I am supportive of Erik's suggestion. I am absolutely against a
process involving the submission of an iCLA.
Is a checkbox really required? Isn't a disclaimer enough to protect
IP rights?
Thanks,
Gianny
On 17/04/2008, at 4:01 AM, Jason Warner wrote:
I'd be more inclined to do something
Hi,
It would be great to have only one TCP/IP connection opened between
an EJB client and the EJB server and this across multiple requests.
My understanding is that at the moment a TCP/IP connection is
negotiated for each EJB request which is very expensive especially
based on the rather
Sorry for this mistake. It is now fixed.
Thanks for having reported it.
Gianny
On 15/04/2008, at 5:04 AM, Donald Woods wrote:
Is there a reason you only updated wadi-aop to 2.0-M10 and not the
rest of the WADI artifacts?
-Donald
Hello Hernan,
I will work on WADI clustering over the week-end. FWIW, this WIKI
page, http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDEV/clustering-configuration-for-
jetty.html, describes how to set-up WADI clustering. I will also
address farming and remote node management features.
Sorry for not having
Hello Joe,
It is a change intended for the 2.1 branch as I would like G 2.1.1 to
use WADI 2.0-M10.
It fixes a replication bug: the dirty flag of a session is reset when
a null value is retrieved from a session. As a consequence, session
state updates are not pushed to replication peers
Ooops. Sorry for that and thanks for your gentle nudge. This is now
fixed.
Thanks,
Gianny
On 10/04/2008, at 3:08 AM, Joe Bohn wrote:
Jarek Gawor wrote:
Gianny,
Can you please take a look at these failures? The tests have been
failing since your commit on the 5th.
Jarek
BTW, the same is
issues)
Components: core
Affects Versions: 2.1
Reporter: Gianny Damour
Assignee: Gianny Damour
Fix For: 2.2
Annotation based approach to create the GBeanInfo of a GBean.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3952?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gianny Damour closed GERONIMO-3952.
---
Resolution: Fixed
This is now implemented.
Definition of GBeanInfo via annotations
On 01/04/2008, at 7:52 AM, David Blevins wrote:
On Mar 31, 2008, at 5:37 AM, Gianny Damour wrote:
From: David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
1. I think we should try harder to separate the identification of
a constructor parameter as attribute or reference from
identifying its name. So, I
Hi,
Sorry for starting another thread (I deleted the initial thread and
had to start another one).
From: Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Looks cool. Only question I have is why the G prefix on
annotations other than GBean?
I will drop the G prefix on annotations other than GBean; it is
Hi,
I am working on the declaration of GBeanInfo via annotations.
This is an example GBean with all the possible annotations (note that
some annotation properties have default values so you do not see all
of them in the example):
@GBean(j2eeType=type, name=name)
@GPriority(priority=123)
Hello Vamsi,
If the applications display distinct numbers, then the nodes do not
see each other. I think this is a problem with multicasting.
Could you please confirm that you have uncommented the last line of
etc/rc.d/start-server,default.groovy which sets the system property
On 21/03/2008, at 4:53 AM, David Jencks wrote:
On Mar 20, 2008, at 10:28 AM, newbie-gero wrote:
Hi lists,
i have read up about the Geronimo and it seems to be a very good
application
server. However i like to check the performance of Geronimo.
So i like to ask all of you what are the
18, 2008 at 6:11 PM, Gianny Damour
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
This is a problem with the deployment descriptor. You name of the
clustering substitution group element is tomcat-clustering-wadi for
tomcat and not clustering-wadi. As a matter of fact, I have on my to-
do list a task to refactor
Hello,
This is a problem with the deployment descriptor. You name of the
clustering substitution group element is tomcat-clustering-wadi for
tomcat and not clustering-wadi. As a matter of fact, I have on my to-
do list a task to refactor substitution group element builders for
Tomcat,
Hi,
There was a typo in the way node2 was started. It used to be:
geronimo/start-server -D node.name=node2 -G server.name=yellow -b
It should actually be:
geronimo/start-server -D node.name=yellow -G server.name=node2 -b
Though, I am not sure that this can explain the problem. What does
the
Hi,
Also, I just deployed a new 2.0-SNAPSHOT which defines a context-root
and use standard (versus delta) replication. You may want to grab it
as the context root is less cryptic with this latest version.
