L.S.,
I have made some changes to this tutorial:
- added a section on Installing ServiceMix
- added some information about SUs
- tried to clarify why the client.html is being used
- added header/footer {scrollbar}s
- tried to elaborate on the dependency between a SU and a JBI component.
On the
On 6/11/07, Gert Vanthienen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
L.S.,
I have made some changes to this tutorial:
- added a section on Installing ServiceMix
- added some information about SUs
- tried to clarify why the client.html is being used
- added header/footer {scrollbar}s
- tried to elaborate on
+1
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Please review the specifications located at
http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/specs-rc1/
We are voting these in a block. Failures will be removed from the
block and others will proceed forward.
Voting concludes on Monday, June 11th at 1800 ET.
Thanks
Javascript error when creating database pools using the admin console wizard
Key: GERONIMO-3235
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3235
Project: Geronimo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3235?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Carl Bunting closed GERONIMO-3235.
--
Resolution: Invalid
Fix Version/s: 2.0-M6
Ignore this...
I had a previous version of
+1
Regards,
Alan
On Jun 8, 2007, at 2:43 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Please review the specifications located at http://
people.apache.org/~hogstrom/specs-rc1/
We are voting these in a block. Failures will be removed from the
block and others will proceed forward.
Voting concludes on
+1
Regards,
Alan
On Jun 8, 2007, at 8:06 PM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
Please review the specifications located at
http://people.apache.org/~prasad/specs_rc1/
We are voting these in a block. Failures will be removed from the
block and others will proceed forward.
Voting concludes on Monday,
+1
Prasad Kashyap wrote:
Please review the specifications located at
http://people.apache.org/~prasad/specs_rc1/
We are voting these in a block. Failures will be removed from the
block and others will proceed forward.
Voting concludes on Monday, June 11th at 2300 ET.
Cheers
Prasad
+1
Note -- I am planning to replace Geronimo's copy of the EL and JSP
specs with the originals from Tomcat when they release and publish
the next stable version to maven central. See:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/geronimo-dev/200705.mbox/%
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
+1
Joe
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Please review the specifications located at
http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/specs-rc1/
We are voting these in a block. Failures will be removed from the block
and others will proceed forward.
Voting concludes on Monday, June 11th at 1800 ET.
Thanks
+1
Joe
Prasad Kashyap wrote:
Please review the specifications located at
http://people.apache.org/~prasad/specs_rc1/
We are voting these in a block. Failures will be removed from the
block and others will proceed forward.
Voting concludes on Monday, June 11th at 2300 ET.
Cheers
Prasad
+1
The geronimo-servlet_2.5_spec-1.1-sources.jar has some extra source
files in it. But the binary looks ok.
Best wishes,
Paul
On Jun 8, 2007, at 5:43 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Please review the specifications located at http://
people.apache.org/~hogstrom/specs-rc1/
We are voting these
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3234?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12503428
]
Prasad Kashyap commented on GERONIMO-3234:
--
Completed: At revision: 546167
Please review and close if
+1
Anita
--- Prasad Kashyap [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please review the specifications located at
http://people.apache.org/~prasad/specs_rc1/
We are voting these in a block. Failures will be removed from the
block and others will proceed forward.
Voting concludes on Monday, June 11th
Configuration already exists
Key: GERONIMO-3236
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3236
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: public (Regular issues)
Reporter:
Looks like we have all the input we're going to get for 2.0-M6. I'm
cutting the release binaries today to start a vote. I'll be calling
it -rc2 so as not to be confused with 2.0-M6-rc1 which was the first
release to pass CTS.
Look for the binaries and thanks for the input / help.
A couple of questions about the spec releases:
1) Why does activation-1.1 still have a trunk branch in svn?
2) Why hasn't the javamail-1.4 spec been released? Geronimo has an
indirect dependency on the 1.4 spec through the javamail uber-jar, which
also needs to made into a release.
Rick
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3236?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12503465
]
Jarek Gawor commented on GERONIMO-3236:
---
I meant app client jar files and not EJB jar files.
Activation: + 0.1 pom is missing scm section
Jacc: +1
Deployment : +1
Servlet: -1 unless someone can explain why its ok to include the sun
explanatory comments in javax/servlet/resources/web-app_2_2.dtd and
javax/servlet/resources/web-app_2_5.xsd. Also scm section is missing
in pom
Stax:
el: + 0.1 missing scm section in pom.xml
j2ee-management: +0.1 missing scm section in pom.xml. Is the spec
still called j2ee management?
jsp-2.1: -1 unless the comments in the following files are not from
sun or there is a written licensing trail showing we can redistribute
them:
---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2992?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jarek Gawor resolved GERONIMO-2992.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.0-M7
EJB-based web services are now supported
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2991?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jarek Gawor resolved GERONIMO-2991.
---
Resolution: Fixed
This was fixed a while ago.
