This FAQ entry might help
http://incubator.apache.org/activemq/how-do-i-use-jms-efficiently.html
On 6/12/06, Erin Oceng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I am writing multithreaded MQ app code, I am not sure if this is ok (pseudo
code)
Connection connection = createConnection();
for ( each
I think that clears things up for me a bit - what you're proposing makes
sense. I'll poke around today and see what I can come up with.
Thanks,
Nate
On 6/12/06, Brian McCallister [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jun 12, 2006, at 4:14 PM, Nathan Mittler wrote:
Agreed ... using the type header is
FWIW I'd like to have content-type header support. Couldn't we then
use content-type as the standard header that any Stomp-JMS bridge
would use to decide if something is a TextMessage or a BytesMessage?
On 6/13/06, Nathan Mittler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think that clears things up for me a
I agree with all that. In a pure Stomp world, content-type is a very
useful header and probably affect how the stomp client processes the
message.
Whatever the default rule is for Stomp - JMS I'd have thought most
JMS providers would (through configuration or implementation) probably
use that to
Sounds good to me.
+1
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hiram
Chirino
Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2006 1:45 PM
To: activemq-dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: STOMP and JMSType
On 6/13/06, Mittler, Nathan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just to
I would suggest that we use a weak form of specification encoding.
ActiveMQ already uses pseudo-urls in a lot of places, and named
transforms trump class names, usually:
yeah! URI style configuration rocks!
-Brian
--
Regards,
Hiram
So it sounds like we're all in agreement on the content-type header. For
text, it would be something like text and for bytes it would be
application/octet-stream. So this would not be an application-level
header, but would be used by my stomp client code to determine which message
type to
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-451?page=comments#action_36323 ]
Mark Swanson commented on SM-451:
-
I don't have a use case for attachments.
However, I do have a good one for properties. It simply seemed that the
existing code assumed I
I think that we may need to recut the release due to http://
issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2108
Apparently I forgot to convert message-destination elements in
geronimo plans to the naming namespace and as a consequence it is
impossible to use them in web plans. Aside from
If your application need to start thousands jobs, I bet you willprefer to create them programmatically instead of having to deploy them.IMaybe the deployer should only create the job and let quartz store it in the database.
The only problem is that when the job is undeployed, you have to remove
I have pushed XBean 2.4 binaries in a private repo for review.They are available at http://people.apache.org/~gnodet/xbean-2.4/m1/org.apache.xbean
http://people.apache.org/~gnodet/xbean-2.4/m2/org/apache/xbean[ ] +1 Release the binary as XBean 2.4
[ ] -1 Veto the release (provide specific
+1.
I didn't see a binary tarball of an entire assembly; at some point we
might wanna make an xbean.zip with all the jars and javadocs inside or
something; but for now I think most users just use the jars directly
in maven anyway :)
On 6/13/06, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have
fix the uberjar to tidy up the notice/license files to make it absolutely clear
whats going on
--
Key: AMQ-752
URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-752
Project:
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2108?page=comments#action_12415977
]
Christoph Sturm commented on GERONIMO-2108:
---
will this fix go into 1.1? will there be a new rc?
web app deployment fails with strange error if geronimo-web.xml
David,
Thanks for the heads up. I saw the JIRA and the commits. Leave it open but I suspect we're going
to close down tonight and cut the final release.
David Jencks wrote:
I think that we may need to recut the release due to
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2108
All,
Good feedback on the release and each successive build we have less issues.
Based on the feedback from people I have taken the following actions:
1. Updated the builds (both 1.1 and trunk) to include the LICENSE.txt file for
the server.
2. Modified and tested the Tomcat configuration in
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2108?page=all ]
Matt Hogstrom updated GERONIMO-2108:
Fix Version: 1.1
This has been applied to 1.1 and a new RC will be available tonight.
web app deployment fails with strange error if
On 6/13/06, Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All,Good feedback on the release and each successive build we have less issues.Based on the feedback from people I have taken the following actions:1. Updated the builds (both 1.1 and trunk) to include the
LICENSE.txt file for the server.2.