Thanks,
Gianny
On 19/03/2008, at 12:08 AM, Gianny Damour wrote:
Hi
Hello,
Nope. It seems wadi-clustering dependencies have been cleaned up too
much for the 2.0.2 distribution. I do not think there is an easy work-
around, except the issue or a 2.0.3 wadi-clustering configuration
with the right runtime dependencies.
Thanks,
Gianny
On 18/03/2008, at 9:42
?
-Donald
Gianny Damour wrote:
Hi,
A problem has been identified with WADI 2.0-M8 used by Geronimo
2.1 causing the failure of clustered applications when a specific
node (the node hosting the singleton partition rebalancing
service) is killed (a normal shutdown is fine). WADI 2.0-M9
addresses
://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3922
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: New Feature
Security Level: public (Regular issues)
Affects Versions: 2.1
Reporter: Gianny Damour
Assignee: Gianny Damour
Fix For: 2.2
Addition
+1
Thanks,
Gianny
On 12/03/2008, at 5:37 PM, David Jencks wrote:
Hi,
Changes in v5:
legal files in all the jars (I hope)
fix a typo in the NOTICE template
make the generated site work better (parent link, maven feather)
remove logging-config and checkstyle-config per jdillons advice.
move
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3922?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gianny Damour closed GERONIMO-3922.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Committed.
Addition of an AspectJ configuration enabling the load
Hi,
I believe the external app version is quite important from an end-
user perspective; so, I'm inclined to go for B then C. For instance,
users clearly see the external app version while browsing plugin
repositories. Furthermore, this allows the clear versioning of two
plugins for
On 29/02/2008, at 6:04 AM, David Jencks wrote:
I went to a selenium get together Monday and think we have some
great opportunities for improving and speeding up our testsuite.
The bits I think would be of most benefit, from my perspective as a
non-test-engineer, are:
selenium grid. This
On 28/02/2008, at 7:19 AM, Jarek Gawor wrote:
Oh boy where have you been? :)
2.2 = 2.2-SNAPSHOT = trunk
2.1.1 = 2.1-SNAPSHOT = branches/2.1
2.0.3 = 2.0.3-SNAPSHOT = branches/2.0
So, if you see 2.1.1 in subject of these emails, it really refers to
2.1.1-SNAPSHOT version as defined in the
Hi,
We have now some basic support for SFSB clustering. If you would like
to give it a try then here are some instructions.
1. Create a clustered EJB module.
* SFSBs must implement Serializable even if they are EJB3 SFSBs.
* In the geronimo-openejb DD, include the 'openejb-clustering-wadi'
Hi,
Geronimo trunk declares 3.0.0-SNAPSHOT as the OpenEJB SNAPSHOT
version. OpenEJB trunk defines 3.0-SNAPSHOT as the version. Which one
is correct?
Thanks,
Gianny
Hi,
Thanks for reporting this problem.
This is an embarrassing bug. Is the problem already identified? If
this is a Geronimo regression, then it seems to me that we need to be
improve our testing approach. For instance, along with each bug fix,
I would expect the addition of new tests to
+1
Thanks,
Gianny
On 14/02/2008, at 2:12 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
+1
I tested the Tomcat JEE version and was able to deploy DayTrader
2.0 and run through all scenarios.
pgp signatures verified ok
gpg: Signature made Sun Feb 10 15:21:19 2008 EST using DSA key ID
86859358
gpg: Good
Hi,
This is really great news.
I very quickly browsed the specifications and I have a couple of
questions:
1. Is there a way to define task dependencies? For instance, I should
be able to queue a task B which will only be executed after the
execution of task A as task B depends on task
On 12/02/2008, at 3:05 AM, Donald Woods wrote:
Gianny Damour wrote:
On 09/02/2008, at 12:43 AM, Donald Woods wrote:
- Continued work on enable full clustering of all components
Hello Donald,
Could you please list the top two components you would like to see
clustered?
