jbi maven plugin can't pick up jar from maven repos if this jar has no relavant
pom file when build component installer
---
Key: SM-1055
URL:
Hi all,
When are we going to release servicemix 3.1.2? As a new commiter in
servicemix team, I'd like to know how is the release process looks like.
If possible, shall I be release manager of this time? :-)
Any suggestion is appreciated.
Best Regards
Freeman
On Sep 12, 2007, at 8:46 AM, Freeman Fang wrote:
Hi all,
When are we going to release servicemix 3.1.2? As a new commiter in
servicemix team, I'd like to know how is the release process looks
like.
If possible, shall I be release manager of this time? :-)
Yeah of course you can :-)
Thanks in advance.
Cheers
Freeman
Nodet Guillaume wrote:
On Sep 12, 2007, at 8:46 AM, Freeman Fang wrote:
Hi all,
When are we going to release servicemix 3.1.2? As a new commiter in
servicemix team, I'd like to know how is the release process looks like.
If possible, shall I be release
I have updated the releasing notes to something that I hope will work ;-)
See http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SM/Release+Guide
If you have any questions, just yell !
On 9/12/07, Nodet Guillaume [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sep 12, 2007, at 8:46 AM, Freeman Fang wrote:
Hi all,
I think I resolved most of the resolve to wrong version problems
(basically #3 below), and I managed to start with framework and
deploy plugins until I got a working web console (jetty, and the old
non-modular console).
There are still a bunch of weirdnesses going on such as openejb
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2964?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12526710
]
Vamsavardhana Reddy commented on GERONIMO-2964:
---
I downloaded
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-200?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12526716
]
Tomasz Mazan commented on GERONIMODEVTOOLS-200:
---
Thanks for quick patch. Works fine.
On 9/11/07, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
sorry about the hassle, but I had little support keeping it in trunk,
the decision to move it to sandbox had nothing to do with comet, or
anything else, simply egos that got in the way of rational decisions.
Hi,
I'm really worried
On 9/8/07, Paul McMahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I raised a concern about moving trunk to sandbox since it's the only
branch that contains the annotation support needed by Geronimo. A
committer responded that he will think about maintaining a patchset
with this annotation support. See
Confusing security exception thrown while authenticating using JMX with a just
starting server
--
Key: GERONIMO-3467
URL:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3467?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12526785
]
Shiva Kumar H R commented on GERONIMO-3467:
---
Forgot to mention that this is causing problem in Geronimo
After voting to move tomcat/trunk to sandbox there has been some good
discussion about the development model for a new trunk, mainly
whether it will follow some form of RTC. When a new trunk is created
I will ask them to reapply the annotation support patch and offer to
help if needed.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2964?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12526802
]
Donald Woods commented on GERONIMO-2964:
Yep, the XML needs to be updated to include 2.0.2-SNAPSHOT as a
I agree that we should change it from ERROR to INFO.
I think any change in log4j is on the fly, i.e. you can change it any
time and you don't have to restart the server to pick up the change.
Lin
Prasad Kashyap wrote:
I don't mind if INFO is the default log level. It would be nice if we
can
Hi Donalds, Yes now that all the License files have been fixed (thanks to Kevan)
I plan on another vote later today. Thanks
Donald Woods wrote:
Tim, how is the 2.0.0 plugin updates coming?
Do you have an outlook for when we'll be ready for another RC vote?
-Donald
Kevan Miller wrote:
Hey
Given all of the work and interest in the J2G tool, I would like to move the
current J2G files from sandbox/j2g to devtools/trunk/j2g, so we can start
working towards an official release of the tool.
Does this require a Vote first or does the CTR process apply here, as the code
is already in
Yes!
I am all for this, especially so we can progress it onto the Development
Tools section of the Geronimo site to make it more noticeable and easily
accessible to people interested in migrating applications, as right now the
only way to download it or even be aware of it is by digging through
On 9/12/07, Donald Woods [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does this require a Vote first or does the CTR process apply here, as the code
is already in our svn repo?
I'd say it merely requires lazy consensus where you declare your
intent (already done) and after a couple of days (say 72 hours) commit
Sounds good. I'll give everyone a few days to discuss it and then call a
Vote. Thanks.
-Donald
Jacek Laskowski wrote:
On 9/12/07, Donald Woods [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does this require a Vote first or does the CTR process apply here, as the code
is already in our svn repo?
I'd say it
The tool seems to already be getting some attention from users in the
community. I think, moving it out of sandbox and into devtools might
increase the interest in it. That seems like a good thing to me.
-Jason Warner
On 9/12/07, Donald Woods [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sounds good. I'll give
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3461?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12526812
]
Donald Woods commented on GERONIMO-3461:
Background info on this temp change -
Original Message
On Sep 12, 2007, at 10:21 AM, Donald Woods wrote:
Given all of the work and interest in the J2G tool, I would like to
move the current J2G files from sandbox/j2g to devtools/trunk/j2g,
so we can start working towards an official release of the tool.
Does this require a Vote first or does
Links broken through Ajp13.
---
Key: GERONIMO-3468
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3468
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: public (Regular issues)
Components:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-193?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shiva Kumar H R reassigned GERONIMODEVTOOLS-193:
Assignee: Shiva Kumar H R (was: Tim McConnell)
Runs
Hi, this particular vote thread has been canceled primarily due missing License
and Notice files. Those have now been fixed and a new RC vote will be
forthcoming very soon. Thanks for you patience.
