Just a random question but shouldn't the Windows download be a .zip instead
of .tar.gz? (I'm using the Linux version so it doesn't really affect me)
alex
On 9/20/07, Freeman Fang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All,
I have uploaded a version of ServiceMix 3.1.2 for you to review. See
Hi Alex,
Good catch, it should be .zip for windows platform, I update the
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SM/ServiceMix+3.1.2
Thanks very much
Freeman
Alex Boisvert wrote:
Just a random question but shouldn't the Windows download be a .zip instead
of .tar.gz? (I'm using the
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-1071?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_40158
]
Guillaume Nodet commented on SM-1071:
-
quoteI have been thinking about something like this for the Apache
Forwarding to the dev list ...
On 9/21/07, d. santosh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thank you, I can't assign it to myself.
user id : d.santosh
email id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You should now have karma to assign issues to yourself.
can you let me know the issue details which could help me in
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-1071?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_40160
]
Guillaume Nodet commented on SM-1071:
-
Yeah, good idea to investigate. It may be a bit a complex api just to
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-1070?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Santosh R Dubey reassigned SM-1070:
---
Assignee: Santosh R Dubey
ODE integration
---
Key: SM-1070
Is the activemq port number is configurable?
We are trying to configure the port by changing it at
conf/servicemix.properties.
However, once the port number is changed to anything other than 61616 the
ServiceMix container stops working.
Please help.
--
View this message in context:
We ended up using July 24th ActiveMQ SNAPSHOT and it worked for us. We are
actually hoping that this fix makes it in the next major releases of
ServiceMix (3.1.2 and 3.2).
Also, please help with following requests:
com.ctc.wstx.exc.WstxParsingException: for jsr181 proxy by ArmenH1
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3481?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12529322
]
Vamsavardhana Reddy commented on GERONIMO-3481:
---
David, thanks for the patch.
Can this be added to the existing Maven2 spec builds?
Is there a maven plugin for generating OSGi bundles?
Yes there is. We developed one over at Felix. It has been released
too. Have a look at:
http://felix.apache.org/site/maven-bundle-plugin-bnd.html
The plugin makes it easy to create jars
Bruce, are you sure ?
I think these jars are all available from the public repo:
http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/janino/janino/2.3.2/
http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-servlet_2.4_spec/1.1/
http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/javax/activation/activation/1.1/
...
On 9/21/07, Donald Woods [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Okay, was just looking for more details. Wasn't trying to shoot you down...
:-)
So, you're not going as far as proposing real OSGi/Eclipse bundles, where we
control which classes/methods are exported for others to use
It is a real OSGi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3482?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Guillaume Nodet updated GERONIMO-3482:
--
Attachment: specs.diff
Patch to show what could be the result of OSGifying all
OSGifying spec jars
---
Key: GERONIMO-3482
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3482
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Task
Security Level: public (Regular issues)
Components: specs
I've jist attached a patch to
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3482 to show what it
would look like. Of course we need to bring all specs from the tags
to the trunk and OSGify them, but it's usually just a matter of
changing the packaging to packagingbundle/packaging.
On 9/21/07,
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-1071?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_40159
]
Gert Vanthienen commented on SM-1071:
-
Another option could be to use JCR for storing/versioning/accessing the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-214?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tomasz Mazan updated GERONIMODEVTOOLS-214:
--
Attachment: testEJB.zip
Attachment with project source, and build
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3481?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12529358
]
Vamsavardhana Reddy commented on GERONIMO-3481:
---
Added the missing attributes substitutionsFile and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-214?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tomasz Mazan updated GERONIMODEVTOOLS-214:
--
Attachment: (was: project views.jpg)
Fictional deployment of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-214?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tomasz Mazan updated GERONIMODEVTOOLS-214:
--
Attachment: deployed jar view.jpg
Fictional deployment of EJB-JAR
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-214?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tomasz Mazan updated GERONIMODEVTOOLS-214:
--
Attachment: deploying view.jpg
Fictional deployment of EJB-JAR
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-214?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tomasz Mazan updated GERONIMODEVTOOLS-214:
--
Attachment: geronimo console view.jpg
Fictional deployment of
OpenEJB trunk at 0
Geronimo Revision: 578034 built with tests included
See the full build-0400.log file at
http://people.apache.org/~prasad/binaries/2.0/20070921/build-0400.log
[INFO] Installing
/home/prasad/geronimo/2.0/configs/webservices-common/target/webservices-common-2.0.2-SNAPSHOT.car
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-214?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tomasz Mazan updated GERONIMODEVTOOLS-214:
--
Attachment: screenshot-1.jpg
Project development view
Fictional
On 9/21/07, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bruce, are you sure ?
