Hi ,
Thanks for the tip. I was wondering why the behaviour has changed
though. Whatever I am using works on another app server like Websphere
and also in 1.0 of Geronimo where tomcat's classloader is used. My
question is shouldn't the Web Application Classloader have access to
the re
Matt Did you get any feedback on this?On 7/5/06, Matt Hogstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I understand the point of confusion about the binding votes and PMC membership.It was pointed out that we have a disparity in PMC / committer populations. I think it would bebeneficial to the project to adjus
Over the last week I have been working with the xbean code trying to
figure out the best way to build up a full server. After a few false
starts, I've decided that the best approach is to attempt to build up
a large server using just Spring with no modularity (and no kernel)
and then once
Make it easier to just enable the command trancing of the TransportLogger.
--
Key: AMQ-809
URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-809
Project: ActiveMQ
Type: Improvement
Versions
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-808?page=all ]
Hiram Chirino updated AMQ-808:
--
Description:
This was initially noticed because at times avisoryies stopped working for some
cases. This is due to the way the Region uses a DestinationMap to f
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-808?page=all ]
Hiram Chirino resolved AMQ-808:
---
Resolution: Fixed
fixed.
> The DestinationMap removeAll is removing too many nodes out of the map.
> -
The DestinationMap removeAll is removing too many nodes out of the map.
---
Key: AMQ-808
URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-808
Project: ActiveMQ
Type: Bug
Components: Broker
... will now all build from Continuum when adding their pom URL's as
m2 projects :-)
But, due to Continuum not always building them in the right order it
might be necessary to "Build All" a few times to get everything all
happy.
This means that we will soon be able to deploy SNAPSHOT arti
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1786?page=comments#action_12420204
]
Bruce Snyder commented on GERONIMO-1786:
This means that the console page for the JMS Server contains links to
functionality that cannot be fulfilled in Geronimo 1
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2175?page=comments#action_12420203
]
Jason Dillon commented on GERONIMO-2175:
Forgot to add the issue id in the comment. Fix was added in rev #420691 to
possibly fix this.
Pending resolution that th
Sachin,At a minimum, you need to add:OpenEJB, MX4J, and XStream to the root LICENSE fileMX4J, and XMLBeans to the root NOTICE fileDid you investigate Hessian licensing? I didn't find any licensing info (at first). So, took a look at the source. The first source file I looked at contained the follow
I started to have problems in deploying my second application which I had it
running with v1.0's plugin. It is a simple ClassViewer application that
has a jsp and a servlet. The jsp calls the servlet when user clicks on the
submit button to get the class description.
Upon deployment of the appl
Hi Sachin,
It is great that you put out the FAQ - we definitely need that!
One question I'd like to get answered is: There are two checkboxes in the
AG server configuration panel:
Enable in-place deployment
Run standalone modules directly from workspace.
What's the difference between them?
Fixed. Re-vote.http://people.apache.org/dist/geronimo/eclipse/unstable/g-eclipse-plugin-1.1-deployable-RC5.ziphttp://people.apache.org/dist/geronimo/eclipse/unstable/g-eclipse-plugin-1.1-updatesite-RC5.zip (still uploading available shortly)On Jul 10, 2006, at 8:21 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:Sachin,I'
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2167?page=comments#action_12420192
]
Kevan Miller commented on GERONIMO-2167:
Leonard, thanks much for the test case.
I haven't been able to reproduce on MAC OSX. I'm afraid that this is going to
be
Forget what I said... I'll add them.On Jul 10, 2006, at 9:41 PM, Sachin Patel wrote:Ok thanks, but a license is not needed for the update site zip as this is handled by the update manager. As far as the deployable plugin the licenses only need to be packaged within the features and not each indivi
Ok thanks, but a license is not needed for the update site zip as this is handled by the update manager. As far as the deployable plugin the licenses only need to be packaged within the features and not each individual plugin.On Jul 10, 2006, at 8:21 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:Sachin,I'm afraid I don'
Aaron Mulder wrote:
On 7/10/06, Alan D. Cabrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Maven 1 repos can be used from Maven 2.
