[Request] Geronimo Confluence admin right

Hi, I found that some members of the same timezone with me are working on the Geronimo docs, and could anyone help to grant me the admin right for Geronimo confluence, so that I could trigger the async process quickly and aslo grant permissions to those guys who would like contribute to the

XA_RBROLLBACK Exception when using Derby in transaction.roolback()

Hi, I encournter a problem when run the app in the G-3.0-SANPSHOT. In the app, I used Datasource DS-A and Datasource DS-B to link two derby database. If UserTransaction.rollback() called, the server occured error: org.apache.derby.client.am.XaException: XA_RBROLLBACK : Error executing a

[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-5520) managedbean1.0 javax.annotation.ManagedBean

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5520?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] janel Zhang updated GERONIMO-5520: -- Attachment: managedbean1.0-test.patch The testsuite

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-5152) Transaction manager doesn't retry stuff that might work later

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5152?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12897169#action_12897169 ] David Jencks commented on GERONIMO-5152: rev 984318 ports rev 939929 to branches

[BUILD] trunk: Failed for Revision: 984309

Geronimo Revision: 984309 built with tests included See the full build-0300.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20100811/build-0300.log See the unit test reports at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20100811/unit-test

[BUILD] branches/2.2: Failed for Revision: 984267

Geronimo Revision: 984267 built with tests included See the full build-2000.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20100811/build-2000.log Download the binaries from http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20100811 [INFO] BUILD

What happened to Geronimo plugins in 3.0

Hi devs, I'm trying to sort out how the geronimo plugin works in 3.0 and what the differences are comparing to the ones in the previous version. After reading some code and JIRAs, I'm quite confused, such as * is a geronimo-plugin.xml file required any longer? * what's relationship

Geronimo Server Trunk - Compilation Errors shown in Eclipse workspace

Hi, After building the Geronimo 3.0 trunk, I see some errors shown in Eclipse when I import the projects into workspace. The following are few such. 1) Error: The blank final field parameterTypes may not have been initialized Source location: Line 82 in

Re: [Request] Geronimo Confluence admin right

Hi Ivan, You should be all set. --kevan On Aug 11, 2010, at 3:12 AM, Ivan wrote: Hi, I found that some members of the same timezone with me are working on the Geronimo docs, and could anyone help to grant me the admin right for Geronimo confluence, so that I could trigger the async

[jira] Assigned: (GERONIMO-5503) Run geronimo as Linux service update

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5503?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] viola.lu reassigned GERONIMO-5503: -- Assignee: Forrest Xia (was: viola.lu) Pls apply it, thanks Run geronimo as Linux service

[DISCUSS] Policy for granting access to Geronimo TCK materials

All, Our policy for granting access to the Geronimo TCK test harness is described here -- https://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxPMGT/geronimo-project-policies.html#GeronimoProjectPolicies-AccesstoTCK The policy describes a 72 hour waiting period when granting non-Geronimo committers read-only access to

Re: XA_RBROLLBACK Exception when using Derby in transaction.roolback()

U r using wrong url. Both the url point to same database. This is what seems to be happening. A single transaction has been started which is being committed twice. If using xa u need two physically different databases. Hope this helps. Cheers, Sandip Sent from my “contract free” BlackBerry®

Re: Geronimo Server Trunk - Compilation Errors shown in Eclipse workspace

I don't have any answers. IIRC, this doesn't stop you from using eclipse. I always build outside of my IDE, anyway... There are newer versions of Eclipse. Current is Helios (3.6). Good chance that at least some of your problems are fixed... On Aug 11, 2010, at 7:28 AM, Vamsavardhana Reddy

[discuss]atinject tck

Hi I have been investigating how to run the JSR 330 tck (also called the atinject tck), as this is a requirement for Java EE 6 compliance. I am able to check out the open web bean project and run its atinject tck from the open web bean project checkout dir, using the atinject tck runner provided

[BUILD] trunk: Failed for Revision: 984396

Geronimo Revision: 984396 built with tests included See the full build-0900.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20100811/build-0900.log See the unit test reports at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20100811/unit-test

[jira] Created: (GERONIMO-5521) NoClassDefFoundError when deploying a datasource with non-OSGi jdbc lib dependencies

NoClassDefFoundError when deploying a datasource with non-OSGi jdbc lib dependencies Key: GERONIMO-5521 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5521

plugins\aries\geronimo-aries-builder compile error in trunk

Hi, dev: I met compile error when build module plugins\aries\geronimo-aries-builder under g 3.0 trunk: its org.apache.geronimo.aries.builder.GeronimoApplication class file, *new SimpleBundleInfo(applicationFactory, bm, url.toExternalForm())); * is undefined, which should be changed to *new