JMS and DataSource
On 09/02/2008, at 12:43 AM, Donald Woods wrote:
Agree with 1a, all of #2 and 3b.
- Creating documentation when new features go into svn instead as
an after thought when we are trying to close out a release.
- Samples become a prerequisite of each new release.
- Project mentoring - have
On 07/02/2008, at 2:54 AM, Joe Bohn wrote:
Kevan Miller wrote:
All,
In preparation for our 2.1 release, please hold off on any commits
to branches/2.1.
If you have something that you feel absolutely *must* be fixed,
please check with me.
I'll be working on generating a 2.1 release
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 3, 2008, at 5:34 PM, Gianny Damour wrote:
Hi Kevan,
concurrent is a WADI runtime dependency. The server starts fine
because wadi-clustering is not started by default and, assuming this
was the case, this dependency is only used when an invocation is
contextualized
Hi Kevan,
concurrent is a WADI runtime dependency. The server starts fine
because wadi-clustering is not started by default and, assuming this
was the case, this dependency is only used when an invocation is
contextualized.
So, could you please rollback this change?
Thanks,
Gianny
On
Congrats Viet!
Thanks,
Gianny
On 31/01/2008, at 2:47 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
All,
I'd like to welcome Viet Nguyen as a new committer on the Geronimo
project. Viet has made a number of contributions to Geronimo,
including our new monitoring capabilities, the J2G conversion tool,
as well
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3772?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12563827#action_12563827
]
Gianny Damour commented on GERONIMO-3772:
-
Hello,
Sorry, I missed the first
Hello,
David B. kindly reminded me I should mention the SFSB clustering work
I am currently working on on the OpenEJB dev. list - so far, I only
mentioned this work on the Geronimo dev. list.
Firstly, apology for only mentioning this work now.
Now, let me talk a little bit of this work: I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3772?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gianny Damour reassigned GERONIMO-3772:
---
Assignee: Gianny Damour
Start failed, Cannot load property editor
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3772?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gianny Damour closed GERONIMO-3772.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Thanks for having raised this issue Yun Feng. As Geronimo has build
Matt, many many thanks for your hard work and long hours/nights you
spent working on Geronimo as our PMC Chair and more. I assume you
will no more produce the project reports for the Board; however, we
are still expecting your performance reports :)
Kevan, congratulations and thanks for
On 17/01/2008, at 1:30 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
On Jan 16, 2008, at 7:48 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: gdamour
Date: Wed Jan 16 04:48:37 2008
New Revision: 612439
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=612439view=rev
Log:
Move farm related classes to new sub-project geronimo-farm. Add
On 17/01/2008, at 9:01 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
I am now integration testing the OpenEJB clustering support and it
appears I will need to do some minor adjustments. As part of the
change, four sub-projects/dependencies are added: geronimo-openejb-
clustering-wadi,
Hello Tim,
I am pretty sure the Eclipse plugin is deploying to all the Targets
returned by DeploymentManager.getTargets(). It should instead deploy
to the first returned Targets. By convention, this first Target is
the default Configuration store, which is explicitly configured by
users.
On 11/01/2008, at 7:15 AM, David Jencks wrote:
Could you update us on your guess for a time frame for the SFSB
clustering? Will this require OpenEJB changes? Is it realistic to
get this into 2.1?
Hello David,
I still target to complete SFSB clustering over the week-end. If this
is not
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3721?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gianny Damour reassigned GERONIMO-3721:
---
Assignee: Gianny Damour
WADI modules prevent Geronimo from starting when offline
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1410?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gianny Damour closed GERONIMO-1410.
---
Resolution: Invalid
Assignee: Gianny Damour
No more valid.
Configuration geronimo
Hi Jarek,
Thanks for the creation of this bug. If you encounter another WADI
related problem, then please feel free to create a JIRA and notify me
by email as I do not systematically read the JIRA notifications (may
be I should).
Thanks,
Gianny
On 07/01/2008, at 4:56 AM, Jarek Gawor
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3721?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gianny Damour resolved GERONIMO-3721.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.1
Assignee: Jarek Gawor
Hi,
Is it actually used in Geronimo? If not, then I would prefer this
utility to be say part of http-client.