Guillaume Nodet wrote:
I have pushed XBean 2.4 binaries in a private repo for review.
They are available at
http://people.apache.org/~gnodet/xbean-2.4/m1/org.apache.xbean
http://people.apache.org/~gnodet/xbean-2.4/m1/org.apache.xbean
Also mentioned in another thread:
Two things:
1. Releases can't be vetoed; they use a consensual vote,
not the '3 +1s and 0 -1s' mechanism.
2. Since a release bears the Apache name, releasing software
is an official act of the Foundation, and as a consequence
only members of the PMC
Hi all,
I am compiling cmd code on SuSe(Linux machine- i686-suse-linux,
version 2.6.13-15.8-default) , I am able to create the object file of this
code but when I make a executable file it gives the following error
/stomp/StompTransport.cpp:147: undefined reference to
CMS is dependent on UNIX pthreads, so in your linker options you'll need
-lpthread
-Original Message-
From: Arshad Ahamad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2006 7:26 AM
To: activemq-dev@geronimo.apache.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Linking error for compiling CMS
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2093?page=comments#action_12415995
]
Mario Ruebsam commented on GERONIMO-2093:
-
The NPE appeared in 1.1-20060607.
The problem is fixed in 1.1-rc1. No more NPE while displaying or saving
deployment
Hi Neal,
Thanks for this feedabck. You are correct: it is pretty easy to write
some initialization code to create a sequence table and insert a value.
As a matter of fact, if you have a look to
org.tranql.pkgenerator.SequenceTablePrimaryKeyGenerator.initSequenceTable()
you can see that is is
There's some documentation on key generators here:
http://chariotsolutions.com/geronimo/ejb-structure.html#ejb-structure-entity-cmp-pkgen
It could probably use some examples, though. :)
Thanks,
Aaron
On 6/12/06, Neal Sanche [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All,
Yesterday I had some fun with
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1865?page=all ]
Aaron Mulder updated GERONIMO-1865:
---
Fix Version: 1.1.1
(was: 1.1)
We need to provide a restart link in the console and through the command-line
tool.
Add ability
The 1.1 support should work. I gave a demo on it at the Rational
Conference last week. But of course I was launching from within a
self-hosted environment, so let me double check the actual
distribution this morning. In the meantime, could you try as well
installing over a clean WTP
Place required attrtibutions in the NOTICES.txt file or a license included in
the LICENSE.txt file
--
Key: GERONIMO-2112
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2112
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2112?page=all ]
John Sisson updated GERONIMO-2112:
--
Attachment: geronimo-1.1-RC-licenses-attributions-draft1.txt
Place required attrtibutions in the NOTICES.txt file or a license included in
the
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
All,
Good feedback on the release and each successive build we have less
issues.
Based on the feedback from people I have taken the following actions:
1. Updated the builds (both 1.1 and trunk) to include the LICENSE.txt
file for the server.
2. Modified and tested
Ok, my bad, you're right, the distribution is in fact bad. I'll
remove it so other people don't report the same problem. Not sure
what is wrong since everything works when self hosting... I'll dig
into it..
thanks.
On Jun 13, 2006, at 8:38 AM, Sachin Patel wrote:
The 1.1 support
Ah found the problem, the bundle manifest was missing a . entry for
bundle-classpath. I'm uploading a new driver right now.
On Jun 13, 2006, at 9:07 AM, Sachin Patel wrote:
Ok, my bad, you're right, the distribution is in fact bad. I'll
remove it so other people don't report the same
Hi James,
I'm not sure if this is what you're after or not, but you can include
source and javadoc jars when you prepare your upload bundle (assuming XBean
is built using M2 and that you are deploying the resulting artifacts to
iBiblio) with the following command:
mvn source:jar
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1945?page=all ]
Erin Mulder updated GERONIMO-1945:
--
Assign To: (was: Erin Mulder)
Console's web application list does not show WARs that are deployed inside
EARs
Cool, thanks Ian!
