XDoclet, Maven2 und JBossWS

Hello, I have the following problem since 2 weeks, hope someone can help me, i've tried to ask in much other forums before: I am new to maven and have to refactor an old project for JBossWS, which was deployed on Tomcat before. The maven-script (or ejbdoclet) currently don't generate

Re: [VOTE] Release geronimo-jta_1.1_spec-1.1 jar (1st vote)

+1 Jacek On 4/18/07, Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Please review and vote on the binaries for geronimo- jta_1.1_spec-1.1. the binaries can be seen in: http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/spec-rc1 [ ] +1 Release these binaries [ ] 0 [ ] -1 Do not release these binaries This vote

Re: [VOTE] Release geronimo-ws-metadata_2.0_spec-1.1 jar (1st vote)

+1 Jacek On 4/18/07, Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Please review and vote on the binaries for geronimo-ws- metadata_2.0_spec-1.2. the binaries can be seen in: http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/spec-rc1 [ ] +1 Release these binaries [ ] 0 [ ] -1 Do not release these binaries This

Re: [VOTE] Release geronimo-stax-api_1.0_spec-1.0 jar (1st vote)

+1 Jacek On 4/18/07, Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Please review and vote on the binaries for geronimo-stax- api_1.0_spec-1.0. the binaries can be seen in: http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/spec-rc1 [ ] +1 Release these binaries [ ] 0 [ ] -1 Do not release these binaries This

Re: [VOTE] Release geronimo-annotation_1.0_spec-1.1 jar (1st vote)

+1 Jacek On 4/18/07, Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Please review and vote on the binaries for geronimo- annotation_1.0_spec-1.1. the binaries can be seen in: http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/spec-rc1 [ ] +1 Release these binaries [ ] 0 [ ] -1 Do not release these binaries This

Re: [VOTE] Release geronimo-jpa_3.0_spec-1.1 jar (1st vote)

+1 Jacek On 4/18/07, Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Please review and vote on the binaries for geronimo- jpa_3.0_spec-1.1. the binaries can be seen in: http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/spec-rc1 [ ] +1 Release these binaries [ ] 0 [ ] -1 Do not release these binaries This vote

Re: Should we upgrade to Maven 2.0.6?

On 4/18/07, Donald Woods [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just noticed yesterday that Maven 2.0.6 was released on March 31 as a bug fix release. I just built the Rev529799 server with unit tests enabled from a clean repo with Maven 2.0.6 without any problems I work with M2 2.0.6 since its very

Re: [VOTE] Release geronimo-jta_1.1_spec-1.1 jar (1st vote)

+1 On 4/18/07, Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Please review and vote on the binaries for geronimo- jta_1.1_spec-1.1. the binaries can be seen in: http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/spec-rc1 [ ] +1 Release these binaries [ ] 0 [ ] -1 Do not release these binaries This vote will

Re: [VOTE] Release geronimo-ws-metadata_2.0_spec-1.1 jar (1st vote)

+1 On 4/18/07, Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Please review and vote on the binaries for geronimo-ws- metadata_2.0_spec-1.2. the binaries can be seen in: http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/spec-rc1 [ ] +1 Release these binaries [ ] 0 [ ] -1 Do not release these binaries This vote

Re: [VOTE] Release geronimo-stax-api_1.0_spec-1.0 jar (1st vote)

+1 On 4/18/07, Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Please review and vote on the binaries for geronimo-stax- api_1.0_spec-1.0. the binaries can be seen in: http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/spec-rc1 [ ] +1 Release these binaries [ ] 0 [ ] -1 Do not release these binaries This vote

Re: [VOTE] Release geronimo-annotation_1.0_spec-1.1 jar (1st vote)

+1 On 4/18/07, Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Please review and vote on the binaries for geronimo- annotation_1.0_spec-1.1. the binaries can be seen in: http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/spec-rc1 [ ] +1 Release these binaries [ ] 0 [ ] -1 Do not release these binaries This vote

Re: [VOTE] Release geronimo-jpa_3.0_spec-1.1 jar (1st vote)

+1 On 4/18/07, Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Please review and vote on the binaries for geronimo- jpa_3.0_spec-1.1. the binaries can be seen in: http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/spec-rc1 [ ] +1 Release these binaries [ ] 0 [ ] -1 Do not release these binaries This vote will