I didn't know that.
Why would we need to post maven
1 jars into a maven 2 repository?
Well, if you're creating a Maven 2 project now, and you use the group
ID "geronimo", you
I've finally managed to reproduce the problem in GERONIMO-2125, in
which you have an ear, with a war inside, with a manifest classpath,
and the stuff on the mcp doesn't work.
The problem is pretty much caused by our new configuration for the
war, although I think a similar problem would occ
Duh, I just re-read the thread.
Regards,
Alan
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Doh...I meant the Spec jars.
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
Why do we need to do this? M2 can load M1 artifacts from an M1 repo.
Regards,
Alan
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Donald,
I had to manually publish these for the M2. At the tim
Sachin,
I'm afraid I don't see either a NOTICE or LICENSE files in the plugin
zip file, itself, nor any of the embedded jar files. They all must
contain both LICENSE and NOTICE files. Afraid this is a
requirement. And you'll need to create new binaries... See http://
www.apache.org/dev/rel
On 7/11/06, Matt Hogstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Geronimo folks: do you want this also issued as an official press
> release?
Yes please.
+1
> If so, do you have any customers or partners we could include
> as part of the announcement? E.g. quotes or complementary announcements?
>
I
Susan Wu wrote:
From what I understand, the code release has been made available on the
Geronimo web site and a general announcement has been made with regards
to its availability.
Geronimo folks: do you want this also issued as an official press
release?
Yes please.
If so, do you ha
As far as I can tell, someone just copied uddi-server to uddi-db and
then never removed the webapp bits.
Looks like its been like for about a year too.
--jason
On Jul 10, 2006, at 4:36 PM, Jacek Laskowski wrote:
On 7/11/06, Jason Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So, unless someone can s
The uddi-db module should be buildable now since #420661
Give it a whirl and let me know if you run into anything else.
--jason
On Jul 10, 2006, at 4:28 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
It appears that the uddi-db module should *NOT* have any webapp
stuff, but only the derby database files.
So, un
On 7/11/06, Jason Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So, unless someone can shed some light onto why the db module has
webapp files in it, I'm going to remove them.
I don't know, but there must be a svn command that would help us to
find it out, shouldn't there? Wouldn't svn log tell us about t
It appears that the uddi-db module should *NOT* have any webapp
stuff, but only the derby database files.
So, unless someone can shed some light onto why the db module has
webapp files in it, I'm going to remove them.
--jason
On Jul 10, 2006, at 4:15 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
Why are the u
Doh...I meant the Spec jars.
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
Why do we need to do this? M2 can load M1 artifacts from an M1 repo.
Regards,
Alan
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Donald,
I had to manually publish these for the M2. At the time the tag was
cut the pom.xml did not have updated entries for M2 to p
I have been remiss in my TCK duties. I'll reset my TCK e-mail and watch for
JIRAs.
David Blevins wrote:
On Jul 10, 2006, at 11:19 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
On Jul 10, 2006, at 1:55 PM, David Blevins wrote:
Kevan, you've been tck dog for six months now. Having built the
system and done the j
Why are the uddi-* webapp files duplicated in the -server and -db
modules?
uddi-db/src
uddi-db/src/sql
uddi-db/src/sql/juddi.sql
uddi-db/src/webapp
uddi-db/src/webapp/happyjuddi.jsp
uddi-db/src/webapp/WEB-INF
uddi-db/src/webapp/WEB-INF/juddi.properties
uddi-db/src/webapp/WEB-INF/web.xml
uddi-s
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2175?page=comments#action_12420183
]
Jason Dillon commented on GERONIMO-2175:
We must implement a solution to this, probably to just have the packaging
plugin generate the mapping at runtime from the
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1710?page=comments#action_12420182
]
Jason Dillon commented on GERONIMO-1710:
What is the status of this?
