Re: Move other repos to gitbox?

Of course I assume it was only intended to migrate *active* projects over to git. LieGrue,strub On Tuesday, 20 March 2018, 16:15:54 CET, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: +0 (not sure it brings much but no issue if you have time to do it) we surely want to ensure what

Re: Move other repos to gitbox?

+0 (not sure it brings much but no issue if you have time to do it) we surely want to ensure what we import is maintained though - ie dont migrate G server ;). Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog

Re: Move other repos to gitbox?

good idea, +1 txs and LieGrue,strub On Tuesday, 20 March 2018, 15:15:53 CET, John D. Ament wrote: Since the JCS code is now on gitbox, how do others feel about moving the other git repos into gitbox?  And possibly even converting config into gitbox?

Re: simple-jcache?

Ok, fair enough. On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 10:07 AM Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > No, > > I basically took some time this morning to start from the jcs-jcache code > and remove jcs dependency using part of the patch i submitted earlier. So > 100% developped here. > > > Romain

Move other repos to gitbox?

Since the JCS code is now on gitbox, how do others feel about moving the other git repos into gitbox? And possibly even converting config into gitbox?

Re: simple-jcache?

No all written here, really ;)Would Romain probably take longer to look up a good impl than to hack it quickly himself :D txs and LieGrue,strub On Tuesday, 20 March 2018, 15:06:06 CET, John D. Ament wrote: So it was developed entirely here? I guess its ok,

Re: simple-jcache?

No, I basically took some time this morning to start from the jcs-jcache code and remove jcs dependency using part of the patch i submitted earlier. So 100% developped here. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog

Re: simple-jcache?

So it was developed entirely here? I guess its ok, it looked like it was imported from some other repo. On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 10:03 AM Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > Hmm, this is all code I wrote @asf ( > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCS-127 + JCS/jcache code) so

Re: [VOTE] Release XBean 4.7 (take 2)

Thanks John, and also thanks for taking a very in depth look at even the details! And here is my own +1 as well. LieGrue,strub On Tuesday, 20 March 2018, 14:49:56 CET, John D. Ament wrote: On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 6:11 PM Romain Manni-Bucau

Re: simple-jcache?

Hmm, this is all code I wrote @asf (https://issues.apache.org/ jira/browse/JCS-127 + JCS/jcache code) so nothing to clear normally. It is different from a donation from a legal perspective. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau | Blog

Re: simple-jcache?

WTF..iddlesticks why? are we going crazy? This is brand new code written by Romain. So why do we need any IP clearing? This is OUR VERY OWN CODE! On Tuesday, 20 March 2018, 14:56:33 CET, John D. Ament wrote: Don't forget that code imports need to go through IP

Re: simple-jcache?

Don't forget that code imports need to go through IP clearance via incubator. On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 2:21 PM Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > Hi guys, > > wonder if there would be some objection to create a geronimo-jcache-simple > project? > > it would host a jcache

Re: simple-jcache?

created and initial import done https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=geronimo-jcache-simple.git;a=commit;h=e104016642f0eafbb58822ec79b82adea6c10239 there are a lot of enhancements possible but this is a start we can rely on probably Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau

Re: jaxrs 2.1 fix

LGTM On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 4:15 AM Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > Hi guys, > > fixed this morning an issue in our jaxrs 2.1 jar which was not handling a > nested SPI (SseEventSource$Builder) correctly - the $ was converted to a .. > > Also changed the default (spec API) to

Re: [VOTE] Release XBean 4.7 (take 2)

On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 6:11 PM Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > > > Le 19 mars 2018 20:20, "John D. Ament" a écrit : > > The check in the build is that there's a NOTICE file available, and if its > there you should use that. > > Realistically what I

Re: jaxrs 2.1 fix

sounds fine. LieGrue,strub On Tuesday, 20 March 2018, 09:15:20 CET, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: Hi guys, fixed this morning an issue in our jaxrs 2.1 jar which was not handling a nested SPI (SseEventSource$Builder) correctly - the $ was converted to a .. Also

jaxrs 2.1 fix

Hi guys, fixed this morning an issue in our jaxrs 2.1 jar which was not handling a nested SPI (SseEventSource$Builder) correctly - the $ was converted to a .. Also changed the default (spec API) to an implementation (cxf) to ensure it loads something OOTB. Let me know if there is any issue.

[jira] [Resolved] (GERONIMO-6602) jaxrs 2.1 API doesnt handle SseBuilder SPI correctly

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6602?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Romain Manni-Bucau resolved GERONIMO-6602. -- Resolution: Fixed > jaxrs 2.1 API doesnt handle SseBuilder SPI correctly >

[jira] [Created] (GERONIMO-6602) jaxrs 2.1 API doesnt handle SseBuilder SPI correctly

Romain Manni-Bucau created GERONIMO-6602: Summary: jaxrs 2.1 API doesnt handle SseBuilder SPI correctly Key: GERONIMO-6602 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6602 Project: