[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-902?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gert Vanthienen updated SM-902:
---
Attachment: SM-902.patch
I think this patch might at least solve the issue, but I admit it is a very
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-931?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_38988
]
Thomas Termin commented on SM-931:
--
Gert,
I'm currently working on this but you were faster. :-)
PMD/CheckStyle
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-864?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Thomas Termin reassigned SM-864:
Assignee: Thomas Termin
Configure jetty in the main configuration so that we can easily deploy
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-864?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Work on SM-864 started by Thomas Termin.
Configure jetty in the main configuration so that we can easily deploy web
applications
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-932?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gert Vanthienen updated SM-932:
---
Attachment: SM-932-file.patch
SM-932-file.patch fixes PDM/CheckStyle errors for servicemix-ftp
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3039?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
David Jencks closed GERONIMO-3039.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Maybe I'm missing something but your bigmess patch basically works for
Hi Folks,
G source code build failed in rev. 527408 with following error.
Any ideas?
Thanks,
Lasantha
Compiling 7 source files to
/home/hd2/work/geronimo/trunk/my-workspace/my-server/modules/geronimo-openejb-builder/target/classes
[INFO]
Hi everybody !
I have recently checked in lots of changes. These are mostly
code conventions fixes. Let me explain.
I've started to add checkstyle and pmd checks at build time.
For those who do not know these tools, checkstyle
(http://checkstyle.sourceforge.net/) enforces
code conventions
Building with Maven version: 2.0.5
Revision: 527420 built with tests included
See the full build-0500.log file at
http://people.apache.org/~prasad/binaries/20070411/build-0500.log
120K downloaded
Downloading:
http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-snapshot-repository/org/apache/cxf/cxf-tools-common
On Apr 11, 2007, at 4:32 AM, lasantha wrote:
Hi Folks,
G source code build failed in rev. 527408 with following error.
Any ideas?
I think this should be fixed by 527416
--kevan
Kevan,
Thanks for the reply.
Yes now it is over and CXF gives following.
Missing:
--
1) com.sun.xml.bind:jaxb-impl:jar:2.0.5
Try downloading the file manually from the project website.
Then, install it using the command:
mvn install:install-file -DgroupId=com.sun.xml.bind
On Apr 11, 2007, at 5:45 AM, Lasantha Ranaweera wrote:
Kevan,
Thanks for the reply.
Yes now it is over and CXF gives following.
Missing:
--
1) com.sun.xml.bind:jaxb-impl:jar:2.0.5
Try downloading the file manually from the project website.
Then, install it using the command:
mvn
Lasantha,
The following should fix your immediate problem.
edit geronimo/server/trunk/pom.xml
search for jaxb-impl
change the version from 2.0.3 to 2.0.5.
I'm guessing that this is a pretty safe upgrade. However, I'll let
someone more familiar with our jaxb usage make the change...
--kevan
Rebuilding trunk from a fresh checkout with a clean M2 repository, I get
the following errors:
|/home/rick/Geronimo/builds/g/2.0/modules/geronimo-cxf/src/main/java/org/apache/geronimo/cxf/GeronimoDestinationFactory.java:[23,37]
cannot find symbol|
|symbol : class AbstractHTTPTransportFactory|
They just pushed some snaps so I think we need to make a few fixes.
Jeff
Rick McGuire wrote:
Rebuilding trunk from a fresh checkout with a clean M2 repository, I get
the following errors:
I fixed it AFAICT so you should update now. Hopefully I didn't break
anything ;-)
Jeff
Rick McGuire wrote:
Rebuilding trunk from a fresh checkout with a clean M2 repository, I get
the following errors:
Enable PMD/CheckStyle for servicemix-core
-
Key: SM-933
URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-933
Project: ServiceMix
Issue Type: Task
Components: servicemix-core
Actually, jaxb should to be downgraded to 2.0.0.