Thanks,
Gianny
On 06/01/2008, at 6:45 AM, Donald Woods wrote:
There has been a lot of ongoing work by Jeff, Prasad, Rick, Sangjin
and others on the AsyncHttpClient (aka. AHC) code
All, Happy New Year 2008!
On 05/01/2008, at 9:10 AM, David Jencks wrote:
There are a couple code rearrangements I'd like to see before 2.1
goes out. I think they are somewhat related.
1. The plugin management code has been getting larger and more
complicated and I think it should be in
: Clustering
Affects Versions: 2.0.2
Reporter: Gianny Damour
Assignee: Gianny Damour
Fix For: 2.1
Users should be able to cluster Tomcat web-applications the same way they are
doing it with Jetty.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3696?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gianny Damour closed GERONIMO-3696.
---
Resolution: Fixed
This is now implemented.
Tomcat Clustering over WADI
Hi,
I have just checked in support for clustering of Tomcat Web-
applications over WADI. This works pretty much the same way Jetty Web-
applications are clustered over WADI.
For instance, to cluster a Tomcat Web-app, a tomcat-clustering-wadi
element, see
Ooops. I wonder how this happened. I must have move this folder by
dragging it unintentionally within my IDE to another folder. Thanks
for the fix.
Thanks,
Gianny
On 12/12/2007, at 4:33 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: gawor
Date: Tue Dec 11 09:33:48 2007
New Revision: 603314
URL:
+1
Thanks,
Gianny
On 11/12/2007, at 8:58 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
Folks, a small change to Genesis was made to support a custom legal
resource bundle for the GShell release. I'd like to get this out
so we can get GShell out too.
+1 -Release it
+0 -Eh, whatever
-1 -Um, no no
Hi,
Thanks for having fixed this problem David. I may have introduced
this bug while working on the property editor stuff. So, I will have
a look at it and see if we can avoid this explicit registration of
property editors.
Thanks,
Gianny
On 11/12/2007, at 1:14 PM, David Jencks wrote:
+1
Thanks,
Gianny
On 07/12/2007, at 1:43 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
The discussion thread has been out there long enough for comment,
and those who have responded appear positive about the prospect. I
think it's time to put this to a vote. The full proposal from Matt
Hogstrom is attached
Congrats Jay!
Gianny
On 05/12/2007, at 3:26 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
All,
Please join us in congratulating Jay McHugh as the newest member of
the Geronimo PMC. It's been great to have Jay working with us as a
committer on Geronimo. Even better to have him join us in providing
oversight
://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3669
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: New Feature
Security Level: public (Regular issues)
Components: Clustering
Affects Versions: 2.0.2
Reporter: Gianny Damour
Assignee: Gianny Damour
Fix
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3669?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gianny Damour closed GERONIMO-3669.
---
Resolution: Fixed
This is now implemented.
Remote control of geronimo instances via
Hi,
As described a couple of days ago, I have just added a couple of
commands to simplify the remote control of servers.
This is an excerpt of the commit message:
Add a couple of gshell commands to simplify the remote control of
servers.
The commands being added are:
* alias: used to
Hi,
I quickly had a look to the monitoring components. I think it is
going well. Though, I have one comment: is it possible to increase
unit testing?
Thanks,
Gianny
On 04/12/2007, at 8:16 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: ecraig
Date: Mon Dec 3 13:16:49 2007
New Revision: 600692
On 04/12/2007, at 11:45 AM, Jason Dillon wrote:
On Dec 2, 2007, at 5:10 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
A bit harder to apples-to-apples compare the longer term growth.
lib/gshell accounts for a 5 meg growth (unpacked). So, that
would help account for most of the growth in the minimal
assembly...
Hi,
Some heads-up.
I will soon add gshell-remote-client/common/server, gshell-whisper
and mina dependencies so that we can remote control servers. In other
words, it will increase a little bit more.
