[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-628?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Guillaume Nodet reopened SM-628:
FYI, we tend to resolve issue when the patches are actually committed (but
maybe we should change
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-628?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Oleg Zhurakousky resolved SM-628.
-
Resolution: Fixed
I was able to replicate inconsistencies of this and other similar tests and
This report for October is the first report
since ServiceMix graduation last month.
ServiceMix resources have not been moved yet.
Hopefully everything will be sorted out soon.
We have released our first non incubating
version of ServiceMix, the 3.1.2 version,
on September 25th.
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-624?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_40368
]
Oleg Zhurakousky commented on SM-624:
-
Can someone please give me quick pointer on this one.
This test only has
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-1100?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Brian Greer updated SM-1100:
Attachment: mojo-containerName-patch.txt
Allow containerName to be specified on the command line for
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-628?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_40363
]
ozhurakousky edited comment on SM-628 at 10/12/07 6:23 AM:
---
I agree and that was my
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-1100?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Brian Greer updated SM-1100:
Attachment: (was: mojo-containerName-patch.txt)
Allow containerName to be specified on the command
On 10/12/07, Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't know of any reason to maintain KEYS files in any other svn
directory. I propose we delete them from all non-tagged branches/trunks in
our svn tree. Thoughts?
Was there a reason to keep them in the other places? I'd love to hear
what
+1
++Vamsi
On 10/10/07, Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As discussed in the Geronimo 2.0.2 release discussion thread, we need
to release geronimo-txmanager 2.0.2 to pick up fixes for the Geronimo
2.0.2 release. geronimo-txmanager contains the geronimo-transaction
and
Hi all,
we are running our application on Geronimo, we want our apllication to be
profile by making use of a profiler to know details like CPU usage
memory,time.
So we are calling profiler in geronimo batch file.
when we debug the geronimo batch file , we are getting the following
message.
On 10/12/07, David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 12, 2007, at 8:28 AM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
This is geronimo's transitive depenendency feature. When you
include a jar with such a file in a configuration's dependencies, all
the jars listed in the g-d.xml file also get included
On Oct 12, 2007, at 1:55 PM, Jason Warner wrote:
Donald,
I'm still unsure of the status of the license files for J2G. If we
can get a confirmation that those are ok, then I'm all for
releasing a 1.0.0. Otherwise, I think we should hold off.
Right. They aren't ok. And must be fixed
On Oct 12, 2007, at 1:55 PM, Jason Warner wrote:
Donald,
I'm still unsure of the status of the license files for J2G. If we
can get a confirmation that those are ok, then I'm all for
releasing a 1.0.0. Otherwise, I think we should hold off.
By the way, the patches seem to be missing a
+1
-Donald
Kevan Miller wrote:
As discussed in the Geronimo 2.0.2 release discussion thread, we need to
release geronimo-txmanager 2.0.2 to pick up fixes for the Geronimo 2.0.2
release. geronimo-txmanager contains the geronimo-transaction and
geronimo-connector components.
The proposed
I think we should keep the KEYS file in trunk and copy it to dist
when we're releasing...
On Oct 12, 2007, at 12:07 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
On Aug 8, 2007, at 3:08 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
And... this is done. I don't know what else needs to be
changed... if anyone runs into any
I was still running into this with the latest 2.0.2-SNAPSHOT level
tonight on SLED10, but I can manually add the OpenEJB svn repo for now,
since this only seems to be a problem on my machines
-Donald
Kevan Miller (JIRA) wrote:
[
Are there are any major items that we want to get into a J2G 1.0.0
release, or is everyone ready to create a branch and start the release
process?
-Donald
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Could we investigate this more and remove the dependency? I really
doubt we should need to pull this in.
thanks
david jencks
On Oct 12, 2007, at 8:55 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: gawor
Date: Fri Oct 12 08:55:29 2007
New Revision: 584194
URL:
The transaction module (o.a.g.modules) has two GBeans -
GeronimoTransactionManagerGBean and
GeronimoTransactionManagerImplGBean
Can they be merged? I would like to set their J2eeType to
JTAResource.
Thanks
Anita
On Oct 12, 2007, at 8:28 AM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
A quick investigation into this gave rise to some insights and more
questions -
Insights:
1) An explicit-versions.properties gets generated by the PackageMojo
while building every config.
2) I doubt if this is getting serialized into the
Testsuite failure: JNDI lookup fails with java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError
Key: GERONIMO-3531
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3531
Project: Geronimo
A quick investigation into this gave rise to some insights and more questions -
Insights:
1) An explicit-versions.properties gets generated by the PackageMojo
while building every config.
2) I doubt if this is getting serialized into the car. So I am unsure
if this ever gets used.
3) An
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-238?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12534302
]
Ted Kirby commented on GERONIMODEVTOOLS-238:
For posterity, I wanted to record some things I
On Oct 12, 2007, at 8:54 AM, Anita Kulshreshtha wrote:
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: kevan
Date: Thu Oct 11 21:25:03 2007
New Revision: 584040
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=584040view=rev
Log:
Add RELEASE-NOTES for 2.0.2 release
.
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: kevan
Date: Thu Oct 11 21:25:03 2007
New Revision: 584040
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=584040view=rev
Log:
Add RELEASE-NOTES for 2.0.2 release
.
.
+To enable MEJB
On Oct 12, 2007, at 8:50 AM, Anita Kulshreshtha wrote:
The transaction module (o.a.g.modules) has two GBeans -
GeronimoTransactionManagerGBean and
GeronimoTransactionManagerImplGBean
Can they be merged? I would like to set their J2eeType to
JTAResource.