Axis2: supports service-ref overwrite
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3019?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jarek Gawor resolved GERONIMO-3019.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.0-M7
Patch committed (Committed revision
On Jun 11, 2007, at 1:07 PM, David Jencks wrote:
Servlet: -1 unless someone can explain why its ok to include the
sun explanatory comments in javax/servlet/resources/web-app_2_2.dtd
and javax/servlet/resources/web-app_2_5.xsd. Also scm section is
missing in pom
I mentioned earlier that
On Jun 11, 2007, at 10:51 AM, Paul McMahan wrote:
On Jun 11, 2007, at 1:07 PM, David Jencks wrote:
Servlet: -1 unless someone can explain why its ok to include the
sun explanatory comments in javax/servlet/resources/web-
app_2_2.dtd and javax/servlet/resources/web-app_2_5.xsd. Also
scm
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2997?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jarek Gawor resolved GERONIMO-2997.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Patch applied (Committed revision 546211). Thanks!
jaxws-war test:
On Jun 11, 2007, at 1:07 PM, David Jencks wrote:
Activation: + 0.1 pom is missing scm section
Jacc: +1
Deployment : +1
Servlet: -1 unless someone can explain why its ok to include the
sun explanatory comments in javax/servlet/resources/web-app_2_2.dtd
and
On Jun 11, 2007, at 12:37 PM, Rick McGuire wrote:
A couple of questions about the spec releases:
1) Why does activation-1.1 still have a trunk branch in svn?
It doesn't ... perhaps you have some local mods in the FS that kept
subversion from deleting it.
2) Why hasn't the javamail-1.4
On Jun 11, 2007, at 1:32 PM, David Jencks wrote:
el: + 0.1 missing scm section in pom.xml
j2ee-management: +0.1 missing scm section in pom.xml. Is the spec
still called j2ee management?
jsp-2.1: -1 unless the comments in the following files are not
from sun or there is a written
Mixed JAX-RPC and JAX-WS web services in javaee webservices.xml
---
Key: GERONIMO-3237
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3237
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Bug
The title says it all...
You can peruse these at http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/2.0-M6-rc2
[ ] +1 for to release
[ ] 0 to abstain
[ ] -1 don't release (please provide reason)
This vote will conclude on Thursday June 14th at 1500.
Scrap these...rc3 is coming...the double copying of versions is back.
On Jun 11, 2007, at 3:06 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
The title says it all...
You can peruse these at http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/2.0-M6-rc2
[ ] +1 for to release
[ ] 0 to abstain
[ ] -1 don't release (please
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3157?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jason Warner reassigned GERONIMO-3157:
--
Assignee: Jason Warner
unit test cases for J2G
---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3157?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jason Warner updated GERONIMO-3157:
---
Attachment: Geronimo-3157.patch
After going through the jira history, I saw that there
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3157?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Paul McMahan reassigned GERONIMO-3157:
--
Assignee: Paul McMahan (was: Jason Warner)
unit test cases for J2G
On 6/11/07, David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Activation: + 0.1 pom is missing scm section
Jacc: +1
scm section in pom.xml is wrong
Deployment : +1
scm section in pom.xml is wrong.
Servlet: -1 unless someone can explain why its ok to include the sun
explanatory comments in
CORBA security failure in corba-helloworld testset
--
Key: GERONIMO-3238
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3238
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: public
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3157?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12503655
]
Paul McMahan commented on GERONIMO-3157:
Thanks for the patch Jason. committed in rev 546303.
while
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3157?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Paul McMahan reassigned GERONIMO-3157:
--
Assignee: Jason Warner (was: Paul McMahan)
unit test cases for J2G
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3236?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
David Jencks reassigned GERONIMO-3236:
--
Assignee: David Jencks
Configuration already exists
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3236?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
David Jencks closed GERONIMO-3236.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.0-M7
Fixed in rev 546315. testsuite app works
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3144?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
David Jencks closed GERONIMO-3144.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.0-M6)
2.0-M7
Fixed
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3238?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
David Jencks closed GERONIMO-3238.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed in rev 546319. My current thinking is that the corba layer should
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3154?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
David Jencks closed GERONIMO-3154.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.0-M6)
2.0-M7
Tomcat
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2485?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
David Jencks closed GERONIMO-2485.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.0-M5)
2.0-M6
This
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2744?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
David Jencks closed GERONIMO-2744.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.0-M6
Haven't thought of a better fix.
App
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3138?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
David Jencks closed GERONIMO-3138.
--
Resolution: Fixed
I'm not sure what happened about jay's patch but AFAICT this has been
I think I've narrowed the problem on the rebuild. When building from
the top-level it seems we pick up more cars than we want. If I build
local in the assemblies dir then things seem to be scoped correctly.
Something odd with Maven and / or how were using it.
The binaries are uploading
48 matches
Mail list logo