I think these jars are all available from the public repo:
http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/janino/janino/2.3.2/
http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-servlet_2.4_spec/1.1/
On 9/21/07, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've jist attached a patch to
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3482 to show what it
would look like. Of course we need to bring all specs from the tags
to the trunk and OSGify them, but it's usually just a matter of
changing
+1
On Sep 20, 2007, at 6:40 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
For ServiceMix 4.0, which will be based on OSGi, I will need to have
OSGified versions of some of the spec jars that geronimo provides.
It's quite easy to do in ServiceMix (see
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/servicemix/branches/
Well, maybe, I can't really tell :-(
On 9/21/07, Gert Vanthienen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Guillaume,
It was using the default configuration of ServiceMix, so it was using
the tcp:// broker connection. However... today, the problem is gone. I
restored the original config, with all flows
Guillaume,
It was using the default configuration of ServiceMix, so it was using
the tcp:// broker connection. However... today, the problem is gone. I
restored the original config, with all flows enabled and now the memory
usage is back to normal. However, the ActiveMQ config also still
+1
Freeman Fang wrote:
Hi All,
I have uploaded a version of ServiceMix 3.1.2 for you to review. See
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SM/ServiceMix+3.1.2
for all the links and release notes.
[ ] +1 Release ServiceMix 3.1.2
[ ] ± 0
[ ] -1 Do not release ServiceMix 3.1.2
Cheers
So I have something more consistent, but I can really put it as a
patch as it involves copying from tags to trunk, so I guess I'll just
commit it for review.
The only problem I have comes from the commonj spec: the package is
java.commonj and it seems the felix plugin does not really like java.*
So I have something more consistent, but I can really put it as a
patch as it involves copying from tags to trunk, so I guess I'll just
commit it for review.
The only problem I have comes from the commonj spec: the package is
java.commonj and it seems the felix plugin does not really like
I guess given that no framework support it and that nobody uses this
jar yet, I will just defer ;-)
Many thanks for this explanation.
On 9/21/07, Karl Pauls [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So I have something more consistent, but I can really put it as a
patch as it involves copying from tags to
So I've just commited a patch for everybody to review.
I have tested some of the bundles inside servicemix 4.0, so at least
i'm confident it won't break servicemix ;-)
Seriously, they seem to be ok, though i had to limit the exported
package from stax-api to javax.xml.stream* to not clash with
On Sep 21, 2007, at 9:08 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
I guess given that no framework support it and that nobody uses this
jar yet, I will just defer ;-)
Many thanks for this explanation.
There isn't a current release of the commonj spec. We only released
commonj when we released all specs
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3482?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12529416
]
Guillaume Nodet commented on GERONIMO-3482:
---
Adding geronimo-activation_1.1_spec
Sending
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3456?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Anita Kulshreshtha updated GERONIMO-3456:
-
Attachment: configs.patch
- config.patch (created from configs dir) for
On 9/21/07, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I guess given that no framework support it and that nobody uses this
jar yet, I will just defer ;-)
Makes sense, although it might not be too hard to split it up in two
different jars and turn it into an extension bundle - might give use a
: 578034 built with tests included
See the full build-0400.log file at
http://people.apache.org/~prasad/binaries/2.0/20070921/build-0400.log
[INFO] Installing
/home/prasad/geronimo/2.0/configs/webservices-common/target/webservices-common-2.0.2-SNAPSHOT.car
to
/home/prasad/.m2/repository
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2994?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Peter Petersson updated GERONIMO-2994:
--
Attachment: roller_plugin_070921.patch
Adding roller_plugin_070921.patch
For the specs, there are generally 2 version identifiers. The first
level is the implementation level the spec is supposed to be at. For
example, javamail 1.4 or javamail 1.3.1. The second is the Geronimo
release version of that specification. For example, the javamail 1.4
spec in trunk is
Donald, thanks for doing all these!