This may still change, however here is a list of the new commands:
* alias: to create an
But overall... Cool beans that other folks are starting to help
with GShell!!! Perhaps we need a little more discussion on who is
doing what for now and the next release?
--jason
-Original Message-
From: Gianny Damour [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 2 Dec 2007 12:40:41
To:dev
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3612?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gianny Damour closed GERONIMO-3612.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.0.x)
2.1
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3620?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12544394
]
Gianny Damour commented on GERONIMO-3620:
-
Hi Vamsi. I fixed 1. a couple of days ago.
Remote deployment
On 21/11/2007, at 7:55 AM, Joe Bohn wrote:
Regarding the list-modules command, it lists all the
configurations per target, i.e. configuration store.
As Kevan also pointed out, I think that we need to consider the
multiple configuration stores in the console when more than one is
present
Welcome on board Erik!
On 21/11/2007, at 3:45 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Please extend a welcome to Erik Craig who is the latest committer
to be added to the Geronimo fold. Erik has had a sustained and
continued track record in working on the J2G conversion tool as
well as his recent work
On 15/11/2007, at 7:43 AM, Gianny Damour wrote:
Hi Kevan,
Sorry for my late reply and thanks for raising this security issue.
I believe that the encryption of password attributes is not enough
in this case as password in this case is an XML JavaBean attribute;
based on a cursory review
On 17/11/2007, at 12:30 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
On Nov 13, 2007, at 9:36 PM, Gianny Damour wrote:
Hi Joe,
After some investigations, here is my understanding of problem 1:
there are two deployments because by default, i.e. when no target
is specified, the distribute command executes
Versions: 2.0.2
Reporter: Gianny Damour
Assignee: Gianny Damour
Fix For: 2.0.x
When a configuration is installed, either via the command line or via various
portlets, and no configuration store is explicitly selected, it is installed to
all the configuration
Security Level: public (Regular issues)
Components: management
Affects Versions: 2.0.2
Reporter: Gianny Damour
Assignee: Gianny Damour
Fix For: 2.0.x
At the moment, it is not so easy to override an attribute defined by a JavaBean
xml
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3610?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gianny Damour closed GERONIMO-3610.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Now implemented.
Allows the override of XML JavaBean attribute
Hi,
gsh does not work for me anymore. It seems that some classes are no
more found:
~/geronimo/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-jetty6-javaee5/target/
geronimo-jetty6-javaee5-2.1-SNAPSHOT$ bin/gsh -v
Apache Geronimo (2.1-SNAPSHOT)
Type 'help' for more information.
All,
Jason gave me a hand on IRC. He is working on it; so, watch his
commit to know when gsh is up and running again!
Thanks,
Gianny
On 17/11/2007, at 11:46 AM, Gianny Damour wrote:
Hi,
gsh does not work for me anymore. It seems that some classes are no
more found:
~/geronimo
Hi Kevan,
Sorry for my late reply and thanks for raising this security issue. I
believe that the encryption of password attributes is not enough in
this case as password in this case is an XML JavaBean attribute;
based on a cursory review of GBeanOverride, it seems that this case
is not
On 13/11/2007, at 8:01 PM, Jeff Genender wrote:
Gianny Damour wrote:
I hope we are not talking about the same thing. I am talking about a
deployment time constraint and not a runtime constraint mandating
that all the servers are reachable when an application is *deployed*.
FWIW
be looking into the necessary TCK changes?
Thanks,
Joe
Gianny Damour wrote:
Hi,
I have just checked in support for distribution of configurations
to clusters and also management, i.e. start/stop, of such
clustered deployments.
I will try to explain how everything hangs together so that people
Level: public (Regular issues)
Components: Clustering
Affects Versions: 2.0.2
Reporter: Gianny Damour
Fix For: 2.1
Users should be able to distribute configurations to a kind of clustered
repository, which is able to cascade this distribution to repositories
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3597?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gianny Damour reassigned GERONIMO-3597:
---
Assignee: Gianny Damour
Distribution and start/stop of clustered deployments
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3597?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gianny Damour closed GERONIMO-3597.
---
Resolution: Fixed
This is now implemented.