Re: [build]package org.apache.catalina.l ifecycle does not exist

Maybe you are building offline? This is in a modified tomcat binary that is in the repository file system remote repository. You have to build that module online in order to get the modified tomcat jars into your local repo. However, I don't know how you could get this far without a

Re: [jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-3106) When you are in the Create Database Pool wizard the jar driver list could show only jars containing Driver implementations

Sorry for the ignorance, but I'm a but confused about this jar selection... Does it allows me to have more than one driver version for the same vendor (like having a Oracle 8i and Oracle 10g drivers at same time being used by different datasources)? If not, what is the point in selecting the JAR

Re: [VOTE] Release geronimo-ws-metadata_2.0_spec-1.1 jar (1st vote)

+1 Matt Hogstrom wrote: Please review and vote on the binaries for geronimo-ws-metadata_2.0_spec-1.2. the binaries can be seen in: http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/spec-rc1 [ ] +1 Release these binaries [ ] 0 [ ] -1 Do not release these binaries This vote will conclude Saturday April 21

Re: [VOTE] Release geronimo-stax-api_1.0_spec-1.0 jar (1st vote)

+1 Matt Hogstrom wrote: Please review and vote on the binaries for geronimo-stax-api_1.0_spec-1.0. the binaries can be seen in: http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/spec-rc1 [ ] +1 Release these binaries [ ] 0 [ ] -1 Do not release these binaries This vote will conclude Saturday April 21 at

Re: [VOTE] Release geronimo-jpa_3.0_spec-1.1 jar (1st vote)

+0 Matt Hogstrom wrote: Please review and vote on the binaries for geronimo-jpa_3.0_spec-1.1. the binaries can be seen in: http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/spec-rc1 [ ] +1 Release these binaries [ ] 0 [ ] -1 Do not release these binaries This vote will conclude Saturday April 21 at 1300

Re: [VOTE] Release geronimo-annotation_1.0_spec-1.1 jar (1st vote)

+1 Matt Hogstrom wrote: Please review and vote on the binaries for geronimo-annotation_1.0_spec-1.1. the binaries can be seen in: http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/spec-rc1 [ ] +1 Release these binaries [ ] 0 [ ] -1 Do not release these binaries This vote will conclude Saturday April 21

Re: [VOTE] Release geronimo-jta_1.1_spec-1.1 jar (1st vote)

+0 Matt Hogstrom wrote: Please review and vote on the binaries for geronimo-jta_1.1_spec-1.1. the binaries can be seen in: http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/spec-rc1 [ ] +1 Release these binaries [ ] 0 [ ] -1 Do not release these binaries This vote will conclude Saturday April 21 at 1300

Re: [VOTE] Release geronimo-ws-metadata_2.0_spec-1.1 jar (1st vote)

+1 Anita --- Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Please review and vote on the binaries for geronimo-ws- metadata_2.0_spec-1.2. the binaries can be seen in: http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/spec-rc1 [ ] +1 Release these binaries [ ] 0 [ ] -1 Do not release these binaries

Re: [VOTE] Release geronimo-jpa_3.0_spec-1.1 jar (1st vote)

+1 Anita --- Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Please review and vote on the binaries for geronimo- jpa_3.0_spec-1.1. the binaries can be seen in: http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/spec-rc1 [ ] +1 Release these binaries [ ] 0 [ ] -1 Do not release these binaries This vote

Re: [VOTE] Release geronimo-annotation_1.0_spec-1.1 jar (1st vote)

+1 Anita --- Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Please review and vote on the binaries for geronimo- annotation_1.0_spec-1.1. the binaries can be seen in: http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/spec-rc1 [ ] +1 Release these binaries [ ] 0 [ ] -1 Do not release these binaries

Re: Why are we including native code in Geornimo (aka. JLine)

I am uncomfortable with what feels to me like an architectural deviation. It would seem that an AG goal is portability to many platforms. This seems implicit with java, and certainly depends on java being supported on many platforms. By using JLine, we are letting that package determine on

Re: Why are we including native code in Geornimo (aka. JLine)

On 4/19/07, Ted Kirby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am uncomfortable with what feels to me like an architectural deviation. It would seem that an AG goal is portability to many platforms. This seems implicit with java, and certainly depends on java being supported on many platforms. By using

[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-3098) EL in JSF does not work

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3098?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Alexander Zynevich updated GERONIMO-3098: - Attachment: E11.war this is the minimum war file I could produce. Should be