I recall seeing some mail about if we needed this plugin or not... but I don't
recall the out
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2175?page=all ]
Jason Dillon updated GERONIMO-2175:
---
Fix Version: 1.2
(was: Wish List)
> etc/explicit_versions.properties should be automatically generated (or made
> unecessary)
> -
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2175?page=all ]
Jason Dillon reassigned GERONIMO-2175:
--
Assign To: Jason Dillon
> etc/explicit_versions.properties should be automatically generated (or made
> unecessary)
> --
Ug... AntRun always seems to end up causing more problems than it
resolves.
May need to create a plugin to execute sql to get around this...
which is probably a good idea anyways.
Luckily I've done that a few times, should be easy to cook up.
--jason
On Jul 10, 2006, at 5:17 AM, Jacek La
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2177?page=comments#action_12420179
]
Jason Dillon commented on GERONIMO-2177:
I agree. +1
> Move the installer portion of assembly out of trunk to sandbox
> --
On Jul 10, 2006, at 3:10 PM, David Jencks wrote:
I sure hope we manage to change the groupIds to org.apache.geronimo
before anything gets released.
I think that this should be done when we are ready to reorganize the
1.2 tree for m2... and probably not before.
--jason
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1887?page=comments#action_12420176
]
David Jencks commented on GERONIMO-1887:
Sorry, that was ambiguous. I meant that someone needs to look at trunk to see
if it is already fixed or still needs work.
On Jul 10, 2006, at 12:36 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
On 7/10/06, Alan D. Cabrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Maven 1 repos can be used from Maven 2.
I didn't know that.
Why would we need to post maven
1 jars into a maven 2 repository?
Well, if you're creating a Maven 2 project now, and you
This is another "windows sucks" problem... this one being windows
file locking sucks.
You will only see this on windows.
But... what appears to be more troubling is that the antrun plugin is
running twice!
:-(
--jason
On Jul 10, 2006, at 5:17 AM, Jacek Laskowski wrote:
On 7/10/06, Pra
"Donald Woods (JIRA)" writes:
> Have you tried removing the spaces from the name and giving it a real
> Maven friendly version number like "0.1" instead of "0"?
I just gave this a go and no dice.
Thanks though; any other thoughts?
On Jul 10, 2006, at 3:38 PM, David Blevins wrote:
On Jul 10, 2006, at 11:19 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
On Jul 10, 2006, at 1:55 PM, David Blevins wrote:
Kevan, you've been tck dog for six months now. Having built the
system and done the job myself, I know you're not going to
survive anothe
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2168?page=comments#action_12420169
]
Tim Howe commented on GERONIMO-2168:
I made the following change as well:
{{
if (instance instanceof GBeanLifecycle) {
checkIfShouldFail();
On Jul 10, 2006, at 3:29 PM, Lin Sun wrote:Hi Sachin,I tried the plugin today. I am able to start the server and run my firstsimple application which is great! Here are some comments I have so far.1) You probably already knew this - Download and Install button doesn't workyet. I went over to th
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2168?page=comments#action_12420162
]
Tim Howe commented on GERONIMO-2168:
This is indeed strange. I modified GBeanInstance.java like so:
{{private String printException(Throwable t) {
StringW
toby cabot wrote:
Hi Alan,
On Sun, Jul 09, 2006 at 09:39:30AM -0700, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
toby cabot wrote:
What's the status of the Geronimo/Equinox (OSGi server) integration?
XBean is built on Spring and Spring is coming out w/ OSGi support.
On Jul 10, 2006, at 3:33 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
Kevan Miller wrote:
On Jul 10, 2006, at 1:55 PM, David Blevins wrote:
Kevan, you've been tck dog for six months now. Having built the
system and done the job myself, I know you're not going to
survive another six months. We definitely
Why do we need to do this? M2 can load M1 artifacts from an M1 repo.