-sachin
On Apr 11, 2007, at 6:00 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
On Apr 11, 2007, at 5:45 AM, Lasantha Ranaweera wrote:
Kevan,
Thanks for the reply.
Yes now it is over and CXF gives following.
Missing:
--
1)
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-932?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gert Vanthienen updated SM-932:
---
Attachment: SM-932-ftp.patch
SM-932-ftp.patch fixes PDM/CheckStyle errors for servicemix-ftp
Building with Maven version: 2.0.5
Revision: 527493 built with tests skipped
See the full build-1000.log file at
http://people.apache.org/~prasad/binaries/20070411/build-1000.log
2911K downloaded
Downloading:
http://tomcat.apache.org/dev/dist/m2-repository/org/apache/ws/commons/schema
Dims, Sure i 'll look into that and submit a patch.
Thanks, Lin
Davanum Srinivas wrote:
Lin,
I think we can use ListableRepository interface somehow then we can
get rid of the version information. But i think we may have to fix
Maven2Repository to work even we don't pass in the version field
This patch disabled SAAJGBean which breaks SAAJ tests. I'll try to re-enable it.
Jarek
On 4/11/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: djencks
Date: Wed Apr 11 00:37:44 2007
New Revision: 527403
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=527403
Log:
GERONIMO-3039, upgrade
What do you think to package an antlib.xml file in servicemix-core so
that the user can easily declare all jbi tasks like:
typedef resource=org/apache/servicemix/jbi/management/task/antlib.xml
uri=http://servicemix.apache.org/ant/1.0/
Otherwise the user has to declare a taskdef for each task.
-, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Building with Maven version: 2.0.5
Revision: 527493 built with tests skipped
See the full build-1000.log file at
http://people.apache.org/~prasad/binaries/20070411/build-1000.log
2911K downloaded
Downloading:
http://tomcat.apache.org/dev/dist/m2
Dims,
I'm getting the following error if I use XmlSchema SNAPSHOT but works
fine with 1.2:
java.lang.IncompatibleClassChangeError
at
org.apache.cxf.service.factory.ReflectionServiceFactoryBean.initializeWrappedSchema(ReflectionServiceFactoryBean.java:385)
at
What about these files which is already included in the distribution ?
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/servicemix/trunk/distributions/apache-servicemix/src/main/release/ant/
Isn't it the same thing ?
On 4/11/07, Thomas TERMIN [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What do you think to package an
://people.apache.org/
~prasad/binaries/20070411/build-1000.log
2911K downloaded
Downloading: http://tomcat.apache.org/dev/dist/m2-repository/org/
apache/ws/commons/schema/XmlSchema/1.2/XmlSchema-1.2.jar
[WARNING] Unable to get resource
'org.apache.ws.commons.schema:XmlSchema:jar:1.2' from repository
tomcat-m2
]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Building with Maven version: 2.0.5
Revision: 527493 built with tests skipped
See the full build-1000.log file at http://people.apache.org/
~prasad/binaries/20070411/build-1000.log
2911K downloaded
Downloading: http://tomcat.apache.org/dev/dist/m2-repository/org/
apache
Building with Maven version: 2.0.5
Revision: 527590 built with tests skipped
See the full build-1400.log file at
http://people.apache.org/~prasad/binaries/20070411/build-1400.log
[INFO] Building war:
/home/prasad/geronimo/trunk/applications/geronimo-ca-helper/target/geronimo-ca-helper-2.0
the full build-1400.log file at http://people.apache.org/
~prasad/binaries/20070411/build-1400.log
[INFO] Building war: /home/prasad/geronimo/trunk/applications/
geronimo-ca-helper/target/geronimo-ca-helper-2.0-SNAPSHOT.war
[INFO] [tools:verify-legal-files {execution: verify-legal-files}]
[INFO
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2735?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12488140
]
Anita Kulshreshtha commented on GERONIMO-2735:
--
rev 527596
- Updated config-substitutions.properties
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3011?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12488144
]
Anita Kulshreshtha commented on GERONIMO-3011:
--
rev 527596 Added port configuration for
-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3089?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12488148
]
Jason Dillon commented on GERONIMO-3089:
Related to: http://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1225
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3089?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12488150
]
Jason Dillon commented on GERONIMO-3089:
Discussion thread here:
We need too many modules built to run the geronimo-gbean-deployer
-
Key: GERONIMO-3090
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3090
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3090?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12488155
]
David Jencks commented on GERONIMO-3090:
step one in rev 527627.