Are you thinking of releasing this separately from the Geronimo Eclipse
plugin? Might be good to release together when Eclipse plugin releases
its next maintenance release (if it comes out soon) and also allow users
to download j2g using Eclipse update
On 9/21/07, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yeah, good point.
I've managed to somehow include both versions in the manifest.
The specification version (javamail 1.4) goes into the package version
for OSGi, whereas the maven version (1.2-SNAPSHOT) goes into the
Bundle-Version manifest
Yeah, good point.
I've managed to somehow include both versions in the manifest.
The specification version (javamail 1.4) goes into the package version
for OSGi, whereas the maven version (1.2-SNAPSHOT) goes into the
Bundle-Version manifest entry.
I suppose this is the right way to deal with that,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3481?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Vamsavardhana Reddy updated GERONIMO-3481:
--
Attachment: GERONIMO-3481-weird.patch
GERONIMO-3481-weird.patch addressed
Well, I previously used an OSGified bundle of stax-api that only
contained java.xml.stream packages. The geronimo one contains other
classes in javax.xml* packages, so I've first tried to export all
these packages from the bundle. When I did that, I end up with the
following exception in my
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3456?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Anita Kulshreshtha updated GERONIMO-3456:
-
Attachment: configs.diff
The configs.patch has duplicates. Please use
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-1037?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kristian Koehler updated SM-1037:
-
Attachment: geronimo-plugin.patch-04
This is an updated patch. The serviceMix version is
On 9/21/07, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So I've just commited a patch for everybody to review.
I have tested some of the bundles inside servicemix 4.0, so at least
i'm confident it won't break servicemix ;-)
Seriously, they seem to be ok, though i had to limit the exported
After thinking about this some more I upgraded the MyFaces version to
1.2.1-SNAPSHOT in server/trunk but not in the 2.0 branch. If trunk
is passing all JSF tests in time for 2.0.2 then I will upgrade there
as well.
Best wishes,
Paul
On Sep 17, 2007, at 2:10 PM, Paul McMahan wrote:
On
Erik, could you create a page in the wiki sandbox (http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxSBOX/index.html) that we could later move into the main web site
Cheers!
Hernan
Donald Woods wrote:
J2G has now been moved out of sandbox and into -
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/devtools/j2g/trunk
Will we have a released version of MyFaces 1.2.1? I believe we do not want
to include any SNAPSHOT versions as dependencies in our releases.
Vamsi
On 9/21/07, Paul McMahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After thinking about this some more I upgraded the MyFaces version to
1.2.1-SNAPSHOT in
My +1
Freeman
Freeman Fang wrote:
Hi All,
I have uploaded a version of ServiceMix 3.1.2 for you to review. See
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SM/ServiceMix+3.1.2
for all the links and release notes.
[ ] +1 Release ServiceMix 3.1.2
[ ] ± 0
[ ] -1 Do not release
Roger, will do.
On 9/21/07, Hernan Cunico [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Erik, could you create a page in the wiki sandbox (
http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxSBOX/index.html) that we could later move into
the main web site
Cheers!
Hernan
Donald Woods wrote:
J2G has now been moved out of sandbox
On Sep 21, 2007, at 10:43 AM, Vamsavardhana Reddy wrote:
Will we have a released version of MyFaces 1.2.1? I believe we do
not want to include any SNAPSHOT versions as dependencies in our
releases.