Regards,
Alan
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Donald,
I had to manually publish these for the M2. At the time the tag was
cut the pom.xml did not have updated entries for M2 to properly
publish them. The pom is being corrected for
On Jul 10, 2006, at 11:19 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
On Jul 10, 2006, at 1:55 PM, David Blevins wrote:
Kevan, you've been tck dog for six months now. Having built the
system and done the job myself, I know you're not going to survive
another six months. We definitely need to get someone else
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1887?page=comments#action_12420159
]
Alan Cabrera commented on GERONIMO-1887:
Are you saying that we need an RTC for trunk work?
> Remove unneeded jars from console WEB-INF/lib directories
> -
On 7/10/06, Alan D. Cabrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Maven 1 repos can be used from Maven 2.
I didn't know that.
Why would we need to post maven
1 jars into a maven 2 repository?
Well, if you're creating a Maven 2 project now, and you use the group
ID "geronimo", you know this is going t
Kevan Miller wrote:
On Jul 10, 2006, at 1:55 PM, David Blevins wrote:
Kevan, you've been tck dog for six months now. Having built the
system and done the job myself, I know you're not going to survive
another six months. We definitely need to get someone else to take
that job for a while.
Aaron Mulder wrote:
Since we don't necessarily plan on converting Geronimo 1.1.x to Maven
2, can we post the 1.1 JARs in a Maven 2 repo somewhere, with a
structure corresponding to the new 1.2/Maven 2 group IDs (o.a.g.*) but
no POMs?
That would help with building plugins using Maven 2 against th
Hi Sachin,
I tried the plugin today. I am able to start the server and run my first
simple application which is great! Here are some comments I have so far.
1) You probably already knew this - Download and Install button doesn't work
yet. I went over to the eclipse update site, and didn't se
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1738?page=all ]
Prasad Kashyap updated GERONIMO-1738:
-
Attachment: geronimo-deployment-plugin-RTC-VOTE.3.patch
The 2.patch of deployment plugin failed to build due to changes in the package
names of Ke
Bill,
Here's the latest patch:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12336616/geronimo-deployment-plugin-RTC-VOTE.3.patch
Now let's see how itests are doing.
Cheers
Prasad.
On 7/7/06, Prasad Kashyap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Bill,
No. I applied the patch against an existing c
Susan Wu wrote:
>
>> From what I understand, the code release has been made available on the
> Geronimo web site and a general announcement has been made with regards
> to its availability.
>
> Geronimo folks: do you want this also issued as an official press
> release? If so, do you have any
Since we don't necessarily plan on converting Geronimo 1.1.x to Maven
2, can we post the 1.1 JARs in a Maven 2 repo somewhere, with a
structure corresponding to the new 1.2/Maven 2 group IDs (o.a.g.*) but
no POMs?
That would help with building plugins using Maven 2 against the 1.1
JARs (such as k
On Jul 10, 2006, at 1:55 PM, David Blevins wrote:
Kevan, you've been tck dog for six months now. Having built the
system and done the job myself, I know you're not going to survive
another six months. We definitely need to get someone else to take
that job for a while.
What do you thin
From what I understand, the code release has been made available on the
Geronimo web site and a general announcement has been made with regards to
its availability.
Geronimo folks: do you want this also issued as an official press
release? If so, do you have any customers or partners we cou
Kevan, you've been tck dog for six months now. Having built the
system and done the job myself, I know you're not going to survive
another six months. We definitely need to get someone else to take
that job for a while.
What do you think?
