Congrats! :)
geir
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
In recognition of his contributions and participation in the Apache
Geronimo community, the Geronimo PMC is proud to announce the
committership of Rick McGuire.
Rick has contributed in many places, and is a pleasure to work with, and
we look
JPA @JoinTable annotation is not retained in runtime
Key: GERONIMO-1894
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1894
Project: Geronimo
Type: Bug
Security: public (Regular issues)
Components:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1894?page=all ]
Andrus Adamchik updated GERONIMO-1894:
--
Attachment: patch.txt
JPA @JoinTable annotation is not retained in runtime
Issues with geronimo specs
--
Key: GERONIMO-1895
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1895
Project: Geronimo
Type: Bug
Security: public (Regular issues)
Components: specs
Versions: 1.1
Reporter: Kevan Miller
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1894?page=all ]
Jeff Genender closed GERONIMO-1894:
---
Resolution: Fixed
Assign To: Jeff Genender
Sendinggeronimo-spec-jpa/src/main/java/javax/persistence/JoinTable.java
Transmitting file
configs/client-builder requires activemq-core-3.2.1
---
Key: GERONIMO-1896
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1896
Project: Geronimo
Type: Bug
Security: public (Regular issues)
Components:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1896?page=all ]
Aaron Mulder updated GERONIMO-1896:
---
Summary: configs/client-deployer requires activemq-core-3.2.1 (was:
configs/client-builder requires activemq-core-3.2.1)
Description: Should
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1896?page=all ]
Aaron Mulder resolved GERONIMO-1896:
Resolution: Fixed
Assign To: Aaron Mulder
configs/client-deployer requires activemq-core-3.2.1
You can try:
svn co https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/branches/1.1/
It's not quite stable yet but it's quickly moving in that direction.
The 1.0 branch is more stable but will be obsolete shortly, so I'd
recommend 1.1.
Thanks,
Aaron
On 4/22/06, argyn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i started looking into code in org.apache.geronimo.security.jacc
http://geronimo.apache.org/api/org/apache/geronimo/security/jacc/package-summary.html
package. basically, i want to figure out how to plug the custom JACC
provider into Geronimo, so i need to look at the existing ones. where's
Look under the security module.
argyn wrote:
i started looking into code in org.apache.geronimo.security.jacc
http://geronimo.apache.org/api/org/apache/geronimo/security/jacc/package-summary.html
package. basically, i want to figure out how to plug the custom JACC
provider into Geronimo, so i
I thought someone (david jencks?) mentioned 1.2 branch. is it trunc? if
it's not stable, then do you have a less unstable tag there for me to
download?
thanks
argyn
Aaron Mulder wrote:
You can try:
svn co https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/branches/1.1/
It's not quite stable yet
David Jencks wrote:
On Apr 22, 2006, at 3:49 PM, argyn wrote:
I thought someone (david jencks?) mentioned 1.2 branch. is it trunc?
if it's not stable, then do you have a less unstable tag there for
me to download?
You should look at 1.2 (==trunk) as it has the half of jacc
m2 is not ready yet. Do a:
maven m:co
then a
maven new
argyn wrote:
David Jencks wrote:
On Apr 22, 2006, at 3:49 PM, argyn wrote:
I thought someone (david jencks?) mentioned 1.2 branch. is it trunc?
if it's not stable, then do you have a less unstable tag there for
me to download?
All,
While working on the plugins I found that our Directory is out of date
(0.9.2 vs latest 0.9.3 on iBiblio). I also found that if we just
take the latest of everything Directory-related it blows up (in
particular, mina 0.9.0 doesn't work, but 0.8.2 appears to).
Can someone test a good
Yeah, I can take a look.
Jeff
Aaron Mulder wrote:
All,
While working on the plugins I found that our Directory is out of date
(0.9.2 vs latest 0.9.3 on iBiblio). I also found that if we just
take the latest of everything Directory-related it blows up (in
particular, mina 0.9.0 doesn't work,
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1871?page=all ]
Jeff Genender reopened GERONIMO-1871:
-
Great fix Gianny. Can we please get in in 1.1? This is critical enough that I
think this needs to be in the next release.
Unable to deploy
+1 absolutely
Can you do it?
-dain
On Apr 22, 2006, at 7:36 PM, Jeff Genender wrote:
Can we get this in 1.1? This is a pretty nasty bug.
Jeff
Gianny Damour (JIRA) wrote:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1871?page=all ]
Gianny Damour closed GERONIMO-1871:
Actually, the fix is already in 1.1 (I just checked via the Subversion
Commits tab that the commit has not disappeared into the ether).
Thanks,
Gianny
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
+1 absolutely
Can you do it?
-dain
On Apr 22, 2006, at 7:36 PM, Jeff Genender wrote:
Can we get this in 1.1? This
+1
Aaron Mulder wrote:
All,
How would you feel about referring to configurations (e.g. a group of
GBeans with own ID and classloader) as a module instead? It seems
like configuration can be confusing, as it more traditionally refers
to a larger scope like an entire installation. For example,
20 matches
Mail list logo
