[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-5325) iframe causes some portlets display incorrectly

2010-06-11 Thread Rex Wang (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5325?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12877725#action_12877725 ] Rex Wang commented on GERONIMO-5325: I think it's pretty hard to replace the iframe

Re: [jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-5325) iframe causes some portlets display incorrectly

2010-06-11 Thread Ben Liang
Actuall, now every time reload the page the navagation tree node will open according to the url. I think the user may want to check a portlet and those portlets in the same group. So if we have made a good category then the user will feel it easy to find the related portlets. On Fri, Jun 11,

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-5376) OpenEJB failover failed

2010-06-11 Thread Ivan (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5376?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12877737#action_12877737 ] Ivan commented on GERONIMO-5376: 1. I opened a JIRA OpenEJB-1297, and David has kindly

[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-5325) iframe causes some portlets display incorrectly

2010-06-11 Thread Ben Liang (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5325?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ben Liang updated GERONIMO-5325: Attachment: Two scroll bars.jpg iframe causes some portlets display incorrectly

Re: [jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-5325) iframe causes some portlets display incorrectly

2010-06-11 Thread Rex Wang
Yes, Ben and I have noticed the context problem of the dojo tree, and IMHO the current solution is acceptable :-) It's really boring in fixing such small bugs in console after pulling in the iframe, That should not be the focus of our geronimo. Besides the issues we list in the jira, I also found

Re: Release new javamail components.

2010-06-11 Thread Ivan
Seems that the parent pom of all the java mail modules is still genesis-java5-flava, I am thinking that we still need to compile the artifacts with Java 5 ? I tried to compile the modules with Java 5, but get some errors, with Java 6, all build OK. 2010/6/9 Rick McGuire rick...@gmail.com This

[WS-Security] Axis2/Tomcat (patches available)

2010-06-11 Thread rahul.soa
Hello Devs, As you know, I worked on enabling ws-security in CXF/Jetty last year during my Google Summer of Code (its still going via jira GERONIMO-4642). I have been trying to understand the Axis2/tomcat part in Geronimo in past several days. I thought of starting some work on it. Hence I

[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-5325) iframe causes some portlets display incorrectly

2010-06-11 Thread Rex Wang (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5325?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Rex Wang updated GERONIMO-5325: --- Attachment: screenshot-timeout.jpg iframe causes some portlets display incorrectly

[BUILD] branches/2.1: Failed for Revision: 953558

2010-06-11 Thread gawor
Geronimo Revision: 953558 built with tests included See the full build-0200.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.1/20100611/build-0200.log Download the binaries from http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.1/20100611 [INFO] BUILD

[BUILD] trunk: Failed for Revision: 953585

2010-06-11 Thread gawor
Geronimo Revision: 953585 built with tests included See the full build-0300.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20100611/build-0300.log Download the binaries from http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20100611 [INFO] BUILD

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-5325) iframe causes some portlets display incorrectly

2010-06-11 Thread Shawn Jiang (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5325?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=1280#action_1280 ] Shawn Jiang commented on GERONIMO-5325: --- Fixed the problems described in this

Release new javamail components -- second attempt

2010-06-11 Thread Rick McGuire
This is a bug fix release to fix a major problem with using the javamail code on EBCDIC-based platforms. The JIRA in question is https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5326 The second attempt version also corrects the Java 5 compilation errors encountered with the first attempt.

[BUILD] branches/2.2: Failed for Revision: 953665

2010-06-11 Thread gawor
Geronimo Revision: 953665 built with tests included See the full build-0800.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20100611/build-0800.log See the unit test reports at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20100611/unit-test-reports

Re: Release new javamail components -- second attempt

2010-06-11 Thread Donald Woods
+1 Built both artifacts from source. Jars contained correct looking License/Notice files. RAT returned some hits, but they were not new files and were mostly for provider and test files. Can we get some excludes added for future releases? -Donald On 6/11/10 6:57 AM, Rick McGuire wrote: This

Re: [VOTE] Geronimo 3.0-M1 release - 3rd attempt

2010-06-11 Thread Donald Woods
+1 as I think the below issues are acceptable for a milestone release. Was able to build the tag and start the Tomcat Java EE 6 server. -Donald On 6/10/10 4:29 PM, Jarek Gawor wrote: +0.5 M1 is affected by GERONIMO-5336. All services will most likely bind to the local loopback device

