No help for me ?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/How-to-obtain-URI-address-of-http%3Aendpoint---tf4437467s12049.html#a12672738
Sent from the ServiceMix - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
All,
I think it's time to start rolling out a 2.0.2 release. There have
been a number of fixes in response to user issues, since 2.0.1. Time,
I think, to make these available in a release. We'd also be able to
make use of released versions of OpenJPA, Axis2, and hopefully
OpenEjb,
On 9/14/07, Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All,
I think it's time to start rolling out a 2.0.2 release. There have
been a number of fixes in response to user issues, since 2.0.1. Time,
I think, to make these available in a release. We'd also be able to
make use of released versions of
Is there a reason for not deploying MEJB as an application and hard
coding it in g-openejb?
Thanks
Anita
Be a better Heartthrob. Get better relationship answers from someone who knows.
Yahoo!
Jason Dillon wrote:
Anyways... email for any reason. Aighty?
Hey Jason,
Before I realized the new gshell changes were introduced yesterday I
attempted to start the server the old fashioned way using ./geronimo.sh
run. This failed due to the assembly not containing the necessary yoko
Maybe you could rewrite your question ?
I don't really understand what you want to do.
The URI of the http endoint is usually configured using
the httpLocation attribute of the endpoint...
On 9/14/07, Micky Santomax [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No help for me ?
--
View this message in context:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2552?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12527493
]
Uncle Johns Band commented on GERONIMO-2552:
I don't see any recent activity on this item. I tried
Guillaume,
I think this this user has several http consumer endpoints, configured
at different URIs (e.g. http://0.0.0.0/service1,
http://0.0.0.0/service2, http://0.0.0.0/service3). On all of these
endpoints, the same targetService is configured (ex:Service) and it is
in this targetService
Thanks Tim and Kevan!
Lin
Tim McConnell wrote:
Hi Kevan, yes I shall handle via:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-207
Kevan Miller wrote:
On Sep 13, 2007, at 5:39 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
On Sep 13, 2007, at 4:44 PM, Lin Sun wrote:
I think we also need to update the
If this is the case, the consumer endpoint can be accessed on the message
exchange. IIRC there is also a property that has a unique ID for this
endpoint.
The URI should also be available as a property.
On 9/14/07, Gert Vanthienen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Guillaume,
I think this this user has
L.S.,
Done! Wouldn't it be a good idea to add the distinction between
beginner - intermediate - advanced to this page
(http://incubator.apache.org/servicemix/tutorials.html) as well, just to
'discourage' beginner users to start writing SE/BC on day 1?
Secondly, how about adding a links to
The consumer *component* can be retrieved using:
((MessageExchangeImpl) exchange).getSourceContext().getComponent()
ServiceMix components also set the following property:
exchange.getProperty(JbiConstants.SENDER_ENDPOINT)
which returns a string uniquely identifying the endpoint.
I don't
Things don't automatically happen in WTP 1.5.1. We had to register our
features with WTP to get it shown up on the list. I hope they are doing
this automatically for 2.0.1 RC too, but if not, we probably should
raise a WTP bugzilla as soon as possible to get it into 2.0.1.
Lin
Ted Kirby
Add NamespaceContextImpl to servicemix-core
---
Key: SM-1056
URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-1056
Project: ServiceMix
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: servicemix-core,
Kevan,
I have one remaining task to do for 2.0.2. I would like to update the
version of CXF to 2.0.1 (or 2.0.2 if it is released really soon). Just
need to verify first if it is all good from TCK standpoint.
Jarek
On 9/14/07, Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All,
I think it's time to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2925?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
David Jencks reassigned GERONIMO-2925:
--
Assignee: David Jencks
Key used for encryption same for all server instances
Kevan Miller wrote:
All,
I think it's time to start rolling out a 2.0.2 release. There have been
a number of fixes in response to user issues, since 2.0.1. Time, I
think, to make these available in a release. We'd also be able to make
use of released versions of OpenJPA, Axis2, and hopefully
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2188?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12527520
]
David Jencks commented on GERONIMO-2188:
I'm mystified as to what you want me to do. AFAICT the entire
Hi Lin/Kevan, do you all feel this change is a show-stopped for RC2 ?? If so,
I'll cancel the vote and start another one for RC3. Please advise. Thanks.
Lin Sun wrote:
Thanks Tim and Kevan!
Lin
Tim McConnell wrote:
Hi Kevan, yes I shall handle via:
BTW we should be careful of preserving the work Gianny did a while
back to reduce the number of jars that need to be in lib by providing
a bootstrap repository. (I don't understand exactly what he did,
this might not be exactly right). I was hoping we could take the
stax/jaxb jars back
Hi Tim,
I think it would be nice to get this addressed, as this is the GUI that
users will see before they click on the accept radio button to accept
the license. But I can be convinced the other way too.