[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-3098) EL in JSF does not work

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3098?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Alexander Zynevich updated GERONIMO-3098: - Attachment: E11.zip EL in JSF does not work ---

Re: Console Realm Portlet

Please ignore this. This is in my local copy... Thanks Anita --- Anita Kulshreshtha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: . I am also seeing this: ERROR : unknown operation getUsers() and ERROR : unknown operation getGroups() Thanks Anita

Re: Why are we including native code in Geornimo (aka. JLine)

On Apr 19, 2007, at 9:35 AM, Aaron Mulder wrote: On 4/19/07, Ted Kirby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am uncomfortable with what feels to me like an architectural deviation. It would seem that an AG goal is portability to many platforms. This seems implicit with java, and certainly depends on

Updated Spec Jars

Yesterday I updated OpenEJB and Geronimo to use new SNAPSHOTs of specifications for JPA, Annotation, JTA and ws-metadata. I published the openejb artifacts to the M2 repo. You should svn up on G and do a rebuild.

Re: Why are we including native code in Geornimo (aka. JLine)

Some good points. See inline On Apr 18, 2007, at 4:36 PM, Donald Woods wrote: Is this not a disaster waiting to happen? Isn't everything we do a disaster waiting to happen :) Do we really need to include this package just for usage by the following?

Re: [jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-3106) When you are in the Create Database Pool wizard the jar driver list could show only jars containing Driver implementations

On Apr 19, 2007, at 2:08 AM, Daniel Alheiros wrote: Sorry for the ignorance, but I'm a but confused about this jar selection... Does it allows me to have more than one driver version for the same vendor (like having a Oracle 8i and Oracle 10g drivers at same time being used by different

ActiveMQ question

Does anyone know if disabling the ConnectorServer with service URL /jmxrmi will affect activemq's functionality inside geronimo. The ManagementContext has a flag isCreateConnector. Setting this flag to false will prevent this ConnectorServer from being created. This will free up

Re: ActiveMQ question

On 4/19/07, Anita Kulshreshtha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Does anyone know if disabling the ConnectorServer with service URL /jmxrmi will affect activemq's functionality inside geronimo. The ManagementContext has a flag isCreateConnector. Setting this flag to false will prevent this

[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-3011) Adjust port configuration for running multiple instances of geronimo

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3011?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Anita Kulshreshtha updated GERONIMO-3011: - Attachment: activemq.patch activemq.patch disables creation of the second

[jira] Resolved: (GERONIMO-3098) EL in JSF does not work

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3098?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Paul McMahan resolved GERONIMO-3098. Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 2.0-M4 Thanks for attaching your app. The JSF

Re: ActiveMQ question

Thanks James! Anita --- James Strachan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 4/19/07, Anita Kulshreshtha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Does anyone know if disabling the ConnectorServer with service URL /jmxrmi will affect activemq's functionality inside geronimo. The

Re: [jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-3106) When you are in the Create Database Pool wizard the jar driver list could show only jars containing Driver implementations

Interesting... So if my application depends on an OracleDriver or other vendor specific implementations how my application will be instructed to refer to the specific implementation (jar) as my class import one of those. How can it resolve the reference to the correct jar? An example class:

Re: Why are we including native code in Geornimo (aka. JLine)

The only license which is important is the one which is used for the current software you use. A relicense can not effect previously released software. So I don't think there is any issue there. Projects sometimes relicense their software under a more friendly license (from a AL perspective) so

Re: [VOTE] Release geronimo-stax-api_1.0_spec-1.0 jar (1st vote)

+1 David On Apr 18, 2007, at 9:22 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote: Please review and vote on the binaries for geronimo-stax- api_1.0_spec-1.0. the binaries can be seen in: http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/spec-rc1 [ ] +1 Release these binaries [ ] 0 [ ] -1 Do not release these binaries This

Re: [VOTE] Release geronimo-jta_1.1_spec-1.1 jar (1st vote)

+1 David On Apr 18, 2007, at 9:23 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote: Please review and vote on the binaries for geronimo- jta_1.1_spec-1.1. the binaries can be seen in: http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/spec-rc1 [ ] +1 Release these binaries [ ] 0 [ ] -1 Do not release these binaries This vote

Re: [VOTE] Release geronimo-ws-metadata_2.0_spec-1.1 jar (1st vote)