On 6/13/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi James,
I'm not sure if this is what you're after or not, but you can include
source and javadoc jars when you prepare your upload bundle (assuming XBean
is built using M2 and that you are deploying the resulting
Geronimo doesn't start if restarted using another JDK
-
Key: GERONIMO-2113
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2113
Project: Geronimo
Type: Bug
Security: public (Regular issues)
Components:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2113?page=all ]
Nellya Udovichenko updated GERONIMO-2113:
-
Attachment: HOWLLog.patch
Geronimo doesn't start if restarted using another JDK
-
+1
On 6/13/06, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have pushed XBean 2.4 binaries in a private repo for review.
They are available at
http://people.apache.org/~gnodet/xbean-2.4/m1/org.apache.xbean
http://people.apache.org/~gnodet/xbean-2.4/m2/org/apache/xbean
[ ] +1 Release the binary
Not sure if i did it already.. here's my +1.
On 6/13/06, Hiram Chirino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
On 6/13/06, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have pushed XBean 2.4 binaries in a private repo for review.
They are available at
BTW I confess to skim reading this thread a little so appologies if I
missed some subtleties along the way :)
So I guess there's 2 things.
(i) Whats the default mapping of stomp content-type - JMS Message
that most stomp-jms providers should support by default.
(ii) Allowing folks to customize
John Sisson wrote:
6. Third Party Licenses. This needs to be reviewed and the
appropriate licenses compiled. Volunteers? We did not have one in the
1.0 stream so I'd like clarification if this is a requirement or
something that can be deferred.
IMO this is a requirement. Just have a look
HttpInvoker is losing message properties and attachments
Key: SM-451
URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-451
Project: ServiceMix
Type: Bug
Components: servicemix-components
Versions: 3.0
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
4. Remaining JIRA Issues
*Needs to be investigated* _Paul or Aaron_ can you examine this issue
and recommend a fix?
GERONIMO-2093Console database pool always gets NPE on deploy
The NPE appeared in 1.1-20060607.
The problem is fixed in 1.1-rc1. No more NPE while
Just to make clear what the proposed new hard-coded logic does:
1) If there is no content-length, it's a text message (same as before)
2) else, if there is no message type, it's a bytes message (same as
before)
3) else use amq-msg-type to determine the message type
So this logic is
+1--jasonOn Jun 13, 2006, at 1:11 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:I have pushed XBean 2.4 binaries in a private repo for review.They are available at http://people.apache.org/~gnodet/xbean-2.4/m1/org.apache.xbean http://people.apache.org/~gnodet/xbean-2.4/m2/org/apache/xbean[ ] +1 Release the
The think your views are a bit STOMP point of view centric. bytes
messages work fine when both end assume you are just moving around
bytes messages.. and it's true everything can eventually converted
down to a byte[].
If you look at it from a JMS point of view, how will a STOMP client
deal with
On 6/13/06, Mittler, Nathan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just to make clear what the proposed new hard-coded logic does:
1) If there is no content-length, it's a text message (same as before)
2) else, if there is no message type, it's a bytes message (same as
before)
3) else use amq-msg-type to
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2040?page=all ]
Donald Woods resolved GERONIMO-2040:
Fix Version: 1.1
(was: 1.2)
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed by David Jencks on 6/1/06
MagicGBall application not working in
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2113?page=all ]
David Jencks reassigned GERONIMO-2113:
--
Assign To: David Jencks
Geronimo doesn't start if restarted using another JDK
-
Hi Aaron,
I am trying to learn what the in-place deployment mean and how to use it.
My understanding was that users can update the hot deploy files (for
example, update one jsp file) in the Geronimo_home\deploy directory and
server will redeploy the change automatically. This was not working in
I think that this gbean adaptation code should be in geronimo rather
than amq. I'm OK with applying it as is but would prefer some issues
to be addressed first or, even better, immediately after the
transfer (assuming it is done with svn mv).