Do you need to spin another build because of this site below is still
pointing at
Always appends default value into Server VM Arguments field after modifying
this field.
---
Key: GERONIMODEVTOOLS-208
URL:
On Sep 14, 2007, at 10:48 AM, Tim McConnell wrote:
Hi Lin/Kevan, do you all feel this change is a show-stopped for
RC2 ?? If so,
I'll cancel the vote and start another one for RC3. Please advise.
Thanks.
Hey Tim,
From a binary perspective, things are fine. However, if the
installation
Hi again Lin, I'll create an RC3 to fix the licensing problems. But the
plugin.xml for geronimo.st.v20.core_2.0.0.jar is correct if you look at it from
the actual deployable zip that is being (and will be) voted on, or even in svn.
It actually points to a real eclipse update site (e.g.,
Okay, thanks for the information
Kevan Miller wrote:
On Sep 14, 2007, at 10:48 AM, Tim McConnell wrote:
Hi Lin/Kevan, do you all feel this change is a show-stopped for RC2 ??
If so,
I'll cancel the vote and start another one for RC3. Please advise.
Thanks.
Hey Tim,
From a binary
Jarek, This commit is causing some problems for the new admin
console plugin because it needs to inherit the spring classes from
its parent component (pluto-support). This situation is the inverse
of the original problem we were hoping to solve where a web-app does
*not* want to inherit
Yes this was my case :
I think this this user has several http consumer endpoints, configured
at different URIs (e.g. http://0.0.0.0/service1,
http://0.0.0.0/service2 , http://0.0.0.0/service3). On all of these
endpoints, the same targetService is configured (ex:Service) and it is
in
On 9/14/07, Lin Sun [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tim, thanks for your nice instruction. I am able to do scenario 2 fine
without any prob!
I have noticed 2 things:
1) one other recommended scenario (may be the most recommended scenario)
used to be not download anything, but start at define a
Thanks for catching this Kan Ogawa. I will re-open GERONIMODEVTOOLS-107.
- Shiva
On 9/14/07, Kan Ogawa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tim,
Tim McConnell wrote:
Start of discussion thread.
The GERONIMODEVTOOLS-107 issue that was already closed is not
fully fixed yet in 2.0.0 RC2.
( Now,
Hi Tim, cool. as long as you got it covered that is great. I was only
looking at what I downloaded (didn't check the svn.).
Lin
Tim McConnell wrote:
Hi again Lin, I'll create an RC3 to fix the licensing problems. But the
plugin.xml for geronimo.st.v20.core_2.0.0.jar is correct if you look
Hi Kan, we shall try !!
Kan Ogawa wrote:
Tim,
Tim McConnell wrote:
Start of discussion thread.
The GERONIMODEVTOOLS-107 issue that was already closed is not fully
fixed yet in 2.0.0 RC2.
( Now, I don't reopen this issue yet. )
I forward here my reply to question that Ted Kirby
Vote is canceled. An RC3 will be forthcoming very shortly.
Tim McConnell wrote:
Hi, Please review and vote on the release of the Geronimo Eclipse Plugin
2.0.0 RC2 (to correspond with the Geronimo 2.0.1 Server release).
Changes from RC1 include:
1. Updates to License/Notice files
2.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2188?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12527583
]
Lin Sun commented on GERONIMO-2188:
---
David,
I think I know where the confusion is now. Geronimo 2.0 or 2.0.1
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-107?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12527593
]
Shiva Kumar H R commented on GERONIMODEVTOOLS-107:
--
This is fixed in
1) \branches\2.0.0
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-952?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_40135
]
Srivatsan Sridharan commented on SM-952:
Adding comment here as it is a related issue:
When the library
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3413?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12527602
]
Paul McMahan commented on GERONIMO-3413:
thanks for Viet for the patch! committed in rev 575775.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-195?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tim McConnell closed GERONIMODEVTOOLS-195.
--
Resolution: Fixed
This was fixed sometime ago--should be closed
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-197?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tim McConnell updated GERONIMODEVTOOLS-197:
---
Affects Version/s: (was: 2.0)
2.1
Ugh... I had a feeling that this filtering will cause problems for
someone. Anyway, in general I think moving the hidden-classes filter
to the CXF deployer is a better solution (to keep it all together and
assuming it has the same effect as when specified in the web container
deployer). But, in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-197?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tim McConnell updated GERONIMODEVTOOLS-197:
---
Affects Version/s: (was: 2.1)
2.0
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-198?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tim McConnell updated GERONIMODEVTOOLS-198:
---
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.0)
2.1
Daytrader
Summarizing list of things to be completed before we re-spin RC3:
1) Fix problem reported by Lin (a JIRA for this will be opened)
2) Open a JIRA to make sure we don't loose track of updating build.xml to
use WTP 2.0.1 once they are GAed. This probably will happen after GEP
2.0gets released.