-David
Manu George wrote:
Hi,
I have an application that is packaged as an EAR. The WAR inside
the EAR is having some images in the images directory directly inside
the war. In Geronimo 1.0, I was able to access them using
Thread.currentThread().getContextClassLoader().getResource() method, b
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1887?page=comments#action_12420103
]
David Jencks commented on GERONIMO-1887:
This issue was in fact completed in 1.1 previously, rev 420574 broke the
console. This was not detectable without a clean
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1887?page=all ]
David Jencks updated GERONIMO-1887:
---
Fix Version: 1.2
(was: 1.1.1)
Fixed in 1.1.1 in rev 420574
> Remove unneeded jars from console WEB-INF/lib directories
>
On Jul 9, 2006, at 3:00 PM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
On Jul 9, 2006, at 11:08 AM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
On Jul 9, 2006, at 9:16 AM, David Jencks wrote:
There's a geronimo version of the commonj spec at
org.apache.geronimo.specs:geronimo-commonj_1.1_spec:1.0:jar at
ibiblio. I'm not entirely
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-744?page=all ]
Adrian Co resolved AMQ-744:
---
Resolution: Fixed
Added summary for blocks received, blocks sent, context switch, user time,
system time, idle time, wait time.
> add a "vmstat" agent to the mav
Restart network bridges if they ever get stopped
Key: AMQ-805
URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-805
Project: ActiveMQ
Type: Improvement
Reporter: Hiram Chirino
Assigned to: Hiram Chirino
Right
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2063?page=comments#action_12420098
]
David Jencks commented on GERONIMO-2063:
I haven't checked, but I'm very confident that this problem was also present in
geronimo 1.0. I believe the simplest work
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2063?page=all ]
Donald Woods updated GERONIMO-2063:
---
Regression: [Regression]
Priority: Critical (was: Major)
Isn't this a critical problem for Geronimo 1.1, given that the Orb is shutdown
if ANY
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-804?page=comments#action_36540 ]
Hiram Chirino commented on AMQ-804:
---
I noticed that the issue is cause when the client the created the temporary
destination and a subscription to that temporary destination
Use of Temporary Destinations over broker networks can cause the network
bridges to die.
Key: AMQ-804
URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-804
Project: ActiveMQ
Ty
The static multicast discovery agent should include reconnect logic when it is
notified that one of it's sevices failed.
Key: AMQ-803
URL: https://issues.apac
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-802?page=comments#action_36538 ]
Hiram Chirino commented on AMQ-802:
---
This can even lead to a busy loop as the failover connection establishes a
connection and then the network bridge detects that the connec
Donald,
I had to manually publish these for the M2. At the time the tag was cut the pom.xml did not have
updated entries for M2 to properly publish them. The pom is being corrected for 1.2-SNAPSHOT.
Donald Woods wrote:
Still wondering how this was done
Did someone have to run "mvn inst
Broker Network connections over SSH tunnels do not get established.
---
Key: AMQ-802
URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-802
Project: ActiveMQ
Type: Bug
Components: Broker
Version
On Jul 10, 2006, at 10:03 AM, Sachin Patel wrote:Ok thanks for the correction. So what classifies a veto?IIUC, only code (i.e. a commit) can be vetoed. If any license/legal-type issues are uncovered in the release, then that's probably a stop-release problem (effectively a veto). I think our goal
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2067?page=all ]
Anita Kulshreshtha updated GERONIMO-2067:
-
Attachment: m2-plugins.patch
configs.patch
These patches are built against rev 418907. The first server that starts has
be
Ok thanks for the correction. So what classifies a veto?On Jul 10, 2006, at 9:54 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:On Jul 10, 2006, at 9:07 AM, Sachin Patel wrote:On Jul 10, 2006, at 5:16 AM, Jacek Laskowski wrote:On 7/10/06, Sachin Patel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: No critical reason, just a time frame on wh
Hi Alan,
On Sun, Jul 09, 2006 at 09:39:30AM -0700, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
> toby cabot wrote:
> >What's the status of the Geronimo/Equinox (OSGi server) integration?
>
> XBean is built on Spring and Spring is coming out w/ OSGi support.
> Dain has some other XBean <-> OSGi stuff in the oven as
On Jul 10, 2006, at 9:07 AM, Sachin Patel wrote:On Jul 10, 2006, at 5:16 AM, Jacek Laskowski wrote:On 7/10/06, Sachin Patel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: No critical reason, just a time frame on when I'll upload the driver to thedistribution size if no -1's have been casted. That's interesting...would
On Jul 9, 2006, at 8:57 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
Jeremy,
Thanks for pointing these problems out. I'll start working on
getting a SNAPSHOT...