1. DataSourceReference should be replaced by
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2108?page=all ]
David Jencks closed GERONIMO-2108:
--
Fix Version: 1.2
Resolution: Fixed
After studying this some more I think my fix is complete.
web app deployment fails with strange error if
On 6/13/06, Lin Sun [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am trying to learn what the in-place deployment mean and how to use it.
My understanding was that users can update the hot deploy files (for
example, update one jsp file) in the Geronimo_home\deploy directory and
server will redeploy the change
My first sentence is supposed to mean I support moving this code to
geronimo :-). I went ahead and reviewed it even without it being
attached to a jira issue, but I would like there to be a jira issue
for this for tracking purposes: the patch doesn't need to be attached
to it.
thanks
On 6/13/06, Brian McCallister [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jun 13, 2006, at 10:36 AM, Hiram Chirino wrote:
The think your views are a bit STOMP point of view centric. bytes
messages work fine when both end assume you are just moving around
bytes messages.. and it's true everything can
This is really a pretty simple minded uncontroversial patch that's
been sitting around for 3 or 4 days now after 2 quick +1's. I know
we're trying to get 1.1 out the door but another review would be
really appreciated to keep the m2 migration moving.
thanks
david jencks
On Jun 10, 2006,
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2112?page=all ]
Donald Woods updated GERONIMO-2112:
---
Attachment: NOTICES-draft1.txt
Attaching a modified NOTICES.TXT from our WASCE redistribution of Geronimo,
which should get you 90+% of what you
Last (and only, depending on how you count) +1 was 4 days ago, any
chance 2 more people are willing to review this?
thanks
david jencks
On Jun 9, 2006, at 7:51 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
+1
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
David Jencks wrote:
I've uploaded
+1, seems fine to me.
Btw, would it be easier for the m2 migration, to create a branch, where
the RTC would not apply, and then merge all in trunk ?
I guess this could also apply to some features that requires a
significant number of patches...
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
Prasad Kashyap wrote:
Timer already cancelled error when attempting to grab a connection from a pool
--
Key: GERONIMO-2114
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2114
Project: Geronimo
Type: Bug
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2114?page=all ]
Jay D. McHugh updated GERONIMO-2114:
Attachment: PaLM.war
Here is the application war file.
Timer already cancelled error when attempting to grab a connection from a pool
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2114?page=all ]
Jay D. McHugh updated GERONIMO-2114:
Attachment: build_plc.sql
Here is a script that will populate a test database.
Instructions:
1) Create a database called 'plc'
2) Create a user
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2114?page=all ]
Jay D. McHugh updated GERONIMO-2114:
Attachment: plc_db.deploy.g1.1.xml
After installing the mysql jdbc driver into Geronimo and creating the database -
Deploy a connection pool with
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2114?page=comments#action_12416062
]
Jay D. McHugh commented on GERONIMO-2114:
-
After everything is setup, browse to http://servername:8080/PaLM/
Enter user: jmchugh
password: noise
Hover the mouse
What happens in the case that the files no longer exist on the next
server startup? Two scenarios I'm worried about:
1) files were loaded from an NFS/Samba/SMB share which has become
disconnected
2) Eclipse users who deploy the app into the server, test it, stop the
server and then delete the
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2112?page=all ]
Dave Colasurdo updated GERONIMO-2112:
-
Attachment: NOTICE.txt
LICENSE.txt
Here is the initial pass at the LICENSE.TXT and NOTICE.TXT files for Geronimo
1.1..
Still
Good point! I shutdown the server and renamed the hello directory. Then
start the server afterwards. I saw the following exception when server
attempted to start the hello module. I didn't see Geronimo server started
at the end but luckily all the important module seemed to be started before
Dave Colasurdo wrote:
John Sisson wrote:
6. Third Party Licenses. This needs to be reviewed and the
appropriate licenses compiled. Volunteers? We did not have one in
the 1.0 stream so I'd like clarification if this is a requirement or
something that can be deferred.