3)
Hello World JSP does not open in Eclipse browser when invoked with run as, run
on server from within Eclipse
--
Key: GERONIMODEVTOOLS-209
URL:
Upgrade build process to download the WTP 2.0.1 artifacts when it GA'es at the
end of September
---
Key: GERONIMODEVTOOLS-210
URL:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3472?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Paul McMahan updated GERONIMO-3472:
---
Component/s: (was: console)
Jetty
from the patch this looks like a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-211?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shiva Kumar H R reassigned GERONIMODEVTOOLS-211:
Assignee: Shiva Kumar H R
Eliminate compile time errors
Eliminate compile time errors (related to XmlBeans schemas) reported by Eclipse
during plug-in development
--
Key: GERONIMODEVTOOLS-211
URL:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-211?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shiva Kumar H R closed GERONIMODEVTOOLS-211.
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed in branches\2.0.0 at revision 575782.
Lets try and stick to the release often goal of open source and not try to
fix everything before we release the 2.0.0 plugin. There will always be bugs
that need to be fixed (just look at all of the open JIRAs for the Server) and
we should try to maintain the past goals of always shipping a
WTP2.0.1RC2 is now available.
See
http://download.eclipse.org/webtools/downloads/drops/R2.0/M-2.0.1RC2-20070913200918/
Ted Kirby
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-198?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Donald Woods updated GERONIMODEVTOOLS-198:
--
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.1)
2.0.x
Daytrader
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-204?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Donald Woods updated GERONIMODEVTOOLS-204:
--
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.1)
Affects Version/s: (was:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-197?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Donald Woods updated GERONIMODEVTOOLS-197:
--
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.1)
Mechanism required to LICENSE/NOTICE
+1000
david jencks
On Sep 14, 2007, at 4:43 PM, Jarek Gawor wrote:
I know that at least the 5am build runs with tests on. I would like to
change that so that each build always runs with all tests enabled.
Some of the tests in testsuite/ directory actaully start the server so
if they are
I know that at least the 5am build runs with tests on. I would like to
change that so that each build always runs with all tests enabled.
Some of the tests in testsuite/ directory actaully start the server so
if they are successful we should at least know that the server starts
up ok and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-203?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Donald Woods updated GERONIMODEVTOOLS-203:
--
Affects Version/s: (was: 2.1)
2.0
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-193?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Donald Woods updated GERONIMODEVTOOLS-193:
--
Affects Version/s: (was: 2.1)
2.0
Yes! This would definitely take care of at least some of MY headaches.
+1
On 9/14/07, David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1000
david jencks
On Sep 14, 2007, at 4:43 PM, Jarek Gawor wrote:
I know that at least the 5am build runs with tests on. I would like to
change that so that each
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-210?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Donald Woods updated GERONIMODEVTOOLS-210:
--
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.1)
2.0.x
Why is the discussion on the eclipse plugin release happening in the [VOTE]
thread?
Vamsi
On 9/12/07, Tim McConnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Donalds, Yes now that all the License files have been fixed (thanks to
Kevan)
I plan on another vote later today. Thanks
Donald Woods wrote:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1053?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12527639
]
Vamsavardhana Reddy commented on GERONIMO-1053:
---
Can someone verify if this is still a problem?
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-179?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Donald Woods updated GERONIMODEVTOOLS-179:
--
Component/s: xdoclet
XDoclet 1.2 Support
---
Move J2G from Sandbox to Devtools
-
Key: GERONIMODEVTOOLS-212
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-212
Project: Geronimo-Devtools
Issue Type: New Feature
Components: J2G
On Sep 14, 2007, at 2:56 PM, Jarek Gawor wrote:
Ugh... I had a feeling that this filtering will cause problems for
someone. Anyway, in general I think moving the hidden-classes filter
to the CXF deployer is a better solution (to keep it all together and
assuming it has the same effect as when
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-205?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tim McConnell updated GERONIMODEVTOOLS-205:
---
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.0.x)
2.0
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-209?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tim McConnell updated GERONIMODEVTOOLS-209:
---
Description:
This appears to be a WTP 2.0.x bug, not a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-207?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tim McConnell closed GERONIMODEVTOOLS-207.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed in revision 575868
Update the license in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-205?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tim McConnell closed GERONIMODEVTOOLS-205.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed in revision 575869
Name change from
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2925?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
David Jencks updated GERONIMO-2925:
---
Attachment: GERONIMO-2925.patch
I've implemented a pluggable encryption system for
Periodically users show up who want their passwords obscured in new
ways that allow their systems to break by removing the key used to
obscure them :-) (how's that for a biased view of the situation :-)
They don't like SimpleEncryption because the key is hardcoded and
thus the same for
70 matches
Mail list logo