We need too many modules built to run
upgrade to xmlbeans 2.2.0 for scout compatibility
-
Key: GERONIMO-3091
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3091
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: public
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3091?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
David Jencks closed GERONIMO-3091.
--
Resolution: Fixed
rev 527628. Complain or reopen if you find problems.
upgrade to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2997?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12488184
]
Lin Sun commented on GERONIMO-2997:
---
I just noticed something interesting today. If I ran jaxws-war with the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3090?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
David Jencks closed GERONIMO-3090.
--
Resolution: Fixed
rev 527673 implements the 2 geronimo-gbean-deployer idea which seems to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3017?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jay D. McHugh updated GERONIMO-3017:
Attachment: jpa-war.war
This is a simple war file that attempts to install a
The server now uses config-substitution.properties file. Please
rebuild assemblies.
Thanks
Anita
The fish are biting.
Get more visitors on your site using Yahoo! Search Marketing.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2985?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Lasantha Ranaweera updated GERONIMO-2985:
-
Attachment: SOAP12.patch
Here is a SOAP 1.2 over HTTP sample.
Following
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3011?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12488236
]
Anita Kulshreshtha commented on GERONIMO-3011:
--
rev 527746
- Changed default RMINaming port to 1098
David B,
Setting the system property admin.disabled (next to duct tape!)in
OpenEjbSystemGBean worked.
Thanks
Anita
--- Anita Kulshreshtha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- David Blevins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 1, 2007, at 5:43 AM, Anita Kulshreshtha wrote:
Don't the following need to be updated too, given they are used
throughout the configs and assemblies?
assemblies\pom.xml 42 25:PlanNamingPort1099/PlanNamingPort
configs\pom.xml 63 25:PlanNamingPort1099/PlanNamingPort
Also, other references to 1099 in the source -
Why are we changing the port?
--jason
On Apr 11, 2007, at 7:33 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
Don't the following need to be updated too, given they are used
throughout the configs and assemblies?
assemblies\pom.xml 42 25:PlanNamingPort1099/
PlanNamingPort
configs\pom.xml 63 25:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2998?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Lasantha Ranaweera updated GERONIMO-2998:
-
Attachment: G2898-2.patch
This will add the fault handling capabilities to
In short, 1099 must be available to start other instances of
geronimo.
http://www.developer.com/java/ent/article.php/3455311
Thanks
Anita
--- Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why are we changing the port?
--jason
On Apr 11, 2007, at 7:33 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
Don't the
APACHE GERONIMO STATUS: -*-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2007-04-03 09:56:37 -0400 (Tue, 03 Apr 2007) $]
The current version of this file can be found at:
* http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/trunk/STATUS
Upcoming Releases:
Geronimo
I don't get it... if we change the port to 1098... how then does some
other instance of Geronimo need 1099... and not 1098?
Is there anything specific on the document you linked to which
explains why we are changing the port? I quickly looked it over and
nothing stands out as
Cool! Many thanks :-)
--jason
On Apr 10, 2007, at 2:33 AM, Conor MacNeill wrote:
Jason Dillon wrote:
Okay, thanks for the update.
It's done now - let me know of any issues.
Conor
And how does the portOffset relate to this? If you start with 1098,
isn't the next server instance going to use 1099 and the next one 1100?
If so, why not start with 1099 and let the next one use 1100 and then
1101?
It's not clear to me either why the RMI port default needs to be
53 matches
Mail list logo