Re: [VOTE] Geronimo 3.0-M1 release - 3rd attempt

2010-06-11 Thread Vamsavardhana Reddy
Donald, I am unable to build the tag starting with an empty maven repo. I tried with Maven-2.2.1 as well as Maven-3.0-beta1. I am using Sun JDK 1.6.0_20. Which version of Sun JDK and Maven have you used to build the tag? On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 5:43 PM, Donald Woods dwo...@apache.org wrote:

Re: [VOTE] Geronimo 3.0-M1 release - 3rd attempt

2010-06-11 Thread Donald Woods
Those versions on Mac What problem did you encounter? Did you run the bootstrap build first? mvn install -Dstage=bootstrap mvn install -Donald On 6/11/10 12:33 PM, Vamsavardhana Reddy wrote: Donald, I am unable to build the tag starting with an empty maven repo. I tried with

Re: [VOTE] Geronimo 3.0-M1 release - 3rd attempt

2010-06-11 Thread Vamsavardhana Reddy
Ah... missed the bootstrap build step :D . The build seems to run fine now. Will post again if it fails. Thanks Donald. On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 10:47 PM, Donald Woods dwo...@apache.org wrote: Those versions on Mac What problem did you encounter? Did you run the bootstrap build first?

[BUILD] branches/2.2: Failed for Revision: 953780

2010-06-11 Thread gawor
Geronimo Revision: 953780 built with tests included See the full build-1400.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20100611/build-1400.log See the unit test reports at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20100611/unit-test-reports

svn problems

2010-06-11 Thread Rick McGuire
I'm seeing some serious problems accessing svn right now, and unfortunately, I think this might have messed some things up. I was using the release plugin to create a branch from the 2.2 tag, and received the following error while attempting to create the branch version from the modified tag

[BUILD] trunk: Failed for Revision: 953836

2010-06-11 Thread gawor
Geronimo Revision: 953836 built with tests included See the full build-1500.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20100611/build-1500.log Download the binaries from http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20100611 [INFO] BUILD

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-5091) Bundlize the yoko jar files.

2010-06-11 Thread David Jencks (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5091?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12878143#action_12878143 ] David Jencks commented on GERONIMO-5091: I have been told that there's a good

[BUILD] branches/2.2: Failed for Revision: 953904

2010-06-11 Thread gawor
Geronimo Revision: 953904 built with tests included See the full build-2000.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20100611/build-2000.log Download the binaries from http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20100611 [INFO] BUILD

[jira] Created: (GERONIMO-5380) Optionally expose gbeans in the osgi serviice registry

2010-06-11 Thread David Jencks (JIRA)
Optionally expose gbeans in the osgi serviice registry -- Key: GERONIMO-5380 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5380 Project: Geronimo Issue Type: New Feature

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-5376) OpenEJB failover failed

2010-06-11 Thread viola.lu (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5376?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12878191#action_12878191 ] viola.lu commented on GERONIMO-5376: Paste a post on openejb dev mail list about

[BUILD] trunk: Failed for Revision: 953918

2010-06-11 Thread gawor
Geronimo Revision: 953918 built with tests included See the full build-2100.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20100611/build-2100.log Download the binaries from http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20100611 [INFO] BUILD

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-5376) OpenEJB failover failed

2010-06-11 Thread Ivan (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5376?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12878192#action_12878192 ] Ivan commented on GERONIMO-5376: a. If you program the url like

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-5376) OpenEJB failover failed

2010-06-11 Thread viola.lu (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5376?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12878194#action_12878194 ] viola.lu commented on GERONIMO-5376: Some adjustification of description here: I

[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-5376) OpenEJB failover failed

2010-06-11 Thread viola.lu (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5376?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] viola.lu updated GERONIMO-5376: --- Description: Server 1: window 2003, viola-dev Server 2: suse 10 sp2, suse10sp268 Server 3: redhat

[jira] Created: (GERONIMO-5381) Monitoring can not open graphs

2010-06-11 Thread Ben Liang (JIRA)
Monitoring can not open graphs -- Key: GERONIMO-5381 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5381 Project: Geronimo Issue Type: Bug Security Level: public (Regular issues) Components:

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-5381) Monitoring can not open graphs

2010-06-11 Thread Ben Liang (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5381?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12878197#action_12878197 ] Ben Liang commented on GERONIMO-5381: - Hi all, This problem not always occurs,

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-5380) Optionally expose gbeans in the osgi serviice registry

2010-06-11 Thread David Jencks (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5380?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12878205#action_12878205 ] David Jencks commented on GERONIMO-5380: Conversely we can provide some base