Tim McConnell wrote:
Hi, Please review and vote on the release of the Geronimo Eclipse Plugin
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2964?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12526820
]
Anita Kulshreshtha commented on GERONIMO-2964:
--
I wish we had a system where one could say version
On 9/11/07, David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1. While reviewing config poms I saw some suspicious dependencies.
Axis and Axis2 depend on openejb which subverts any attempt to run
axis web services on a minimal server. The openejb-deployer requires
openejb to be running which subverts
observations debugging :)
Please see the 12-Sep IRC discussions between shivahr and mcconne
http://servlet.uwyn.com/drone/log/bevinbot/geronimo/20070912 for further
discussions on this.
Runs ping and throws java.lang.SecurityException during Geronimo server
startup
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2964?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12526830
]
Vamsavardhana Reddy commented on GERONIMO-2964:
---
Updating geronimo-plugin.xml in
On Sep 12, 2007, at 7:44 AM, Jacek Laskowski wrote:
On 9/8/07, Paul McMahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I raised a concern about moving trunk to sandbox since it's the only
branch that contains the annotation support needed by Geronimo. A
committer responded that he will think about
Anita, there was some discussion about supporting wildcards in the
Geronimo version numbers a while back you might be interested in seeing.
http://www.nabble.com/1.1-Candidate-releases-available-
tf1746400s134.html#a4765468
Best wishes,
Paul
On Sep 12, 2007, at 11:31 AM, Anita Kulshreshtha
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-193?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12526837
]
Shiva Kumar H R commented on GERONIMODEVTOOLS-193:
--
This is fixed in branches\2.0.0. Will
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-193?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shiva Kumar H R updated GERONIMODEVTOOLS-193:
-
Affects Version/s: (was: 2.0)
2.1
From console: database pool doesn't work well if the name contains a / like
jdbc/EmployeeDataSource
---
Key: GERONIMO-3469
URL:
+1 - I agree this is a good thing to do. Let me know if you need any
help here.
Lin
Donald Woods wrote:
Sounds good. I'll give everyone a few days to discuss it and then call
a Vote. Thanks.
-Donald
Jacek Laskowski wrote:
On 9/12/07, Donald Woods [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does this
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2964?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12526884
]
Donald Woods commented on GERONIMO-2964:
Yep, I was afraid of that
Guess we really need to work on
Ah! the long summer vacation.. Now we are at 2.0.1. Is all that stuff
already implemented?
Thanks
Anita
--- Paul McMahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anita, there was some discussion about supporting wildcards in the
Geronimo version numbers a while back you might be interested in
seeing.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3461?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Donald Woods updated GERONIMO-3461:
---
Affects Version/s: (was: 2.1)
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.1)
Disable MEJB
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3461?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Donald Woods closed GERONIMO-3461.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Committed revision 575052 in branches/2.0 (aka. 2.0.2-SNAPSHOT)
Disable
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3456?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Donald Woods updated GERONIMO-3456:
---
Affects Version/s: 2.1
Fix Version/s: 2.1
Fix needs to go into trunk, too...
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-202?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tim McConnell closed GERONIMODEVTOOLS-202.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Tim McConnell (was: Shiva Kumar H
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3449?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12526897
]
Lin Sun commented on GERONIMO-3449:
---
think I hit this today too with derby embed XA. so this seems to be a
Setting system properties through the deployment plan fails.
Key: GERONIMO-3470
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3470
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Bug
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2964?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Vamsavardhana Reddy updated GERONIMO-2964:
--
Attachment: GERONIMO-2964-combined-new.patch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-193?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12526957
]
Kan Ogawa commented on GERONIMODEVTOOLS-193:
Thanks, Shiva.
I have verified your fix and
Enabling Web Server Manager statistics appears to have no effect in admin
console
--
Key: GERONIMO-3471
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3471
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2964?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12526964
]
Anita Kulshreshtha commented on GERONIMO-2964:
--
Have you tried changing/fixing the SUID for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3471?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12526965
]
Anita Kulshreshtha commented on GERONIMO-3471:
--
The Jetty statistics are not hooked up. There is an
Thanks Guillaume
Cheers
Freeman
Guillaume Nodet wrote:
I have updated the releasing notes to something that I hope will work ;-)
See http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SM/Release+Guide
If you have any questions, just yell !
On 9/12/07, Nodet Guillaume [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On
With a little more work I'm now able to start with framework and add
jetty, jasper, and jetty-admin and get a working web console
I guess maybe the next step is to make the car-maven-plugin:assemble
use the plugin-install features so it builds up the config.xml and
other config files.
Hi, Please review and vote on the release of the Geronimo Eclipse Plugin 2.0.0
RC2 (to correspond with the Geronimo 2.0.1 Server release). Changes from RC1
include:
1. Updates to License/Notice files
2. Numerous JIRA fixes
The deployable zip file is here:
Start of discussion thread.
--
Thanks,
Tim McConnell
Looks good. Thanks Tim.
Attached are some minor updates/feedback on your instructions.
On 9/12/07, Tim McConnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Start of discussion thread.
--
Thanks,
Tim McConnell
=== Step #1 --
54 matches
Mail list logo