IMO this is a
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2098?page=all ]
David Jencks closed GERONIMO-2098:
--
Resolution: Fixed
Thanks to the +1 vote from myself, Aaron, and Guillaume I've applied the final
patch in rev 413963
Application migration to
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2114?page=comments#action_12416069
]
Kevan Miller commented on GERONIMO-2114:
Jay, thanks for your help with this issue!
Seems to be memory-related. Jay reported that Increasing the heap size seems
The stax api which is hosted at codehaus is ASL 2 and does not have anyNOTICE file included, so my best guess is that there is nothing to do for this one.Cheers,Guillaume Nodet
On 6/13/06, Dave Colasurdo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dave Colasurdo wrote: John Sisson wrote: 6. Third Party Licenses.This
If you look at the NOTICES-Draft1.txt file I attached before Dave's,
you'll see the Stax source contains the following License/Notices which
need to be mentioned -
(i) Indiana University Extreme! LabSoftware License V1.1
Indiana University Extreme! Lab Software License, Version 1.1.1
This jar: http://dist.codehaus.org/stax/jars/stax-api-1.0.1.jardoes not contain anything and is licensed under ASL 2.I guess you are refering to the stax RI from BEA, but this one
is not licensed under ASL and is not reditributable.Cheers,Guillaume NodetOn 6/13/06, Donald Woods
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2098?page=comments#action_12416075
]
Prasad Kashyap commented on GERONIMO-2098:
--
RTC vote thread.
http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@geronimo.apache.org/msg23947.html
Application migration to Maven
Could you guys point me to a place in AMQ where this sort of thing is being
done? That would save me a lot of searching =)
I'm viewing this problem from the client side - the Stomp C++ client that
Tim Bish and I are writing currently supports text and bytes messages. So
when I get a stomp
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-752?page=comments#action_36325 ]
robert burrell donkin commented on AMQ-752:
---
Uber jar licensing seems like a thorny issue to me and probably one that's
quite a bit bigger than just ActiveMQ. Once I
On Jun 13, 2006, at 1:50 PM, Nathan Mittler wrote:
Could you guys point me to a place in AMQ where this sort of thing
is being
done? That would save me a lot of searching =)
I'm viewing this problem from the client side - the Stomp C++
client that
Tim Bish and I are writing currently
On 6/13/06, Nathan Mittler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could you guys point me to a place in AMQ where this sort of thing is being
done? That would save me a lot of searching =)
Its not really done anywhere else :-(
I'm viewing this problem from the client side - the Stomp C++ client that
Tim
It may be misleading to have it built if it doesn't work. Users will
try to build from source and will ask us why the installer doesn't work...
I also noticed that the standard.jar that seems to be only under the
j2ee-installer assembly is different to the standard-1.1.1.jar file
I probably can help out.
Jeff
Carmen Hagen wrote:
Heard that the Atlanta JUG is interested in having a Geronimo committer
speak at their October 17th meeting. Anyone interested? Please let me
know as soon as possible, and I'll get you connected. Thanks!
Thanks Sachin, I will give it a good run tonight, and let you know
through JIRAs if I encounter anything.
Cheers.
-Neal
Sachin Patel wrote:
Ah found the problem, the bundle manifest was missing a . entry for
bundle-classpath. I'm uploading a new driver right now.
On Jun 5, 2006, at 11:57
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2112?page=all ]
John Sisson updated GERONIMO-2112:
--
Attachment: geronimo-1.1-RC-licenses-attributions-draft2.txt
Updated/Added the following items:
axis
commons-fileupload
commons-io
commons-modeler
dwr
Just tried it, and it's the same thing Sachin. Could you, perhaps, send
me the following file, or make it available in the .zip:
org.apache.geronimo.st.v11.ui.jar
It isn't in the .zip you sent, however it is in the source distribution,
but I can't make the plugin source code compile. Are you
Jeff,
if you end up going and the JUG is open to all, then could you update
the events page with the details.