Thanks
A few comments:
TimerManager.isSuspended(), isSuspending(), waitForStop(), and
waitForSuspend() look correct to me. The javadoc for
T
On Jul 10, 2006, at 12:32 AM, Jason Dillon wrote:
You know... every field in an interface is by default public static
and final. Adding these modifiers is redundant.
You're right, of course. They already had "redundant" 'public
static'. The patch that Jeremy submitted added the 'final'. I
On Jul 10, 2006, at 5:16 AM, Jacek Laskowski wrote:On 7/10/06, Sachin Patel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: No critical reason, just a time frame on when I'll upload the driver to thedistribution size if no -1's have been casted. That's interesting...would that mean that if Geronimo 1.2 is about torelea
On 7/10/06, Prasad Kashyap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Seeing this error on Windows XP only. Unable to recreate it on Linux.
I am trying to build the trunk using m2. I began with a clean repo and
did a fresh checkout.
I executed build.bat and it ran the bootstrap stage. Then I executed
build.ba
Seeing this error on Windows XP only. Unable to recreate it on Linux.
I am trying to build the trunk using m2. I began with a clean repo and
did a fresh checkout.
I executed build.bat and it ran the bootstrap stage. Then I executed
build.bat -Dstage=assembly -Dmaven.test.skip=true.
It failed w
Project: Apache Geronimo
Status: Open
Assignee: Unassigned
Geronimo Info: Patch Available
Total: 25 items
DATE UPDATED KEY SUMMARY
Dec 18 2005 - GERONIMO-1381 - [Daytrader] Removed unused code
Dec 22 2005 - GERONIMO-1400 - modularize daytrader deployment plan
Jan 3 2
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2125?page=all ]
Mario Ruebsam updated GERONIMO-2125:
Attachment: ear-1.0-SNAPSHOT.ear
ear without the ejb.jar
> Classpath entries in the web app archive META-INF/MANIFEST.MF are not added
> to the wep
On 7/10/06, srsprasad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
How to get the List of Queues or Topics presently active in Broker.
A code sample will really help me alot.
Thanks in advance...
The FAQ has lots of useful information
http://incubator.apache.org/activemq/faq.html
e.g.
http://incubator.apache.
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2125?page=comments#action_12420014
]
Mario Ruebsam commented on GERONIMO-2125:
-
Everything is ok in this example as long the ejb.jar is existent. If the
ejb.jar is removed from the ear and the applica
On 7/10/06, Sachin Patel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
No critical reason, just a time frame on when I'll upload the driver to the
distribution size if no -1's have been casted.
That's interesting...would that mean that if Geronimo 1.2 is about to
release only 72 hours matters or 3+ votes?
The
Hi,
I have an application that
is packaged as an EAR. The WAR inside the EAR is having some images in
the images directory directly inside the war. In Geronimo 1.0, I was
able to access them using
Thread.currentThread().getContextClassLoader().getResource() method,
but now I am unable to do
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1887?page=all ]
David Jencks reassigned GERONIMO-1887:
--
Assign To: David Jencks (was: Paul McMahan)
> Remove unneeded jars from console WEB-INF/lib directories
> --
On Jul 9, 2006, at 8:57 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
On Jul 9, 2006, at 3:00 PM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
On Jul 9, 2006, at 11:08 AM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
On Jul 9, 2006, at 9:16 AM, David Jencks wrote:
There's a geronimo version of the commonj spec at
org.apache.geronimo.specs:geronimo-commonj
FYI...Target is to get JIRA upgraded by the end of the week (according to Jeff).--jasonBegin forwarded message:From: Jeff Turner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Date: July 9, 2006 8:26:03 PM PDTTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Cc: Jason Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Subject: JIRA Wiki syntax turned off for Geronimo, GShell Hi,
94 matches
Mail list logo