I added a miniscule amount of
+1
Jarek
On 10/10/07, Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As discussed in the Geronimo 2.0.2 release discussion thread, we need
to release geronimo-txmanager 2.0.2 to pick up fixes for the Geronimo
2.0.2 release. geronimo-txmanager contains the geronimo-transaction
and geronimo-connector
+1
On Oct 10, 2007, at 1:42 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
As discussed in the Geronimo 2.0.2 release discussion thread, we
need to release geronimo-txmanager 2.0.2 to pick up fixes for the
Geronimo 2.0.2 release. geronimo-txmanager contains the geronimo-
transaction and geronimo-connector
David,
I did investigate it. But maybe there is a better solution. Here's the
change in OpenEJB:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/openejb/trunk/openejb3/server/openejb-ejbd/src/main/java/org/apache/openejb/server/ejbd/JndiRequestHandler.java?r1=570629r2=581127
Jarek
On 10/12/07, David Jencks
Can you show the full java command-line invocation that is starting the server?
Thanks,
Ted Kirby
On 10/12/07, annaiah [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
we are running our application on Geronimo, we want our apllication to be
profile by making use of a profiler to know details like CPU
All
A reminder about this release vote. Hoping to call the vote tomorrow.
--kevan
On Oct 10, 2007, at 1:42 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
As discussed in the Geronimo 2.0.2 release discussion thread, we
need to release geronimo-txmanager 2.0.2 to pick up fixes for the
Geronimo 2.0.2 release.
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-627?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Oleg Zhurakousky updated SM-627:
Attachment: JCAFlowTest_patch.txt
The same solution as JMSFlowTest (see discussion there). Make
Folks,
In trunk, I've noticed that dependencies specified in
geronimo-dependency.xml without an explicit version get resolved to an
incorrect version when installed. For example, the root pom defines
geronimo-schema-j2ee_1.4 dependency with version 1.2. But in the final
javaee assembly only the
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-628?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Oleg Zhurakousky updated SM-628:
Attachment: SMTestCasesPatches.zip
Patches for JMSFlowTest
Class not found (org.apache.camel.Component) while starting servicemix-camel
component
--
Key: SM-1103
URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-1103
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-628?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_40365
]
Oleg Zhurakousky commented on SM-628:
-
Cool, but don't commit yet. I just edited my previous comment with a little
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-1103?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gert Vanthienen closed SM-1103.
---
Resolution: Cannot Reproduce
Never mind... I guess everyone is entitled to a moment of confusion
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-628?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_40366
]
Oleg Zhurakousky commented on SM-628:
-
Guillaume
Go ahead and commit if you like. I just tested it with
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-238?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ted Kirby updated GERONIMODEVTOOLS-238:
---
Attachment: GD238-2.patch
Here is a better patch file. It puts elements
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3531?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jarek Gawor resolved GERONIMO-3531.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.1
Committed fixes to trunk (revision 584194).
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3531?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jarek Gawor updated GERONIMO-3531:
--
Summary: Testsuite failure: EJB JNDI lookup fails with
java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError
On Oct 12, 2007, at 11:22 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
On Oct 12, 2007, at 1:55 PM, Jason Warner wrote:
Donald,
I'm still unsure of the status of the license files for J2G. If
we can get a confirmation that those are ok, then I'm all for
releasing a 1.0.0. Otherwise, I think we should
Donald,
I'm still unsure of the status of the license files for J2G. If we can get
a confirmation that those are ok, then I'm all for releasing a 1.0.0.
Otherwise, I think we should hold off.
~ Jason Warner
On 10/11/07, Donald Woods [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are there are any major items that
The core container has only a few dependencies: one on
org.codehaus.plexus.personality.plexus.lifecycle.phase package and
several on org.codehaus.plexus.util package, but I don't have to
include the whole plexus to make gshell run, so I'm quite happy with
that.
However, whisper heavily rely on
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-1103?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_40372
]
Guillaume Nodet commented on SM-1103:
-
Actually, this was a real problem until I fixed it a few days ago. The
I will see about adding a TransportProvider abstraction to deal with
this...
I'm flying to Hawaii this weeken for a funeral :-( But I might have
time to look into this stuff then... else when I get back.
--jason
On Oct 12, 2007, at 3:48 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
The core container
I got it working.The problem was because I didn't specified useShutDownHook
attribute in externalized activemq.xml. So activemq shutdown was happening
outside of geronimo shutdown. During shutdown activemq tries to access derby
db which was already shutdown by geronimo causing the exception.
Best
All,
I've prepared a 2.0.2 release candidate for review and vote.
http://people.apache.org/~kevan/release-votes/geronimo-2.0.2-dist/
contains the 8 Java EE and Minimal server (tar/zip and tomcat/jetty)
binaries. Here are pointers to the zip files:
On Oct 12, 2007, at 9:57 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
[ ] +1 Release Geronimo 2.0.2
[ ] 0 No opinion
[ ] -1 Do not release Geronimo 2.0.2 (please provide rationale)
Here's my +1
--kevan
I generated some graphs that represent the dependencies of the config/
modules in trunk. I thought it would be fun to share:
car-only dependencies:
http://people.apache.org/~gawor/carDeps.pdf
jar and car dependencies:
http://people.apache.org/~gawor/allDeps.pdf
rectangles represent car modules
50 matches
Mail list logo
