[jira] Created: (SM-1108) Versionning of endpoints

2007-10-17 Thread Guillaume Nodet (JIRA)
Versionning of endpoints Key: SM-1108 URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-1108 Project: ServiceMix Issue Type: New Feature Reporter: Guillaume Nodet Fix For: 4.0 As the

Re: XBean Namespaces

2007-10-17 Thread Andreas Schaefer (2)
You can find it in: ServiceMix Source Home/deployables/serviceeingines/servicemix-eip/ target/xbean/servicemix-eip.xsd Otherwise you'll find it in the root of the archive servicemix-eip- version.jar There you'll find the URL in the target namespace. Have fun Andreas Schaefer CEO of

Re: ServiceMix Bean issues with send()

2007-10-17 Thread Andreas Schaefer (2)
Hi Geeks I am moving this thread to the DEV mailing list because it not about using ServiceMix anymore. The problem is that when using the asynchronous message exchange that the response is not sent back to the calling SU but to the Provider Endpoint of the called SU. I just keep on

Re: XBean Namespaces

2007-10-17 Thread Gordon Dickens
Thanks Andreas! Andreas Schaefer (2) wrote: You can find it in: ServiceMix Source Home/deployables/serviceeingines/servicemix-eip/target/xbean/servicemix-eip.xsd Otherwise you'll find it in the root of the archive servicemix-eip-version.jar There you'll find the URL in the target

Re: ServiceNames and EndPoints

2007-10-17 Thread Guillaume Nodet
Only one, and you can not control which one in a standard JBI way. However, ServiceMix has a notion of Endpoint resolver and policy, but these are currently configured at the container level. On 10/18/07, Gordon Dickens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, If I have a 2 services defined with the

[jira] Created: (SM-1109) attachment should be supported in cxf se and bc

2007-10-17 Thread Freeman Fang (JIRA)
attachment should be supported in cxf se and bc --- Key: SM-1109 URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-1109 Project: ServiceMix Issue Type: Improvement Components:

Re: allowHosts in geronimo 2.0.1

2007-10-17 Thread Ashish Jain
Any help on this issue On 10/16/07, Ashish Jain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I am trying to simulate the allowHosts feature for geronimo 2.0.1 which was available in geronimo 1.2. With geronimo 1.2 it works fine and I am able to restrict access to EJB application running on the

Effectiveness of WADI's Design and Implementation Comforted

2007-10-17 Thread Gianny Damour
Hi, Over the last two weeks, I have been working on various experimentations in order to validate and demonstrate the effectiveness of WADI's distributed session engine and replication engine. I wrote a WIKI page to capture the findings:

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-3533) monitoring pluging: cleanup poms

2007-10-17 Thread Anita Kulshreshtha (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3533?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12535540 ] Anita Kulshreshtha commented on GERONIMO-3533: -- Patch applied in rev 585475 monitoring pluging:

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-3520) missing jsr-77 stats for JTA

2007-10-17 Thread Anita Kulshreshtha (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3520?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12535556 ] Anita Kulshreshtha commented on GERONIMO-3520: -- Txmaanger patch applied to rev 584554 at

Re: allowHosts in geronimo 2.0.1

2007-10-17 Thread Kevan Miller
On Oct 17, 2007, at 3:06 AM, Ashish Jain wrote: Any help on this issue On 10/16/07, Ashish Jain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I am trying to simulate the allowHosts feature for geronimo 2.0.1 which was available in geronimo 1.2. With geronimo 1.2 it works fine and I am able to

[BUILD] 2.1: Failed for Revision: 585476

2007-10-17 Thread prasad
OpenEJB trunk at 585399 Geronimo Revision: 585476 built with tests included See the full build-0900.log file at http://people.apache.org/~prasad/binaries/trunk/20071017/build-0900.log [INFO] ... SUCCESS (0:00:06.992) [INFO] [INFO

Re: Effectiveness of WADI's Design and Implementation Comforted

2007-10-17 Thread Jeff Genender
Gianny Damour wrote: Hi, Over the last two weeks, I have been working on various experimentations in order to validate and demonstrate the effectiveness of WADI's distributed session engine and replication engine. I wrote a WIKI page to capture the findings:

trying to build 2.0 - missing xbean-naming jar?

2007-10-17 Thread toby cabot
Hi Folks, I'm trying to build the 2.0 branch from scratch and have hit a snag because of a jar that Maven can't find. I checked out the 2.0 branch (Revision: 585448), upgraded to Maven 2.0.7, removed ~/.m2, and tried to build. It fails in configs/client-corba-yoko because it can't find

Re: trying to build 2.0 - missing xbean-naming jar?

2007-10-17 Thread Matt Hogstrom
Tony, OpenEJB uses svn for a private repo to stabilize their release. The jars you are looking for are located at http://svn.apache.org/repos/ asf/openejb/repo/org/apache/xbean/xbean-naming/ Adding the following repo should fix the problem http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openejb/repo/ On

Re: allowHosts in geronimo 2.0.1

2007-10-17 Thread Ashish Jain
Hi Kevan, It would be great if we can have allowHosts feature back in AG. Shall I open a jira for this issue? Thanks Ashish On 10/17/07, Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Oct 17, 2007, at 3:06 AM, Ashish Jain wrote: Any help on this issue On 10/16/07, Ashish Jain

Re: jetty jee5 assembly broken in branches/2.0

2007-10-17 Thread Jarek Gawor
Any more thoughts on this, especially on the current thread pool behavior? Jarek On 10/9/07, Jarek Gawor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 10/9/07, Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Jarek, Thanks for tracking this down. 50 threads per connector seems like overkill to me. It's dependent