[jira] Assigned: (GERONIMO-5509) Invalid deployment descriptor error: cvc-attribute.4: The value '2.0' does not equal the fixed value '1.0' of attribute 'version'

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5509?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] viola.lu reassigned GERONIMO-5509: -- Assignee: viola.lu Invalid deployment descriptor error: cvc-attribute.4: The value '2.0'

Re: [DISCUSS] Policy for granting access to Geronimo TCK materials

I agree we should drop the waiting period. thanks david jencks On Aug 11, 2010, at 5:07 AM, Kevan Miller wrote: All, Our policy for granting access to the Geronimo TCK test harness is described here --

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-5509) Invalid deployment descriptor error: cvc-attribute.4: The value '2.0' does not equal the fixed value '1.0' of attribute 'version'

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5509?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12897289#action_12897289 ] viola.lu commented on GERONIMO-5509: This defect is related with jira:

[BUILD] branches/2.2: Failed for Revision: 984384

Geronimo Revision: 984384 built with tests included See the full build-0800.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20100811/build-0800.log Download the binaries from http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20100811 [INFO] BUILD

Re: [DISCUSS] Policy for granting access to Geronimo TCK materials

Agree to drop the 72 hour wait, as once the signed NDA is on file there should be no further delays required. -Donald On 8/11/10 8:07 AM, Kevan Miller wrote: All, Our policy for granting access to the Geronimo TCK test harness is described here --

Re: plugins\aries\geronimo-aries-builder compile error in trunk

I'll get this resolved. Jarek On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 10:37 AM, viola lu viola...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, dev:  I met compile error when build module plugins\aries\geronimo-aries-builder under g 3.0 trunk: its org.apache.geronimo.aries.builder.GeronimoApplication class file,    new

Re: XA_RBROLLBACK Exception when using Derby in transaction.roolback()

I use DataSourceDefinition(name=java:app/SHAcc) link to url=jdbc:derby://localhost:1527/SHAcc, DataSourceDefinition(name=java:app/BJAcc)link to another url=jdbc:derby://localhost:1527/BJAcc, so they point to two different databases. The transaction can commit correctly. The problem

Re: JCDI and Bean Validation TCKs

For the Bean Validation TCK, I compared the content that gets downloaded from the JBoss maven repo to the 1.0.3 content provided from Oracle and they were identical. Not sure what that means for final JEE6 certification, but I don't see how they can tell from the logs which set of artifacts were

Re: [DISCUSS] Policy for granting access to Geronimo TCK materials

I agree seems like it isn't necessary and we might as well be consistent. Joe On 8/11/10 8:07 AM, Kevan Miller wrote: All, Our policy for granting access to the Geronimo TCK test harness is described here --

Re: [discuss]atinject tck

It looks like the same general setup as the BVAL tck, in that it uses the surefire plugin and a suiteXmlFiles which is either provided in the downloaded TCK files or provided locally (which I don't think we can use the open web beans overrides unless we have TCK challenges approved by Oracle.)

Re: XA_RBROLLBACK Exception when using Derby in transaction.roolback()

You should be able to use two datasources on one database. It's a bit odd but we should be able to handle it. It's more plausible to get in this situation with a jms provider where you have inbound and outbound messaging, geronimo will treat the inbound XAResource and outbound XAResource as

Re: [discuss]atinject tck

Donald, As Lin pointed out the atinject is a bit different. Both JCDI and Bean Validation TCKs can be run in standalone and in-container mode. For Geronimo we run them in in-container mode. However, the atinject TCK seems to only support the standalone mode. So the question is, is it enough to

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-5519) Transaction recovery might commit the wrong branch on an XAResource

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5519?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12897336#action_12897336 ] David Jencks commented on GERONIMO-5519: Likely fix for this committed: 2.1

Re: [discuss]atinject tck

Hi Donald Thanks for the reply. I am not familar with BVAL tck. Can you point me the suiteXmlFiles? Also does the BVAL tck provides a valid archive to be deployed to a App server? Please see more comments in line. Lin On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 12:06 PM, Donald Woods dwo...@apache.org wrote:

Re: [discuss]atinject tck

BTW, I found this - http://groups.google.com/group/atinject-observer/browse_thread/thread/6eb81864296495e3/7834cf0821c8f358?#7834cf0821c8f358 I think the instruction were from the authors of the tck, while they gave examples of running this tck by itself with the injector, which in our case is

Re: [discuss]atinject tck

Yep, finally found the OWB email talking about the TCKs (see Q/A #3) - http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/openwebbeans-dev/201001.mbox/%3c683599.32550...@web38207.mail.mud.yahoo.com%3e For build automation, I'd prefer we have copies of these OWB TCK projects in our own svn in the

