
URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-393
Project: ServiceMix
Type: Bug
Versions: 3.0-M1
Reporter:
Create XFire example
Key: SM-394
URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-394
Project: ServiceMix
Type: Task
Components: servicemix-components
Reporter: Dan Diephouse
Priority: Minor
Fix For: 3.0-M2
We should have a
Seems OK, but I noticed a couple things:
* SM-393: problems occur if you have spaces in the folder that
contains the servicemix install.
* soap-binding: http://servicemix.org/soap+binding+example doesn't
exist but is referenced in the README.txt
* Which website is supposed to
It looks to me as if a local-tx only connector is being used as if it
supports xa. It shouldn't be possible to deploy a connector with a
correct ra.xml in such a way as to create this problem. Can you
supply the geronimo plan for the connector, and indicate which
connector you deployed,
Looks like tomcat needs to be done too.
John
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: gdamour
Date: Sun Apr 9 00:03:44 2006
New Revision: 392687
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=392687view=rev
Log:
Fix default namespace.
Modified:
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1800?page=comments#action_12373764
]
Jacek Laskowski commented on GERONIMO-1800:
---
I think the patch should be accompanied with a doco on
On 4/9/06, Aaron Mulder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So I'm putting some stuff into 1.1, some of which is related to config
IDs and some of which is not.
My question is, for the stuff unrelated to config IDs, should I be
merging to HEAD right away? Or is it going to be easier if I don't
and we
On 4/8/06, Andrew Steeley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I had the same build break when I was using an old version of
/etc/project.properties or /pom.xml, which had the activemq_property set to
3.2. activeMQ 3.2 was moved out of the incubator in leiu of v. 4. But it
looks like they've upgraded
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1800?page=comments#action_12373765
]
Vasily Zakharov commented on GERONIMO-1800:
---
Good idea, I can write the doc. Should I put the doc here for someone to put it
to the site you mentioned?
I don't
I searched through the dev list but couldn't find a description of its use.
Thanks,
John
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1800?page=comments#action_12373767
]
Jacek Laskowski commented on GERONIMO-1800:
---
You don't need to wait for anybody, but go straight to the page and write the
doc. It's the only way to have
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1800?page=all ]
Jacek Laskowski resolved GERONIMO-1800:
---
Fix Version: 1.x
Resolution: Invalid
SPECjAppServ2004 is a commercial application, so we can't ship it. The plans
will be available
On 4/6/06, anita kulshreshtha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dain,
Thanks! I need to sort out the dependencies anyway. IIUC, currently
we are including the dependencies referenced by the plans, i.e. the
ones needed by GBeans. We are including few extra ones. The maven
transitive dependency list
On Apr 9, 2006, at 2:01 AM, John Sisson wrote:
I searched through the dev list but couldn't find a description of
its use.
While there are undoubtedly other uses, the main use I know of is to
deploy connectors on an app client in a separate configuration (not
as part of a client plan).
On Apr 9, 2006, at 1:27 AM, Zakharov, Vasily M wrote:
David,
The deployment plan is
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12324904/specdb.xml
and the deployment string is:
java -jar bin/deployer.jar --user system --password manager deploy
Connector builder doesn't check consistency of transaction settings
---
Key: GERONIMO-1822
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1822
Project: Geronimo
Type: Bug
Security: public
On 4/9/06, Jacek Laskowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd say do what's better for you atm. I guess it's not going to be an
easy task to merge them so the more we've got sooner the better the
merging will be.
Btw, how do you do it? What's the command to merge the branch? Can you
filter out
On Apr 9, 2006, at 12:23 AM, David Jencks wrote:
There seems to be a problem with collection valued references in
1.1. Normally we want a collection valued reference to determine
its members based on the target gbeans implementing an interface.
This works great for single valued
Now I'm confused. Shouldn't the deployment code detect that the RA
is targeted for an app client and auto set the flag?
-dain
On Apr 9, 2006, at 9:59 AM, David Jencks wrote:
On Apr 9, 2006, at 2:01 AM, John Sisson wrote:
I searched through the dev list but couldn't find a description of
FYI for anyone who is interested:
I've made a branch in the sandbox for servlet 2.5 integration work.
The svn url is:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/sandbox/servlet-2.5
So far I have checked in the 2.5 servlet spec schema (and all of the
other JavaEE 5 schemas too) and upped the
On 4/9/06, Dain Sundstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I fixed this by just listing the two default servelts by name. I
believe this is much less error prone.
-cain
Dude, if you're looking for the app server where all the majorly evil
people hang out, I think you're at the wrong one!
Aaron
Can it be deleted?
Thanks,
John
ROFL...*that* is hilarious!
Aaron Mulder wrote:
On 4/9/06, Dain Sundstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I fixed this by just listing the two default servelts by name. I
believe this is much less error prone.
-cain
Dude, if you're looking for the app server where all the majorly evil
people
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1800?page=comments#action_12373800
]
Vasily Zakharov commented on GERONIMO-1800:
---
The deployment string for Derby connector turned out (thanks to David Jencks)
to be wrong - XA connector should be
David,
Thank you!
Well, replacing the .rar in deployment string resolved the problem...
And created another one :) that looks pretty much the same.
The main stack I see in the console is the same, however the cause for
it is slightly different (see further details and analysis below the
stack):
Well Safari just about crashes my machine trying to load the continuum
report page, and it comes up with a text area like 10 screens wide...
But UI aside, the long and the short if it is that the most recent
failure was caused by an OutOfMemoryError. I guess we need to bump up
the configuration?
Add Embedded LDAP Server Viewer Portlet
---
Key: GERONIMO-1823
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1823
Project: Geronimo
Type: New Feature
Security: public (Regular issues)
Versions: 1.x
Reporter:
Hello Jacek,
I didn't mean to exclude you from the list. :) I sent
the email to get everybodys comments and suggestions
but I included Aaron, Joe, and Paul because I already
exchanged emails with them before. Anyway, I already
created a jira for this work as suggested and I hope
to work with in
Dojo is fine with me.
Aaron
On 4/9/06, Chris Cardona [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Jacek,
I didn't mean to exclude you from the list. :) I sent
the email to get everybody's comments and suggestions
but I included Aaron, Joe, and Paul because I already
exchanged emails with them before.
On Apr 9, 2006, at 9:23 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
Well Safari just about crashes my machine trying to load the continuum
report page, and it comes up with a text area like 10 screens wide...
But UI aside, the long and the short if it is that the most recent
failure was caused by an
I don't understand what you are trying to do wrt copying the existing j2ee 1.4 schemas still used in jee 5. If you intend the j2ee-schema directory to be a replacement for the one in trunk, then keeping all the schemas there is reasonable, and expecting class duplication between the two nearly
How could it possibly do that? We're dealing with a standalone connector here, not something that is part of an app client plan. The app client builder already tells the connector builder to suppress the default parent id when it is in charge of deploying a connector as part of an app client plan.
41 matches
Mail list logo