Thanks,
John
Jeff Genender wrote:
I probably can help out.
Jeff
Carmen Hagen wrote:
Heard that the Atlanta JUG is interested in having a Geronimo committer
speak at their
My bad, you're right. Fixing and rebuilding now. Check for a new
driver shortly. Thanks for your patience.
-sachin
On Jun 13, 2006, at 9:09 PM, Neal Sanche wrote:
Just tried it, and it's the same thing Sachin. Could you, perhaps,
send me the following file, or make it available in the
Well, in the meantime I'm learning how to compile it. Downloaded Maven
2.0.4 and am just waiting for the rest of the downloads to happen.
Exciting stuff. :)
-Neal
Sachin Patel wrote:
My bad, you're right. Fixing and rebuilding now. Check for a new
driver shortly. Thanks for your patience.
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2112?page=all ]
Kevan Miller updated GERONIMO-2112:
---
Attachment: NOTICE.txt
NOTICE.txt file.
John,
I believe this addresses all of the notice/license requirements which you've
identified -- great work
Cool, you'll want to do an svn update, i just checked in some stuff,
happened to be that v11.ui wasn't even building, nor being packaged :)
On Jun 13, 2006, at 9:39 PM, Neal Sanche wrote:
Well, in the meantime I'm learning how to compile it. Downloaded
Maven 2.0.4 and am just waiting for
I noticed that in the build scripts... Good that you fixed it. I will
keep trying to build it. I ran into the out of memory problem just now
and found your previous post on MAVEN_OPTS=-Xmx512m so I'll stop the
build and svn update first. Thanks.
-Neal
Sachin Patel wrote:
Cool, you'll want to
Ok, actually I'm using now...
MAVEN_OPTS=-Xmx1024m -XX:MaxPermSize=512m
and I'm uploading a build as we speak, should be done in just about 5
min.
On Jun 13, 2006, at 10:13 PM, Neal Sanche wrote:
I noticed that in the build scripts... Good that you fixed it. I
will keep trying to build
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2112?page=comments#action_12416112
]
John Sisson commented on GERONIMO-2112:
---
We're getting closer.
All licenses should be moved to the LICENSE.txt file. The NOTICE.txt file
should only contain
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2112?page=comments#action_12416113
]
Dave Colasurdo commented on GERONIMO-2112:
--
That was the format I used in the original LICENSE.TXT and NOTICE.txt that I
attached (separating licenses from
Okay, good, because my build is failing. I'll download yours and test it
out here. My error during build was:
[ERROR] BUILD FAILURE
[INFO]
[INFO] Compilation failure
Exclude j2ee-installer assembly from 1.1 build by renaming project.xml file to
project.xml.ignore
-
Key: GERONIMO-2115
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2115
Hi Sachin, I just wanted to report that your latest build works very
well for me. Thanks very much!
Cheers.
-Neal
Precompile JSPs in apps. Jar classes into web-inf/lib
-
Key: GERONIMO-2116
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2116
Project: Geronimo
Type: Sub-task
Security: public (Regular issues)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2116?page=all ]
Prasad Kashyap updated GERONIMO-2116:
-
Attachment: jspc.patch
Precompile JSPs in apps. Jar classes into web-inf/lib
-
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2116?page=all ]
Prasad Kashyap reassigned GERONIMO-2116:
Assign To: David Jencks
Precompile JSPs in apps. Jar classes into web-inf/lib
-
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2115?page=all ]
John Sisson closed GERONIMO-2115:
-
Resolution: Fixed
Exclude j2ee-installer assembly from 1.1 build by renaming project.xml file
to project.xml.ignore
John Sisson wrote:
Jeff,
if you end up going and the JUG is open to all, then could you update
the events page with the details.
Sure...lets see if I am going for sure first ;-)
Thanks,
John
Jeff Genender wrote:
I probably can help out.
Jeff
Carmen Hagen wrote:
Heard that
1 - 100 of 102 matches
Mail list logo