We can request a release when it is passing TCK. Getting it into a
Geronimo build is a
Redeploy should start any dependent configurations it stops.
Key: GERONIMO-3483
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3483
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Bug
On Sep 21, 2007, at 10:48 AM, Paul McMahan wrote:
On Sep 21, 2007, at 10:43 AM, Vamsavardhana Reddy wrote:
Will we have a released version of MyFaces 1.2.1? I believe we do
not want to include any SNAPSHOT versions as dependencies in our
releases.
We can request a release when it is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3481?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12529472
]
Vamsavardhana Reddy commented on GERONIMO-3481:
---
Oh well... after looking at the code,
+1
Cheers,
Thomas
Freeman Fang wrote:
Hi All,
I have uploaded a version of ServiceMix 3.1.2 for you to review. See
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SM/ServiceMix+3.1.2
for all the links and release notes.
[ ] +1 Release ServiceMix 3.1.2
[ ] ± 0
[ ] -1 Do not release
OpenEJB trunk at 0
Geronimo Revision: 578171 built with tests included
See the full build-1000.log file at
http://people.apache.org/~prasad/binaries/2.0/20070921/build-1000.log
[INFO] Installing
/home/prasad/geronimo/2.0/configs/webservices-common/target/webservices-common-2.0.2-SNAPSHOT.car
I meant the geronimo-jetty-2.0.1.xsd, geronimo-web-2.0.1.xsd, and
geronimo-tomcat-2.0.1.xsd.
I guess the main question is what is our versioning policy (if any)
and what should and should not go into a patch and/or minor release.
Jarek
On 9/21/07, Vamsavardhana Reddy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3374?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Donald Woods updated GERONIMO-3374:
---
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.0.x)
2.0.1
Admin console uses Generic
OpenEJB trunk at 0
Geronimo Revision: 578176 built with tests included
See the full build-1000.log file at
http://people.apache.org/~prasad/binaries/trunk/20070921/build-1000.log
[INFO] Using default encoding to copy filtered resources.
[INFO] [car:validate-configuration]
[INFO] [car:prepare
Minor issue:
Your GPG public key is not in the KEYS file. I also could not find it in
the public keyserver at pgp.mit.edu. Thus, I could not verify the
signatures.
Dan
Freeman Fang wrote:
Hi All,
I have uploaded a version of ServiceMix 3.1.2 for you to review. See
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3477?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12529481
]
Matthew Vaughton commented on GERONIMO-3477:
Kevan Miller has access to a test case.
Transaction
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-214?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12529484
]
Kan Ogawa commented on GERONIMODEVTOOLS-214:
Tomasz,
Thank you for attaching sample ejb
Hello,
I have one question about the architecture of servicemix. It's about the
strategy servicemix uses for processing of xml.
We are trying to find some platform that will replace cocoon2 as our xml
routing system, and servicemix seems to be nice thing for our needs.
However, I noticed
From ... I can live with introducing an optional element to an existing
schema in your original e-mail, I assume that you are not totally against
the schema changes. From what I understand, when a schema is changed
(except for some corrections in comments or some annotations), it can no
longer
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3477?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kevan Miller reassigned GERONIMO-3477:
--
Assignee: Kevan Miller
Transaction recovery broken for resource adapter
On Sep 21, 2007, at 6:36 AM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
Can you please create an account for me on that machine you promised.
On #geronimo dblevins wrote:
Sep 19 15:39:43 dblevins pkashyap: going to make you an
account on the zone if you're around to change your password right away
Been
In theory, the public key should be in the web of trust.
See http://people.apache.org/~henkp/trust/
On 9/21/07, Daniel Kulp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Minor issue:
Your GPG public key is not in the KEYS file. I also could not find it in
the public keyserver at pgp.mit.edu. Thus, I could
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3456?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Anita Kulshreshtha updated GERONIMO-3456:
-
Attachment: mejb.diff
The mejb.patch also has duplicates. please apply
I didn't want to tie the J2G releases to the WTP server adaptor releases for
now, but we could in the future if there is more synergy between them and
users start asking for it... For now, placing J2G in the same update site as
the WTP plugins should be enough for most users.