Re: [discuss]atinject tck

On 8/11/10 12:58 PM, Lin Sun wrote: Hi Donald Thanks for the reply. I am not familar with BVAL tck. Can you point me the suiteXmlFiles? After running the validator-tck-runner, take a look at - target/dependency/jsr303-tck-suite.xml Also does the BVAL tck provides a valid

Re: What happened to Geronimo plugins in 3.0

Hi Jeff, Thanks for nudging me to try to answer some of these questions. I've been meaning to for a long time. First of all, in my mind, most of the basic infrastructure in geronimo trunk is in a temporary state of transition. My eventual goals include - using osgi services for all

Transaction manager versions

I'm not sure we have plausible versions for our tm components. trunk is at 3.1-SNAPSHOT has has (same as the released 3.0) improved recovery support which required an api change and also supports j2ca 1.6 which extends j2ca 1.5. I'm not sure if this means we extended the geronimo APIs that

[jira] Created: (GERONIMO-5522) ActiveMQ + OSGi XML xBean configuration problem

ActiveMQ + OSGi XML xBean configuration problem --- Key: GERONIMO-5522 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5522 Project: Geronimo Issue Type: Bug Security Level: public

Re: [discuss]atinject tck

Thanks for the link - that is rather detailed and matches what I discovered so far. I have no prob in having their tck runner in our tck dir. I'll work on that. Lin On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 3:16 PM, Donald Woods dwo...@apache.org wrote: Yep, finally found the OWB email talking about the TCKs

[BUILD] trunk: Failed for Revision: 984538

Geronimo Revision: 984538 built with tests included See the full build-1500.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20100811/build-1500.log Download the binaries from http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20100811 [INFO] BUILD

Re: JCDI and Bean Validation TCKs

The BVAL and JCDI builds have now been updated to allow extracting Geronimo assemblies into the target directory for automated testing. mvn test -Pincontainer,geronimo-assembly -DassemblyId=tomcat7-javaee6 Note, that the assemblyIds are different from the ones defined in the parent server POM,

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-5522) ActiveMQ + OSGi XML xBean configuration problem

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5522?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12897456#action_12897456 ] David Jencks commented on GERONIMO-5522: I doubt we can help you with this

Re: Transaction manager versions

On Aug 11, 2010, at 3:58 PM, David Jencks wrote: I'm not sure we have plausible versions for our tm components. trunk is at 3.1-SNAPSHOT has has (same as the released 3.0) improved recovery support which required an api change and also supports j2ca 1.6 which extends j2ca 1.5. I'm not

[BUILD] branches/2.2: Failed for Revision: 984494

Geronimo Revision: 984494 built with tests included See the full build-1400.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20100811/build-1400.log Download the binaries from http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20100811 [INFO] BUILD

Re: Re: XA_RBROLLBACK Exception when using Derby in transaction.roolback()

Hi David, Below is the stack trance: 2010-08-12 09:21:23,585 WARN [Transaction] Error ending association for XAResource org.apache.geronimo.transaction.manager.wrappernamedxaresou...@1e77734; transaction will roll back. XA error code: 100 org.apache.derby.client.am.XaException:

[jira] Created: (GERONIMO-5523) Add testsuite for JTA 1.1

Add testsuite for JTA 1.1 - Key: GERONIMO-5523 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5523 Project: Geronimo Issue Type: Task Security Level: public (Regular issues) Components: testsuite

Re: [VOTE] maven-plugins 1.1 for Geronimo Eclipse Plugin (2nd try)

my own +1 for it 2010/8/11 Delos dait...@gmail.com Hi all, This is the second try for releasing maven-plugins 1.1 used by GEP. I have created the buildable source distribution for it. As part of GEP, maven-eclipsepde-plugin helps to convert eclipse plugins to maven dependencies and add

[BUILD] trunk: Failed for Revision: 984624

Geronimo Revision: 984624 built with tests included See the full build-2100.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20100811/build-2100.log Download the binaries from http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20100811 [INFO] BUILD

[jira] Created: (GERONIMO-5524) Security annotation on EJB testsuite:javax.annotation.security.RunAs RolesAllowed PermitAll DenyAll DeclareRoles

Security annotation on EJB testsuite:javax.annotation.security.RunAs RolesAllowed PermitAll DenyAll DeclareRoles Key: GERONIMO-5524 URL:

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-5524) Security annotation on EJB testsuite:javax.annotation.security.RunAs RolesAllowed PermitAll DenyAll DeclareRoles

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5524?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12897586#action_12897586 ] janel Zhang commented on GERONIMO-5524: --- The testsuite test for security

[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-5524) Security annotation on EJB testsuite:javax.annotation.security.RunAs RolesAllowed PermitAll DenyAll DeclareRoles

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5524?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] janel Zhang updated GERONIMO-5524: -- Attachment: test-security-annotation-ejb.patch Security annotation on EJB