+1 David On Apr 18, 2007, at 9:22 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote: Please review and vote on the binaries for geronimo-ws- metadata_2.0_spec-1.2. the binaries can be seen in: http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/spec-rc1 [ ] +1 Release these binaries [ ] 0 [ ] -1 Do not release these binaries

Re: [VOTE] Release geronimo-jpa_3.0_spec-1.1 jar (1st vote)

+1 David On Apr 18, 2007, at 9:22 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote: Please review and vote on the binaries for geronimo- jpa_3.0_spec-1.1. the binaries can be seen in: http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/spec-rc1 [ ] +1 Release these binaries [ ] 0 [ ] -1 Do not release these binaries This vote

Re: [VOTE] Release geronimo-annotation_1.0_spec-1.1 jar (1st vote)

+1 David On Apr 18, 2007, at 9:23 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote: Please review and vote on the binaries for geronimo- annotation_1.0_spec-1.1. the binaries can be seen in: http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/spec-rc1 [ ] +1 Release these binaries [ ] 0 [ ] -1 Do not release these binaries This

Re: Why are we including native code in Geornimo (aka. JLine)

On Apr 19, 2007, at 6:02 AM, Ted Kirby wrote: It would seem that an AG goal is portability to many platforms. This seems implicit with java, and certainly depends on java being supported on many platforms. By using JLine, we are letting that package determine on which platforms AG will run.

Re: [jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-3106) When you are in the Create Database Pool wizard the jar driver list could show only jars containing Driver implementations

I don't seem to be explaining what I have in mind very well. I was thinking of a text entry box on the db wizard page where you;d type in a fully qualified class name and a button you'd then push, at which point only jars containing that class would appear in the list of jars. You could

Re: Why are we including native code in Geornimo (aka. JLine)

Thanks for all the replies and info, especially details from Jason! I apologize for not doing my full homework. I missed the community discussion of using JLine in my search: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2216. Given that things work if JLine is not fully supported on a platform

[jira] Created: (GERONIMO-3107) PersistenceUnits getting processed more than once

PersistenceUnits getting processed more than once - Key: GERONIMO-3107 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3107 Project: Geronimo Issue Type: Bug Security Level: public

[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-3107) PersistenceUnits getting processed more than once

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3107?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] David Jencks updated GERONIMO-3107: --- Attachment: GERONIMO-3107.patch Untested patch that ought to eliminate dups.

[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-3107) PersistenceUnits getting processed more than once

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3107?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Matt Hogstrom updated GERONIMO-3107: Assignee: Matt Hogstrom (was: David Jencks) PersistenceUnits getting processed more

[jira] Closed: (GERONIMO-3107) PersistenceUnits getting processed more than once

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3107?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Matt Hogstrom closed GERONIMO-3107. --- Resolution: Fixed Applied the patch. Swizzled the patch a little to only add a PU to the

Re: [VOTE] Release geronimo-stax-api_1.0_spec-1.0 jar (1st vote)

-1 javax/xml/stream/XMLStreamException.java is missing an Apache source license header. Other than that, looks good... --kevan On Apr 18, 2007, at 12:22 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote: Please review and vote on the binaries for geronimo-stax- api_1.0_spec-1.0. the binaries can be seen in:

Re: [VOTE] Release geronimo-jta_1.1_spec-1.1 jar (1st vote)

+1 --kevan On Apr 18, 2007, at 12:23 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote: Please review and vote on the binaries for geronimo- jta_1.1_spec-1.1. the binaries can be seen in: http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/spec-rc1 [ ] +1 Release these binaries [ ] 0 [ ] -1 Do not release these binaries This vote

Re: [VOTE] Release geronimo-annotation_1.0_spec-1.1 jar (1st vote)

+1 --kevan On Apr 18, 2007, at 12:23 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote: Please review and vote on the binaries for geronimo- annotation_1.0_spec-1.1. the binaries can be seen in: http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/spec-rc1 [ ] +1 Release these binaries [ ] 0 [ ] -1 Do not release these binaries

Re: [VOTE] Release geronimo-jpa_3.0_spec-1.1 jar (1st vote)

+1 Matt, Thanks for getting these out... --kevan On Apr 18, 2007, at 12:22 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote: Please review and vote on the binaries for geronimo- jpa_3.0_spec-1.1. the binaries can be seen in: http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/spec-rc1 [ ] +1 Release these binaries [ ] 0 [ ] -1