-Donald
Lin
On Friday 21 September 2007, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
In theory, the public key should be in the web of trust.
See http://people.apache.org/~henkp/trust/
Well, yes. But I need to see the key first to see if its been signed by
anyone. Right now, we cannot even get that far
Freeman: I
Some of the tests in testsuite are broken and fail for one reason or
another. I tried to fix as many tests as I could but there is still a
bunch of them that I'm not sure how to fix. It would be great if
people could take a look at the tests that they are familiar with and
try to fix them (or
Kevan,
This should be created from rev 563889. I had one commit to the branch in
rev 577161 (just correcting a typo) post what was used in 2.0.1. Though I
had sent an e-mail earlier to the dev-list about creating this tag I forgot
to follow it up :o(
Vamsi
On 9/22/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-214?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12529532
]
Tomasz Mazan commented on GERONIMODEVTOOLS-214:
---
Kan,
The same exepcion got my workmate -
+1
On Sep 21, 2007, at 4:09 AM, Freeman Fang wrote:
Hi All,
I have uploaded a version of ServiceMix 3.1.2 for you to review. See
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SM/ServiceMix+3.1.2
for all the links and release notes.
[ ] +1 Release ServiceMix 3.1.2
[ ] ± 0
[ ] -1 Do not release
Many many thanks for looking at this!
I will look into jca-cms-tests and sec-tests but I have several other
tasks ahead of this, and if anyone else beats me to fixing them I
will not object.
thanks
david jencks
On Sep 21, 2007, at 3:03 PM, Jarek Gawor wrote:
Some of the tests in
On Sep 21, 2007, at 3:18 PM, Vamsavardhana Reddy wrote:
Kevan,
This should be created from rev 563889. I had one commit to the
branch in rev 577161 (just correcting a typo) post what was used in
2.0.1. Though I had sent an e-mail earlier to the dev-list about
creating this tag I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-214?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12529557
]
Tim McConnell commented on GERONIMODEVTOOLS-214:
Thanks for the example Tomasz--now I at
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3481?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
David Jencks updated GERONIMO-3481:
---
Attachment: GERONIMO-3481-2.patch
After a lot of help from David Blevins we seem to have
After a lot of help from David Blevins I think we've figured out a
reasonable plan. I've modified the EjbModuleBuilder to construct a
ConfigurationFactory for each app it deploys and fill in
ContainerInfos from all the EjbContainer gbean in scope of the app's
Configuration. After some
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3481?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
David Jencks updated GERONIMO-3481:
---
Attachment: GERONIMO-3481-2a.patch
Small patch to openejb to go with the preceding patch.
Please help with this request.
ArmenH wrote:
Hi,
Does anyone have a complete example of jsr181 proxy for external web
service?
I have two services, one is inside jbi container and the other one is
outside. The inside service
consumes the external web service. I followed the
Please help with this request.
ArmenH wrote:
Hi,
Does anyone have a complete example of jsr181 proxy for external web
service?
I have two services, one is inside the JBI container and the other one is
outside. The inside service
consumes the external web service. I followed
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-214?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12529595
]
Kan Ogawa commented on GERONIMODEVTOOLS-214:
Tim,
I wonder that installing testEJB jar in
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-1061?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_40164
]
Jeff Peterson commented on SM-1061:
---
Please include in 3.1.2 release
Race condition in RSS feed-writer component
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-1021?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_40163
]
Jeff Peterson commented on SM-1021:
---
Please include in 3.1.2 release
DOMException: NAMESPACE_ERR
Thanks David J and David B! I used the patches to build a fresh
server with modified assembly to include MEJB. I was able to access
MEJB from a web application. So far so good.. Now, I am not getting
access denied from a plain java client :( even though the generated
DD shows:
90 matches
Mail list logo