Re: jetty jee5 assembly broken in branches/2.0

2007-10-17 Thread Matt Hogstrom
Disabling AJP by default makes a lot of sense. Users that are interested will seek it out. I think 25 threads per core as a default makes sense as a good starting point. Assuming most people would run a 4-way for production a default in the thread pool like 100 is a good starting

[RESULT] Geronimo 2.0.2 (rc1)

2007-10-17 Thread Kevan Miller
All, This vote has passed with a unanimous 17 +1 votes. Thanks all. Will start pushing binaries... --kevan On Oct 12, 2007, at 9:57 PM, Kevan Miller wrote: All, I've prepared a 2.0.2 release candidate for review and vote. http://people.apache.org/~kevan/release-votes/geronimo-2.0.2-dist/

[jira] Created: (GERONIMODEVTOOLS-246) Classpath Container Extension Point

2007-10-17 Thread Tim McConnell (JIRA)
Classpath Container Extension Point --- Key: GERONIMODEVTOOLS-246 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-246 Project: Geronimo-Devtools Issue Type: New Feature Components:

Re: allowHosts in geronimo 2.0.1

2007-10-17 Thread Kevan Miller
On Oct 17, 2007, at 10:54 AM, Ashish Jain wrote: Hi Kevan, It would be great if we can have allowHosts feature back in AG. Shall I open a jira for this issue? Hi Ashish, Yes, thanks. That would be helpful. --kevan

[jira] Closed: (GERONIMO-3428) Update user documentation in Create Plan portlet's jsp files

2007-10-17 Thread Shiva Kumar H R (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3428?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Shiva Kumar H R closed GERONIMO-3428. - Resolution: Fixed Completed: At revision: 585559 Update user documentation in

[jira] Resolved: (GERONIMO-3520) missing jsr-77 stats for JTA

2007-10-17 Thread Viet Hung Nguyen (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3520?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Viet Hung Nguyen resolved GERONIMO-3520. Resolution: Fixed missing jsr-77 stats for JTA

[jira] Resolved: (GERONIMO-3533) monitoring pluging: cleanup poms

2007-10-17 Thread Viet Hung Nguyen (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3533?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Viet Hung Nguyen resolved GERONIMO-3533. Resolution: Fixed monitoring pluging: cleanup poms

[jira] Created: (GERONIMO-3534) allowHosts attribute unavailable in geronimo 2.0.1

2007-10-17 Thread Ashish Jain (JIRA)
allowHosts attribute unavailable in geronimo 2.0.1 -- Key: GERONIMO-3534 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3534 Project: Geronimo Issue Type: New Feature Security

[jira] Created: (GERONIMO-3535) monitoring plugin: collecting agent needs to be secured

2007-10-17 Thread Viet Hung Nguyen (JIRA)
monitoring plugin: collecting agent needs to be secured --- Key: GERONIMO-3535 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3535 Project: Geronimo Issue Type: Improvement

[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-3535) monitoring plugin: collecting agent needs to be secured

2007-10-17 Thread Viet Hung Nguyen (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3535?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Viet Hung Nguyen updated GERONIMO-3535: --- Attachment: geronimo-3535.patch This patch secures the MRC EJB, and allows for it

[jira] Closed: (GERONIMO-3516) Replace the administration console with the new extensible version

2007-10-17 Thread Paul McMahan (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3516?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Paul McMahan closed GERONIMO-3516. -- Resolution: Fixed Replace the administration console with the new extensible version

[jira] Closed: (GERONIMO-3509) copy the extensible administration console plugin into the server project

2007-10-17 Thread Paul McMahan (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3509?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Paul McMahan closed GERONIMO-3509. -- Resolution: Fixed copy the extensible administration console plugin into the server

XBean Namespaces

2007-10-17 Thread Gordon Dickens
To better understand XBeans, I wanted to understand where or how the namespace is defined for each service type (binding component/service engine). For example: For the servicemix-eip wiretap, I see in the org.apache.servicemix.eip.patterns.WireTap.java class that the xbean is defined as

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-3535) monitoring plugin: collecting agent needs to be secured

2007-10-17 Thread Anita Kulshreshtha (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3535?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12535814 ] Anita Kulshreshtha commented on GERONIMO-3535: -- Patch applied in rev 585796 monitoring plugin:

[jira] Resolved: (GERONIMO-3309) Add missing LICENSE.txt and NOTICE.txt files to the J2G conversion tool

2007-10-17 Thread Lin Sun (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3309?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Lin Sun resolved GERONIMO-3309. --- Resolution: Fixed Made more changes in rev 585796 + 585797. Added Dom4j, pull-paser, and jaxen

Re: [Discuss] Remaining work items before we create a J2G 1.0.0 branch?

2007-10-17 Thread Lin Sun
Hi Kevan, I've marked G3309 as resolved. I documented my analysis in the latest few comments I added in the JIRA. If there is anything else that is missing from a legal point of view, please let me know. Thanks, Lin Kevan Miller wrote: On Oct 12, 2007, at 1:55 PM, Jason Warner wrote:

[jira] Resolved: (GERONIMO-3535) monitoring plugin: collecting agent needs to be secured

2007-10-17 Thread Viet Hung Nguyen (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3535?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Viet Hung Nguyen resolved GERONIMO-3535. Resolution: Fixed monitoring plugin: collecting agent needs to be secured