Distribution and start/stop of clustered
Hi,
I have just checked in support for distribution of configurations to
clusters and also management, i.e. start/stop, of such clustered
deployments.
I will try to explain how everything hangs together so that people
can jump in, provide feedback, request enhancements etc.
There is
On 13/11/2007, at 4:35 AM, Jeff Genender wrote:
Gianny Damour wrote:
2. The clustered store uploads the backed configuration to the
registered cluster members, which subsequently locally install
them. If
the remote installation fails for one of the members, then the
clustered store
On 13/11/2007, at 4:42 PM, Jeff Genender wrote:
Gianny Damour wrote:
You can successfully distribute when all the configured cluster
members are running. If one of them is down, then the installation
fails. This seems to be a typical scenario - at least based on the
clustered deployments I
Hi,
I resumed this week-end some work on clustered deployment. I think
this will be completed in about 2-3 weeks. This will allow
distribute, uninstall, start, stop, et cetera of configurations to a
cluster as a single logic operation. I am keen to get this change in
for 2.1, if it does
heads-up?
Thanks,
Gianny
On 06/11/2007, at 9:34 AM, Jeff Genender wrote:
Gianny,
Since there are multiple clustering implementations going on at the
same
time, could you please keep us aprised of what you are doing so we
don't
clash?
Thanks,
Jeff
Gianny Damour wrote:
Hi,
I resumed
Type: New Feature
Security Level: public (Regular issues)
Components: Clustering
Affects Versions: 2.0.2
Reporter: Gianny Damour
Fix For: 2.1
State stored in HttpSessions can now be replicated via a fine grained approach.
More information is provided
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3578?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gianny Damour closed GERONIMO-3578.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Gianny Damour
Checked in.
Delta Replication
Dain, Jeff,
Thanks for your feedback on the weakness of the annotation approach.
It should be easy to have a less obtrusive configuration mechanism as
the logic is encapsulated within a single (AspectJ) aspect. I will
see what I can do.
In more details, an aspect adds the interface
On 17/10/2007, at 11:53 PM, Jeff Genender wrote:
Gianny Damour wrote:
Excerpt of the conclusion:
The effectiveness of the design and implementation of WADI's
distributed
session lookup engine and replication engine is further comforted
by the
observed average response times
Hi,
Over the last two weeks, I have been working on various
experimentations in order to validate and demonstrate the
effectiveness of WADI's distributed session engine and replication
engine. I wrote a WIKI page to capture the findings:
Hi Kevan,
Many thanks for taking the time to explain me what I should do. It is
highly appreciated.
Thanks,
Gianny
On 04/10/2007, at 3:15 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
On Oct 3, 2007, at 10:07 AM, Gianny Damour wrote:
Hi Matt,
Yes: I would like to add this dependency from the Eclipse
that have large
session objects this looks like a way to effectively manage them.
Is your question about the license used for AspectJ from the
Eclipse Foundation ?
On Sep 28, 2007, at 9:23 PM, Gianny Damour wrote:
Hi,
I would like to add a dependency to a new wadi module, wadi-aop,
relying
Hi,
I would like to add a dependency to a new wadi module, wadi-aop,
relying on AspectJ JARs.
The goal it to allow users to configure delta session replication for
their clustered Web applications. I capture here how this works:
On 31/08/2007, at 10:12 AM, David Jencks wrote:
Clustering
IIUC we have a lot of partial clustering solutions. For instance
there's WADI, native tomcat clustering, a terracotta integration,
and IIUC Jeff has been working on a clustering solution (my
apologies if I left any out). I'd
+1
Gianny
On 16/08/2007, at 6:39 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
The updated binaries are available for review. I have incorporated
the security changes provided by David Jencks, Kevan and Vamsi.
Thanks gents !
I also incorporated a few additional fixes. Please note the change
log for the
+1
Thanks,
Gianny
can move up to the released version and ensure
there are no gotchas in the final few builds.
Thanx
Prasad
On 7/12/07, Gianny Damour [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
When do you want to get released versions of these dependencies?
I can take care of the WADI dependencies and cut a release a couple
101 - 200 of 665 matches
Mail list logo
